Abstract
This article empirically examines the utility of the gravity modeling in regard to its explanatory resolution, to its power against linearity, and to its geographical scale (intercity vs. interregional). For this purpose, the analysis is performed towards three directions; the first regards the model structure and examines how the number of explanatory variables (drafted from a pool of available predictors) affects the model determination, the second examines the model type, comparing the same predictor configurations entered to gravity multivariate linear regression models, and the third examines the changes induced corresponding interregional and intercity gravity models due to the effect of geographical scale. The analysis shows that the gravity modeling is generally effective in the study of systems of spatio-economic interaction, where the use of its standard expression appears a safe and simple choice. However, this model may also attain many effective extended expressions, and thus, it can be functional in higher complexity demand. Overall, this paper sheds some light to the interregional commuting for the case of Greece and highlights the utility of gravity model in the fields of Econophysics and of economic modeling.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
(source: own elaboration)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barthelemy M (2011) Spatial networks. Phys Rep 499:1–101
Buehler R (2012) Determinants of bicycle commuting in the Washington, DC region: the role of bicycle parking, cyclist showers, and free car parking at work. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 17(7):525–531
De Vries J, Nijkamp P, Rietveld P (2009) Exponential or power distance-decay for commuting? An alternative specification. Environ Plan A 41:461–480
Drobne S, Bogataj M, Lisec A (2012) Dynamics and local policy in labour commuting. Bus Syst Res 3(2):14–26
Gargiulo F, Lenormand M, Huet S, Espinosa OB (2012) A commuting network model: getting the essentials. J Artif Soc Soc Simul. https://doi.org/10.18564/jasss.1964
GoogleMaps (2017) Measure distances toolbox. https://www.google.gr/maps. Accessed 14 Aug 2017
Green M, Meyer S (1997) An overview of commuting in Canada: with special emphasis on rural commuting and employment. J Rural Stud 13(2):163–175
Hamillton B (1989) Wasteful commuting again. J Polit Economy 97(6):1497–1504
Hamillton B, Roell A (1982) Wasteful Commuting. J Polit Economy 90(5):1035–1053
Hellenic Statistical Service (ELSTAT) (2011) Results of the census of population-habitat 2011 referring to the permanent population of Greece. Newspaper of (the Greek) Government (ΦΕΚ), Second Issue (Τ-Β), Number 3465, 28-12-12
Horak J, Ivan I, Tesla J (2014) Improved gravity models of commuting conditions: a Czech case study. In: Proceedings of the second international conference on traffic and transport engineering, Belgrade, Serbia, November 27–28, 2014, pp 171–178
Kang C, Liu Y, Guo D, Qin K (2015) A generalized radiation model for human mobility: spatial scale, searching direction and trip constraint. PLoS One 10(11):e0143500
Kraft S, Blazek J (2012) Spatial interactions and regionalisation of the Vysocina region using the gravity models. Acta Universitatis Palackianae Olomucensis Geographica 43(2):65–82
Lee BS, McDonald JF (2003) Determinants of commuting time and distance for Seoul residents: the impact of family status on the commuting of women. Urban Stud 40(7):1283–1302
Lloyd C, Shuttleworth I (2005) Analysing commuting using local regression techniques: scale, sensitivity, and geographical patterning. Environ Plan A 37(1):81–103
Mantegna RN, Stanley HE (1999) Introduction to econophysics: correlations and complexity in finance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Masucci AP, Serras J, Johansson A, Batty M (2013) Gravity vs. radiation model: on the importance of scale and heterogeneity in commuting flows. Phys Rev E 88(2):022812
McArthur DP, Kleppe G, Thorsen I, Uboe J (2011) The spatial transferability of parameters in a gravity model of commuting flows. J Transp Geogr 19:596–605
Newton I (1934) Sir Isaac Newton’s mathematical principles of natural philosophy and his system of the world. University of California Press, California
Norusis M (2004) SPSS 13, Advanced statistical procedures companion. Prentice Hall Publications, New Jersey
Pinheiro C, Van Vlasselaer V, Baesens B, Evsukoff A, Silva M, Ebecken N (2015) A models comparison to estimate commuting trips based on mobile phone data. In: Silhavy R, Senkerik R, Oplatkova Z, Prokopova Z, Silhavy P (eds) Software engineering in intelligent systems—proceedings of the 4th computer science on-line conference 2015, vol 3: Software Engineering in Intelligent Systems, Switzerland, Springer International Publishing AG, pp 35–44
Polyzos S (2011) Regional development. Kritiki Publications, Athens (in Greek)
Polyzos S, Tsiotas D, Minetos D (2013) Determining the driving factors of commuting: an empirical analysis from Greece. J Eng Sci Technol Rev 6(3):46–55
Polyzos S, Tsiotas D, Papagiannis K (2014) Determining the changes in commuting after the Ionian Motorway’s construction. MIBES Trans 8:113–131
Polyzos S, Tsiotas D, Niavis S (2015) Analyzing the location decisions of agro-industrial investments in Greece. Int J Agric Environ Inf Syst (IJAEIS) 6(2):77–100
Ravenstein EG (1889) The laws of migration. J R Stat Soc 52(2):241–305
Reilly WJ (1931) The law of retail gravitation. Knickerbocker Press, New York
Ren Y, Ercsey-Ravasz M, Wang P, Gonzalez M, Toroczkai Z (2014) Predicting commuter flows in spatial networks using a radiation model based on temporal ranges. Nat Commun 5:5. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6347
Sandow E (2008) Commuting behaviour in sparsely populated areas: evidence from northern Sweden. J Transp Geogr 16(1):14–27
Serway R (1990) Physics for scientists and engineers, vol I, 3rd edn. Saunders College, London
Sinha S, Chatterjee A, Chakraborti A, Chakrabarti BK (2010) Econophysics: an introduction. Willey-VCH Verlag GmbH, Weinheim
Stefanouli M, Polyzos S (2015) Factors determining commuting intensity; an. empirical analysis in Greece. MIBES Trans 9:166–183
Stefanouli M, Polyzos S (2017) Gravity vs. radiation model: two approaches on commuting in Greece. Transp Res Proc 24C:65–72
Stutzer A, Frey B (2008) Stress that doesn’t pay: the Commuting Paradox. Scand J Econ 110(2):339–366
Tinbergen J (1963) Shaping the world economy. Thunderbird Int Bus Rev 5(1):27–30
Tsiotas D (2017) The imprint of tourism on the topology of maritime networks: evidence from Greece. Anatol Int J Tour Hosp Res 28(1):52–68
Tsiotas D, Polyzos S (2013) The contribution of ANN’s simple perceptron pattern to inequalities measurement in regional science. Oper Res Int J 13(2):289–301
Tsiotas D, Polyzos S (2015a) Analyzing the maritime transportation system in Greece: a complex network approach. Netw Spat Econ 15(4):981–1010
Tsiotas D, Polyzos S (2015b) Making the Web-Science operational for interregional commuting analysis: Evidence from Greece. J Knowl Econ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-015-0269-0
Uboe J (2004) Aggregation of gravity models for journeys to work. Environ Plan A 36:715–729
Wesolowski A, O’Meara WP, Eagle N, Tatem AJ, Buckee CO (2015) Evaluating spatial interaction models for regional mobility in Sub-Saharan Africa. PLoS Comput Biol 11(7):e1004267
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they do not have conflict of interest.
About this article
Cite this article
Tsiotas, D., Aspridis, G., Gavardinas, I. et al. Gravity modeling in social science: the case of the commuting phenomenon in Greece. Evolut Inst Econ Rev 16, 139–158 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40844-018-0120-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40844-018-0120-y