Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Agricultural loss due to wildlife: a case study on elephant depredation in a protected area of South India

  • RESEARCH PAPER
  • Published:
Journal of Social and Economic Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Crop raiding by wildlife is an important form of human–wildlife conflict and has been reported from several protected areas of India. With the growing concerns of forest fragmentation, habitat destruction and expansion of agriculture, the extent of this problem is also getting amplified. The current research is a case study of this issue in Malai Mahadeshwara Wildlife Sanctuary (MM Hills) of Western Ghats in South India, with a special emphasis on elephant depredation. The objective of the study is to understand the types of human–wildlife conflict in selected villages. The study also attempted to assess the direct economic loss due to elephant depredation of crops. Primary data have been collected through household questionnaire survey and focus group discussions in two affected villages (Pacchedoddi located inside MM Hills and Kanchalli located on the fringes of MM Hills). Discussions were also undertaken with the staff of the forest administration. It was revealed that apart from elephants, different types of crops were damaged by boars, rodents and squirrels. Crop raiding by elephants had increased; mainly due to the construction of a dam in MM Hills that acted as a source of water and attracted elephants. Additionally, the availability of water also enabled the villagers to cultivate economically profitable crops, which were also preferred by elephants as they are more palatable leading to increase in elephant raids. The intensity of such raiding was more in Pacchedoddi than Kanchalli. The control measures applied were not fully effective. As a whole, it was found that agriculture was the main reason of human–elephant conflicts in MM Hills and crop loss severely affected the rural people of MM Hills. This formidable conservation issue in the area represents an important ecosystem disservice. It is suggested that this problem should be addressed with a synchronized approach for both conservation and agricultural livelihood with proper compensation schemes and alternate crop choices through government initiatives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahrestani FS, Heitkönig IM, Prins HH (2012) Diet and habitat-niche relationships within an assemblage of large herbivores in a seasonal tropical forest. J Trop Ecol 28(4):385–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anand S, Radhakrishna S (2017) Investigating trends in human-wildlife conflict: is conflict escalation real or imagined? J Asia Pac Biodivers. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japb.2017.02.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barua M, Bhagwat SA, Jadhav S (2013) The hidden dimensions of human-wildlife conflict: health impacts, opportunity and transaction costs. Biol Cons 157:309–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.07.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baskaran N (2013) An overview of Asian elephants in the Western Ghats, southern India: implications for the conservation of Western Ghats ecology. J Threat Taxa 5(14):4854–4870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonacic C, Amaya-Espinel JD, Ibarra JT (2016) Human-wildlife conflicts. Trop Conserv Perspect Local Global Priorities 11:109

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartera NH, Shresthab BK, Karkic JB, Pradhand NMB, Liua J (2012) Coexistence between wildlife and humans at fine spatial scales. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109(38):15360–15365. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1210490109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceausu S, Graves RA, Killion A, Sevenning RA (2018) Governing trade-offs in ecosystem services and disservices to achieve human-wildlife coexistence. Conserv Biol 33(3):543–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhary S, Chettri N, Uddin K, Khatri TB, Dhakal M, Bajracharya B, Ning W (2016) Implications of land cover change on ecosystems services and people’s dependency: a case study from the Koshi Tappu wildlife reserve. Nepal Ecol Complex 28:200–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook RM, Henley MD, Parrini F (2015) Elephant movement patterns in relation to human inhabitants in and around the Great Limpopo Transfrontier Park. Koedoe 57:1–7. https://doi.org/10.4102/koedoe.v57i1.1298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crespin SJ, Simonetti JA (2019) Reconciling farming and wild nature: integrating human-wildlife coexistence into the land-sharing and land-sparing framework. Ambio 48(2):131–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daily GC (1997) Introduction: what are ecosystem services. In: Nature’s services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems, vol 1, no 1. Island Press, Washington, DC, p 1-10. ISBN: 9781559634755

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel JC, Manakadan R, Swaminathan SR, Babu M, Balasubramanian G, Desai A, Mohan Raj N (2008) The population, distribution, habitat and problems of the Asian Elephant Elephas maximus in Andhra Pradesh. India. Bombay Natural History Society and U.S, Fish and Wildlife Service

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickman AJ (2010) Complexities of conflict: the importance of considering social factors for effectively resolving human-wildlife conflict. Anim Conserv 13:458–466. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1795.2010.00368.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutta H, Singha H, Dutta BK, Deb P (2018) Human-elephant conflict in Patheria hills reserve forest along the Indo-Bangladesh border in Northeast India. Gajah 48:24–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans LA, Adams WM (2018) Elephants as actors in the political ecology of human–elephant conflict. Trans Inst Br Geogr 43:630–645. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernando P, Kumar MA, Williams AC, Wikramanayake E, Aziz T, Singh SM (2008) Review of human-elephant conflict mitigation measures practiced in South Asia. Areas technical support document submitted to World Bank. WWF-World Wide Fund for nature, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of Karnataka (2017) Report of the comptroller and auditor general of India performance audit on administration of National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries in Karnataka (Report No 6), Bengaluru

  • Green RE, Cornell SJ, Scharlemann JP, Balmford A (2005) Farming and the fate of wild nature. Science 307(5709):550–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gubbi S (2012) Patterns and correlates of human-elephant conflict around a South Indian Reserve. Biol Cons 148:88–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.01.046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gubbi S, Swaminath MH, Poornesha HC, Bhat R, Raghunath R (2014) An elephantine challenge: human–elephant conflict distribution in the largest Asian elephant population, southern India. Biodivers Conserv 23:633–647. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-014-0621-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guru BK, Das A (2021) Cost of human-elephant conflict and perceptions of compensation: evidence from Odisha, India. J Environ Plan Manag 64(10):1770–1794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haidt A, Kamiński T, Borowik T, Kowalczyk R (2018) Human and the beast-Flight and aggressive responses of European bison to human disturbance. PLoS ONE 13(8):e0200635. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hazarika A, Dutta H (2018) Perceptions of human-elephant conflict around Abhaypur reserve forest in Northeast India. Gajah 48:27–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayson EA, Christopher G (2008) Human-elephant conflict in the southern Western Ghats: a case study from the Peppara wild life sanctuary, Kerala. India Indian For 134(10):1309–1325

    Google Scholar 

  • Karanth KK, Kudalkar S (2017) History, location, and species matter: insights for human–wildlife conflict mitigation from India. Hum Dimens Wildl 22(4):331–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karanth KK, Gopalaswamy AM, Prasad PK, Dasgupta S (2013) Patterns of human–wildlife conflicts and compensation: Insights from Western Ghats protected areas. Biol Cons 166:175–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karnataka elephant task force (2012) Report submitted to the Honourable high court of Karnataka, India Karnataka forest department website. https://aranya.gov.in/aranyacms/English/WildLifeSanctuary.aspx (Accessed on 24 June 2020)

  • Knight J (ed) (2000) Natural enemies: people–wildlife confl icts in anthropological perspective. Routledge, London, United Kingdom

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, M. A., Mudappa, D., Raman, T. R. S., & Madhusudan, M. D. (2004). The elephant hills: conservation of wild Asian elephants in a landscape of fragmented rainforests and plantations in the Anamalais, India (Vol 10, p. 98), CERC Technical Report

  • Kumar R. S. (1994). Ecology of Asian Elephants (Elephas maximus), their habitats and interactions with people in Hosur and Dharmapuri Forest Division, Tamil Nadu, south Indian. Ph.D. thesis. Bharathidasan University, Trichirapally

  • Lelea S, Springate-Baginskib O, Lakerveldc R, Debd D, Dash P (2013) Ecosystem services: origins, contributions, Pitfalls, and alternatives. Conserv Soc 11(4):343–358. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-4923.125752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lingaraju HG, Venkataramana GV (2016) An assessment of human-elephant conflict (HEC): a case study of Bandipur National Park, Karnataka. India J Wildl Research 4(2):26–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Madden FM (2008) The growing conflict between humans and wildlife: law and policy as contributing and mitigating factors. J Int Wildl Law Policy 11(2–3):189–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madden F, McQuinn B (2014) Conservation’s blind spot: the case for conflict transformation in wildlife conservation. Biol Cons 178:97–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallegowda P, Setty S, Rengaian G (2018) Vegetation structure and prioritizing plants for eco-restoration of degraded wildlife corridor in dry tropical forest of South India. In: Shibata A (ed) Vegetation. IntechOpen, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathers N, Fox N, Hunn A (2009) Surveys and questionnaires The NIHR Design Service for the East Midlands. Yorkshire & the Humber, Leeds

  • Mayberry A, Hovorka AJ, Kate E, Evans KE (2017) Well-being impacts of human-elephant conflict in Khumaga, Botswana: exploring visible and hidden dimensions. Conserv Soc 15(3):280–291. https://doi.org/10.4103/cs.cs_16_132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mekonen S (2020) Coexistence between human and wildlife: the nature, causes and mitigations of human wildlife conflict around Bale Mountains National Park. Southeast Ethiop BMC Ecol 20(1):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Midha N, Kumar NK, Boominathan D, Thomas S, Jain C (2018) Kallar elephant corridor in the Western Ghats. India Curr Sci 115(12):2211–2218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mumby HS, Plotnik JM (2018) Taking the elephants’ perspective: remembering elephant behavior, cognition and ecology in human-elephant conflict mitigation. Front Ecol Evol 6:1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2018.00122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nair R, Jayson E (2021) Estimation of economic loss and identifying the factors affecting the crop raiding behaviour of Asian elephant (Elephas maximus) in Nilambur part of the southern Western Ghats, Kerala. India Curr Sci 121:521–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neupanea D, Kunwar S, Boharab AK, Risch TS, Johnson RL (2017) Willingness to pay for mitigating human-elephant conflict by residents of Nepal. J Nat Conserv 36:65–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2017.02.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyhus PJ (2016) Human-wildlife conflict and coexistence. Annu Rev Environ Resour 41:143–171. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-085634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyirenda VR, Nkhata B, Tembo O, Siamundele S (2018) Elephant crop damage: subsistence farmers’ social vulnerability, livelihood sustainability and elephant conservation. Sustainability 10:3572. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyumba TO, Wilson K, Derrick CJ, Mukherjee N (2018) The use of focus group discussion methodology: insights from two decades of application in conservation. Methods Ecol Evol 9:20–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pooley S, Bhatia S, Vasava A (2021) Rethinking the study of human–wildlife coexistence. Conserv Biol 35(3):784–793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qomariah IN, Rahmi T, Said Z, Wijaya A (2019) Conflict between human and wild Sumatran Elephant (Elephas maximus sumatranus Temminck 1847) in Aceh Province Indonesia. Biodiversitas 20(1):77–84. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d200110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandra TV, Bharath S, Gupta N (2018) Modelling landscape dynamics with LST in protected areas of Western Ghats, Karnataka. J Environ Manage 206:1253–1262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao KS, Maikhuri RK, Nautiyal S, Saxena KG (2002) Crop damage and livestock depredation by wildlife: a case study from Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve, India. J Environ Manage 66:317–327. https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.2002.0587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rathnamma MD, Abhishek MJ, Ashok D (2021) Regional disparities using population as a criteria a case study of South Karnataka. Int J Recent Adv Multidiscip Topics 2(11):156–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravenelle J, Nyhus PJ (2017) Global patterns and trends in human–wildlife conflict compensation. Conserv Biol 31(6):1247–1256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinhardt I, Kluth G, Nowak S, Mysłajek RW (2013) A review of wolf management in Poland and Germany with recommendations for future transboundary collaboration. Federal agency for nature conservation, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson C, Leimgruber P, Rodriguez S, McEvoy J, Sotherden E, Tonkyn D (2019) Perception of human-elephant conflict and conservation attitudes of affected communities in Myanmar. Trop Conserv Sci 12:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940082919831242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoldt M, Göttert T, Mann C, Zeller U (2020) Transfrontier conservation areas and human-wildlife conflict: the case of the Namibian component of the Kavango-Zambezi (KAZA) TFCA. Sci Rep 10(1):1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sukumar R (1990) Ecology of the Asian elephant in southern India. II. Feeding habits and crop raiding patterns. J Trop Ecol 6:33–53. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266467400003175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton TF, Puri RK, Bhagwat S, Howard P (2019) Human adaptation to biodiversity change: an adaptation process approach applied to a case study from southern India. Ambio 48(12):1431–1446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Eeden LM, Eklund A, Miller JR, López-Bao JV, Chapron G, Cejtin MR, Treves A (2018) Carnivore conservation needs evidence-based livestock protection. PLoS Biol 16(9):e2005577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkataraman AB, Kumar NV, Varma S, Sukumar R (2002) Conservation of a flagship species: prioritizing Asian elephant (Elephas maximus) conservation units in southern India. Curr Sci 82:1022–1033

    Google Scholar 

  • Vijayakrishnan S, Kumar MA, Umapathy G, Kumar V, Sinha A (2018) Physiological stress responses in wild Asian elephants Elephas maximus in a human-dominated landscape in the Western Ghats, Southern India. Gen Comp Endocrinol 266:150–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitham CML (2015) Combining patterns of human-wildlife conflicts and ecosystem services for more efficient conservation management, PhD thesis, Beijing Forestry University, China

  • Young JC, Marzano M, White RM, McCracken DI, Redpath SM, Carss DN, Quine CP, Watt AD (2010) The emergence of biodiversity conflicts from biodiversity impacts: characteristics and management strategies. Biodivers Conserv 19(14):3973–3990

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The funding support was provided by Technology Information, Forecasting and Assessment Council, Department of Science and Technology, Government of India

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Ecological Economics and Natural Resources (CEENR), Institute for Social and Economic Change (ISEC), Dr. VKRV Rao Road, Nagarabhavi, Bengaluru, 560072, India

    Meenakshi Negi, Mrinalini Goswami & Sunil Nautiyal

  2. G.B. Pant National Institute of Himalayan Environment, Kosi-Katarmal, Almora, Uttarakhand, 263643, India

    Sunil Nautiyal

Authors
  1. Meenakshi Negi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mrinalini Goswami
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sunil Nautiyal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sunil Nautiyal.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

The authors have no conflict of interests that are relevant to the content of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Negi, M., Goswami, M. & Nautiyal, S. Agricultural loss due to wildlife: a case study on elephant depredation in a protected area of South India. J. Soc. Econ. Dev. 25, 350–364 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40847-022-00230-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40847-022-00230-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation