Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Normative Framework of Noise Mapping in India: Strategies, Implications and Challenges Ahead

  • Review Paper
  • Published:
Acoustics Australia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper presents a retrospective and prospective view of noise mapping strategy followed across the globe as a diagnostic tool for controlling the noise pollution in urban cities. The concept of noise mapping is primitive in India and thus developing the noise maps is really a great challenge for big metropolitan cities of India. The paper discusses the benefits associated, input parameters required, methodology, sampling and interpolation techniques used, noise control action plans and challenges ahead for the development of strategic noise maps. The pros and cons associated with noise mapping and validity of principal traffic noise models in India are presented. Also, various technical aspects pertaining to noise mapping are clarified in Indian perspectives based on the standard operating procedures used internationally. This paper recommends a national policy framework of noise mapping and control for Self-Reliant India (Aatmanirbhar Bharat) and shall serve as a guiding document to all the stake holders for noise mapping of the larger parts of the country.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Babisch, W., Beule, B., Schust, M., Kersten, N., Ising, H.: Traffic noise and risk of myocardial infarction. Epidemiology 16, 33–40 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Babisch, W.: Road traffic noise and cardiovascular risk. Noise Health 10(38), 27–33 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. van Kempen, E., Casas, M., Pershagen, G., Foraster, M.: WHO environmental noise guidelines for the European region: a systematic review on environmental noise and cardiovascular and metabolic effects: a summary. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 15(2), 379 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  4. WHO-JRC: Burden of disease from environmental noise-Quantification of healthy life years last in Europe. European Center for Environment and Health JRC EU (2011)

  5. Directive 2002/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25th June 2002, relating to the assessment and management of environmental noise, Official Journal of the European Communities (2002)

  6. Borelli, D., Repetto, S., Schenone, C.: Noise mapping of the flyover highway in Genoa: comparison of different methods. Noise Mapp. 1, 59–73 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Murphy, E., King, E.A.: Strategic environmental noise mapping: methodological issues concerning the implementation of the EU environmental noise directive and their policy implications. Environ. Int. 36(3), 290–298 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. European Commission Working Group Assessment of Exposure to Noise (WG-AEN)-Position Paper, Final Draft-Good Practice Guide for Strategic Noise Mapping and the Production of Associated Data on Noise Exposure-Version 2nd–13th January, 2006

  9. Conference of European Directors of Roads, CEDR: Best practice in strategic noise mapping (2013)

  10. Kok, A.: Refining the CNOSSOS-EU calculation method for environmental noise. In: Proceedings Internoise, Madrid (2019)

  11. Vogiatzis, K., Remy, N.: Environmental noise mapping as a smart urban tool development. In: Smart Urban Development (2019). https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.88449

  12. King, E.A., Murphy, E., Rice, H.J.: Implementation of the EU environmental noise directive: lessons from the first phase of strategic noise mapping and action planning in Ireland. J. Environ. Manag. 92(3), 756–764 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Escobar, V.G., Morillas, J.M.B., Gozalo, G.R., Gόmez, R.V., del Rίo, J.C., Sierra, J.A.M.: Analysis of the grid sampling method for noise mapping. Arch. Acoust. 37(4), 499–514 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  14. King, E.A., Murphy, E.: The development of a practical framework for strategic noise mapping. Appl. Acoust. 70, 1116–1127 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lee, S.-W., Chang, S.I., Park, Y.-M.: Utilizing noise mapping for environmental impact assessment in a downtown redevelopment area of Seoul, Korea. Appl. Acoust. 69, 704–714 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Environmental Noise Guidelines for the European Region: World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe, Denmark, 2018 (2018)

  17. Garg, N., Sinha, A.K., Gandhi, V., Bhardwaj, R.M., Akolkar, A.B.: A pilot study on establishment of ambient noise monitoring network across the major cities of India. Appl. Acoust. 103, 20–29 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Garg, N., Sinha, A.K., Sharma, M.K., Gandhi, V., Bhardwaj, R.M., Akolkar, A.B., Singh, R.K.: Study on the establishment of a diversified national ambient noise monitoring network in seven major cities of India. Curr. Sci. 113(7), 1367–1383 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Garg, N., Sinha, A.K., Gandhi, V., Bhardwaj, R.M., Akolkar, A.B.: Evaluation and analysis of environmental noise pollution in seven major cities of India. Arch. Acoust. 42(2), 175–188 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  20. The Noise Pollution (Regulation and Control) Rules: Ministry of Environment & Forests, India (2000)

  21. Central Pollution Control Board, India. http://cpcb.nic.in. Accessed 5 Dec 2020

  22. Kalawapudi, K., Singh, T., Dey, J., Vijay, R., Kumar, R.: Noise pollution in Mumbai Metropolitan Region (MMR): an emerging environmental threat. Environ. Monit. Assess. 192, 152 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sonaviya, D.K.R., Tandel, B.N.: Integrated road traffic noise mapping in urban Indian context. Noise Mapp. 7, 99–113 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Konadath, S., Mahadeva, A., Chatni, S.: Noise measurement across different land-use patterns. J. Speech Lang. Hear. Assoc. 33, 55–62 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Laxmi, V., Dey, J., Kalawapudi, K., Vijay, R., Kumar, R.: An innovative approach of urban noise monitoring using cycle in Nagpur, India. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 26(36), 36812–36819 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sonaviya, D.K.R., Tandel, B.N.: 2-D noise maps for tier-2 city urban Indian roads. Noise Mapp. 6, 1–7 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Manojkumar, N., Basha, K., Srimuruganandam, B.: Assessment, prediction and mapping of noise levels in Vellore City, India. Noise Mapp. 6, 38–51 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Das, P., Talukdar, S., Ziaul, S.K., Das, S., Pal, S.: Noise mapping and assessing vulnerability in meso level urban environment of Eastern India. Sustain. Cities Soc. 46, 101416 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Debnath, A., Singh, P.K.: Environmental traffic noise modeling of Dhanbad township area, a mathematical approach. Appl. Acoust. 129, 161–172 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lokhande, S.K., Jain, M.C., Dhawale, S.A., Gautam, R., Bodhe, G.L.: Realizing modeling and mapping tools to study the upsurge of noise pollution as a result of open-cast mining and transportation activities. Noise Health 20, 60–67 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Lokhande, S.K., Dhawale, S.A., Pathak, S.S., Gautam, R., Jain, M.C., Bodhe, G.L.: Appraisal of noise level dissemination surrounding Mining and industrial areas of Keonjhar, Odisha: a comprehensive approach using noise mapping. Arch. Acoust. 42(3), 423–432 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Manwar, V.D., Mandal, B.B., Pal, A.K.: Environmental propagation of noise in mines and nearby villages: a study through noise mapping. Noise Health 18(83), 185–193 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Akhtar, N., Ahmad, K., Alam, P.: Noise monitoring and mapping for some pre-selected locations of New Delhi, India. Fluct. Noise Lett. 15(02), 1650019 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Alam, W.: GIS based assessment of noise pollution in Guwahati City of Assam, India. Int. J. Environ. Sci. 2, 743–751 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Banerjee, D., Chakraborty, S.K., Bhattacharyya, S., Gangopadhyay, A.: Appraisal and mapping the spatial-temporal distribution of urban road traffic noise. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 6(2), 325–335 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Kalaiselvi, R., Ramachandraiah, A.: Environmental noise mapping study for heterogeneous traffic conditions. In: Proceedings of 20th International Congress on Acoustics, ICA 2010, 23–27 August 2010, Sydney

  37. Director General of Mines Safety (DGMS): Recommendations of 10th National Conference on Safety in Mines (2008)

  38. de Kluijver, H., Stoter, J.: Noise mapping and GIS: optimizing quality and efficiency of noise effect studies. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 27, 85–102 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  39. European Environmental Agency, State of the art of noise mapping in Europe (2005)

  40. Konadath, S., Chatni, S., Mahadeva, A.: Noise mapping: a scoping review. J. Acoust. Soc. India 45(4), 176–188 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  41. ISO 9613-2: 1996 Acoustics-Attenuation of sound during propagation outdoors-part 2: general method of calculation

  42. Morillas, J.M.B., González, D.M., Gozalo, G.R.: A review of the measurement procedure of the ISO 1996 standard. Relationship with the European Noise Directive. Sci. Total Environ. 565, 595–606 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Banerjee, P., Ghose, M.K., Pradhan, R.: GIS based spatial noise impact analysis (SNIA) of the broadening of national highway in Sikkim Himalayas: a case study. AIMS Environ. Sci. 3(4), 714–738 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Margaritis, E., Kang, J.: Soundscape mapping in environmental noise management and urban planning: case studies in two UK cities. Noise Mapp. 4, 87–103 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  45. ESRI, ARC/INFO user’s guide: cell-based modelling with GRID. Analysis, display and management, 2nd edition (1992)

  46. Achilleos, G.A.: The inverse distance weighted interpolation method and error propagation mechanism—creating a DEM from an analogue topographical map. J. Spatial Sci. 56(2), 283–304 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  47. del Río, F.J.C., Escobar, V.G., Carmona, J.T., Gómez, R.V., Sierra, J.A.M., Gozalo, G.R., Morillas, J.M.B.: A street categorization method to study urban noise: the Valladolid (Spain) study. Environ. Eng. Sci. 28(11), 811–817 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Morillas, J.M.B., Escobar, V.G., Sierra, J.A.M., Gómez, R.V., Vaquero, J.M., Carmona, J.T.: A categorization method applied to the study of urban road traffic noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 117(5), 2844–2852 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Morillas, J.M.B., Escobar, V.G., Carmona, J.T., Sierra, J.A.M., Vílchez-Gómez, R., Carmona del Río, F.J.: Analysis of the prediction capacity of a categorization method for urban noise assessment. Appl. Acoust. 72, 760–771 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Garg, N., Maji, S.: A critical review of principal traffic noise models: strategies and implications. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 46, 68–81 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  51. de Lisle, S.: Comparison of road traffic noise prediction models: CoRTN, TNM, NMPB, ASJ RTN. Acoust. Aust. 44, 409–413 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Kumar, K., Ledoux, H., Schmidt, R., Verheij, T., Stoter, J.: A harmonized data model for noise simulation in the EU. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 9, 121 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9020121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Heutschi, K., Locher, B., Gerber, M.: sonROAD18: swiss implementation of the CNOSSOS-EU road traffic noise emission model. Acta Acust. United Acust. 104, 697–706 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Federal Highway Administration report, Techniques for Reviewing TNM Model Runs and Associated Noise Modeling Reports, FHWA-HEP-18-068, U.S Department of Transportation

  55. Sakamoto, S.: Road traffic noise prediction model ‘‘ASJ RTN-Model 2018’’: report of the research committee on road traffic noise. Acoust. Sci. Technol. 41(3), 529–589 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  56. European Civil Aviation Conference, ECAC.CEAC Doc 29, Report on Standard Method of Computing Noise Contours around Civil Airports, 3rd Edition, Volume 2: Technical Guide (2005)

  57. Kokkonen, J.: CNOSSOS-EU noise model implementation in Finland and experience of it in 3rd END round. In: Proceedings Euronoise 2018, pp 1219–1224 (2018)

  58. Aviation Environmental Design Tool (AEDT), Federal Aviation Administration, US Department of Transportation. https://aedt.faa.gov/. Accessed 5 Dec 2020

  59. Lokahnde, S.K., Pathak, S.S., Kokate, P.A., Dhawale, S.A., Bodhe, G.L.: Assessment of heterogeneous road traffic noise in Nagpur. Arch. Acoust. 43(1), 113–121 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  60. Mishra, R.K., Mishra, A.R., Singh, A.: Traffic noise analysis using RLS-90 model in urban city. In: Proceedings Internoise, 2019, Madrid, pp. 6490–6502 (2019)

  61. Hepworth, P.: Accuracy implication of computerized noise predictions for environmental noise mapping. In: Proceedings of the 35th International Congress on Noise Control Engineering. Institute of Noise Control Engineering of the USA, Hawaii (2006)

  62. Nijland, H.A., Van Wee, G.P.: Traffic noise in Europe: a comparison of calculation methods, noise indices and noise standards for road and railroad traffic in Europe. Transp. Rev. 25, 591–612 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  63. Arana, M., Martin, R.S., Martin, M.L.S., Aramendía, E.: Strategic noise map of a major road carried out with two environmental prediction software packages. Environ. Monit. Assess. 163, 503–513 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  64. Garg, N., Maji, S.: A retrospective view of noise pollution control policy in India: status, proposed revisions and control measures. Curr. Sci. 111(1), 29–38 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  65. Garg, N., Sharma, O., Mohanan, V., Maji, S.: Passive noise control measures for traffic noise abatement in Delhi, India. J. Sci. Ind. Res. 71, 226–234 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  66. Garg, N., Kumar, A., Saini, P.K., Maji, S.: A retrospective view of ambient noise standards in India: status and proposed revision. Noise Control Eng. J. 63(3), 266–278 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  67. Garg, N., Mangal, S.K., Saini, P.K., Dhiman, P., Maji, S.: Comparison of ANN and analytical models in traffic noise modelling and predictions. Acoust. Aust. 43, 179–189 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  68. ECMT: Efficient transport for Europe-policies for internalization of external costs. In: European Conference of Ministers of Transport, Paris (1998)

  69. Modra, M.: Cost-benefit analysis of the application of traffic noise insulation measures to existing houses, EPA (Melbourne), 1984, cited in Poldy (1993)

  70. Douglass Lee, Efficient Highway User Charges, USDOT as cited in MacKenzie, Dower & Chen (1992), The Going Rate, World Resources Institute

  71. Nijland, H.A., Van Kempen, E.E.M.M., Van Wee, G.P., Jabben, J.: Costs and benefits of noise abatement measures. Transp. Policy 10, 131–140 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  72. Murphy, E., King, E.A.: Scenario analysis and noise action planning: modelling the impact of mitigation measures on population exposure. Appl. Acoust. 72, 487–494 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  73. Torija, A.J., Ruiz, D.P., Fernandez, V.A., Ridao, A.R.: Noticed sound events management as a tool for inclusion in the action plans against noise in medium-sized cities. Landsc. Urban Plan. 104, 148–156 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  74. Münzel, T., Schmidt, F.P., Steven, M.D.S., Herzog, J., Driber, A., Sørensen, M.: Environmental noise and the cardiovascular system. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 71, 688–697 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  75. Noise abatement approaches. Future Brief 17. Produced for the European Commission DG Environment by the Science Communication Unit, UWE, Bristol. Science for Environment Policy, pp. 1–28 (2017)

  76. Position Paper of the Working Group on Health and Socio-economic aspects, Valuation of Noise (2003)

  77. Garg, N.: On suitability of day-night average sound level descriptor in Indian scenario. Arch. Acoust. 44(2), 385–392 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  78. Garg, N., Sharma, O.: Measurement accuracy of secondary standard of sound pressure in comparison to primary standards. MAPAN J. Metrol. Soc. India 27, 219–229 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  79. Garg, N., Surendran, P., Dhanya, M.P., Chandran, A.T., Asif, M., Singh, M.: Measurement uncertainty in microphone free-field comparison calibrations. MAPAN J. Metrol. Soc. India 34, 357–369 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  80. Garg, N., Chauhan, B.S.: Environmental noise mapping: strategies, uncertainties and challenges ahead. In: 6th National Conference on Advances in Metrology, Admet 2020. CSIR-National Physical Laboratory, New Delhi, 5–6 January, 2020, pp. 4

  81. Garg, N., Vishesh, M.S.: Fuzzy TOPSIS approach in selection of optimal noise barrier for traffic noise abatement. Arch. Acoust. J. 40, 453–467 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  82. Garg, N., Saxena, T.K., Maji, S.: Long-term versus short-term noise monitoring: strategies and implications in India. Noise Control Eng. J. 63(1), 26–35 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  83. Rajakumara, H.N., Jayaram, A., Nilap, A.R.: Spatial interpolation of aircraft noise and land use study at Kempegowda International Airport Limited Bangalore using GIS and remote sensing. Int. J. Pure Appl. Math. 120(6), 6839–6863 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  84. Bureau of Indian Standards: National Building Code of India 2016, Volume 2. Bureau of Indian Standards. Noida

  85. Bose, T., Adhvaryu, B., Chakraborti, S.: Airport noise and urban planning: a case of Ahmedabad, India. Urban India 39(I), 28–40 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  86. Manwar, V., Mandal, B.B., Pal, A.K.: Application of noise mapping in an Indian opencast mine for effective noise management. In: Proceedings of 12th ICBEN Congress on Noise as a Public Health Problem, 18–22 June, 2017, Zurich

  87. Practitioner Handbook for Local Noise Action Plans, Recommendations from the SILENCE project, The SILENCE Handbook. https://www.polisnetwork.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/silence_handbook_local-noise-action-plans-2.pdf. Accessed 5 Dec 2020

  88. Murphy, E., Faulkner, J.P., Douglas, O.: Current state-of-the-art and new directions in strategic environmental noise mapping. Curr. Pollut. Rep. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40726-020-00141-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Lokhande, S.K., Gautam, R., Dhawale, S.A., Jain, M.C., Bodhe, G.L.: Evaluation of practical framework for industrial noise mapping: a case study. Noise Health 21, 194–199 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors thank Dr. D. K. Aswal, Director, CSIR-National Physical Laboratory, India for his continuous encouragement and support and for providing the necessary infrastructural support for the study. Also, author would like to thank Dr. Sanjay Yadav, Head, Physico Mechanical Metrology Division for his support and help in this study and especially for Fig. 6 in the paper based on the chapter 6 in the book on Metrology for Inclusive Growth of India published recently, ISBN 978-981-15-8871-6. N. Garg is thankful to Mr. Vishal Gandhi, Senior Scientist, CPCB, India for giving an opportunity to contribute towards the formulation of draft for noise mapping in India. One of the authors, Mr. B S Chauhan is thankful to the Dept. of Science and Technology (DST) for DST INSPIRE fellowship for pursuing Doctorate at CSIR-NPL, New Delhi from AcSIR, Ghaziabad.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. Garg.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Garg, N., Chauhan, B.S. & Singh, M. Normative Framework of Noise Mapping in India: Strategies, Implications and Challenges Ahead. Acoust Aust 49, 23–41 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40857-020-00214-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40857-020-00214-1

Keywords

Navigation