Abstract
The current study details structural damage to a newly constructed rigid pavement and reinforced earth (RE) walls, as well as the corrective measures employed. When construction of the RE wall began and reached 1 m above the existing ground level, the client has decided to build a box culvert across the highway, for uninterrupted passage of rainwater across the highway. The bottom of the box culvert was 7 m below ground level. After the construction of box culvert, the surrounding soil below the ground level was not properly compacted due to accessibility constraints. As a consequence, a 5 mm-wide crack in the rigid pavement over the RE wall was observed just before opening for traffic. Moreover, the RE wall had fascia settlement of about 25–65 mm on both sides. Furthermore, around 150 mm gap between Pavement Quality Concrete (PQC) and Dry Lean Concrete (DLC) layers was also noticed over few meters along the approach. A forensic investigation was sought to understand the causes of distress of RE wall and rigid pavement. Non-destructive testing, such as Multichannel Analysis of Surface Waves (MASW) and Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) testing were conducted to assess the condition of backfill and foundation soil. The investigation revealed that the damage was primarily caused due to improper compaction of soil below ground level and adjacent to the box culvert. Pressure grouting of the subsoil in the vicinity of the box culvert and the gap between PQC and DLC layers was resorted to. Further as a safety measure, a simple load test was conducted on DLC layer beyond opening the highway for traffic, and the settlement of DLC layer was found negligible. In addition, the DLC layer settlement was continuously monitored during traffic loading, and no settlement has been observed even after 60 days.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of Data and Materials
The relevant data have been provided in the manuscript and in supplementary data. Any further data required shall be provided, on request, by the corresponding author.
Code Availability
Not applicable.
References
Lee ES (1998) Historical review of reinforced earth structure. J Korean Soc Civil Eng 46(2):40–43 (in Korea)
Mitchell JK, Villet WCB (1987). Reinforcement of earth slopes and embankments. NCHRP Report 290, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC, p 323
Wang YH, Wang MC (1992) Internal stability of reinforced soil retaining structures with cohesive backfills. Transportation research record, p 1414
Das BM (2008) Advanced soil mechanics. Taylor & Francis, New York
Shin EC, Cho SD, Lee KW (2011). Case study of reinforced earth wall failure during extreme rainfall. In: Proc. TC302 symposium Osaka 2011: international symposium on backwards problem in geotechnical engineering and monitoring of geo-construction, pp 146–153
Rao PJ (2008) Practical lessons from failure of a reinforced soil retaining wall on a major highway. In: Proceedings international conference on case histories in geotechnical engineering, Arlington, VA, pp 5–36
Haddad A, Shafabakhsh G (2008). Failure of segmental retaining walls due to the insufficiency of backfill permeability. In: Proc. geosynthetics in civil and environmental engineering. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 852–856
Koerner RM, Soong TY, Koerner GR (2005) Back drainage design and geo-composite drainage materials. In: Proc. GRI-19 conference, Las Vegas, GII Publication, Folsom, PA, pp 51–86
Bathurst RJ, Nernheim A, Walters DL, Allen TM, Burgess P, Saunders DD (2009) Influence of reinforcement stiffness and compaction on the performance of four geosynthetic reinforced soil walls. Geosyn Int 16(1):43–59. https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.2009.16.1.43
Koerner RM, Koerner GR (2011) The importance of drainage control for geosynthetic reinforced mechanically stabilized earth walls. J GeoEng 6(1):3–13. https://doi.org/10.6310/jog.2011.6(1).1
Koerner RM, Koerner GR (2018) An extended data base and recommendations regarding 320 failed geosynthetic reinforced mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) walls. J Geotextile Geomembr 46(6):904–912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2018.07.013
Chauhan VB, Dasaka SM (2018) Performance of a rigid retaining wall with relief shelves. J Perform Constr Facil 32(3):04018021. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001161
Kim YJ, Jung HS, Lee YJ, Oh DW, Son M, Yoon HH (2020) Behaviour analysis of reinforced soil retaining wall according to laboratory scale test. Appl Sci 10(3):901. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10030901
Lo DO, Cunningham J, Burland JB (2018) Investigation of distress of a reinforced earth wall in Hong Kong. Proc Inst Civil Eng Forensic Eng 171(3):127–136
Sengupta A (2012) Numerical study of a failure of a reinforced earth retaining wall. Geotech Geol Eng 30(4):1025–1034
IS: 2720 (Part-4) (Indian Standard) (2015) Methods of test for soils: grain size analysis. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India
IS: 2720 (Part-7) (Indian Standard) (2016) Methods of test for soils: determination of water content-dry density relation using light compaction. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India
IS: 2720 (Part-16) (Indian Standard) (2016) Methods of test for soils: laboratory determination of CBR. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India
IS: 2720 (Part-11) (Indian Standard) (1998) Methods of test for soils: determination of the shear strength parameters of a specimen tested in unconsolidated undrained triaxial compression without the measurement of pore water pressure. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India
IS: 2720 (Part-2) (Indian Standard) (2010) Methods of test for soils: determination of water content. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India
MORTH (Ministry of Road Transport and Highways) (2001) Ministry’s technical circulars and directives on national highways and centrally sponsored road and bridge projects, vol II. Ministry of Transport, Department of Surface Transport (Roads Wing), New Delhi, India
IRC:SP:102 (Indian Road Congress: Special Publication) (2014) Guidelines for design and construction of reinforced soil walls. No: 102, New Delhi, India.
IRC:SP:58 (Indian Road Congress: Special Publication) (2014) Guidelines for use of fly ash in road embankments. No: 58, New Delhi, India
MRTS03 (Transport and Main Roads Specifications), July (2021) Drainage structures, retaining structures and embankment slope protections. Department of transport and main roads, Queensland Government, Australia. https://www.tmr.qld.gov.au/-/media/busind/techstdpubs/Specifications-and-drawings/Specifications/3-Roadworks-Drainage-Culverts-and-Geotechnical/MRTS03.pdf?la=en
Berg R, Christopher BR, Samtani N (2009) Design of mechanically stabilized earth walls and reinforced soil slopes-vol 1. Rep. No. FHWA-NHI-10-024. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC
IMD (Indian Meteorological Department). Regional meteorological center, Mumbai, India. http://www.imdmumbai.gov.in/eindex.asp
Jia J (2018) Dynamic and cyclic properties of soils. soil dynamics and foundation modeling. Springer, Cham, pp 75–108
IRC:6 (Indian Road Congress) (2016) Standard specifications and code of practice for road bridges, section: II, Loads and load combinations. No: 6, New Delhi, India
Geoguide-1. (2020) Guide to retaining wall design. Geotechnical engineering office, Civil engineering and development department, The government of Hong Kong, special administrative region, Hong Kong. https://www.cedd.gov.hk/filemanager/eng/content_106/eg1_20200601.pdf
Acknowledgements
Authors gratefully acknowledge the support provided by the Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority (MMRDA) to collect the data presented in this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Material preparation, data collection, analysis, and preparation of first draft were performed by SMD and ASSR. Conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis and investigation, and supervision: SMD.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
40891_2022_382_MOESM1_ESM.pdf
Supplementary file1 Figs. S1(a), S1(b), S2(a), S2(b), S2(c), S3(a), and S3(b) will be available in the Springer library (link.springer.com). (PDF 340 KB)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Raghuram, A.S.S., Dasaka, S.M. Forensic Analysis of a Distressed RE Wall and Rigid Pavement in a Newly Constructed Highway Approach. Int. J. of Geosynth. and Ground Eng. 8, 38 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-022-00382-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-022-00382-2