Skip to main content
Log in

Synergistic high efficiency and low energy loss of all-small-molecule organic solar cells based on benzotriazole-based π-bridge unit

基于苯并三氮唑π-桥单元协同高效率和低能量损失的全小分子有机太阳电池

  • Articles
  • Published:
Science China Materials Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Reducing energy loss (Vloss) is one of the most crucial challenges in organic photovoltaic cells. The Vloss, determined by the differences between the optical band gap (Eg) of the active layer material and the open-circuit voltage (Voc) of the device, is generally alleviated by lowering the energy difference between the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) and highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) level of the donor (D) and acceptor (A). In this work, we synthesized two A-π-D-π-A-type small-molecule donors (SMDs) SM-benzotriazole (BTz)-1 and SM-BTz-2 by introducing a BTz π-bridge unit and terminal regulation. The BTz π-bridge unit significantly lowers the HOMO energy level of SMDs, resulting in high Voc and high mobility, achieving a balance of low energy loss (<0.5 eV) and high efficiency. Ultimately, the organic solar cells based on SM-BTz-2 as the donor and Y6 as the acceptor obtain a high Voc of 0.91 V, Jsc of 22.8 mA cm−2, fill factor of 68%, and power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 14.12%, which is one of the highest efficiencies based on the SMDs with triazole π-bridges to date. What’s more, the BTz π-bridge unit is a potential unit that can improve mobility and reduce energy loss.

摘要

降低电压损失(Vloss)是有机光伏电池未来商业化应用面临的关键挑战之一. Vloss一般由活性层材料的光学带隙和器件的开路电压(Voc)之差定义, 而Voc则由给受体之间的最低未占据分子轨(LUMO)和最高占据分子轨道(HOMO)之间的能级差决定. 本文通过引入苯并三唑(BTz)π-桥单元, 利用末端调控策略合成了两种A-π-D-π-A型小分子给体SM-BTz-1和SM-BTz-2. 结果显示, BTz π-桥单位显著降低了小分子给体的HOMO能级, 使其具有较高的Voc和载流子迁移率, 实现了高效率与低能量损失(小于0.5 eV)之间的平衡. 最终, 以SM-BTz-2为给体, Y6为受体的全小分子有机太阳能电池Voc为0.91 V, 短路电流密度(Jsc) 为22.8 mA cm−2, 填充因子为68%, 能量转化效率为14.12%. 此外, 该工作也进一步说明了苯并三唑π-桥单元是提高载流子迁移率, 降低能量损失的有效构建单元.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sun C, Pan F, Bin H, et al. A low cost and high performance polymer donor material for polymer solar cells. Nat Commun, 2018, 9: 743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen X, Xu G, Zeng G, et al. Realizing ultrahigh mechanical flexibility and >15% efficiency of flexible organic solar cells via a “welding” flexible transparent electrode. Adv Mater, 2020, 32: 1908478

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Yuan X, Sun R, Wu Y, et al. Simultaneous enhanced device efficiency and color neutrality in semitransparent organic photovoltaics employing a synergy of ternary strategy and optical engineering. Adv Funct Mater, 2022, 32: 2200107

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gu X, Zhou Y, Gu K, et al. Roll-to-roll printed large-area all-polymer solar cells with 5% efficiency based on a low crystallinity conjugated polymer blend. Adv Energy Mater, 2017, 7: 1602742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Li X, Pan F, Sun C, et al. Simplified synthetic routes for low cost and high photovoltaic performance n-type organic semiconductor acceptors. Nat Commun, 2019, 10: 519

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Shi K, Qiu B, Zhu C, et al. Influence of altering chlorine substitution positions on the photovoltaic properties of small molecule donors in all-small-molecule organic solar cells. J Mater Chem C, 2022, 10: 2017–2025

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Liu F, Zhou L, Liu W, et al. Organic solar cells with 18% efficiency enabled by an alloy acceptor: A two-in-one strategy. Adv Mater, 2021, 33: 2100830

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cui Y, Yao H, Zhang J, et al. Single-junction organic photovoltaic cells with approaching 18% efficiency. Adv Mater, 2020, 32: 1908205

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bao S, Yang H, Fan H, et al. Volatilizable solid additive-assisted treatment enables organic solar cells with efficiency over 18.8% and fill factor exceeding 80%. Adv Mater, 2021, 33: 2105301

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cheng Y, Huang B, Huang X, et al. Oligomer-assisted photoactive layers enable >18% efficiency of organic solar cells. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2022, 61: e202200329

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Feng W, Wu S, Chen H, et al. Tuning morphology of active layer by using a wide bandgap oligomer-like donor enables organic solar cells with over 18% efficiency. Adv Energy Mater, 2022, 12: 2104060

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhou R, Jiang Z, Yang C, et al. All-small-molecule organic solar cells with over 14% efficiency by optimizing hierarchical morphologies. Nat Commun, 2019, 10: 5393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Xu T, Lv J, Yang K, et al. 15.8% Efficiency binary all-small-molecule organic solar cells enabled by a selenophene substituted sematic liquid crystalline donor. Energy Environ Sci, 2021, 14: 5366–5376

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang X, Qin L, Li Y, et al. High-performance all-small-molecule organic solar cells enabled by Regio-isomerization of noncovalently conformational locks. Adv Funct Mater, 2022, 32: 2112433

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Shi K, Qiu B, Zhu C, et al. Effects of alkyl side chains of small molecule donors on morphology and the photovoltaic property of all-small-molecule solar cells. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2021, 13: 54237–54245

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bin H, van der Pol TPA, Li J, et al. Efficient organic solar cells with small energy losses based on a wide-bandgap trialkylsilyl-substituted donor polymer and a non-fullerene acceptor. Chem Eng J, 2022, 435: 134878

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang Y, Liu D, Lau TK, et al. A novel wide-bandgap polymer with deep ionization potential enables exceeding 16% efficiency in ternary nonfullerene polymer solar cells. Adv Funct Mater, 2020, 30: 1910466

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. An Q, Wang J, Ma X, et al. Two compatible polymer donors contribute synergistically for ternary organic solar cells with 17.53% efficiency. Energy Environ Sci, 2020, 13: 5039–5047

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. An N, Cai Y, Wu H, et al. Solution-processed organic solar cells with high open-circuit voltage of 1.3 V and low non-radiative voltage loss of 0.16 V. Adv Mater, 2020, 32: 2002122

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Qin Y, Zhang S, Xu Y, et al. Reduced nonradiative energy loss caused by aggregation of nonfullerene acceptor in organic solar cells. Adv Energy Mater, 2019, 9: 1901823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhan L, Li S, Lau TK, et al. Over 17% efficiency ternary organic solar cells enabled by two non-fullerene acceptors working in an alloy-like model. Energy Environ Sci, 2020, 13: 635–645

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ma X, Wang J, Gao J, et al. Achieving 17.4% efficiency of ternary organic photovoltaics with two well-compatible nonfullerene acceptors for minimizing energy loss. Adv Energy Mater, 2020, 10: 2001404

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Guo J, Qiu B, Yang D, et al. 15.71% Efficiency all-small-molecule organic solar cells based on low-cost synthesized donor molecules. Adv Funct Mater, 2022, 32: 2110159

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Guo J, Bin H, Wang W, et al. All-small molecule solar cells based on donor molecule optimization with highly enhanced efficiency and stability. J Mater Chem A, 2018, 6: 15675–15683

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Chen H, Hu D, Yang Q, et al. All-small-molecule organic solar cells with an ordered liquid crystalline donor. Joule, 2019, 3: 3034–3047

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Qiu B, Chen Z, Qin S, et al. Highly efficient all-small-molecule organic solar cells with appropriate active layer morphology by side chain engineering of donor molecules and thermal annealing. Adv Mater, 2020, 32: 1908373

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Bin H, Yao J, Yang Y, et al. High-efficiency all-small-molecule organic solar cells based on an organic molecule donor with alkylsilyl-thienyl conjugated side chains. Adv Mater, 2018, 30: 1706361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gao J, Ge J, Peng R, et al. Over 14% efficiency nonfullerene all-small-molecule organic solar cells enabled by improving the ordering of molecular donors via side-chain engineering. J Mater Chem A, 2020, 8: 7405–7411

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Yang L, Zhang S, He C, et al. New wide band gap donor for efficient fullerene-free all-small-molecule organic solar cells. J Am Chem Soc, 2017, 139: 1958–1966

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Liu C, Qiu N, Sun Y, et al. All-small-molecule organic solar cells based on a fluorinated small molecule donor with high open-circuit voltage of 1.07 V. Front Chem, 2020, 8: 329

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Ye C, Wang Y, Bi Z, et al. High-performance organic solar cells based on a small molecule with thieno[3,2-b]thiophene as π-bridge. Org Electron, 2018, 53: 273–279

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhang Z, Deng D, Li Y, et al. Polymerized small-molecule acceptor as an interface modulator to increase the performance of all-small-molecule solar cells. Adv Energy Mater, 2021, 12: 2102394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Fang J, Ye C, Wang X, et al. Non-fullerene organic solar cells based on a small molecule with benzo[1,2-c:4,5-c′]dithiophene-4,8-dione as π-bridge. Org Electron, 2019, 67: 175–180

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Fan D, Fan C, Fan H, et al. Impact of fluorine substituted π-bridges on the photovoltaic performance of organic small-molecule donor materials. Mol Syst Des Eng, 2021, 6: 739–747

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Wang Y, Wang Y, Zhu L, et al. A novel wide-bandgap small molecule donor for high efficiency all-small-molecule organic solar cells with small non-radiative energy losses. Energy Environ Sci, 2020, 13: 1309–1317

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Xue L, Yang Y, Xu J, et al. Side chain engineering on medium bandgap copolymers to suppress triplet formation for high-efficiency polymer solar cells. Adv Mater, 2017, 29: 1703344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Bin H, Gao L, Zhang ZG, et al. 11.4% Efficiency non-fullerene polymer solar cells with trialkylsilyl substituted 2D-conjugated polymer as donor. Nat Commun, 2016, 7: 13651

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Xue X, Zheng B, Zhang Y, et al. Two birds with one stone: High efficiency and low synthetic cost for benzotriazole-based polymer solar cells by a simple chemical approach. Adv Energy Mater, 2020, 10: 2002142

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Bin H, Yang Y, Zhang ZG, et al. 9.73% Efficiency nonfullerene all organic small molecule solar cells with absorption-complementary donor and acceptor. J Am Chem Soc, 2017, 139: 5085–5094

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Bin H, Angunawela I, Qiu B, et al. Precise control of phase separation enables 12% efficiency in all small molecule solar cells. Adv Energy Mater, 2020, 10: 2001589

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Chen S, Wang Y, Zhang L, et al. Efficient nonfullerene organic solar cells with small driving forces for both hole and electron transfer. Adv Mater, 2018, 30: 1804215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Zhu C, Meng L, Zhang J, et al. A quinoxaline-based D-A copolymer donor achieving 17.62% efficiency of organic solar cells. Adv Mater, 2021, 33: 2100474

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Zhou L, Meng L, Zhang J, et al. Introducing low-cost pyrazine unit into terpolymer enables high-performance polymer solar cells with efficiency of 18.23%. Adv Funct Mater, 2022, 32: 2109271

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Guo J, Hu K, Qiu B, et al. Fine-tuning miscibility and π-π stacking by alkylthio side chains of donor molecules enables high-performance all-small-molecule organic solar cells. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2021, 13: 36033–36043

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Zhou L, Xia X, Meng L, et al. Introducing electron-withdrawing linking units and thiophene π-bridges into polymerized small molecule acceptors for high-efficiency all-polymer solar cells. Chem Mater, 2021, 33: 8212–8222

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Wang Y, Qian D, Cui Y, et al. Optical gaps of organic solar cells as a reference for comparing voltage losses. Adv Energy Mater, 2018, 8: 1801352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Vandewal K, Ma Z, Bergqvist J, et al. Quantification of quantum efficiency and energy losses in low bandgap polymer:fullerene solar cells with high open-circuit voltage. Adv Funct Mater, 2012, 22: 3480–3490

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Shockley W, Queisser HJ. Detailed balance limit of efficiency of p-n junction solar cells. J Appl Phys, 1961, 32: 510–519

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Vandewal K, Benduhn J, Nikolis VC. How to determine optical gaps and voltage losses in organic photovoltaic materials. Sustain Energy Fuels, 2018, 2: 538–544

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Ma Y, Zhou X, Cai D, et al. A minimal benzo[c][1,2,5]thiadiazole-based electron acceptor as a third component material for ternary polymer solar cells with efficiencies exceeding 16.0%. Mater Horiz, 2020, 7: 117–124

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Rivnay J, Mannsfeld SCB, Miller CE, et al. Quantitative determination of organic semiconductor microstructure from the molecular to device scale. Chem Rev, 2012, 112: 5488–5519

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2019YFA0705900), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51820105003, 21734008, 61904181, 52173188 and 52103243), the Key Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDPB13), and the Basic and Applied Basic Research Major Program of Guangdong Province (2019B030302007).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Guo J synthesized the molecule donor materials; Guo J and Hu K performed the device fabrication and characterization of the SM-OSCs; Qiu B conducted the experiment guidance; Zhang J and Yang D were responsible for the transient absorption spectroscopy test and DFT analysis respectively; Li X, Meng L, Zhang Z and Li Y were responsible for conceptualizing the experiment, designing the experiment, and supervising the whole project.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Beibei Qiu  (邱贝贝), Jinyuan Zhang  (章津源), Lei Meng  (孟磊) or Zhanjun Zhang  (张占军).

Additional information

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary information

Experimental data and supporting data are available in the online version of the paper.

Jing Guo received her BSc degree from Yanbian University in 2017. Now she is a jointly trained PhD candidate at the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (UCAS) and the Institute of Chemistry, CAS (ICCAS) under the guidance of Prof. Yongfang Li. Her current research focuses on the synthesis and characterization of organic photovoltaic materials.

Beibei Qiu is currently a lecturer at Zhejiang Normal University. He received his BSc and MSc degrees from the Central South University in 2013 and 2016, respectively, and his PhD degree in 2020 from ICCAS, under the supervision of Prof. Yongfang Li. His research interests are in the fields of organic photovoltaic materials and devices.

Jinyuan Zhang received his PhD degree from the North Carolina State University (NCSU) in 2016, then he did his postdoctoral research at the Northwestern University (NU). He joined Prof. Yongfang Li’s group at ICCAS as a postdoctoral fellow in 2019. His research focuses on investigating the working mechanism of organic solar cells via ultrafast spectroscopy.

Zhanjun Zhang received his PhD degree from Shanxi Institute of Coal Chemistry, CAS in 1999. Then he worked as a postdoctoral researcher in Prof. Shengmin Cai’s group at Peking University. He became a professor of the UCAS in 2001. His research focuses on the design, synthesis and application of organic solar cell photovoltaic materials and lithium ion battery materials.

Lei Meng received his BSc degree from Shanghai Jiao Tong University in 2011, MSc degree from NU in 2012 and PhD degree from the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) in 2017. After graduation, he continued his postdoctoral research at UCLA. In 2018, he joined the ICCAS as a professor in the Key Laboratory of Organic Solids. His current research interest mainly focuses on organic semiconductor materials, organic solar cells and perovskite solar cells.

Yongfang Li is a professor at the ICCAS, and Soochow University. He received his PhD degree in 1986 from the Department of Chemistry, Fudan University. He joined ICCAS in 1988 and was promoted to be a professor in 1993. He was invited to be a professor at Soochow University in 2012, and was elected as a member of the CAS in 2013. His present research field is photovoltaic materials and devices for polymer solar cells.

Supporting Information

40843_2022_2172_MOESM1_ESM.pdf

Synergistic high efficiency and low energy loss of all-small-molecule organic solar cells based on benzotriazole-based π-bridge unit

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guo, J., Hu, K., Qiu, B. et al. Synergistic high efficiency and low energy loss of all-small-molecule organic solar cells based on benzotriazole-based π-bridge unit. Sci. China Mater. 65, 3382–3391 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40843-022-2172-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40843-022-2172-6

Keywords

Navigation