Abstract
Indoor electrical systems are aimed to provide comfort to the occupants. However, their operation is contingent on the presence or needs of the residents. Hence, to optimize energy consumption and guarantee the desired comfort level of residents, any indoor energy control system should consider the occupancy dynamism within houses and the occupants' behavior patterns. Moreover, there is a growing demand for localized and personalized comfort controls in residential buildings to improve the occupants’ satisfaction. This paper presents a Personalized Energy and Comfort Management System (PECMS) that optimizes building energy consumption and meanwhile maintains residents’ intended comfort levels by predicting their trajectories. Considering home thermal characterization, PECMS coordinates the building system devices and residents by anticipating residents’ behavior using an activity mining and tracking method. With this capability, efficient scheduling of the electrical devices would be achieved. PECMS is simulated and tested on a dataset from a real-world smart home project, including the home’s actual thermal zones, temperatures, and residents’ preferences. Comparative analysis is conducted to evaluate PECMS against existing methods and systems, showcasing its effectiveness in achieving the desired trade-off between energy consumption and occupant comfort levels.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and material
Available upon request.
References
Revel GM, Arnesano M, Pietroni F, Frick J, Reicher M, Schmitt K, Huber J, Ebermann M, Battista U, Alessi F (2015) Cost-effective technologies to control indoor air quality and comfort in energy efficient building retrofitting. Environ Eng Manag J 14(7):1487–1494. https://doi.org/10.30638/eemj.2015.160
Peng Y, Rysanek A, Nagy Z, Schlüter A (2018) Using machine learning techniques for occupancy-prediction-based cooling control in office buildings. Appl Energy 211(December 2017):1343–1358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.12.002
Klein L, Kwak J-Y, Kavulya G, Jazizadeh F, Becerik-gerber B, Varakantham P, Tambe M (2012) Coordinating occupant behavior for building energy and comfort management using multi-agent systems. Autom Constr 22:525–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2011.11.012
Wang W, Chen J, Hong T (2018) Occupancy prediction through machine learning and data fusion of environmental sensing and Wi-Fi sensing in buildings. Autom Constr 94(June):233–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2018.07.007
Chang W-K, Hong T (2013) Statistical analysis and modeling of occupancy patterns in open-plan offices using measured lighting-switch data. Build Simul. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-013-0106-y
Raeiszadeh M, Tahayori H, Visconti A (2019) Discovering varying patterns of Normal and interleaved ADLs in smart homes. Appl Intell 49(12):4175–4188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-019-01493-6
Elie Azar SP (2017) Human behavior and energy consumption in buildings: an integrated agent-based modeling and building performance simulation framework. Department of Engineering Systems and Management Masdar Institute of Science and Technology. Building simulation, pp 482–487
Webber CA, Roberson JA, McWhinney MC, Brown RE, Pinckard MJ, Busch JF (2006) After-hours power status of office equipment in the USA. Energy 31(14):2823–2838
Sanchez M, Webber C, Brown R, Busch J, Pinckard M, Roberson J (2007) Space heaters, computers, cell phone chargers: how plugged in are commercial buildings? Lawrence Berkeley National Lab, (LBNL-62397), Berkeley, CA (United States)
Ioannou A, Itard LC (2015) Energy performance and comfort in residential buildings: sensitivity for building parameters and occupancy. Energy Build 92:216–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.01.055
Yousefi F, Gholipour Y, Yan W (2017) A study of the impact of occupant behaviors on energy performance of building envelopes using occupants’ data. Energy Build 148:182–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.04.085
Sun K, Hong T (2017) A simulation approach to estimate energy savings potential of occupant behavior measures. Energy Build 136:43–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.12.010
Ahmadi-Karvigh S, Ghahramani A, Becerik-Gerber B, Soibelman L (2018) Real-time activity recognition for energy efficiency in buildings. Appl Energy 211:146–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.11.055
Anastasiadi C, Dounis AI (2018) Co-simulation of fuzzy control in buildings and the HVAC system using BCVTB. Adv Build Energy Res 12(2):195–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512549.2017.1279077
Deng Z, Chen Q (2019) Simulating the impact of occupant behavior on energy use of HVAC systems by implementing a behavioral artificial neural network model. Energy Build 198:216–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.06.015
Jia M, Srinivasan RS, Ries R, Weyer N, Bharathy G (2019) A systematic development and validation approach to a novel agent-based modeling of occupant behaviors in commercial buildings. Energy Build 199:352–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.07.009
Wei Y, Xia L, Pan S, Wu J, Zhang X, Han M, Zhang W, Xie J, Li Q (2019) Prediction of occupancy level and energy consumption in office building using blind system identification and neural networks. Appl Energy 240:276–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.02.056
Jia M, Srinivasan R (2020) Building performance evaluation using coupled simulation of energyplus and an occupant behavior model. Sustainability (Switzerland). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104086
Dziedzic JW, Yan D, Sun H, Novakovic V (2020) Building occupant transient agent-based model—movement module. Appl Energy 261(7491):114417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114417
Salimi S, Hammad A (2020) Optimizing energy consumption and occupants comfort in open-plan offices using local control based on occupancy dynamic data. Build Environ 176:106818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106818
Underhill LJ, Dols WS, Lee SK, Fabian MP, Levy JI (2020) Quantifying the impact of housing interventions on indoor air quality and energy consumption using coupled simulation models. J Eposure Sci Environ Epidemiol 30(3):436–447. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-019-0197-3
Park H (2020) Human comfort-based-home energy management for demand response participation. Energies (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/en13102463
Kwon K, Lee S, Kim S (2022) AI-based home energy management system considering energy efficiency and resident satisfaction. IEEE Internet Things J 9(2):1608–1621. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2021.3104830
Jin Y, Yan D, Kang X, Chong A, Sun H, Zhan S (2021) Forecasting building occupancy: a temporal-sequential analysis and machine learning integrated approach. Energy Build. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111362
Le Cam A, Southernwood J, Ring D, Clarke D, Creedon R (2021) Impact of demand response on occupants’ thermal comfort in a leisure center. Energy Eff 14:91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-021-09965-w
Fanger PO (1970) Thermal comfort: analysis and applications in environmental engineering. Danish Technical Press, Copenhagen
U.S. Department of Energy (2020) EnergyPlus v9.1.0—input output reference. p. 484–485
Zupan D (2014) Smart-home energy management in the context of occupants’ activity. Informatica 38:171–180
Wilcox S, Marion W (2008) User manual for TMY3 data sets. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden
Autodesk (2010). Sustainable design analysis and building information modeling. Autodesk-EcotectTM. pp. 1–10
Tapia EM, Intille SS, Larson K (2004) Activity recognisation in Home Using Simple state changing sensors. Pervasive Comput 3001:158–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24646-6_10
Skalko S, Cabot PW (2003) Design of low-rise approved by the ASHRAE Standards Committee on June. 8400. pp 1–6
Funding
Authors have not received any funding for this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Study concept and design: MR and HT; analysis and interpretation of data: MR; drafting of the manuscript: MR and HT; critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content and verification of the analytical methods: AB-J and HT.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.
Ethical approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Raeiszadeh, M., Tahayori, H. & Bahadori-jahromi, A. PECMS: modeling a personalized energy and comfort management system based on residents’ behavior anticipation in smart home. J Reliable Intell Environ 10, 123–136 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40860-023-00206-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40860-023-00206-8