Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Behaviour of jute and bamboo geocell with additional basal mat filled with different infill materials overlaying soft subgrade

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Road construction and maintenance over a soft subgrade are challenging tasks. In the last few decades, polymeric geosynthetic materials are used to reinforce weak subgrade for better durability and cost-effectiveness. Natural geosynthetic materials such as bamboo, jute, and coir, have the potential for road construction and can be used in place of polymeric geosynthetics. In this present study, model plate load tests were performed to evaluate jute and bamboo geocell performance with an additional basal mat overlaying soft subgrade for the unpaved roads. The influence of infill material was studied with three different types of infill materials, i.e., sand, crushed aggregates, and Recycled Asphalt Pavement (RAP). Further, the size effect of infill material was studied by preparing three different crushed aggregate mixes (i.e., mix A, mix B, mix C) using the Fuller method of gradation. For the unreinforced and geocell reinforced system, the load-bearing capacity was found maximum with RAP and minimum with sand. Further, with an additional basal mat, the load-bearing capacity was maximum with mix C. The improvement factor (IF) with jute geocell was found in the range of 4–14.6 and enhanced to 5.1–18 with additional use of jute mat. However, using bamboo geocell, IF was found in the range of 5.1–16.9 and enhanced to 9.3–26.9 with additional use of the bamboo mat. The contribution of both types of geocell reinforcement was found maximum with sand and minimum in RAP as infill material. However, the contribution of the mat was found maximum with mix C and RAP for jute geocell and bamboo geocell, respectively. The infill material size effect was found negligible beyond mix B (i.e., the maximum size of aggregate 25 mm). The performance of the bamboo geocell was observed superior to the jute geocell. RAP and crushed aggregate mixes (mix B and mix C) are found as preferable infill materials of the geocell for maximum bearing capacity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19

Similar content being viewed by others

Data and/or code availability

The datasets generated during the current study are not publicly available because the study is confidential but available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Jones CJFP (1996) Earth reinforcement and soil structures. ASCE Press, Thomas Telford Publishing, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Shukla SK (2016) An introduction to geosynthetic engineering. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Koerner R (2012) Designing with geosynthetics. Pearson Prentice Hall, Pearson, USA

  4. Zornberg J (2017) Functions and applications of geosynthetics in roadways. Procedia Engineering 189:298–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.05.048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sarsby RW (2007) Geosynthetics in civil engineering. Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Krishna AM, Biswas A (2017) Geocell reinforced foundations, ASCE, Geo Congress 2014, Proceedings: 2011–2020. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.30590.69446

  7. Latha G, Nair A, Hemalatha M (2010) Performance of geosynthetics in unpaved roads. Int J Geotech Eng 4:337–349. https://doi.org/10.3328/IJGE.2010.04.03.337-349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dash SK, Rajagopal K, Krishnaswamy NR (2004) Performance of different geosynthetic reinforcement materials in sand foundations. Geosynth Int 11:35–42. https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.2004.11.1.35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mandal JN, Gupta P (1994) Stability of geocell-reinforced soil. Constr Build Mater 8:55–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/0950-0618(94)90009-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hegde A, Sitharam T (2017) Experiment and 3D-numerical studies on soft clay bed reinforced with different types of cellular confinement systems. Transp Geotechnics 10:73–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2017.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Saride S, Vedpathak S, Rayabharapu VK (2014) Elasto-plastic behavior of jute-geocell-reinforced sand subgrade, ASCE, Geo-Congress. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784413272.282

  12. Dash S, Rajagopal K, Krishnaswamy NR (2007) Behaviour of geocell-reinforced sand beds under strip loading. Can Geotech J 44:905–916. https://doi.org/10.1139/T07-03517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rajagopal K, Krishnaswamy NR, Madhavi Latha G (1999) Behaviour of sand confined with single and multiple geocells. Geotext Geomembr 17:171–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-1144(98)00034-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Thakur JK, Han J, Parsons RL (2013) Creep behavior of geocell-reinforced recycled asphalt pavement bases. J Mater Civil Eng 25:1533–1542. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dash SK (2012) Effect of geocell type on load-carrying mechanisms of geocell-reinforced sand foundations. Int J Geomech 12:537–548. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Muthukumar S, Sakthivelu A, Shanmugasundaram K et al (2019) Performance assessment of square footing on jute geocell-reinforced sand. Int J Geosynth Ground Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-019-0176-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Leshchinsky B, Ling H (2013) Effects of geocell confinement on strength and deformation behavior of gravel. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 139:340–352. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Venkateswarlu H, Hegde A (2020) Factors influencing dynamic response of geocell reinforced soil beds, ASCE, Geo Congress 2020, Proceedings: 569–578, https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784482797.055

  19. Biswas A, Krishna AM, Dash SK (2013) Influence of subgrade strength on the performance of geocell-reinforced foundation systems. Geosynth Int 20:376–388. https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.13.00025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dash SK (2010) Influence of relative density of soil on performance of geocell-reinforced sand foundations. J Mater Civ Eng 22:533–538. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pokharel SK, Han J, Leshchinsky D et al (2010) Investigation of factors influencing behavior of single geocellreinforced bases under static loading. Geotext Geomembr 28:570–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2010.06.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Dash SK, Krishnaswamy NR, Rajagopal K (2001) Bearing capacity of strip footings supported on geocell reinforced sand. Geotext Geomembr 19:235–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-1144(01)00006-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tafreshi SNM, Dawson AR (2010) Comparison of bearing capacity of a strip footing on sand with geocell and with planar forms of geotextile reinforcement. Geotext Geomembr 28:72–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2009.09.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sireesh S, Sitharam TG, Dash SK (2009) Bearing capacity of circular footing on geocell–sand mattress overlying clay bed with void. Geotext Geomembr 27:89–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2008.09.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rai M (2010) Geocell-sand soft clay subgrade mattress overlying: behaviour under circular loading. Ph. D thesis, http://gyan.iitg.ernet.in/handle/123456789/331

  26. Pokharel S, Han J, Manandhar C et al (2011) Accelerated pavement testing of geocell-reinforced unpaved roads over weak subgrade. Transp Res Rec 2204:67–75. https://doi.org/10.3141/2204-09

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hegde AM, Sitharam TG (2015) Effect of infill materials on the performance of geocell reinforced soft clay beds. Geomech Geoeng 10:163–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/17486025.2014.92133418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sreevalsa K, Saayinath N, Rizfana K, Gundurao ST (2020) Performance of footing on clay bed reinforced with coir cell networks. Int J Geomech 20:4020106. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sanyal T (2017) Jute Geotextiles and their applications in civil engineering. Springer, Singapore

    Book  Google Scholar 

  30. Lynser MB, Tiwari B, Nongbri B, Kharlyngdoh E (2014) Bamboo mat making and its contribution to the rural livelihood of women in south meghalaya, India. J Am Bamboo Soc 28:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  31. Tardio G, Mickovski S, Rauch HP et al (2018) The use of bamboo in erosion control and slope stabilisation soil bioengineering works

  32. Khan A (2016) Efficacy of jute geotextiles for hill slope erosion control, rural road construction and river bank protection. Asian Regional Conference on Geosynthetics—Geosynthetics for Infrastructure Development.

  33. Chin SC, Tee KF, Tong FS et al (2020) Thermal and mechanical properties of bamboo fiber reinforced composites. Mate Today Commun 23:100876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2019.100876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Hegde A, Sitharam T (2015) Use of bamboo in soft-ground engineering and its performance comparison with geosynthetics: experimental studies. J Mater Civ Eng. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Indian Roads Congress (2008) Manual for design, construction & maintenance of gravel roads. IRC Code of Practice SP:77, New Delhi

  36. Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) (2002) IS: 2366 (Part IV)-1963-methods of test for aggregates for concrete, part 4: mechanical properties. Indian Standards 1–37, New Delhi

  37. D4595–09 AC (2009) Standard test method for tensile properties of geotextiles by the wide-width strip method 04: 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1520/D4595-17

  38. Pokharel SK, Han J, Leshchinsky D, Parsons RL (2018) Experimental evaluation of geocell-reinforced bases under repeated loading. Int J Pavement Res Technol 11:114–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijprt.2017.03.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Thakur JK, Han J, Parsons RL (2013) Creep behavior of geocell-reinforced recycled asphalt pavement bases. J Mater Civ Eng 25:1533–1542. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Thallak SG, Saride S, Dash SK (2007) Performance of surface footing on geocell-reinforced soft clay beds. Geotech Geol Eng 25:509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-007-9125-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Biswas A, Krishna AM, Dash SK (2016) Behavior of geosynthetic reinforced soil foundation systems supported on stiff clay subgrade. Int J Geomech 16:4016007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Dash S, Saride S, Sitharam T (2003) Behaviour of geocell-reinforced sand beds under circular footing. Proceed Inst Civil Eng Ground Improv 7:111–115. https://doi.org/10.1680/grim.2003.7.3.111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Dash S, Karpurapu R, Krishnaswamy NR (2001) Strip footing on geocell reinforced sand beds with additional planar reinforcement. Geotext Geomembr 19:529–538. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-1144(01)00022-X19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Jie H, Pokharel SK, Xiaoming Y et al (2011) Performance of geocell-reinforced RAP bases over weak subgrade under full-scale moving wheel loads. J Mater Civil Eng 23:1525–1534. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) (1980) IS:2720 (Part 30)—1980: Indian standard methods of test for soils laboratory vane shear test. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi

  46. Mhaiskar SY, Mandal JN (1996) Investigations on soft clay subgrade strengthening using geocells. Constr Build Mater 10:281–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/0950-0618(95)00083-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Zhou H, Wen X (2008) Model studies on geogrid- or geocell-reinforced sand cushion on soft soil. Geotext Geomembr 26:231–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2007.10.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Krishnaswamy NR, Rajagopal K, Latha GM (2000) Model studies on geocell supported embankments constructed over a soft clay foundation. Geotech Test J 23:45–54. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ11122J

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Ghareh S (2015) Numerical modeling of the effect of geocell elements’ dimensions on behavior of circular footings. J Struct Eng Geotech 5:9–14

    Google Scholar 

  50. Han J, Yang XM, Leshchinsky D et al (2009) Numerical Analysis for Mechanisms of a Geocell-Reinforced Base Under a Vertical Load BT. In: Li G, Chen Y, Tang X (eds) Geosynthetics in Civil and Environmental Engineering. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 741–746

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  51. Wesseloo J, Visser AT, Rust E (2009) The stress–strain behaviour of multiple cell geocell packs. Geotext Geomembr 27:31–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2008.05.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Venkateswarlu H, Ujjawal KN, Hegde A (2018) Laboratory and numerical investigation of machine foundations reinforced with geogrids and geocells. Geotext Geomembr 46:882–896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2018.08.00

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dept. of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology Silchar, Silchar, Assam, 788010, India

    Sudeep Biswas, Monowar Hussain & Khwairakpam Lakshman Singh

Authors
  1. Sudeep Biswas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Monowar Hussain
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Khwairakpam Lakshman Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors (Sudeep Biswas, Monowar Hussain, Khwairakpam Lakshman Singh) contributed to the study, conception, and design. Sudeep Biswas performed material preparation, experiments, and the first draft of the manuscript. The manuscript was reviewed and edited by Monowar Hussain and Khwairakpam Lakshman Singh. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Monowar Hussain.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no financial or proprietary interests in any material discussed in this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Biswas, S., Hussain, M. & Singh, K.L. Behaviour of jute and bamboo geocell with additional basal mat filled with different infill materials overlaying soft subgrade. Int. J. of Geosynth. and Ground Eng. 7, 56 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-021-00297-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-021-00297-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation