Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Numerical Study of the Plasticity-Induced Stabilization Effect on Martensitic Transformations in Shape Memory Alloys

  • Special Issue: Shape Memory and Superelastic Technologies Conference 2017, Invited Paper
  • Published:
Shape Memory and Superelasticity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is well known that plastic deformations in shape memory alloys stabilize the martensitic phase. Furthermore, the knowledge concerning the plastic state is crucial for a reliable sustainability analysis of construction parts. Numerical simulations serve as a tool for the realistic investigation of the complex interactions between phase transformations and plastic deformations. To account also for irreversible deformations, we expand an energy-based material model by including a non-linear isotropic hardening plasticity model. An implementation of this material model into commercial finite element programs, e.g., Abaqus, offers the opportunity to analyze entire structural components at low costs and fast computation times. Along with the theoretical derivation and expansion of the model, several simulation results for various boundary value problems are presented and interpreted for improved construction designing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Otsuka K, Ren X (2005) Physical metallurgy of ti-ni-based shape memory alloys. Progress Mater Sci 50(5):511–678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Otsuka K, Wayman CM (1999) Shape memory materials. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  3. Shaw JA, Kyriakides S (1995) Thermomechanical aspects of niti. J Mech Phys Solids 43(8):1243–1281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Auricchio F, Reali A, Stefanelli U (2007) A three-dimensional model describing stress-induced solid phase transformation with permanent inelasticity. Int J Plast 23(2):207–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bartel T, Menzel A, Svendsen B (2011) Thermodynamic and relaxation-based modeling of the interaction between martensitic phase transformations and plasticity. J Mech Phys Solids 59(5):1004–1019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bo Z, Lagoudas DC (1999) Thermomechanical modeling of polycrystalline smas under cyclic loading, part iii: evolution of plastic strains and two-way shape memory effect. Int J Eng Sci 37(9):1175–1203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hartl DJ, Chatzigeorgiou G, Lagoudas DC (2010) Three-dimensional modeling and numerical analysis of rate-dependent irrecoverable deformation in shape memory alloys. Int J Plast 26(10):1485–1507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Reese S, Christ D (2008) Finite deformation pseudo-elasticity of shape memory alloys-constitutive modelling and finite element implementation. Int J Plast 24(3):455–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Saint-Sulpice L, Chirani SA, Calloch S (2009) A 3d super-elastic model for shape memory alloys taking into account progressive strain under cyclic loadings. Mech Mater 41(1):12–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Stupkiewicz S, Petryk H (2013) A robust model of pseudoelasticity in shape memory alloys. Int J Numer Methods Eng 93(7):747–769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Stebner AP, Brinson LC (2013) Explicit finite element implementation of an improved three dimensional constitutive model for shape memory alloys. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 257:17–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Junker P (2014) A novel approach to representative orientation distribution functions for modeling and simulation of polycrystalline shape memory alloys. Int J Numer Methods Eng 98(11):799–818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Junker P (2014) An accurate, fast and stable material model for shape memory alloys. Smart Mater Struct 23(11):115010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Junker P, Hackl K (2016) Calibration and finite element implementation of an energy-based material model for shape memory alloys. Shape Mem Superelasticity 2(3):247–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Junker P, Jaeger S, Kastner O, Eggeler G, Hackl K (2015) Variational prediction of the mechanical behavior of shape memory alloys based on thermal experiments. J Mech Phys Solids 80:86–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang XM, Xu BX, Yue ZF (2008) Micromechanical modelling of the effect of plastic deformation on the mechanical behaviour in pseudoelastic shape memory alloys. Int J Plast 24(8):1307–1332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hartl DJ, Lagoudas DC (2009) Constitutive modeling and structural analysis considering simultaneous phase transformation and plastic yield in shape memory alloys. Smart Mater Struct 18(10):104017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lagoudas DC, Entchev PB, Popov P, Patoor E, Brinson LC, Gao X (2006) Shape memory alloys, part ii: modeling of polycrystals. Mech Mater 38(5):430–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lu ZK, Weng GJ (1998) A self-consistent model for the stress-strain behavior of shape-memory alloy polycrystals. Acta Mater 46(15):5423–5433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yu C, Kang G, Kan Q, Song D (2013) A micromechanical constitutive model based on crystal plasticity for thermo-mechanical cyclic deformation of niti shape memory alloys. Int J Plast 44:161–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Waimann J, Junker P, Hackl K (2017) Modeling the cyclic behavior of shape memory alloys. Shape Mem Superelasticity 3(2):124–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hamilton WR (1834) On a general method in dynamics; by which the study of the motions of all free systems of attracting or repelling points is reduced to the search and differentiation of one central relation, or characteristic function. Philos Trans R Soc Lond 124:247–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hamilton WR (1835) Second essay on a general method in dynamics. Philos Trans R Soc Lond 125:95–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Junker P, Hackl K (2016) A discontinuous phase field approach to variational growth-based topology optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 54(1):81–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Schwarz P, Junker S, Hackl K (2017) On the effect of plasticity on damage evolution using a relaxation-based material model. Under Review

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Continuum Mechanics, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany

    Philipp Junker

  2. Admedes GmbH, Pforzheim, Germany

    Philipp Hempel

Authors
  1. Philipp Junker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Philipp Hempel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philipp Junker.

Additional information

This article is an invited paper selected from presentations at the International Conference on Shape Memory and Superelastic Technologies 2017, held May 15–19, 2017, in San Diego, California, and has been expanded from the original presentation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Junker, P., Hempel, P. Numerical Study of the Plasticity-Induced Stabilization Effect on Martensitic Transformations in Shape Memory Alloys. Shap. Mem. Superelasticity 3, 422–430 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40830-017-0121-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40830-017-0121-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation