Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Comparison of the Curative Effects of Hip Arthroplasty with Bio-Type Femoral Stem and Cemented Femoral Stem in Elderly Patients with Unstable Osteoporotic Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the efficacy between a bio-type femoral stem and a cemented femoral stem in hip arthroplasty for severe unstable osteoporotic intertrochanteric femur fractures (UOIFF) in elderly patients.

Methods

The clinical data of 100 elderly patients with UOIFF who underwent hip arthroplasty were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into a biological group (n = 48, receiving a biological-type femoral stem) and a cemented group (n = 52, receiving a cemented femoral stem). The excellent postoperative hip function recovery, perioperative related parameters, and postoperative complication rates were compared between the two groups. The changes in the preoperative and postoperative visual analogue score (VAS), Harris hip function score, functional recovery scale score (FRS), ability to perform activities of daily living (ADL), thromboelastography parameters, bone density, and health survey short form (SF-36) scores were also observed.

Results

The excellent and good rate of joint function recovery in the cemented group (90.38%) was higher than that in the biological group (75.00%) (P < 0.05). The cemented group exhibited a lower drainage volume, shorter time to get out of bed, shorter duration until callus appearance, and a reduced healing time than the biological group (P < 0.05). The complication rate of the cemented group (21.15%) was higher than that of the biological group (6.25%) (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Satisfactory results could be obtained by hip arthroplasty with a bio-type femoral stem or cemented femoral stem in patients with UOIFF. Therefore, the femoral stem regimen should be selected comprehensively on a case-by-case basis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tucker, A., Donnelly, K. J., Rowan, C., McDonald, S., & Foster, A. P. (2018). Is the best plate a nail? A review of 3230 unstable intertrochanteric fractures of the proximal femur. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 32(2), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.1097/bot.0000000000001038

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang, Z. F., Min, J. K., Zhong, J. M., & Wang, D. (2016). Distal fixation prosthesis for unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients: a mid-term follow-up study. Zhongguo Gu Shang. China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, 29(6), 491–495.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hiragami, K., & Ishii, J. (2018). Embedding the lateral end of the lag screw within the lateral wall in the repair of reverse obliquity intertrochanteric femur fracture. Journal of International Medical Research, 46(3), 1103–1108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0300060517726195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Berger-Groch, J., Rupprecht, M., Schoepper, S., Schroeder, M., Rueger, J. M., & Hoffmann, M. (2016). Five-year outcome analysis of intertrochanteric femur fractures: A prospective randomized trial comparing a 2-screw and a single-screw cephalomedullary nail. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 30(9), 483–488. https://doi.org/10.1097/bot.0000000000000616

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ehrnthaller, C., Olivier, A. C., Gebhard, F., & Dürselen, L. (2017). The role of lesser trochanter fragment in unstable pertrochanteric A2 proximal femur fractures—is refixation of the lesser trochanter worth the effort? Clinical Biomechanics (Bristol, Avon), 42, 31–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2016.12.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Meng, Q., Li, S., Cui, S., Liang, W., Wang, W., Li, A., Li, F., Zhang, T., Wang, M., & Feng, Z. (2019). Comparative evaluation of proximal femoral nail antirotation, dynamic hip screw or hip hemiarthroplasty in unstable intertrochanteric fractures of elderly patients. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 035(007), 1036–1039.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lewis, D. P., Wæver, D., Thorninger, R., & Donnelly, W. J. (2019). Hemiarthroplasty vs total hip arthroplasty for the management of displaced neck of femur fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 34(8), 1837-1843.e1832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.03.070

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu, L., Sun, Y., Wang, L., Gao, Q., Li, A., Wang, J., & Gao, Y. (2019). Total hip arthroplasty for intertrochanteric fracture fixation failure. European Journal of Medical Research, 24(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-019-0398-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang, Z., Zhu, J., Lan, X., Li, S., Yang, H., Yu, H., Tang, G., Zhang, W., Yao, W., & Li, S. (2014). Expert consensus on the diagnosis of osteoporosis in Chinese population. Chinese Journal of Osteoporosis, 20(9), 1007–1010. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-7108.2014.09.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang, P., Wang, X., Ma, P., Zhang, H., He, Y., Wang, J., Dong, H., & Zhao, Y. (2019). Effect of bio-artificial hip replacement on the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric comminuted fracture in elderly patients and on the bone mineral density. Sichuan Medical Journal, 040(011), 1138–1141.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ware, J. E., Jr., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992). The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 30(6), 473–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ricci, M. J., McAndrew, C. M., Miller, A. N., Kamath, G., & Ricci, W. M. (2019). Are two-part intertrochanteric femur fractures stable and does stability depend on fixation method? Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 33(9), 428–431. https://doi.org/10.1097/bot.0000000000001509

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Baldwin, P. C. III, Lavender, R. C., Sanders, R., & Koval, K. J. (2016). Controversies in intramedullary fixation for intertrochanteric hip fractures. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 30(12), 635–641. https://doi.org/10.1097/bot.0000000000000652

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Suh, Y. S., Jang, B. W., Nho, J. H., Won, S. H., & Lee, W. S. (2019). Atypical incomplete femoral neck fracture in patients taking long-term bisphosphonate: Case report, a report of 2 cases. Medicine (Baltimore), 98(9), e14701. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000014701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Khandaker, M., Riahinezhad, S., Sultana, F., Vaughan, M. B., Knight, J., & Morris, T. L. (2016). Peen treatment on a titanium implant: effect of roughness, osteoblast cell functions, and bonding with bone cement. International Journal of Nanomedicine, 11, 585–594. https://doi.org/10.2147/ijn.S89376

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Peng, Y., Du, X., Huang, L., Li, J., Zhan, R., Wang, W., Xu, B., Wu, S., Peng, C., & Chen, S. (2018). Optimizing bone cement stiffness for vertebroplasty through biomechanical effects analysis based on patient-specific three-dimensional finite element modeling. Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing, 56(11), 2137–2150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-018-1844-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Trauma Orthopedics Group of Bone Science Branch of Chinese Medical Association, External Fixation and Limb Reconstruction Group B. S. B. o. C. M. A., Traumatic Infection Professional Committee of Trauma Surgeons Branch of Chinese Association of Physicians and Physicians T. E. W. C. o. O. B. o. C. A. o. (2019). China Open Fracture Diagnosis and Treatment Guidelines (2019 Edition). Chinese Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 21(11), 921–928.

  18. Chen, J., Yu, J., He, Q., Zhao, X., Sang, H., Lei, W., Wu, Z., & Chen, J. (2015). A novel injectable porous surface modified bioactive bone cement for vertebroplasty: An in vivo biomechanical and osteogenic study in a rabbit osteoporosis model. American Journal of Translational Research, 7(3), 548–557.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Shi, F., Li, P., Madeven, P., Zheng, L., Yang, L., Liu, G., Brian, A., & Ni, S. (2016). Application of cemented and non-cemented femoral stalk prosthesis in artificial femoral head replacement in osteoporotic patients. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 20(13), 1859–1865.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang, L., Yang, G., Wu, L., & Yu, B. (2010). The biomechanical effects of osteoporosis vertebral augmentation with cancellous bone granules or bone cement on treated and adjacent non-treated vertebral bodies: A finite element evaluation. Clinical Biomechanics (Bristol, Avon), 25(2), 166–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2009.10.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Anselmetti, G. C., Zoarski, G., Manca, A., Masala, S., Eminefendic, H., Russo, F., & Regge, D. (2008). Percutaneous vertebroplasty and bone cement leakage: Clinical experience with a new high-viscosity bone cement and delivery system for vertebral augmentation in benign and malignant compression fractures. Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology, 31(5), 937–947. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-008-9324-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kim, K. H., Kuh, S. U., Park, J. Y., Kim, K. S., Chin, D. K., & Cho, Y. E. (2012). What is the importance of “halo” phenomenon around bone cement following vertebral augmentation for osteoporotic compression fracture? Osteoporosis International, 23(10), 2559–2565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-012-1896-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Petrie, M. J., Harrison, T. P., Buckley, S. C., Gordon, A., Kerry, R. M., & Hamer, A. J. (2017). Stay short or go long? Can a standard cemented femoral prosthesis be used at second-stage total hip arthroplasty revision for infection following an extended trochanteric osteotomy? The Journal of Arthroplasty, 32(7), 2226–2230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.02.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Elkhodair, S., Mortazavi, J., Chester, A., & Pereira, M. (2011). Single fascia iliaca compartment block for pain relief in patients with fractured neck of femur in the emergency department: A pilot study. European Journal of Emergency Medicine, 18(6), 340–343. https://doi.org/10.1097/MEJ.0b013e32834533dd

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Shi, X., Zhou, Z., Yang, J., Shen, B., Kang, P., & Pei, F. (2015). Total hip arthroplasty using non-modular cementless long-stem distal fixation for salvage of failed internal fixation of intertrochanteric fracture. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 30(11), 1999–2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2015.05.041

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Gasik, R., & Kamińska-Tchórzewska, E. (2013). Osteoporosis fracture of sacral bone treated with bone cement—Sacroplasty. Reumatologia/Rheumatology, 4, 304–307. https://doi.org/10.5114/reum.2013.37255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Spin-Neto, R., Stavropoulos, A., Coletti, F. L., Pereira, L. A., Marcantonio, E., Jr., & Wenzel, A. (2015). Remodeling of cortical and corticocancellous fresh-frozen allogeneic block bone grafts–a radiographic and histomorphometric comparison to autologous bone grafts. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 26(7), 747–752. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12343

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Pérez, M. A., Vendittoli, P. A., Lavigne, M., & Nuño, N. (2014). Bone remodeling in the resurfaced femoral head: Effect of cement mantle thickness and interface characteristics. Medical Engineering and Physics, 36(2), 185–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2013.10.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Xinxin Lin and Keqin Yang contributed equally to this work and should be considered as equal first coauthors.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Spine and Joint, Guigang People’s Hospital, No. 1, Zhongshan Road, Guigang, 537100, Guangxi, China

    Xinxin Lin, Keqin Yang, Haitao Tan, Fengping Gan & Jianzhong Jiang

Authors
  1. Xinxin Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Keqin Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Haitao Tan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Fengping Gan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jianzhong Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

XXL, KQY and JZJ designed experiments; HTT and FPG carried out experiments and analyzed experimental results. XXL and KQY wrote the manuscript, JZJ revised the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianzhong Jiang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Guigang People’ s Hospital on December 19 2017 (No. KY002-01).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin, X., Yang, K., Tan, H. et al. Comparison of the Curative Effects of Hip Arthroplasty with Bio-Type Femoral Stem and Cemented Femoral Stem in Elderly Patients with Unstable Osteoporotic Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures. J. Med. Biol. Eng. 41, 523–533 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40846-021-00627-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40846-021-00627-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation