Skip to main content
Log in

Mechanism of Carbonation in Lime-Stabilized Silty Clay from Chemical and Microstructure Perspectives

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The carbonation of lime-treated soils that occurs during the short-term and long-term curing is not sufficiently explored in the domain of lime stabilization. The present study investigates the carbonation mechanism in lime-treated silty clay treated with two lime contents (4%, 8%) subjected to different curing periods (7, 90, 180, and 365 days). The cured samples were exposed to accelerated carbonation, and subsequent change in the unconfined compressive strength was compared with that of control samples tested under a nitrogen environment. The extent of carbonation was measured using phenolphthalein solution. X-ray diffraction technique and thermogravimetric analysis were used to analyze the reaction products resulted from carbonation. The morphology of carbonates and effects of carbonation on the pore structure were assessed using a scanning electron microscope and mercury intrusion porosimeter, respectively. Results show that carbonation has a deleterious effect on the performance of lime-treated clay. The strength of lime-treated soils upon carbonation decreased by 30% on average. The fabric structure of treated clay was found to vary with lime content and curing period, which determined the extent of carbonation. Decalcification of reaction products and cracking induced by the carbonation of residual lime contributed to the reduction in compressive strength of treated clay. The observed strength behavior of the carbonated samples is substantiated by quantifying the variation in pore structure characteristics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

All data used in the study are included in the submitted article.

References

  1. Mesri G, Olson RE (1971) Mechanisms controlling the permeability of clays. Clays Clay Miner 19:151–158. https://doi.org/10.1346/CCMN.1971.0190303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bhuvaneshwari S, Robinson RG, Gandhi SR (2020) Effect of functional group of the inorganic additives on index and microstructural properties of expansive soil. Int J Geosynth Ground Eng 6:51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-020-00235-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Eades JL, Nichols Jr FP, Grim RE (1962) Formation of new minerals with lime stabilization as proven by field experiments in Virginia. High Res Board Bull 335:31–39. http://onlinepubs.trb.org/Onlinepubs/hrbbulletin/335/335-003.pdf

  4. Croft JB (1967) The influence of soil mineralogical composition on cement stabilization. Géotechnique 17:119–135. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1967.17.2.119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gard JA, Taylor HFW (1976) Calcium silicate hydrate (II) (CSH (II)). Cem Concr Res 6:667–677. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-8846(76)90031-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cherian C, Arnepalli DN (2015) A critical appraisal of the role of clay mineralogy in lime stabilization. Int J Geosynth Ground Eng 1:8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-015-0009-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Aryal S, Kolay PK (2020) Long-term durability of ordinary portland cement and polypropylene fiber stabilized kaolin soil using wetting–drying and freezing–thawing test. Int J Geosynth Ground Eng 6:8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-020-0191-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Puppala AJ (2016) Advances in ground modification with chemical additives: from theory to practice. Transp Geotech 9:123–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2016.08.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cuisinier O, Masrouri F, Mehenni A (2020) Alteration of the hydromechanical performances of a stabilized compacted soil exposed to successive wetting–drying cycles. J Mater Civ Eng 32:04020349. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chakraborty S, Nair S (2018) Impact of different hydrated cementitious phases on moisture-induced damage in lime-stabilized subgrade soils. Road Mater Pavement Des 19:1389–1405. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2017.1314222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Moghal AAB, Vydehi V, Moghal MB, Almatrudi R, AlMajed A, Al-Shamrani MA (2020) Effect of calcium-based derivatives on consolidation, strength, and lime-leachability behavior of expansive soil. J Mater Civ Eng 32:04020048. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. McCallister LD, Petry TM (1992) Leach tests on lime-treated clays. Geotech Test J 15:106–114. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ10232J

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Stoltz G, Cuisinier O, Masrouri F (2014) Weathering of a lime-treated clayey soil by drying and wetting cycles. Eng Geol 181:281–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2014.08.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chittoori BC, Puppala AJ, Wejrungsikul T, Hoyos LR (2013) Experimental studies on stabilized clays at various leaching cycles. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 139:1665–1675. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Netterberg F, Paige-Green P (1984) Carbonation of lime and cement stabilized layers in road construction. RS/3/84, National Institute for Transport and Road Research, CSIR, South Africa. https://researchspace.csir.co.za/dspace/bitstream/handle/10204/1384/Netterberg_1984.pdf

  16. Šavija B, Luković M (2016) Carbonation of cement paste: understanding, challenges, and opportunities. Constr Build Mater 117:285–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.04.138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen JJ, Thomas JJ, Jennings HM (2006) Decalcification shrinkage of cement paste. Cem Concr Res 36:801–809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2005.11.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Nakarai K, Yoshida T (2015) Effect of carbonation on strength development of cement-treated Toyoura silica sand. Soils Found 55:857–865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2015.06.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ho LS, Nakarai K, Ogawa Y, Sasaki T, Morioka M (2017) Strength development of cement-treated soils: effects of water content, carbonation, and pozzolanic reaction under drying curing condition. Constr Build Mater 134:703–712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.12.065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. ASTM (2019a) Standard test method for using pH to estimate the soil-lime proportion requirement for soil stabilization. ASTM D6276. ASTM, West Conshohocken, PA. http://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1520/D6276-19

  21. ASTM (2014) Standard test method for specific gravity of soil solids by gas pycnometer. ASTM D5550. ASTM. West Conshohocken, PA. http://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1520/D5550-14

  22. ASTM (2017a) Standard test methods for liquid limit, plastic limit, and plasticity index of soils. ASTM D4318. ASTM, West Conshohocken, PA. https://doi.org/10.1520/D4318-17E01

  23. ASTM (2017b) Standard test methods for particle-size distribution (gradation) of soils using sieve analysis. ASTM D6913. ASTM, West Conshohocken, PA. https://doi.org/10.1520/D6913_D6913M-17

  24. ASTM (2019b) Standard test methods for pH of soils. ASTM D4972. ASTM, West Conshohocken, PA. https://doi.org/10.1520/D4972-19

  25. ASTM (2018) Standard test method for measuring the exchange complex and cation exchange capacity of inorganic fine-grained soils. ASTM D7503. ASTM, West Conshohocken, PA. https://doi.org/10.1520/D7503-18

  26. Arnepalli DN, Shanthakumar S, Rao BH, Singh DN (2008) Comparison of methods for determining specific surface area of fine-grained soils. Geotech Geol Eng 26:121–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-007-9152-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Castellote M, Fernandez L, Andrade C, Alonso C (2009) Chemical changes and phase analysis of OPC pastes carbonated at different CO2 concentrations Mater. Struct 42:515–525. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-008-9399-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Shah V, Scrivener K, Bhattacharjee B, Bishnoi S (2018) Changes in microstructure characteristics of cement paste on carbonation. Cem Concr Res 109:184–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.04.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Rezagholilou A, Papadakis VG, Nikraz H (2017) Rate of carbonation in cement modified base course material. Constr Build Mater 150:646–652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. ASTM (2016) Standard test method for unconfined compressive strength of cohesive soil. ASTM D2166. ASTM, West Conshohocken, PA. https://doi.org/10.1520/D2166_D2166M-16\

  31. Bandipally S, Cherian C, Arnepalli DN (2018) Characterization of lime-treated bentonite using thermogravimetric analysis for assessing its short-term strength behavior. Indian Geotech J 48:393–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-018-0305-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Saranya N, Arnepalli DN (2018) Effect of drying technique on pore structure characteristics of fine-grained geomaterials. Int J Geotech Eng 12:578–591. https://doi.org/10.1080/19386362.2017.1304501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. ASTM (2017c) Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (Unified Soil Classification System. ASTM D2487. ASTM, West Conshohocken. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1520/D2487-17E01

  34. Lammertijn S, De Belie N (2008) Porosity, gas permeability, carbonation, and their interaction in high-volume fly ash concrete. Mag Concr Res 60:535–545. https://doi.org/10.1680/macr.2008.60.7.535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Yeo YS, Nikraz HR (2012) Evaluation of water ingress in cement-treated material for durability assessments. Aust J Civ Eng 10:117–128. https://doi.org/10.7158/14488353.2012.11463984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Cheng H, Yang J, Liu Q, He J, Frost RL (2010) Thermogravimetric analysis–mass spectrometry (TG–MS) of selected Chinese kaolinites. Thermochim Acta 507:106–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2010.05.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Villain G, Thiery M, Platret G (2007) Measurement methods of carbonation profiles in concrete: thermogravimetry, chemical analysis, and gammadensimetry. Cem Concr Res 37:1182–1192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.04.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Morandeau A, Thiéry M, Dangla P (2014) Investigation of the carbonation mechanism of CH and C-S-H in terms of kinetics, microstructure changes and moisture properties. Cem Concr Res 56:153–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2013.11.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Jha AK, Sivapullaiah PV (2020) Lime Stabilization of Soil: A physicochemical and micro-mechanistic perspective. Indian Geotech J 50:339–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-019-00371-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Aldaood A, Bouasker M, Al-Mukhtar M (2016) Effect of water during freeze–thaw cycles on the performance and durability of lime-treated gypseous soil. Cold Reg Sci Technol 123:155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2015.12.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Cherian C, Kollannur NJ, Bandipally S, Arnepalli DN (2018) Calcium adsorption on clays: effects of mineralogy, pore fluid chemistry and temperature. Appl Clay Sci 160:282–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2018.02.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Lemaire K, Deneele D, Bonnet S, Legret M (2013) Effects of lime and cement treatment on the physicochemical, microstructural and mechanical characteristics of a plastic silt. Eng Geol 166:255–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2013.09.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Cizer Ö, Van Balen K, Elsen J, Van Gemert D (2012) Real-time investigation of reaction rate and mineral phase modifications of lime carbonation. Constr Build Mater 35:741–751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.04.036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Khattab SA, Al-Mukhtar M, Fleureau JM (2007) Long-term stability characteristics of a lime-treated plastic soil. J Mater Civ Eng 19:358–366. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2007)19:4(358)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Wang Y, Cui YJ, Tang AM, Tang CS, Benahmed N (2015) Effects of aggregate size on water retention capacity and microstructure of lime-treated silty soil. Géotech Lett 5:269–274. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgele.15.00127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Preetham HK, Nayak S (2019) Geotechnical investigations on marine clay stabilized using granulated blast furnace slag and cement. Int J Geosynth Ground Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-019-0179-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Arandigoyen M, Bicer-Simsir B, Alvarez JI, Lange DA (2006) Variation of microstructure with carbonation in lime and blended pastes. Appl Surf Sci 252:7562–7571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2005.09.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for conducting this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

DP: methodology, data curation, formal analysis and investigation, and original draft preparation. DNA: conceptualization, supervision, validation, visualization, and writing—review and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dali Naidu Arnepalli.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest concerning the content of this manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Padmaraj, D., Arnepalli, D.N. Mechanism of Carbonation in Lime-Stabilized Silty Clay from Chemical and Microstructure Perspectives. Int. J. of Geosynth. and Ground Eng. 7, 74 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-021-00318-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-021-00318-2

Keywords

Navigation