Skip to main content
Log in

An alternative perspective on pure-projectivity of modules

  • Original Article
  • Published:
São Paulo Journal of Mathematical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study of pure-projectivity is accessed from an alternative point of view. Given modules M and N, M is said to be N-pure-subprojective if for every pure epimorphism \(g: B\rightarrow N\) and homomorphism \(f : M \rightarrow N\), there exists a homomorphism \(h: M\rightarrow B\) such that \(gh=f\). For a module M, the pure-subprojectivity domain of M is defined to be the collection of all modules N such that M is N-pure-subprojective. We obtain characterizations for various types of rings and modules, including FP-injective and FP-projective modules, von Neumann regular rings and pure-semisimple rings in terms of pure-subprojectivity domains. As pure-subprojectivity domains clearly include all pure-projective modules, a reasonable opposite to pure-projectivity in this context is obtained by considering modules whose pure-subprojectivity domain consists of only pure-projective. We refer to these modules as psp-poor. Properties of pure-subprojectivity domains and of psp-poor modules are studied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alahmadi, A.N., Alkan, M., López-Permouth, S.R.: Poor modules: the opposite of injectivity. Glasg. Math. 52(A), 7–17 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Alizade, R., Sipahi, D.D.: Modules and abelian groups with minimal (pure-) projectivity domains. J. Algebra Appl. 16(11), 1750203 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Anderson, F.W., Fuller, K.R.: Rings and Categories of Modules. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 13. Springer, New York (1974)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Aydogdu, P., López-Permouth, S.R.: An alternative perspective on injectivity of modules. J. Algebra. 338, 207–219 (2011)

  5. Aydogdu, P., Saraç, B.: On Artinian rings with restricted class of injectivity domains. J. Algebra. 377, 49–65 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Durgun, Y.: Rings whose modules have maximal or minimal subprojectivity domain. J. Algebra Appl. 14(6), 1550083 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Enochs, E.E., Jenda, O.M.G.: Relative Homological Algebra. De Gruyter Expositions in Mathematics, vol. 30. Walter de Gruyter and Co., Berlin (2000)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Facchini, A.: Mittag-Leffler modules, reduced products, and direct products. Rend. Semin. Mat. Univ. Padova. 85, 119–132 (2015)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Geng, Y., Ding, N.: Pure hereditary rings. Commun. Algebra. 37(6), 2127–2141 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Harmanci, A., López-Permouth, S.R., Ungor, B.: On the pure-injectivity profile of a ring. Commun. Algebra. 43(11), 4984–5002 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Holston, C., López-Permouth, S.R., Ertaş, N.O.: Rings whose modules have maximal or minimal projectivity domain. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 216(3), 673–678 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Holston, C., López-Permouth, S.R., Mastromatteo, J., Simental-Rodríguez, J.E.: An alternative perspective on projectivity of modules. Glasg. Math. J. 57(1), 83–99 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Lam, T.Y.: Lectures on Modules and Rings, vol. 189. Springer, New York (1999)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. López-Permouth, S.R., Mastromatteo, J., Tolooei, Y., Ungor, B.: Pure-injectivity from a different perspective. Glasg. Math. J. 60(1), 135–151 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. López-Permouth, S.R., Simental, J.E.: Characterizing rings in terms of the extent of the injectivity and projectivity of their modules. J. Algebra. 362, 56–69 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Mao, L., Ding, N.: FP-projective dimensions. Commun. Algebra. 33(4), 1153–1170 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Moradzadeh-Dehkordi, A., Shojaee, S.H.: Rings in which every ideal is pure-projective or FP-projective. J. Algebra. 478, 419–436 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Song, X., Chen, J.: Notes on pure projective modules. J. Southeast Univ. (English Ed.) 21(4), 506–508 (2005)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Wisbauer, R.: Foundations of Module and Ring Theory. German, Algebra, Logic and Applications, vol. 3. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, Philadelphia (1991)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Zimmermann, W.: On locally pure-injective modules. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 166(3), 337–357 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yusuf Alagöz.

Additional information

Communicated by Sergio R. López-Permouth.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alagöz, Y., Durg̃un, Y. An alternative perspective on pure-projectivity of modules. São Paulo J. Math. Sci. 14, 631–650 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40863-020-00191-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40863-020-00191-3

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classfication

Navigation