Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Biomechanical Analysis of Mandibular Implant-Assisted Removable Partial Denture with Distal Extension

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate the mechanical performance of mandibular implant-assisted removable partial dentures (IARPDs) on abutment teeth, supporting implants, and the mucosa. A risk assessment of patient discomfort and complications was also conducted to provide a design reference for clinical use.

Methods

Mandibular IARPDs with distal extension were analyzed using the finite element method. The mechanical performance of IARPDs was evaluated for varying numbers of missing teeth, crown-to-root ratios of abutment teeth, and locations of occlusal rests.

Results

When an implant was placed at the distal end, the peak von Mises stress in the cortical bone surrounding the abutment tooth was 14.8% lower than that when at the mesial end. Simultaneously, the peak von Mises stress was reduced by 76.7% over the mucosa and increased by 206.7% in the cortical bone surrounding the implant. The use of distal occlusal rests increased the peak von Mises stresses in the cortical bone surrounding the abutment tooth by 8.4% compared to that when using mesial occlusal rests. When the crown-to-root ratio of the abutment tooth increased from 1 to 1.5, the peak von Mises stress in the cortical bone surrounding the abutment tooth increased by 168.7%.

Conclusion

An IARPD with a distal implant can reduce the risk of post-op complications. When the crown-to-root ratio of the abutment tooth is adequate, the distal occlusal rest can be used for IARPDs of distal free ends.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Vermeulen, A., et al. (1996). Ten-year evaluation of removable partial dentures: Survival rates based on retreatment, not wearing and replacement. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 76(3), 267–272.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Teitelbaum, S. L. (2000). Bone resorption by osteoclasts. Science, 289(5484), 1504–1508.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Keltjens, H. M., et al. (1993). Distal extension removable partial dentures supported by implants and residual teeth: Considerations and case reports. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 8(2), 208–213.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. De Freitas, R., et al. (2012). Mandibular implant-supported removable partial denture with distal extension: A systematic review. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 39(10), 791–798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Threeburuth, W., Aunmeungtong, W., & Khongkhunthian, P. (2018). Comparison of immediate-load mini dental implants and conventional-size dental implants to retain mandibular Kennedy class I removable partial dentures: A randomized clinical trial. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 20(5), 785–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Payne, A. G., et al. (2017). Multicentre prospective evaluation of implant-assisted mandibular removable partial dentures: Surgical and prosthodontic outcomes. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 28(1), 116–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ohkubo, C., et al. (2007). Effect of implant support on distal extension removable partial dentures: In vitro assessment. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 34(1), 52–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Matsudate, Y., et al. (2016). Load distribution on abutment tooth, implant and residual ridge with distal-extension implant-supported removable partial denture. Journal of Prosthodontic Research, 60(4), 282–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ohyama, T., et al. (2020). Mechanical analysis of the effects of implant position and abutment height on implant-assisted removable partial dentures. Journal of Prosthodontic Research, 64(3), 340–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Shahmiri, R., & Das, R. (2017). Finite element analysis of implant-assisted removable partial dentures: Framework design considerations. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 118(2), 177–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Abtan, A. A., et al. (2016). Analyzing the 3D printed material Tango plus FLX930 for using in self-folding structure. 2016 International Conference for Students on Applied Engineering (ICSAE).

  12. Chen, F., et al. (2020). Preparation and biological evaluation of ZrO2 all-ceramic teeth by DLP technology. Ceramics International, 46(8), 11268–11274.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ogawa, T., et al. (2004). Mapping, profiling and clustering of pressure pain threshold (PPT) in edentulous oral mucosa. Journal of Dentistry, 32(3), 219–228.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Misch, C. E. (2014). Dental implant prosthetics-e-book. Amsterdam: Elsevier Health Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pattin, C., Caler, W., & Carter, D. (1996). Cyclic mechanical property degradation during fatigue loading of cortical bone. Journal of Biomechanics, 29(1), 69–79.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Blaber, J., et al. (2015). Ncorr: open-source 2D digital image correlation Matlab software. Experimental Mechanics, 55(6), 1105–1122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cendres+Métaux. Pekkton® ivory. https://www.cmsa.ch/en/medtech/products/estheticline/high-performance-polymers/pekktonr-ivory/

  18. Stratasys. Vero Dent Plus MED690. https://www.stratasys.com/materials/search/dentalmaterials?utm_source=data-sheet&utm_medium=pdf&utm_content=dental-materials-data-sheet-link-4-verodentplus-med690

  19. Rees, J. S., & Jacobsen, P. H. (1997). Elastic modulus of the periodontal ligament. Biomaterials, 18(14), 995–999.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Barão, V. A., et al. (2013). Comparison of different designs of implant-retained overdentures and fixed full-arch implant-supported prosthesis on stress distribution in edentulous mandible–a computed tomography-based three-dimensional finite element analysis. Journal of Biomechanics, 46(7), 1312–1320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Professor Dr. Chih-Han Chang and for his guidance and the experimental instruments support in this research.

Funding

This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (Grant number 07-2221-E-006-052-MY2).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chi-Lun Lin.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, YC., Lin, CL., Yu, CH. et al. Biomechanical Analysis of Mandibular Implant-Assisted Removable Partial Denture with Distal Extension. J. Med. Biol. Eng. 42, 534–543 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40846-022-00738-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40846-022-00738-z

Keywords

Navigation