Highlights
-
Three key processes in carbon dioxide reduction reaction (CO2RR) for ethylene generation were discussed, including CO2 adsorption/activation, *CO intermediates formation, and C-C coupling.
-
The preferable mechanism for ethylene over C1 and other C2 products reaction pathways.
-
Engineering strategies of Cu-based catalysts for CO2RR-ethylene.
Abstract
Electrochemical carbon dioxide reduction reaction (CO2RR) provides a promising way to convert CO2 to chemicals. The multicarbon (C2+) products, especially ethylene, are of great interest due to their versatile industrial applications. However, selectively reducing CO2 to ethylene is still challenging as the additional energy required for the C–C coupling step results in large overpotential and many competing products. Nonetheless, mechanistic understanding of the key steps and preferred reaction pathways/conditions, as well as rational design of novel catalysts for ethylene production have been regarded as promising approaches to achieving the highly efficient and selective CO2RR. In this review, we first illustrate the key steps for CO2RR to ethylene (e.g., CO2 adsorption/activation, formation of *CO intermediate, C–C coupling step), offering mechanistic understanding of CO2RR conversion to ethylene. Then the alternative reaction pathways and conditions for the formation of ethylene and competitive products (C1 and other C2+ products) are investigated, guiding the further design and development of preferred conditions for ethylene generation. Engineering strategies of Cu-based catalysts for CO2RR-ethylene are further summarized, and the correlations of reaction mechanism/pathways, engineering strategies and selectivity are elaborated. Finally, major challenges and perspectives in the research area of CO2RR are proposed for future development and practical applications.
Similar content being viewed by others
1 Introduction
The widespread usage of fossil fuels has destroyed the balance of the carbon cycle, resulting in a sharp increase in carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration in the atmosphere, which makes the greenhouse effect an urgent global problem [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. Developing a promising strategy and system to convert CO2 into value-added products has attracted intensive research interest. However, CO2 is chemically inert and the activation of CO2 under ambient conditions is exceptionally challenging [8, 9]. Electrochemical carbon dioxide reduction reaction (CO2RR), among the approaches for CO2 conversion, is an attractive route that offers a variety of reduction products coupled by multiple proton transfer steps, ranging from C1 (e.g., formic acid (HCOOH), carbon monoxide (CO)), C2 (e.g., acetic acid (CH3COOH), ethylene (C2H4), ethanol (C2H5OH,)), C3 (e.g., acetone (CH3COCH3), propanol (C3H7OH)), and beyond (e.g., n-butane (C4H10)) [10,11,12,13]. In particular, closing the anthropogenic carbon cycle and establishing a sustainable carbon economy are made possible by CO2 electrolysis, which is powered by electricity generated from renewable energy sources [14, 15].
Compared to other products, reducing CO2 to ethylene is more desirable due to its larger market necessity and has the highest value among all reduction products [16]. For instance, ethylene is the basic raw chemical material for the polymer industry, pharmaceuticals and high-tech material synthesis. In addition, ethylene can be utilized directly as welding fuels or natural gas additives. Currently, ethylene is mainly manufactured by cracking non-renewable naphtha at high temperatures. The production process is energy-consuming and usually has a negative impact on the environment. Conversely, CO2RR is an alternative way that is green and sustainable to selectively produce ethylene. Currently, the crucial challenge for converting CO2 to ethylene electrochemically is to promote the C–C bond coupling while suppressing the competing reactions such as alternative product formation and hydrogen generation. Cu-based catalysts have been proven to exhibit the best capability for producing ethylene. However, they still suffer from low Faraday efficiency (FE) and poor selectivity. Therefore, it is essential to design novel catalysts for highly efficient CO2 conversion to ethylene [17].
The reaction pathways and reactivity of CO2RR are heavily reliant on the surface properties and the local reaction environment of catalysts. Slightly alternation of the electrode-electrolyte interfaces may significantly influence the catalytic capability and thus tune the overall catalytic performance [18, 19]. Thus, the sensible design of novel Cu-based catalysts with the geometric effect and electronic effect have been regarded as promising ways to increase the adsorption and desorption energies of the ethylene intermediates, which could lead to high selectivity to ethylene [20,21,22,23,24]. A variety of strategies have been adopted to selectively produce ethylene, including nanostructures control [25,26,27,28,29], defects engineering [30, 31], surface modification [14, 32, 33], and oxidation state alteration [34]. These engineering strategies possess unique mechanisms to promote ethylene production. For instance, altering Cu nanostructures (e.g., constructing unique dendrite structures) can efficiently increase the catalytic active sites and the local pH, benefiting ethylene generation [35]. It is also a common and effective strategy to control the crystal facets and phases to alter the binding energy of intermediates which are also beneficial to the formation of ethylene. Defects can contribute to more active sites, regulate electron distribution, and reduce the energy barrier of C–C coupling. Surface modification by coating molecules (e.g., polytetrafluoroethylene) on Cu surface forms a hydrophobic layer, efficiently restraining the competitive hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) and boosting the C2H4 yield [36, 37]. Furthermore, Cu+ can improve the binding ability of *CO, thus promoting *CO interaction and dimerization [38]. Therefore, engineering Cu-based catalysts to achieve maximized active sites, optimized energy barrier of *CO dimerization, and increased local pH, is essential for selectively producing ethylene.
Although several review articles have summarized Cu-based catalysts for CO2RR to produce C2+ products, little attention has been drawn to specifically and systematically discussing the engineering effects of novel Cu-based catalysts for ethylene production. In this review, we focus on the key influences on the production of C2H4, and various engineering strategies on Cu-based catalysts to selectively reduce CO2 into C2H4. We firstly summarize the production mechanisms by reviewing the important steps for CO2RR to ethylene, including the CO2 adsorption/activation, formation of *CO intermediate, the key C–C coupling step for ethylene formation, to provide an overview understanding of the fundamental principles of CO2RR process. Then, we investigate differences in the reaction pathways and conditions for the formation of ethylene and competitive products (C1 and other C2+), providing a specific guideline to design efficient electrocatalysts. We further discuss the design and engineering strategies of Cu-based catalysts for CO2RR conversion to ethylene based on altering the composition, structure, surface state, etc. In particular, the reaction mechanism and correlations between the engineering strategies and selectivity towards ethylene are specifically focused on. Finally, the challenges and perspectives for CO2RR are outlined and discussed.
2 Fundamental and Mechanism of CO2RR to Ethylene
Generally, the electrochemical CO2RR occurs at the three-phase interface, including the gaseous reactant CO2, liquid electrolyte and solid catalysts. The CO2RR process is very complicated due to the presence of many possible intermediates/products with altering the proton-electron transfer, multiple electron transfer and reaction pathways [5]. Specifically, the CO2 conversion reaction to ethylene requires a 12-electron transfer with proton coupling, which involves multiple possible intermediates such as *COCHO, *CH*COH, *OCHCH*O and CH2CH*O [5, 39,40,41,42]. The formation and reaction pathways of these intermediates can be affected by many parameters, such as the electrolyte compositions, applied potentials, temperatures, pH, etc. Therefore, understanding the reaction pathways to selectively generate ethylene is critical for guiding the catalyst design to achieve excellent electrochemical performance. Thus in this section, we will discuss three key processes in CO2RR for ethylene generation: CO2 adsorption/activation, *CO intermediates formation, and C–C coupling (Fig. 1).
2.1 CO2 Adsorption/Activation
The adsorption and activation of CO2 on the active sites in CO2RR process are essential for the subsequent reduction process, as optimal energy level can suppress the competing reaction HER [43,44,45,46]. Generally, there are two CO2 adsorption states on the catalysts. One is to form linear molecules through physical adsorption, and the other is to form charged CO2δ·− species through chemical adsorption (Fig. 2a) [45, 47, 48]. A CO2δ·− intermediate is usually generated on the catalysts with C atom as the bonding site, when only electrons are involved in the activation process. Alternatively, when both protons and electrons participate in the CO2 adsorption/activation process, *COOH is the intermediate with C as binding atoms, followed by the hydroxyl removal and *CO formation, which can be further converted into a number of products, including C1 (CH4, CH3OH, CO) and C2+ products (C2H5OH, C2H4, CH3COOH, C3H7OH). In contrast, *OCOH intermediates are formed if O atoms act as bonding atoms instead of C, which later are only converted to HCOOH (Fig. 2b) [49].
2.2 *CO Intermediate Formation
The adsorption and activation process generates intermediates that are important for the subsequent reduction reactions. The most important intermediate is *CO which is generated from the as-formed *COOH intermediate by proton coupling electron transfer (PCET) process to remove a molecule of H2O. The *CO species can be directly desorbed from the catalysts (e.g., Ag and Au) when *CO adsorption energy is low, forming CO gas (the mechanism of electrochemical CO2RR to form CO) (Fig. 2c) [49, 50]. Alternatively, moderate *CO adsorption energy (e.g., Cu) can lead to further coupling and formation of C–C bonds for promoting the following C2+ production, based on the Sabatier principle [40]. Furthermore, *CO coverage is also crucial for CO2-to-C2+, as high coverage of *CO occupies most of the catalytic active sites can not only reduce the hydrogen adsorption and suppress HER, but also increase the chance of C–C coupling, boosting CO2 to C2+ conversion efficiency [51]. However, it is noteworthy that increasing *CO coverage reduces the affinity of C atoms on Cu surface, which is beneficial to generate oxygenates (especially acetate) rather than ethylene [52]. Therefore, balancing the *CO coverage on the designed catalysts is vital to produce ethylene in CO2RR process.
2.3 C–C Bond Coupling
C–C bond coupling is one of the essential steps in the CO2RR process to generate C2+ products such as ethylene. Three routes for C–C bond coupling have been proposed for the generation of C2+ products (Fig. 3).
The first route is the direct dimerization of the adsorbed *CO intermediates resulting in *CO*CO intermediate through C–C coupling [53]. With the aid of proton coupling and electron transfer, the *CO*CO species are further converted into *CO*COH intermediates on Cu(100) [54]. The presence of OH group in *CO*COH intermediates breaks the charge distribution balance from the symmetrical structure of *CO*CO intermediate, which may lead to the appearance of two different reaction intermediates, *CH*COH or CH2CH*O, when interactions with protons and electrons. The hydrogenolysis of CH2CH*O species produces C2H4, whereas the hydrogenation of CH2CH*O leads to the production of CH3CH*O, resulting in the formation of C2H5OH [55]. The energy barrier of generating C2H4 by CH2CH*O is 0.2 eV lower than that of generating C2H5OH by CH3CH*O [42]. This may be the reason that ethylene is generally more favourable over ethanol on copper-based catalysts. Alternatively, Goddard III and co-workers believed that *CH*COH species is the key intermediate to produce C2H4 and C2H5OH, *CH*COH loses OH group to form *C*CH which is then hydrogenated to form C2H4, whereas, *CH*COH directly hydrogenated to form *CHCHOH which is then hydrogenated to produce C2H5OH [56].
The second possible reaction route is the direct coupling of *CO intermediates with protons to generate *CHO intermediates, which are preferred on Cu(100) surface at high potential or Cu(111) in the full potential range [40, 57]. The dimerization coupling occurs between *CHO and *CO intermediates to form *COCHO species. Due to the hydrogen electrode model, the adsorption energy of *COCHO is 0.16 eV higher than that of *COCOH in the first route, demonstrating the superior stability of *COCHO intermediates. Therefore, compared with the *COCOH intermediate, *COCHO is a more preferred intermediate by the coupling reaction between *CO and *CHO intermediates [40]. The *COCHO is further hydrogenated to form *OCHCH*O and CH2CH*O, which eventually produces ethylene [41, 56, 58].
The third C–C coupling reaction route relies on the dimerization between *CHO intermediates to form the *OCHCH*O species, which is then converted to CH2CH*O via H2O removal through PCET process, and eventually leads to the ethylene production [39]. It is reported that the dimerization of *CHO intermediate to form C–C bond has more kinetic advantages [59]. For example, the theoretical calculation indicated the energy barrier (0.28 eV) for the formation of C–C bond through *CHO dimerization was much lower than that of the dimerization between *CO and *CHO (1.08 eV) on Cu0-Cu+atomic interface, indicating that *CHO intermediates were more prone for direct dimerization [60]. In addition, *CO intermediates form C–C bonds directly through dimerization showed a large reaction energy barrier (1.52 eV), thus *CO is preferentially reduced to *COH or *CHO intermediates for further dimerization to produce ethylene [55].
3 Alternative Reaction Pathways and Conditions for the Formation of Ethylene and Competitive Products
Although we have established the most preferable theoretical reaction pathways for CO2RR to produce ethylene in the previous section, experimentally achieving these reaction pathways remains a great challenge. So far, there have been many factors that can tune the selectivity towards ethylene over the other competing products, such as the microenvironment at the three-phase interface, properties of the catalyst surface and operating conditions, including local pH, cation and anion, surface adsorption substances, catalyst facet, applied overpotential. These physical and/or chemical factors have a vital effect on the thermodynamic adsorption energy of the key intermediates generated in the CO2RR process, resulting in the alteration of the reaction pathways [40, 41, 61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70]. In this section, we will discuss the alternative reaction pathways and conditions for the formation of ethylene and competitive products (C1 and other C2+ products) systematically.
Generally, the morphology of the catalyst surface, hydrophobicity and adsorption of intermediates can lead to the formation of different products. Similarly, the relevant properties of electrolytes, such as pH, CO2 solubility and conductivity, can also determine the catalytic performance and selectivity of CO2RR, due to their direct contact with the active center. Therefore, in order to tune the reduction product towards ethylene, it is essential to explore the effects of different limiting factors for the alteration of product formation. This section summarizes main aspects based on electrolytes, including the effects of pH, anions, cations and additives, as well as the effects of catalyst surface potential and crystal surface.
3.1 Preferable Mechanism for Ethylene over C1 Products Reaction Pathways
The determinative reaction pathway for the generation of ethylene and C1 products is the C–C coupling step. The formation of C1 products generally comes from the low adsorption energy of the C1 intermediates, which cannot stay longer for C–C coupling on the surface catalysts. For instance, the *CO intermediate can be directly desorbed from the catalysts to evolve CO if the adsorption energy of *CO is low. And the *OCOH intermediate generated on the catalysts can be directly reduced to HCOOH through the PCET step. The adsorption energy of intermediates and adsorption sites of intermediates can be altered by many parameters, such as the pH, cation/anion and facet of catalysts, which will significantly influence the reaction pathways to produce ethylene over C1 products.
3.1.1 pH Effect for Ethylene Over C 1
Protons in the electrolyte, especially at the interface between electrode and electrolyte, have a significant effect on the selectivity of reduction products in electrochemical CO2RR. When the pH at the interface is low, the C1 pathway is the main thermodynamic reaction route [58, 71, 72], e.g., the formation of CH4 from the *COH intermediate by *CO hydrogenation [73,74,75,76]. At high pH, the dimerization of *C1 intermediates (*CO and *COH) is the dominant reaction both thermodynamically and kinetically, whereas the C1 pathway is inhibited due to a higher reaction energy barrier, leading to the production of C2 products preferably C2H4 (Fig. 4a). Under neutral conditions, on the other hand, C1 intermediates may not proceed through both C1 and C2 pathways, but could generate multi-carbon products owing to the cross-coupling of these intermediates (e.g., *COH with *CO) [77]. The water molecules binding to the surface of the Cu catalysts play an indispensable role in selectively generating hydrocarbons or oxygenates. Specifically, the surface-adsorbed H2O is usually the proton source in the reaction, directly combining *H with the OH group of the adsorbed intermediates, and then removing a molecule of water, thereby promoting the production of hydrocarbons like ethylene. It is worth mentioning that not just the pH of the bulk electrolyte (such as KCl and KHCO3) can affect the product distribution. The local pH change at the interface during the CO2RR process can also change the selectivity. It has been demonstrated that in electrolytes with weak buffering capacity such as KCl, KClO4 and K2SO4, H+ is continuously consumed and the local pH on the electrode surface increases as the reduction reaction progresses, which is favourable for the production of ethylene [78, 79].
Remarkably, the pH value also affects the competitive HER. CO2RR and HER occur simultaneously in the aqueous electrolyte, since the redox potential of the proton to H2 is very close to the redox potential of CO2 conversion, leading to a significant drop of the FE of ethylene [80]. Generally, the production of H2 is achieved via the direct reduction of protons in the electrolyte (2H+ + 2e− → H2) or the reduction of the solvent (2H2O + 2e− → H2 + 2OH−), indicating a low pH is preferred for HER [81]. Therefore, it is necessary to increase the pH value of the electrolyte in order to improve the CO2RR while suppressing HER. Furthermore, as high pH is also considered beneficial for C2+ production, most studies have been carried out in neutral or alkaline electrolytes [82]. Similarly, designing and controlling the morphology of the electrocatalysts which can increase the local pH value during the reaction is also an excellent strategy to improve the CO2 reduction products, such as developing nanowire arrays, dendritic structures, etc. [35, 83]. This will be illustrated in detail in the catalyst design section.
3.1.2 Cation and Anion Effect
The change of type or concentration of cations in the electrolyte can significantly affect the activity of CO2RR and the selectivity towards the targeted products [78, 84,85,86]. Cations at the interface can change the microenvironment or interact with the intermediates, which act as promoters in CO2RR by changing the free energy pattern and stabilizing specific intermediates. Generally, smaller cations with higher charges are prone to attract more water molecules to form a larger hydration layer, leading to the increase of H+. Cations with smaller hydration layers (such as Cs+) can get closer to the surface of catalysts and enrich the outer Helmholtz layer, making the interface electric field stronger (Fig. 4b) [87]. The strong dipole interactions between the stronger interface electric field and the surface adsorbate promote the proceeding of CO2RR. Meanwhile, solvated cations induced by interfacial electric field can also stabilize CO2 and intermediates with different dipole moments through electrostatic interaction. The enrichment of alkali metal cations (such as Cs+ and K+) in the outer Helmholtz layer can also decrease the activity of competing HER, due to the steric hindrance effect of larger cations to H+ on the outer Helmholtz layer [88]. Therefore, larger cations (such as Cs+) are more effective in promoting the reaction pathway of the intermediates to selectively produce C2+ products, especially ethylene, compared to smaller cations (such as Li+) [89]. Furthermore, *CO intermediates have been demonstrated to function as the ligand for cations, which may promote the formation of C–C bond of *CO intermediate, as larger cations have a much higher chance to attract more *CO (Fig. 4e) [90]. Thus, the as-formed cation-intermediate complex is crucial to promote the formation of C2+ products. Furthermore, as the radius of alkali metal cations increases from Li+, K+ to Cs+, the free energy barrier of *CO dimerization decreases gradually according to the DFT calculations [91]. The presence of larger cations is also beneficial to the formation of other C2 and C3 products (such as acetic acid, glycolic acid, ethanol and propanol) owing to the negative potential required for forming *OCCOH from *CO in the presence of Cs+ compared to Li+ or Na+.
In addition to changing the local electric field and stabilizing the reaction intermediate, the hydrated alkali metal cation in the electrolyte can also affect the local pH of the buffer interface [92,93,94]. The hydrated alkali metal cation will be subjected to the electrostatic interaction of the applied voltage on the cathode, thereby reducing the pKa of the hydrolysis [92]. The larger size of the alkali metal cation, the greater the electrostatic effect, leading to smaller pKa. The hydrolysis reaction is a dynamic equilibrium process [94]. When the pKa of the hydrated alkali metal cation is lower than the local pH value of the interface, it will promote the production of H+ in the electrolyte buffering the local pH value. This will further alleviate the polarization and Nernst loss caused by the increase of local pH under CO2RR conditions and ultimately promote the conversion of CO2 instead of H2 [95].
The anion effect has been also investigated for CO2RR process. Both anions with buffering capacity (bicarbonate (HCO3−), borate (H3BO3−), phosphate (HPO42−)) and anions without buffering capacity (perchlorate (ClO4−), sulphate (SO42−)) have been studied for their influence on the product distribution in CO2RR. The results revealed that electrolytes with stronger buffering capacity can contribute protons more effectively, thus are prone to produce H2 and CH4 while inhibiting the generation of CO, HCOOH, C2H4 and C2H5OH, etc. [21, 96, 97]. Therefore, it is preferred to have electrolytes with lower buffer capacity to generate C2H4 as the main reduction products over C1 chemicals and H2.
3.1.3 Facet Effect for Ethylene over C 1
It has been demonstrated that the selectivity of CO2RR process showed a strong dependence on crystal planes of Cu. For example, C2H4 is prone to be formed on Cu(100), while Cu(111) is favourable for the formation of C1 products (CH4 and HCOO-) [98]. The atomic configuration on the surface of Cu(100) provides the best adsorption geometry for the *CO dimers and stabilises the charged intermediates (*CO*CO) for C2H4 generation (Fig. 4c, d) [99, 100]. For instance, nanostructured Cu films with more exposed Cu(100) facet could effectively increase the *CO coverage and reduce the C–C coupling energy barrier, achieving FEC2H4 of 58.6% at − 0.75 V vs. RHE [46]. However, by adding Cu2+ to the electrolyte to passivate the Cu nanosheet (NSs), the dissolution of the Cu NSs was inhibited and the exposed Cu(111) surface was maintained, leading to the selectivity of CH4 with 70% FE at − 1.6 V vs. RHE [101]. The instrument characterization results show that Cu(111) surface was prone to produce intermediates such as *COOH and *CH2O, which are favourable to forming CH4.
3.2 Preferable Mechanism for Ethylene Over Other C2+ Products Reaction Pathways
Generally, all C2+ products are obtained after C–C coupling step. Therefore, they may share similar reaction intermediates during the reduction processes. Thus, compared to C1 vs. ethylene, it is relatively difficult to tune the selectivity between these C2+ products. However, it is possible to change the conversion tendency of these shared reactions intermediates to different directions by applying different influencing factors, leading to the formation of different reduction products. For instance, ethylene production can be improved by converting *CH*COH to *C*CH by controlling the content of *CO intermediates. In this section, we mainly discuss the influence of *CO intermediates, overpotential and additives on the reaction pathways of ethylene over other C2+ products.
3.2.1 *CO Intermediates Effect
Since *CO intermediates are the keys for C–C coupling to produce C2+ products, it is necessary to understand the relationship between *CO intermediates and the formation pathways of ethylene and the competitive products. As shown in Fig. 5a, the *CH*COH (denoted IM) intermediate is the bifurcation point of the ethanol and ethylene reaction pathways [41, 56, 58]. Thus, it is desirable to control the reaction direction from IM to *C*CH (denoted IM-C) while inhibiting the *CHCHOH (denoted IM-O) pathway to promote ethylene production [102]. The theoretical investigation of the reaction energies of IM-C and IM-O pathways unravelled that the lower coverage of *CO on the catalyst’s surface diminished the enthalpy change of the IM-C pathway, benefiting ethylene production rather than ethanol. However, higher *CO coverage is beneficial to the C–C bond coupling and lower free energy barriers of both the IM-C and IM-O pathways, boosting the overall CO2RR process to C2+ products (Fig. 5b). Therefore, it is vital to maintain proper *CO coverage achieve maximal ethylene selectivity (Fig. 5c) [102]. Intermediates from *CO can also influence the formation of different products. It has shown that *CHO from *CO hydrogenation is a common intermediate for C2+ products on Cu. By coupling with another *CO, it can convert to *COCHO, which forms CH*CO through hydrogenation and dehydroxylation [52]. It has been proposed by Abild Pedersen and his colleagues the hydrogenation of CH*CO is the branch point between ethylene and oxygenates. Theoretical calculation results demonstrated that the repulsive interaction between *CO tends to generate oxygenates, due to increasing *CO pressure has to decrease the surface water adsorption, resulting in the low content of protons. Therefore, the increase of *CO coverage is beneficial to the selectivity of oxygenates (especially acetate, requiring a minimum of protons), rather than ethylene (Fig. 5d) [52].
3.2.2 Overpotential Effect
The applied overpotential can also influence the CO2RR selectivity to produce specific C2+ products by altering the stability of intermediates [42, 56]. For instance, *CO*CO prefer to form under low potential, whereas high potential results in the formation of *COCHO (Fig. 5h) [57, 58, 98]. Specifically, on the Cu(100) surface, when the overpotential is higher than − 0.6 V, C–C coupling preferentially proceeds through the *CO*CO pathway, followed by forming *COCHO, leading to the generation of C2H4 with a lower energy barrier of 0.69 eV. When the overpotential is at the range of − 0.6 to − 0.8 V, *H and *CO share similar adsorption energy, leading to low *CO coverage at the active sites and higher HER. When the overpotential is more negative than − 0.8 V, *COCHO is formed by coupling *CHO with non-adsorbed CO, leading to the formation of C2H4 and CH4 depending on the mass transfer rate of non-adsorbed CO [96, 103]. The theoretical calculations demonstrated that when the overpotential was higher than − 0.6 V, ethylene was the main hydrocarbon product due to the low energy barrier of 0.69 eV for two *CO couples to form a C–C bond [56].
3.2.3 Additives Effect for Ethylene over C 2
Incorporating additives in electrolytes affects the microenvironment at the interface of catalysts/electrolytes, which changes the corresponding properties of local electrolytes, such as pH, hydrophobic layer, conductivity, solubility and viscosity. These properties will have a significant effect on the CO2RR catalytic performance and selectivity (Fig. 5i) [104,105,106]. It has been demonstrated that the hydrophilic interface generally promotes the formation of *COOH (then formic acid), while the hydrophobic interface is conducive to the generation of *CO. The surface hydrophobicity property can also limit the proton and water transport, thus forming a locally high pH at the interface, inhibiting the competitive HER [107]. It also possesses the advantage to reduce the thickness of CO2 diffusion layer, forming a highly active and stable three-phase interface microenvironment. For example, 1-octadecanethiol was added to the surface of dendritic Cu for catalyst surface modification [32]. Due to the presence of long carbon chains, the contact angle between the Cu surface and the electrolyte increased sharply from 17° to 153°. The improvement of hydrophobicity is more conducive to the capture and release of gas reactants and products at the three-phase interface while inhibiting the competitive reaction (HER). As a result, highly selective production of ethylene was achieved with FEC2H4 = 56% at − 1.5 V vs. RHE. Another example is the use of organic molecule (N,Nʹ-(1,4-phenylene)bispyridinium-derived oligomer) to modify the Cu surface (Fig. 5e–g) [14]. The N bader charge in organic molecule affects the production of *COatop, which is more conducive to C–C coupling kinetically. Spectroscopic characterization and simulation calculations showed that the organic molecule adhered to the catalyst surface improved the stability of *COatop, which promote the selectivity to ethylene (FE of 72% at − 0.83V vs. RHE).
4 Engineering Strategies of Efficient Catalysts for Electrocatalytic CO2RR to Ethylene
So far, the most efficient catalysts in CO2RR to produce ethylene are the Cu-based electrocatalysts. However, the pristine Cu catalysts suffer from the insufficient selectivity to ethylene and low overall FE of carbon-based products. There are many strategies proposed to tune the selectivity of Cu catalysts to produce ethylene [108]. For instance, nanoscale Cu catalysts with high porosity and surface areas are beneficial to the microenvironment optimization (e.g., local pH) and reactants/products diffusion [109]. Applying tandem catalyst systems by designing alloys or molecule-Cu catalysts can tune the surface coverage of *CO intermediate, thus optimizing the selectivity for ethylene generation. Moreover, electronic structure tuning is efficient in altering the intrinsic adsorption capability of reactants/intermediates on the catalysts. Heteroatom doping, e.g., alloys/bimetallic catalysts, have been widely investigated to modulate the electronic structure for high ethylene selectivity. Moreover, specific facet exposure may also serve as an efficient approach to regulate the adsorption of intermediates to generate ethylene. Therefore, efficient engineering strategies such as nanostructure control, molecular catalysis, alloy, defects, surface modification, valence state, etc., can be designed for Cu-based catalysts to selectively enhance the ethylene generation rate while inhibiting the competitive products (H2, C1 and other C2+). In this section, we will review various design strategies for Cu-based catalysts, and further investigate the correlation among these strategies, induced specific effects and selectivity for highly efficient producing ethylene.
4.1 Nanostructure Effect
The nanostructure of the designed Cu-based catalysts, including morphology, size, crystal facet, crystal phase, etc., have great influences on the catalytic activity and selectivity of CO2RR towards ethylene generation. Changing the morphology of catalysts may alter the local pH or reactants concentration near the electrodes. The porous structure is also favourable for the mass transportation of the reactants/intermediates/products. Tuning the exposed facets of the designed catalysts is efficient in regulating the binding strength of intermediates, thus changing the CO2RR catalytic activity and selectivity. The size of electrocatalysts affects the number of coordination sites. Therefore, regulating the nanostructure of electrocatalysts is significant for the CO2RR catalytic performance.
4.1.1 Morphology Effect
The designed catalysts with specific morphology may directly influence the reaction mechanism and pathways of CO2RR, by altering the adsorption energy of intermediates, which results in different selectivity of products [110,111,112,113,114]. For instance, the vertical nanosheet arrays with uniform distribution of Cu catalysts can improve the CO2RR efficiency to ethylene by accelerating the mass transfer of CO2 in the electrolyte and near the catalyst surface. Dendrites with cavities/tips/needles can efficiently inhibit the competition of HER by increasing pH in the local environment. Cu catalysts with rough surfaces possess larger specific surface areas, increasing the number of active sites for CO2 adsorption and activation.
Currently, several morphologies of Cu-based catalysts have been proposed and prepared towards CO2RR, including nanoparticles, nanocubes, core-shell structures, nanowires, nanoarrays and nanofoam [83, 115,116,117,118,119]. Specifically, nanoarrays and nanocubes can efficiently promote the selective formation of C2H4 due to the induced tip effect and changed local pH on the catalyst surface. For example, Cu nanowire arrays have been prepared by electrochemical reduction of CuO nanowire arrays on Cu foil [83]. The derived nanowire arrays with long and dense structures limited the diffusion of the generated OH− at the surface of electrodes [21, 120], which led to the increase of local pH at the interface of electrode/electrolyte. The designed nanoarrays could efficiently inhibit the production of CH4 and H2, and facilitate the selectivity of C2+ products, especially C2H4. Another example is the Cu nanowires with step surface derived from activating the Cu nanowires at − 1.05 V vs. RHE, which also delivered excellent selectivity towards C2H4 (Fig. 6a, b) [27]. Theoretical calculation results demonstrated that the adsorption energy barrier of *CO intermediates on two adjacent active sites of the Cu step surface was much lower than that on Cu(100) [121]. The superior thermodynamic stability and lower C–C coupling barrier of the C2 path on the step sites led to the maximum FEC2H4 = 77.4% at − 1.0 V vs. RHE (Fig. 6c). Other than the nanowire structure, the cubic nanoparticles with branches can also promote the selectivity for C2H4 generation. For instance, the cubic Cu2O nanoparticles with branched CuO (B-CuO) were derived by controlling the oxidation rate in aqueous ammonia via dissolution and reprecipitation mechanism [35]. The as-formed branched CuO nanoparticles induced higher electrochemical active surface area and thus more active sites, which facilitated CO2 activation and the subsequent CO2RR process. In addition, the accelerated CO2RR process resulted in large consumption of protons in the solution and a rapid increase of the interfacial pH, which promoted the C–C coupling and the selectivity to ethylene. Thus, the design of Cu2O with the branched CuO nanoparticles delivered a high FE of 70% for C2H4 at − 1.05 V vs. RHE, which is superior to the original cubic Cu2O NPs (FE = 32% at − 1.05 V vs. RHE). Additionally, a 0D-Cu catalyst with dense vertical flake nanostructure (denoted as DVL-Cu) prepared by galvanostatic anodization induced a heterogeneous interface in the CO2RR process, which not only effectively avoided agglomeration, but also reduced the C–C dimerization barrier in the C2H4 formation pathway, boosting the C2H4 selectivity (Fig. 6d-f) [122]. The Cu catalysts with sharp needle-like morphologies can also promote the C–C coupling and ethylene production due to their capability to nucleate and release small bubbles, leading to an increase in current density and mass transfer [123]. Cu nanoneedles were restored from Cu2(OH)3Cl through the electro-redeposition method. The total FECO2RR of this catalyst can reach 75% in 0.1 M KHCO3 at − 1.2 V vs. RHE and a high C2H4/CH4 ratio of 200, demonstrating the preference for ethylene products over C1 products.
4.1.2 Facets Effect
Altering the crystal facets can optimize the catalytic activity and selectivity of the catalysts due to the varied adsorption energy of intermediates on different crystal facets [124,125,126]. The early research results demonstrated that each facet of Cu may contribute to different product generations. For instance, Cu(100) was beneficial to the formation of C2H4, Cu(111) was easier to produce C1 products, and Cu(110) prefer to C2H5OH and CH3COO− [127,128,129]. Therefore, reasonable adjustment of the exposed crystal facets can effectively regulate the corresponding catalytic performance of Cu-based catalysts.
It has been demonstrated that *CO intermediates are prone to be generated on Cu(100) facet compared to other Cu crystal such as Cu(110) and Cu(111), which tends to generate C2H4. Similarly, *CHO intermediates can also be easily formed on Cu(100), and two *CHO are dimerized to form C2H4. On the other hand, Cu(111) is more favourable for the formation of *COH intermediates, which generate both CH4 and HCOO− [130, 131]. For example, three shaped Cu nanocrystals (NCs) with various facets have been prepared by a colloid method, and the one with Cu(100) delivered high productivity (FE = 57% at − 0.75 V vs. RHE) for C2H4 [132]. Nanocrystalline Cu with Cu(111) facet, however, has only 12% ethylene selectivity. Thus, increasing the proportion of Cu(100) facet on Cu-based catalysts is an efficient strategy to enhance the selectivity of C2H4. One example is the Cu foil with a controlled oxidation state and surface morphology derived by using CuCl as a precursor [26]. The stable surface of electropolished Cu(111) is converted to Cu(100) by using HCl to transfer the surface Cu(0) to Cu(I), followed by electrochemical reduction to achieve the reconstruction of Cu surface, leading to high FE for ethylene of 56% at − 2.0 V vs. Ag/AgCl. Moreover, selectively coating Cu(111) to achieve a higher (100)/(111) exposed facet ratio can also enhance the C2H4 production (Fig. 7b). Ultrathin Al2O3 has been utilized to be coated on Cu NCs by atomic layer deposition (ALD) technique resulted in a higher FE(C2H4/CH4) ratio of 22 times over pure Cu NCs (Fig. 7a) [133]. The coated catalyst reaches peak performance with a C2H4 FE of 60.4% at − 1.1 V vs. RHE and 300 mA cm−2 in 5 M KOH electrolyte in a gas diffusion electrode (GDE) flow cell (Fig. 7c). The results demonstrated that the presence of Cu(100) facet is critical for the selectivity to C2H4 in the CO2RR process (Fig. 7d) [134]. The issue is that while Cu(100) is more conducive to the formation of C2H4, Cu(111) is the most stable facet of polycrystalline copper. Therefore, how to expose more Cu(100) and stabilize it in the CO2RR process is important and challenging. It is shown that the surface energy of Cu(100) decreases significantly with the increase of the coverage of adsorbed species (including *CO, *COCHO, *COOH etc.) during CO2RR, while the surface energy of Cu(100) changes slightly with the increase of the coverage of *H species during HER. The reaction intermediates adsorbed on the surface of Cu acted as capping agents which could benefit the growth of Cu(100). On the contrary, the adsorbed species did not affect the surface energy of Cu(111) either for HER or CO2RR. Therefore, due to the lower surface energy of the formed adsorbed species on the Cu(100) facet, it is beneficial to reconstruct the polycrystalline Cu surface into Cu(100) in CO2RR condition, while Cu(111) is more easily formed in HER condition [135].
The high-index facet, adding (111) or (110) steps to the (100) surface forming (Cu(711)(7(100) × (111)), can also boost the FE of ethylene [128]. For instance, the star-shaped Cu2O nanoparticles with (322)(2(111) × (110)) facets prepared by the reductant-controlled method showed a high FEC2H4 value of 74.1% (at − 1.2 V vs. RHE) (Fig. 7e) [136]. DFT calculation revealed that the existence of Cu2O(332) surface could significantly reduce the Gibbs free energy of the intermediate process (forming *CHO + *COOH, *CHO + *CO and *CHO + *CHO), thereby significantly improving the selectivity of C2H4 (Fig. 7f) [39, 137].
In addition to the crystal facet affecting, some non-traditional crystal phases can also effectively regulate the CO2RR process. For instance, 4H Au@Cu and heterogeneous 4H/fcc Au@Cu core-shell nanostructures have been prepared by the epitaxial method with the wet chemical method (Fig. 7g) [28]. Both 4H Au@Cu and 4H/fcc Au@Cu delivered high partial current density (jC2H4) and lower overpotential compared to the conventional face-centered cubic (fcc) Cu, which attributed to the low energy barrier of *CHO intermediates than *COH intermediates on the surface of 4H Cu, inducing preferable pathway for the formation of ethylene.
4.1.3 Size Effect
The size of electrocatalysts directly changes the coordination environment of the surface atoms and thereby influences the CO2RR catalytic activity and selectivity. Decreasing particle sizes increases surface curvature and lowers the average coordination number of surface atoms [5, 138]. The small size of the Cu catalysts (< 15 nm) may result in the strong adsorption activity of *CO on the low coordinated Cu atoms, leading to the production of H2 and CO. With the increase of the size, the proportion of edge sites and corners sites decreases, and thus the generation of H2 and CO is suppressed [139]. However, the large size of catalysts may reduce edge active sites, resulting in unsatisfactory catalytic activity (Fig. 7h). Therefore, optimizing the size of Cu catalysts for CO2RR is highly favourable to generate desired products. For instance, three Cu cubes with a size of 24, 44 and 63 nm, were prepared by adjusting the reflux temperature and aging time. The Cu cubes with 44 nm have exhibited a maximum FEC2H4 of 41% (at − 1.1V vs. RHE) in 0.1 M KHCO3 originating from the ideal ratio of plane sites on Cu(100) to edge sites [140]. The size effect can also influence the unsaturated edge sites, which is also significant to the CO2RR selectivity, resulting in optimized binding strength of the reaction intermediates [100]. For example, Cu nanoparticles with varied sizes were derived by electro-reducing the pre-prepared Cu2O film [141]. The experimental results showed that FEC2H4 was inversely proportional to the size of the catalysts, in which the size decreased from 41 to 18 nm, while the FE of C2H4 increased from 10% to 43%. The smaller Cu particles with higher selectivity for C2H4 were attributed to more grain boundaries and defects, which significantly enhanced the *CO adsorption and thus the C–C coupling step. Although the above two examples showed contradictory conclusions regarding the size of the Cu nanoparticles, the induced effect by altering the catalyst’s size such as increasing crystal facet (former), active sites (latter), and stronger *CO adsorption energy (latter) is more important for promoting ethylene production.
4.2 Molecular Catalysis
Molecules can change the coordination environment of Cu atoms in the catalysts, and the interaction between catalysts and ligands can stabilize the key intermediates. It has been widely studied that modifying Cu by organic macromolecules can form complexes that may be beneficial for ethylene production [142, 143]. For instance, Cu porphyrin (PorCu) and Cu phthalocyanine (CuPc) composed of Cu+ and macrocyclic complexes have been investigated to selectively reduce CO2 to ethylene [144]. PorCu and CuPC have a tuneable molecular structure and a larger conjugated system, which makes it easier to adjust the electronic structure of center Cu+. Moreover, ProCu has exhibited high selectivity and activity to C2H4, attributing to the OH group in the porphyrin structure as binding sites to the reaction intermediates. It can also provide intramolecular sources of protons, with an oxidation state of Cu+ at the center as the active sites [145]. Another example is the surface of the Cu cluster engineered by controlling the paddle-wheel structure of the Cu dimer in the deformed HKUST-1 (C18H6Cu3O12, Cu3(BTC)2·xH2O, BTC = benzene-1,3,5-tricarboxylate) MOF [33]. It was found that the Cu clusters with the asymmetric structure were formed from the deformed Cu dimers by heat treatment, resulting in more uncoordinated Cu sites, which were able to increase the FE of C2H4 from 10% to 45% while reducing the H2 yield to less than 7%. Recently, a local sulphur doping strategy has been used to rationally construct isolated Cu-S (S-HKUST-1) on HKUST-1 precatalyst (Fig. 8a) [146]. The catalyst was reconfigured in situ to obtain a two-phase copper/copper sulphide (Cu/CuxSy) interface with abundant Cuδ+ sites (Fig. 8b). The moderate coupling site distance of stable Cuδ+ reduced the kinetic barrier for the dimerization of the *CO intermediates, demonstrating a high C2H4 selectivity up to 57.2% at − 1.32 V vs. RHE at the operated a j of 400 mA cm−2 (Fig. 8c, d). Moreover, dual active sites with PcCu-(OH)8 as ligands and square planar CuO4 as nodes (PcCu-Cu-O) have been investigated for highly efficient CO2RR [147]. The results demonstrated that the derived PcCu-Cu-O exhibited up to 50% FEC2H4 and a high current density of 7.3 mA cm-2 at − 1.2 V vs. RHE. The excellent catalytic activity and selectivity are attributed to the synergistic effect between PcCu (*CHO formation sites) and CuO4 (*CO formation sites), reducing the energy barrier of C–C coupling step (easier than the direct coupling of *CO intermediates), thus boosting the ethylene selectivity in CO2RR process (Fig. 8e). Another flexible and tunable Cu(I) triazole framework was also developed as a novel MOFs material for electrocatalytic CO2 reduction, in which the Cu2O and dialkyl-1,2,4-triazoles were reacted to produce isoreticular analogs of MAF-2 ([Cu(detz)], Hdetz = 3,5-diethyl-1,2,4-triazole) [148]. By changing the size of the non-coordinating ligand side groups, MAF-2E (i.e., MAF-2, side group are two ethyl groups) was derived, resulting in high FEC2H4 up to 51.2% (− 1.30 V vs. RHE) and excellent stability over 10 h. Computational simulations showed that compared with MAF-2P (side group are two propyl groups), although the binuclear copper sites in the structure could allow the intermediate to have C–C coupling, the smaller ethyl groups had less spatial steric resistance to binuclear Cu sites, which are more favourable for the C–C coupling process to promote the C2H4 generation (Fig. 8f–i). Moreover, the side groups of two ethyl groups increased the hydrophobicity of the material and inhibited the competition of HER.
4.3 Alloy Effect
By combining two or more complementary metals into heterogeneous catalysts, the selectivity, activity and stability of these catalysts can be further improved for CO2RR due to the altered electronic structure and geometric effects [5, 45, 60]. Recently, alloying different metal species with Cu to form bimetallic catalysts has been widely investigated, which showed a significant change in selectivity. For instance, CuIn and CuAu are reported to improve the FE of CO, while CuSn and CuPd can promote the production of HCOO- [60]. CuAg and CuZn, on the other hand, are slightly different. The main products for CO2RR using these two catalyst species can be easily altered by changing the metal ratios and preparation methods.
It has been established that the concentration of *CO on catalysts is a decisive factor in determining the selectivity of CO2RR to ethylene. Forming alloys by introducing foreign metals (e.g., Ag, Zn, Au, Zr) to Cu can convert CO2 to *CO more efficiently, which increases the local *CO concentration around the Cu sites [10, 41, 149,150,151,152,153,154,155]. It has been confirmed by operando Roman Spectroscopy that in AgCu alloys, the *CO intermediates initially formed on Ag sites, which were then transferred to the Cu sites for spillover and hydrogenation (Fig. 9b–e) [156]. To confirm this, the nanoporous CuAg catalysts with varied Ag content (3%–9%) have been achieved by the electrodeposition method, and the results indicated that the Ag content influenced the selectivity of CuAg alloys [154]. The low Ag content of 3% decreased the chance to form C2H4, and the high Ag content of 9% led to the generation of CO by inducing the separated atomic structure [157, 158]. CuAg alloys with appropriate Ag value (6%) resulted in the highest yield of C2H4 (FE = 60% at − 0.7 V vs. RHE and a total current density of − 300 mA cm−2). The regulated CO2RR performance by changing the Ag content is attributed to the alteration of the concentration of surface *CO intermediates, which is more conducive to the C–C coupling on Cu sites, which boosted ethylene production. Another example is the AgCu alloy with heterojunction structure which showed the highest yield of C2H4 with FE = 42% (at − 1.10 V vs. RHE) with Ag content of 6 wt% (Fig. 9a) [159]. The continuous increase of Ag content led to the aggregation of nanoparticles and decrease the catalytic activity. Moreover, the electronic effect induced by the Ag/Cu dual metal alloy catalysts is another factor affecting product selectivity [160]. The results showed that the emergence of the Ag/Cu interface caused electrons to move from the Cu domain to the Ag domain [160]. The electron-depleted Cu could efficiently enhance the binding of *CO on the active sites, which in turn facilitates the coupling of *CO into C2H4. Owing to the *CO spillover effect and electron transfer effect of tandem catalysis, the selectivity of C2H4 was further improved in CO2RR.
Zn atoms play a similar role to the above-mentioned Ag when alloying with Cu to selectively promote ethylene production. For instance, the mixed CuZn NPs with homogeneous elemental distribution have been derived from the ablation of CuZnO alloy using a nanosecond pulse laser [161]. The uniform distribution of Cu and Zn atoms efficiently reduced the transfer distance of the formed *CO intermediates from Zn sites to the nearby Cu sites, thus reducing the reaction barrier and facilitating the C2H4 generation. Similarly, incorporating active metal Al into Cu forming Cu-Al alloy can also enhance C2H4 production (Fig. 9f) [30]. The as-prepared Cu-Al alloy possessed the highest number of *CO adsorption sites, and the *CO adsorption energy (ΔECO) produces near-optimal activity. The water near the Al atoms efficiently reduced the generated *HOCCH to *CCH, which could not only decrease the formation energy, but also inhibits the production of competing alcohols, leading to the selectivity of C2H4 (FE = 80% at − 1.5 V vs. RHE and at a current density of 400 mA cm−2). Different from Zn and Ag to promote the formation of *CO intermediates, Pd possesses stronger adsorption of proton, which can also promote the generation of C2H4. For instance, phase-separated CuPd alloy with adjacent Cu atoms (phase separation) was beneficial to the production of C2H4, whereas the one with alternating Cu-Pd arrangement preferred the production of CH4 [162]. The adjacent characteristics of Cu atoms allowed favourable molecular distance and small spatial steric hindrance, making the adjacent adsorbed *CO easily dimerize into *COCOH intermediates with the aid of Pd, which were then converted into C2H4 (FE = 48% at − 0.7 V vs. RHE and the highest total current density of 370 mA cm–2). In addition, the ternary Cu-Au/Ag nanoframes could also efficiently promote the reduction of CO2 to C2H4 [163]. Alloyed Ag/Au nanoframes have been recognized as one of the most efficient CO-specific catalysts, and the design of nanopore frameworks is also conducive to the exposure of active centers while promoting mass transfer. The derived Cu-Au/Ag nanoframes have exhibited a maximum value of FEC2H4 ≈ 79% at − 0.65 V vs. RHE in the flow cells (Fig. 9g, h). The improved C2H4 production was ascribed to the integrated tandem catalysis (*CO was formed on the Ag/Au nanoframes and then spill over to Cu for coupling), electronic modulation (Cu conducts electrons to Ag/Au) and defect engineering (Ag/Au framework with many defects).
4.4 Defect Effect
The defects can also play a significant role in the electrocatalysis process, such as optimizing the reaction barrier, increasing the number of active sites, and inhibiting the competitive reaction HER, thus promoting catalytic activity and selectivity [100, 110, 164, 165].
4.4.1 Metal Defects
Metal defects optimize the CO2 conversion to C2H4 by altering unsaturated coordination atoms, electronic band structure and local charge distribution. For example, the prism-shaped Cu catalysts with metal defects increased C2H4 yield due to the possible change of local pH and the formation of low-coordinated Cu atoms on the rough prism surface [166]. Cu nanosheets with 6 nm defects size also enhanced the FEC2H4 to 83% at − 1.2 V vs. RHE [25]. The high performance was ascribed to the induced defects, which are beneficial to the adsorption, enrichment and restriction of reaction intermediates (*CO and *OCCO) and OH−, thus promoting the C–C coupling for ethylene production. The effect of pore defects on the performance of C2H4 generation has also been studied. Changing the pore size and depth can significantly influence the selectivity of designed catalysts. When the pore width was reduced to 30 nm, the formation of C2H4 increased from 8% to 38%, while the C1 gas products decreased (FECO = 5% and FECH4 = 15%) [167]. The enhanced C2H4 selectivity is attributed to the restriction of proton transmission and the increased local pH, which is conducive to the occurrence of C–C coupling. Moreover, grain boundaries have been investigated as a kind of defect by designing a unique planetary-like Cu structure via structural reconstruction (Fig. 10a, b) [168]. A large number of Cu grain boundaries were produced during the reconstruction process due to the fusion of components in the ultrafine Cu particles. The components in the shell were separated to form a nano-gap structure, which could effectively limit OH− on the surface of catalysts to maintain a high local pH value, thus promoting C2H4 production (Fig. 10c–f).
4.4.2 Vacancies Defects
In addition to metal defects, oxygen vacancies have also been investigated to selectively boost C2H4 production. These oxygen vacancies can not only generate unsaturated metal ions, but also induce the charged positions as trap sites for electrons or holes [45]. For instance, highly branched CuOx nanodendrites with a high surface density of Vo's (referred to as CuOx-Vo) prepared by a two-step thermal annealing and electrochemical reduction technique showed a high FEC2H4 of about 63% at − 1.4 V vs. RHE (Fig. 10g, h) [169]. This Vo's possessed weakly bound electrons, which make them excellent Lewis base sites to adsorb CO2 and transfer electrons to the intermediate of CO2·−. Therefore, Vo's is functional to optimize the adsorption energy of reactants and promote molecular activation, leading to the strong adsorption energy of *CO/*COH intermediates and rapid desorption of *CH2 (2*CH2 → C2H4).
In addition to O vacancies, other anionic defects such as S and N vacancies have also been found to have an impact on CO2 reduction products. Due to the high mobility of S atoms in complex CuS crystal structures, it is easy to produce stable surface defects [170, 171]. For example, a copper sulfide-copper core-shell catalyst rich in surface vacancies (Cu2S-Cu) was synthesized by using enriching vacancy Cu2S nanoparticles as precursors, which can achieve high selectivity for C2H4 (45% at − 1.1 V vs. RHE) [172]. The introduced vacancies on the Cu shell can efficiently modify the electronic structure of adjacent Cu atoms, which can affect the energy barrier of the rate-limiting reaction intermediates. It is worth noting that when the proportion of vacancies on the surface increases, the energy barrier for ethylene formation will be slightly increased, but ethanol will not be affected, so the selectivity of the product will be transferred from C2H4 to multi-carbon alcohols. Therefore, optimized vacancy degree can contribute to the ethylene production [173]. Recent studies have also shown that N vacancies possess higher stability than O vacancies due to the high metal-N bond energy in transition metal nitrides [174, 175]. Cu3Nx with different nitrogen densities were prepared by a lithiation-enabled vacancy-engineering strategy, and the nitrogen vacancy densities highly affect the adsorption energy of *CO and the energy barrier for the formation of key C2 intermediates [176]. These presented N vacancies led to a decreased distance between adjacent Cu atoms, which is beneficial to the bonding of *CO absorbed at Cu sites [177]. The FE of Cu3Nx with 50% of N vacancy concentrations for C2 products is 81.7% (FEC2H4 = 56%) at − 1.15 V vs. RHE [176]. The Cu3Nx catalyst also showed excellent electrochemical stability at high current density (j = − 350 mA cm−2, 10,000 s, FEC2 dropped from 82.1% to 76%), which greatly surpasses the CuOx catalyst with oxygen vacancies (j = − 350mA cm−2, 850 s, FEC2 dropped from 63% to 43%).
4.4.3 Non-metal Doping
Incorporating non-metal is another technique to introduce defects in Cu-based catalysts. For instance, Cu3N nanocube with perovskite structure preferred the coupling of *CO and *CHO thus enhancing the C2H4 production [178]. Cu1.8Se nanowires grown on 3D copper foam substrates also exhibited excellent capability to produce ethylene, reaching the maximum value of FEC2H4 of 55% at − 1.1 V vs. RHE [179]. The results showed that the introduction of Se can reduce the surface concentration of *CO and inhibit the formation of C1 products. In addition, fluorine-modified copper (F–Cu) introduced a new view on the mechanism of "hydrogen-assisted C–C coupling" [39]. Fluorine modification not only is conducive to the activation of H2O to form active hydrogen species (*H), but also promotes the adsorption and hydrogenation of *CO to produce *CHO intermediates, which can be easily coupled and reduced to C2+ products on the Cu surface. Other than single non-metal elements, silicon dioxide has also been introduced into Cu by one-pot coprecipitation method to create active Cu-SiOx interface sites, which reduced the formation energy of key intermediates OCOH* and OCCOH* during ethylene production [180].
4.5 Surface Modification
Changing the hydrophobicity at the interface between catalysts and electrolyte, such as incorporating molecules to modify the surface of catalysts, is an efficient approach to inhibit HER, facilitate the mass transfer of CO2, and optimize the adsorption/desorption of intermediates, thus boosting the catalytic activity and selectivity of CO2RR to ethylene. Moreover, increasing pH at the hydrophobic interface is also conducive to the occurrence of C–C coupling [181]. For instance, coating different hydrophilic/hydrophobic polymers on CuO nanoparticle (NPs) electrodes can efficiently alter the electrode-electrolyte interface in CO2RR process (Fig. 11a, b) [182]. It was demonstrated that hydrophilic polymers played negligible roles in altering the catalytic performance, whereas hydrophobic polymers can significantly improve the activity, selectivity and stability of CuO derivative electrodes to boost C2H4 generation (Fig. 11d). The experimental results demonstrated that the enhanced performance was mainly attributed to the constructed hydrophobic microenvironment of the gas/liquid/solid three-phase interface on the electrode surface, which limited the water diffusion, improved the local pH near the electrode surface, and then improved the performance of CO2RR process (Fig. 11c, e) [32, 183, 184]. The incorporated polymers can also work as the protective layer of the catalysts. For example, introducing N’N-ethylene-phenanthrolinium dibromide in Cu catalysts can efficiently etch the surface to form cubic nanostructures and stabilize the nanostructures in the electrocatalysis process by forming a protective organic layer, resulting in a high selectivity of 45% for C2H4 at − 1.07V vs. RHE [185]. Moreover, a molecular regulation strategy by functionalizing the electrocatalysts with organic molecules can stabilize the intermediates (*CO) and promote the conversion of CO2RR to ethylene [14]. The incorporation of organic polymers with specific functional groups has been investigated to tune the selectivity of the CO2RR process. The Cu-poly-N-(6-aminohexyl)acrylamide (denoted as Cu-P1) prepared by the coprecipitation method boosted the ethylene selectivity up to 72% at − 0.97 V vs. RHE in 1 M KOH (Fig. 11g) [186]. A series of stable Cu electrodes modified by amine-containing additives with different methylation degrees were prepared by controlling the amount of methyl to replace the hydrogen atom on P1. The results demonstrated that the CO2RR selectivity was dependent on the degree of methylation of P1 on the Cu-P1 electrode, in which the ethylene yield decreased with the increase in the degree of methylation in the polymer, whereas the HER process was the opposite trend. Amino groups also play a key role in boosting the C2H4 generation by contributing to the CO2 capture and leading to local pH increase on the electrode surface (Fig. 11h). Ionic liquids (IL) coated on the Cu catalysts are responsible for the improved conversion efficiency of CO2 to ethylene, which is attributed to their strong CO2 solubility, effectively increasing the CO2 concentration in the reaction phase and improving the equilibrium conversion rate. On the other hand, the strong hydrogen bond and static electricity between ionic liquids and CO2 show suitable reaction energy, which can partially activate CO2 double bond and achieve stronger adsorption of *CO intermediates [187, 188]. For instance, IL BmimNO3 (IL 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium nitrate) on Cu electrocatalyst delivered FE = 77.3% for ethylene selectivity at − 1.49 V vs. RHE [189]. The high CO2RR performance was ascribed to the activation of CO2 molecules on IL, the changed coordination environment of Cu atoms, regulated local electronic structure, and the boosted *CO dimerization rate. Moreover, the hydrophobic carbon chain in BmiNO3 increased the CO2 concentration at the electrode-solution interface, thus inhibiting the competition of HER and improving the efficiency of CO2RR.
4.6 Valence State
The valence state of metal atoms also plays an important role in the selectivity of CO2RR [190]. When the surface Cu atoms are partially positively charged, the synergistic between Cuδ+ and Cu0 causes strong electrostatic adsorption of the negatively charged *CO intermediates on the active sites, reducing the C–C coupling energy barrier and promoting ethylene formation [191]. For instance, Cu2O with Cu+ was covered by the reaction intermediates (such as *CO) on the surface in the CO2RR process, which effectively prevents Cu+ from being reduced to Cu [192]. Cu+ has lower adsorption energy of *CO intermediate than Cu, so it can improve the coverage of *CO and promote C–C coupling. The achieved catalyst reached a maximum C2+ FE of 75.2% at a potential of − 0.61 V vs. RHE. Moreover, the catalysts with a mixed valence state may exhibit superior performance compared to the ones with a single valence state [193]. In the Cu0–Cu+ system, the Cu0 functioned to activate CO2 and promote the subsequent electron transfer, meanwhile Cu+ site enhanced the adsorption of *CO, thus further promoting C–C coupling [194,195,196,197]. The selectivity of the catalysts with Cu+/Cu interface to C2H4 can reach 40% at − 1.0 V vs. RHE, while very little C2H4 (less than 5%) has been observed on pristine Cu catalysts. In addition, Cu4O3 with the same amount of Cu+ and Cu2+ ions were prepared by the solvothermal method, which acted as pre-catalysts to form the intrinsic active sites (Cu0, Cu+ and Cu2+) after partial reduction [34]. The active sites with mixed valence states can not only reduce the energy barrier in forming C–C bonds, but also possess the capability to electrostatically stabilize *OCCO intermediate. The FEC2H4 was 43% at − 0.64 V vs. RHE, and the highest C2+/C1 product ratio of 4.8 has been achieved at the same condition (Fig. 11f). Table 1 summarizes the performance of CO2 to ethylene for the Cu-based catalysts, including FE, current density, durability, electrochemical cell type, GDE structure, and electrolyte selection.
5 Conclusions and Perspectives
The rational design of Cu-based electrocatalysts for ethylene production with high energy density and selectivity is one of the most significant goals in CO2RR. In this review, we have summarized the key steps to convert CO2 to ethylene, including CO2 adsorption/activation, formation of *CO intermediate, and the C–C coupling step. An in-depth understanding of these key steps provides an intrinsic mechanistic investigation of fundamental principles for the CO2RR process. The microenvironment (pH effect, cation/anion effect), facet, *CO intermediates, overpotential and additives influence on CO2RR to generate ethylene or other competitive products have been discussed to propose the preferred reaction pathways and conditions to selectively produce ethylene. The catalyst preparation and surface engineering at the atomic level can significantly affect the interface microenvironment, thus the selectivity from CO2 to ethylene. The strategies of nanostructures control, molecular catalysis, alloy, defect engineering, surface modification, and oxidation state alteration to engineer the Cu-based catalysts have been summarized and discussed. The summarized recent progress of research work demonstrated that the engineered strategies are highly associated with the binding energies of intermediates (optimize the binding energy for specific intermediates), thus controlling the catalytic activity, selectivity and product distribution of CO2RR.
Currently, tremendous progress has been achieved for CO2RR based on experimental and computational methodologies, resulting in many breakthroughs for CO2 converting to ethylene or other C2+ product. However, it is still challenging to specifically generate single specific products as it is difficult to control the engineering strategies to have no influence on other intermediates or products. Therefore, it is still necessary to address the fundamental issues related to CO2RR to achieve continued development and practical application.
5.1 Full Mechanistic Picture
The multiple electrons/protons transfer and a large number of reaction intermediates make CO2RR process extremely complicated [17]. Moreover, the catalytic activity and selectivity of CO2RR are related to many parameters, such as the catalyst structure and composition (facet, defects, etc.) and reaction conditions (pH, applied potential, electrolyte, etc.), making it even more difficult to achieve the desired products due to the competitions between different reaction pathways. Moreover, the competing HER also decreases the total production of ethylene. It is difficult to suppress H2 evolution since *H is necessary for CO2RR mechanism. The selective effect of secondary metals with different binding strengths for *H and *O is vital to alter the products [217]. When secondary metals with weak *H and *O binding energy (such as Ag, Au) form bimetallic catalysts with Cu, due to the synergistic influence of the electronic and geometric effects of the alloy, the weak adsorption energy to *CO is caused, which is facilitates C–C coupling [218]. And weak *H binding also inhibits HER and improves the overall CO2 utilization rate. Therefore, selecting a secondary metal with an appropriate binding energy of the intermediates can promote the production of ethylene.
5.2 Stability Issues
In addition to the catalytic activity and selectivity for CO2RR to generate ethylene products, stability is also important to evaluate the catalytic capability of CO2RR electrocatalysts [219]. Currently, most catalysts can only last less than a few hundred hours under operation conditions. This is far from satisfactory in terms of the practical applications of CO2RR technologies. Most reports focus on the current density and product selectivity, whereas the stability of catalysts has not received enough attention. Finding a key point to balance the relationship between catalytic activity and stability is desired. Moreover, the degradation mechanisms and corresponding solutions for enhancing the stability of catalysts are needed. Wrapping or embedding Cu-based catalysts in ultrathin layers or anchoring Cu-based materials on stable substrates may achieve excellent stability with no sacrifice for the catalytic activity.
5.3 Operando/In-Situ Techniques and DFT Calculation
Operando/in-situ techniques and DFT calculation are effective tools for understanding the structure-performance relationship [220]. Structure evolution of the catalysts may occur in the CO2RR conditions, and the operando/in-situ characterization techniques could monitor the dynamic process to identify the real active sites. Moreover, the intermediates can also be detected in real-time for specific reaction pathways. DFT calculation is a powerful tool for acquiring the reaction-free energy of CO2RR for specific products, revealing the adsorption energies of intermediates and providing an in-depth understanding of the catalytic mechanism at the atomic level. Future efforts may pave the direction of enhancing the time and spatial resolution of operando characterization, and conducting machine-learning coupled DFT to in-depth explore the catalytic mechanism and predict the efficient electrocatalysts.
5.4 Designing Advanced Electrolyzers
Other than the designed catalysts and mechanism understanding of CO2RR, electrolyzers are also important in practical applications [221,222,223,224]. Currently, H-cells are the most widely used devices for CO2RR, owing to their low cost and simple setup [50]. However, the limited solubility and diffusion of CO2 in conventional H-cell electrolytes lead to low current densities (< 100 mA cm−2) which limits their commercialization [5, 55, 225]. Therefore, H-cells are usually used in the laboratory for preliminary performance tests. Flow cell is another conventional electrolysis cell. Different from H-cell, CO2 flows continuously from the back to the catalyst surface through the gas diffusion layer (GDL). Within the flow cell, the rich three-phase boundary composed of CO2, catalyst and electrolyte significantly improve the reaction efficiency [50, 59, 135]. The advantages of a short CO2 diffusion path and no solubility limitation strengthen the mass transfer of CO2, thereby improving the current density and selectivity [59]. However, conventional hydrophobic carbon-based GDL faces the problem of being flooded after a few hours of testing, resulting in flow cell failure. Modification using porous polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) as GDL can greatly improve the hydrophobicity and stability of flow cells [29, 226]. However, it is still severe that the reaction of CO2 with alkaline electrolyte to form carbonate will also lead to low single-pass utilization of CO2 and the reduction of local pH [55]. Membrane electrode assemblies (MEAs) remove the catholyte and allow the direct contact between the cathode GDL with the exchange membrane, thereby reducing the resistance of the entire cell. Compared to flow cell, MEAs show higher activity and lower energy consumption [14]. However, they still face problems such as low ionic conductivity and low CO2 utilization (< 10%). Therefore, additional efforts should be made to improve the ionic conductivity and assembly process of ion exchange membranes in the future [55].
References
Y.H. Fu, D.R. Sun, Y.J. Chen, R.K. Huang, Z.X. Ding et al., An amine-functionalized titanium metal-organic framework photocatalyst with visible-light-induced activity for CO2 reduction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51(14), 3364–3367 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201108357
K. Caldeira, M.E. Wickett, Anthropogenic carbon and ocean pH. Nature 425(6956), 365–365 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/425365a
V. Masson-Delmotte, M. Kageyama, P. Braconnot, S. Charbit, G. Krinner et al., Past and future polar amplification of climate change: climate model intercomparisons and ice-core constraints. Clim. Dynam. 27(4), 437–440 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-006-0149-1
J.W.C. White, P. Ciais, R.A. Figge, R. Kenny, V. Markgraf, A high-resolution record of atmospheric CO2 content from carbon isotopes in pet. Nature 367(6459), 153–156 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1038/367153a0
S. Nitopi, E. Bertheussen, S.B. Scott, X.Y. Liu, A.K. Engstfeld et al., Progress and perspectives of electrochemical CO2 reduction on copper in aqueous electrolyte. Chem. Rev. 119(12), 7610–7672 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00705
J. Huo, Z. Shen, X. Cao, L. Li, Y. Zhao et al., Macro/micro-environment regulating carbon-supported single-atom catalysts for hydrogen/oxygen conversion reactions. Small 18(32), 2202394 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202202394
J. Huo, X. Cao, Y. Tian, L. Li, J. Qu et al., Atomically dispersed mn atoms coordinated with n and o within an n-doped porous carbon framework for boosted oxygen reduction catalysis. Nanoscale 15(11), 5448–5457 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1039/D2NR06096E
S.M. Benson, F.M. Orr, Carbon dioxide capture and storage. MRS Bull. 33(4), 303–305 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1557/mrs2008.63
G.B. Wen, B.H. Ren, Y. Zheng, M. Li, C. Silva et al., Engineering electrochemical surface for efficient carbon dioxide upgrade. Adv. Energy Mater. 12(3), 2103289 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202103289
X. Li, J. Wang, X. Lv, Y. Yang, Y. Xu et al., Hetero-interfaces on Cu electrode for enhanced electrochemical conversion of CO2 to multi-carbon products. Nano-Micro Lett. 14(1), 134 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-022-00879-5
D. Xue, H. Xia, W. Yan, J. Zhang, S. Mu, Defect engineering on carbon-based catalysts for electrocatalytic CO2 reduction. Nano-Micro Lett. 13(1), 5 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-020-00538-7
C. Qiu, K. Qian, J. Yu, M. Sun, S. Cao et al., MOF-transformed In2O3-x@C nanocorn electrocatalyst for efficient CO2 reduction to HCOOH. Nano-Micro Lett. 14(1), 167 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-022-00913-6
C. Ban, Y. Duan, Y. Wang, J. Ma, K. Wang et al., Isotype heterojunction-boosted CO2 photoreduction to CO. Nano-Micro Lett. 14(1), 74 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-022-00821-9
F.W. Li, A. Thevenon, A. Rosas-Hernandez, Z.Y. Wang, Y.L. Li et al., Molecular tuning of CO2-to-ethylene conversion. Nature 577(7791), 509–513 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1782-2
P. De Luna, C. Hahn, D. Higgins, S.A. Jaffer, T.F. Jaramillo et al., What would it take for renewably powered electrosynthesis to displace petrochemical processes? Science 364(6482), 6438 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb0992
N. Han, P. Ding, L. He, Y. Li, Y. Li, Promises of main group metal–based nanostructured materials for electrochemical CO2 reduction to formate. Adv. Energy Mater. 10(11), 1902338 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201902338
T.K. Todorova, M.W. Schreiber, M. Fontecave, Mechanistic understanding of CO2 reduction reaction (CO2RR) toward multicarbon products by heterogeneous copper-based catalysts. ACS Catal. 10(3), 1754–1768 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.9b04746
X. Cao, J. Huo, L. Li, J. Qu, Y. Zhao et al., Recent advances in engineered Ru-based electrocatalysts for the hydrogen/oxygen conversion reactions. Adv. Energy Mater. 12(41), 2202119 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202202119
Y. Zhao, J. Zhang, X. Guo, X. Cao, S. Wang et al., Engineering strategies and active site identification of mxene-based catalysts for electrochemical conversion reactions. Chem. Soc. Rev. 52(9), 3215–3264 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1039/D2CS00698G
Y. Hori, K. Kikuchi, A. Murata, S. Suzuki, Production of methane and ethylene in electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide at copper electrode in aqueous hydrogencarbonate solution. Chem. Lett. 15(6), 897–898 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1246/cl.1986.897
Y. Hori, A. Murata, R. Takahashi, Formation of hydrocarbons in the electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide at a copper electrode in aqueous solution. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Transl. 85(8), 2309–2326 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1039/F19898502309
Y. Hori, A. Murata, R. Takahashi, S. Suzuki, Electroreduction of carbon monoxide to methane and ethylene at a copper electrode in aqueous solutions at ambient temperature and pressure. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 109, 5022–5023 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00250a044
Y. Hori, A. Murata, R. Takahashi, S. Suzuki, Enhanced formation of ethylene and alcohols at ambient temperature and pressure in electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide at a copper electrode. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1, 17–19 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1039/C39880000017
H. Yoshio, M. Akira, T. Ryutaro, S. Shin, Electrochemical reduction of carbon monoxide to hydrocarbons at various metal electrodes in aqueous solution. Chem. Lett. 16(8), 1665–1668 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1246/cl.1987.1665
B.X. Zhang, J.L. Zhang, M.L. Hua, Q. Wan, Z.Z. Su et al., Highly electrocatalytic ethylene production from CO2 on nanodefective Cu nanosheets. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142(31), 13606–13613 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.0c06420
M.G. Kibria, C.T. Dinh, A. Seifitokaldani, P. De Luna, T. Burdyny et al., A surface reconstruction route to high productivity and selectivity in CO2 electroreduction toward C2+ hydrocarbons. Adv. Mater. 30(49), 1804867 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201804867
C. Choi, S. Kwon, T. Cheng, M.J. Xu, P. Tieu et al., Highly active and stable stepped Cu surface for enhanced electrochemical CO2 reduction to C2H4. Nat. Catal. 3(10), 804–812 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-020-00504-x
Y. Chen, Z.X. Fan, J. Wang, C.Y. Ling, W.X. Niu et al., Ethylene selectivity in electrocatalytic CO2 reduction on cu nanomaterials: a crystal phase-dependent study. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142(29), 12760–12766 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.0c04981
C.T. Dinh, T. Burdyny, M.G. Kibria, A. Seifitokaldani, C.M. Gabardo et al., CO2 electroreduction to ethylene via hydroxide-mediated copper catalysis at an abrupt interface. Science 360(6390), 783–787 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aas9100
M. Zhong, K. Tran, Y.M. Min, C.H. Wang, Z.Y. Wang et al., Accelerated discovery of CO2 electrocatalysts using active machine learning. Nature 581(7807), 178–183 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2242-8
J.J. Wu, S.C. Ma, J. Sun, J.I. Gold, C. Tiwary et al., A metal-free electrocatalyst for carbon dioxide reduction to multi-carbon hydrocarbons and oxygenates. Nat. Commun. 7, 13869 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13869
D. Wakerley, S. Lamaison, F. Ozanam, N. Menguy, D. Mercier et al., Bio-inspired hydrophobicity promotes CO2 reduction on a Cu surface. Nat. Mater. 18(11), 1222–1227 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-019-0445-x
D.H. Nam, O.S. Bushuyev, J. Li, P. De Luna, A. Seifitokaldani et al., Metal-organic frameworks mediate Cu coordination for selective CO2 electroreduction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140(36), 11378–11386 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.8b06407
N. Martic, C. Reller, C. Macauley, M. Loffler, B. Schmid et al., Paramelaconite-enriched copper-based material as an efficient and robust catalyst for electrochemical carbon dioxide reduction. Adv. Energy Mater. 9(29), 1901228 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201901228
J. Kim, W. Choi, J.W. Park, C. Kim, M. Kim et al., Branched copper oxide nanoparticles induce highly selective ethylene production by electrochemical carbon dioxide reduction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141(17), 6986–6994 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.9b00911
B. Yang, K. Liu, H. Li, C. Liu, J. Fu et al., Accelerating CO2 electroreduction to multicarbon products via synergistic electric-thermal field on copper nanoneedles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144(7), 3039–3049 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.1c11253
D.-H. Nam, O. Shekhah, A. Ozden, C. McCallum, F. Li et al., High-rate and selective CO2 electrolysis to ethylene via metal-organic-framework-augmented CO2 availability. Adv. Mater. 34(51), 2207088 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202207088
J. Zhang, Y. Wang, Z. Li, S. Xia, R. Cai et al., Grain boundary-derived Cu+/Cu0 interfaces in CuO nanosheets for low overpotential carbon dioxide electroreduction to ethylene. Adv. Sci. 9(21), 2200454 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202200454
W.C. Ma, S.J. Xie, T.T. Liu, Q.Y. Fan, J.Y. Ye et al., Electrocatalytic reduction of CO2 to ethylene and ethanol through hydrogen-assisted C–C coupling over fluorine-modified copper. Nat. Catal. 3(6), 478–487 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-020-0450-0
A.J. Garza, A.T. Bell, M. Head-Gordon, Mechanism of CO2 reduction at copper surfaces: pathways to C2 products. ACS Catal. 8(2), 1490–1499 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.7b03477
Y.W. Lum, T. Cheng, W.A. Goddard, J.W. Ager, Electrochemical CO reduction builds solvent water into oxygenate products. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140(30), 9337–9340 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.8b03986
F. Calle-Vallejo, M.T. Koper, Theoretical considerations on the electroreduction of CO to C2 species on Cu(100) electrodes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52(28), 7282–7285 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201301470
M.B. Ross, P. De Luna, Y.F. Li, C.T. Dinh, D. Kim et al., Designing materials for electrochemical carbon dioxide recycling. Nat. Catal. 2(8), 648–658 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-019-0306-7
M.R. Singh, E.L. Clark, A.T. Bell, Effects of electrolyte, catalyst, and membrane composition and operating conditions on the performance of solar-driven electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 17(29), 18924–18936 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/c5cp03283k
L.M. Wang, W.L. Chen, D.D. Zhang, Y.P. Du, R. Amal et al., Surface strategies for catalytic CO2 reduction: from two-dimensional materials to nanoclusters to single atoms. Chem. Soc. Rev. 48(21), 5310–5349 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1039/c9cs00163h
G. Zhang, Z.-J. Zhao, D. Cheng, H. Li, J. Yu et al., Efficient CO2 electroreduction on facet-selective copper films with high conversion rate. Nat. Commun. 12(1), 5745 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26053-w
X.X. Chang, T. Wang, J.L. Gong, CO2 photo-reduction: insights into CO2 activation and reaction on surfaces of photocatalysts. Energy Environ. Sci. 9(7), 2177–2196 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ee00383d
M. Favaro, H. Xiao, T. Cheng, W.A. Goddard, J. Yano et al., Subsurface oxide plays a critical role in CO2 activation by Cu(111) surfaces to form chemisorbed CO2, the first step in reduction of CO2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 114(26), 6706–6711 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1701405114
Z.Y. Sun, T. Ma, H.C. Tao, Q. Fan, B.X. Han, Fundamentals and challenges of electrochemical CO2 reduction using two-dimensional materials. Chem 3(4), 560–587 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chempr.2017.09.009
Y. Yang, Z. Tan, J. Zhang, Electrocatalytic carbon dioxide reduction to ethylene over copper-based catalytic systems. Chem. Asian J. 17(24), e202200893 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/asia.202200893
M. Zheng, P. Wang, X. Zhi, K. Yang, Y. Jiao et al., Electrocatalytic CO2-to-C2+ with ampere-level current on heteroatom-engineered copper via tuning *CO intermediate coverage. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144(32), 14936–14944 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.2c06820
J. Hou, X. Chang, J. Li, B. Xu, Q. Lu, Correlating CO coverage and CO electroreduction on Cu via high-pressure in situ spectroscopic and reactivity investigations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144(48), 22202–22211 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.2c09956
Y. Kim, S. Park, S.J. Shin, W. Choi, B.K. Min et al., Time-resolved observation of C–C coupling intermediates on Cu electrodes for selective electrochemical CO2 reduction. Energy Environ. Sci. 13(11), 4301–4311 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ee01690j
E. Pérez-Gallent, M.C. Figueiredo, F. Calle-Vallejo, M.T.M. Koper, Spectroscopic observation of a hydrogenated CO dimer intermediate during CO reduction on Cu(100) electrodes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56(13), 3621–3624 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201700580
W.C. Ma, X.Y. He, W. Wang, S.J. Xie, Q.H. Zhang et al., Electrocatalytic reduction of CO2 and CO to multi-carbon compounds over Cu-based catalysts. Chem. Soc. Rev. 50(23), 12897–12914 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1039/d1cs00535a
T. Cheng, H. Xiao, W.A. Goddard, Full atomistic reaction mechanism with kinetics for CO reduction on Cu(100) from ab initio molecular dynamics free-energy calculations at 298 k. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 114(8), 1795–1800 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1612106114
J.D. Goodpaster, A.T. Bell, M. Head-Gordon, Identification of possible pathways for C–C bond formation during electrochemical reduction of CO2: new theoretical insights from an improved electrochemical model. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 7(8), 1471–1477 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b00358
H. Xiao, T. Cheng, W.A. Goddard, Atomistic mechanisms underlying selectivities in C1 and C2 products from electrochemical reduction of CO on Cu(111). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139(1), 130–136 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.6b06846
Y.H. Wang, J.L. Liu, G.F. Zheng, Designing copper-based catalysts for efficient carbon dioxide electroreduction. Adv. Mater. 33(46), 2005798 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202005798
Z. Ni, H. Liang, Z. Yi, R. Guo, C. Liu et al., Research progress of electrochemical CO2 reduction for copper-based catalysts to multicarbon products. Coordin. Chem. Rev. 441, 213983 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2021.213983
Y. Hori, H. Wakebe, T. Tsukamoto, O. Koga, Electrocatalytic process of CO selectivity in electrochemical reduction of CO2 at metal electrodes in aqueous media. Electrochim. Acta 39(11), 1833–1839 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4686(94)85172-7
Y. Hori, R. Takahashi, Y. Yoshinami, A. Murata, Electrochemical reduction of CO at a copper electrode. J. Phys. Chem. B 101(36), 7075–7081 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1021/jp970284i
A.A. Peterson, F. Abild-Pedersen, F. Studt, J. Rossmeisl, J.K. Norskov, How copper catalyzes the electroreduction of carbon dioxide into hydrocarbon fuels. Energy Environ. Sci. 3(9), 1311–1315 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1039/c0ee00071j
K.P. Kuhl, E.R. Cave, D.N. Abram, T.F. Jaramillo, New insights into the electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide on metallic copper surfaces. Energy Environ. Sci. 5(5), 7050–7059 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1039/c2ee21234j
J.H. Montoya, C. Shi, K. Chan, J.K. Norskov, Theoretical insights into a CO dimerization mechanism in CO2 electroreduction. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 6(11), 2032–2037 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b00722
R. Kortlever, J. Shen, K.J.P. Schouten, F. Calle-Vallejo, M.T.M. Koper, Catalysts and reaction pathways for the electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 6(20), 4073–4082 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b01559
T. Cheng, H. Xiao, W.A. Goddard, Free-energy barriers and reaction mechanisms for the electrochemical reduction of CO on the Cu(100) surface, including multiple layers of explicit solvent at pH 0. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 6(23), 4767–4773 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b02247
J.T. Feaster, C. Shi, E.R. Cave, T.T. Hatsukade, D.N. Abram et al., Understanding selectivity for the electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide to formic acid and carbon monoxide on metal electrodes. ACS Catal. 7(7), 4822–4827 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.7b00687
X. Liu, P. Schlexer, J. Xiao, Y. Ji, L. Wang et al., pH effects on the electrochemical reduction of CO2 towards C2 products on stepped copper. Nat. Commun. 10(1), 32 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07970-9
I.V. Chernyshova, P. Somasundaran, S. Ponnurangam, On the origin of the elusive first intermediate of CO2 electroreduction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 115(40), E9261–E9270 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1802256115
S.A. Petrosyan, A.A. Rigos, T.A. Arias, Joint density-functional theory: Ab initio study of Cr2O3 surface chemistry in solution. J. Phys. Chem. B 109(32), 15436–15444 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1021/jp044822k
R. Sundararaman, W.A. Goddard, The charge-asymmetric nonlocally determined local-electric (candle) solvation model. J. Chem. Phys. 142(6), 064107 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4907731
X.W. Nie, M.R. Esopi, M.J. Janik, A. Asthagiri, Selectivity of CO2 reduction on copper electrodes: the role of the kinetics of elementary steps. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52(9), 2459–2462 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201208320
X.W. Nie, W.J. Luo, M.J. Janik, A. Asthagiri, Reaction mechanisms of CO2 electrochemical reduction on Cu(111) determined with density functional theory. J. Catal. 312, 108–122 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2014.01.013
K.J.P. Schouten, Y. Kwon, C.J.M. van der Ham, Z. Qin, M.T.M. Koper, A new mechanism for the selectivity to C1 and C2 species in the electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide on copper electrodes. Chem. Sci. 2(10), 1902–1909 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1039/c1sc00277e
F.S. Roberts, K.P. Kuhl, A. Nilsson, High selectivity for ethylene from carbon dioxide reduction over copper nanocube electrocatalysts. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54(17), 5179–5182 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201412214
H. Xiao, T. Cheng, W.A. Goddard, R. Sundararaman, Mechanistic explanation of the ph dependence and onset potentials for hydrocarbon products from electrochemical reduction of CO on Cu (111). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138(2), 483–486 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.5b11390
Y.Y. Birdja, E. Pérez-Gallent, M.C. Figueiredo, A.J. Göttle, F. Calle-Vallejo et al., Advances and challenges in understanding the electrocatalytic conversion of carbon dioxide to fuels. Nat. Energy 4(9), 732–745 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-019-0450-y
B. Pan, Y. Wang, Y. Li, Understanding and leveraging the effect of cations in the electrical double layer for electrochemical CO2 reduction. Chem. Catal. 2(6), 1267–1276 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.checat.2022.03.012
B. Endrődi, G. Bencsik, F. Darvas, R. Jones, K. Rajeshwar et al., Continuous-flow electroreduction of carbon dioxide. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 62, 133–154 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2017.05.005
C. Chen, J.F. Khosrowabadi Kotyk, S.W. Sheehan, Progress toward commercial application of electrochemical carbon dioxide reduction. Chem 4(11), 2571–2586 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chempr.2018.08.019
W. Nie, G.P. Heim, N.B. Watkins, T. Agapie, J.C. Peters, Organic additive-derived films on Cu electrodes promote electrochemical CO2 reduction to C2+ products under strongly acidic conditions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62(12), e202216102 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202216102
M. Ma, K. Djanashvili, W.A. Smith, Controllable hydrocarbon formation from the electrochemical reduction of CO2 over Cu nanowire arrays. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55(23), 6680–6684 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201601282
T. Ahmad, S. Liu, M. Sajid, K. Li, M. Ali et al., Electrochemical CO2 reduction to C2+ products using Cu-based electrocatalysts: a review. Nano Res. Energy 1, e9120021 (2022). https://doi.org/10.26599/NRE.2022.9120021
M.C.O. Monteiro, F. Dattila, B. Hagedoorn, R. García-Muelas, N. López et al., Absence of CO2 electroreduction on copper, gold and silver electrodes without metal cations in solution. Nat. Catal. 4(8), 654–662 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-021-00655-5
A. Murata, Y. Hori, Product selectivity affected by cationic species in electrochemical reduction of CO2 and CO at a Cu electrode. B Chem. Soc. of Jpn. 64(1), 123–127 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1246/bcsj.64.123
E. Pérez-Gallent, G. Marcandalli, M.C. Figueiredo, F. Calle-Vallejo, M.T.M. Koper, Structure- and potential-dependent cation effects on CO reduction at copper single-crystal electrodes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139(45), 16412–16419 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.7b10142
J. Resasco, L.D. Chen, E. Clark, C. Tsai, C. Hahn et al., Promoter effects of alkali metal cations on the electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139(32), 11277–11287 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.7b06765
V.J. Ovalle, Y.-S. Hsu, N. Agrawal, M.J. Janik, M.M. Waegele, Correlating hydration free energy and specific adsorption of alkali metal cations during CO2 electroreduction on Au. Nat. Catal. 5(7), 624–632 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-022-00816-0
H. Liu, J. Liu, B. Yang, Promotional role of a cation intermediate complex in C2 formation from electrochemical reduction of CO2 over Cu. ACS Catal. 11(19), 12336–12343 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.1c01072
A.S. Malkani, J. Li, N.J. Oliveira, M. He, X. Chang et al., Understanding the electric and nonelectric field components of the cation effect on the electrochemical CO reduction reaction. Sci. Adv. 6(45), eabd2569 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abd2569
M.R. Singh, Y. Kwon, Y. Lum, J.W. Ager III., A.T. Bell, Hydrolysis of electrolyte cations enhances the electrochemical reduction of CO2 over Ag and Cu. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138(39), 13006–13012 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.6b07612
O. Ayemoba, A. Cuesta, Spectroscopic evidence of size-dependent buffering of interfacial ph by cation hydrolysis during CO2 electroreduction. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9(33), 27377–27382 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b07351
F. Zhang, A.C. Co, Direct evidence of local pH change and the role of alkali cation during CO2 electroreduction in aqueous media. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59(4), 1674–1681 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201912637
G. Marcandalli, M.C.O. Monteiro, A. Goyal, M.T.M. Koper, Electrolyte effects on CO2 electrochemical reduction to CO. Accounts Chem. Res. 55(14), 1900–1911 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.2c00080
K.J.P. Schouten, E. Pérez Gallent, M.T.M. Koper, The influence of pH on the reduction of CO and CO2 to hydrocarbons on copper electrodes. J. Electroanaly. Chem. 716, 53–57 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2013.08.033
A.S. Varela, M. Kroschel, T. Reier, P. Strasser, Controlling the selectivity of CO2 electroreduction on copper: the effect of the electrolyte concentration and the importance of the local pH. Catal. Today 260, 8–13 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2015.06.009
Y. Zheng, A. Vasileff, X. Zhou, Y. Jiao, M. Jaroniec et al., Understanding the roadmap for electrochemical reduction of CO2 to multi-carbon oxygenates and hydrocarbons on copper-based catalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141(19), 7646–7659 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.9b02124
K. Jiang, R.B. Sandberg, A.J. Akey, X. Liu, D.C. Bell et al., Metal ion cycling of Cu foil for selective C–C coupling in electrochemical CO2 reduction. Nat. Catal. 1(2), 111–119 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-017-0009-x
D. Gao, R.M. Arán-Ais, H.S. Jeon, B. Roldan Cuenya, Rational catalyst and electrolyte design for CO2 electroreduction towards multicarbon products. Nat. Catal. 2(3), 198–210 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-019-0235-5
G. Chen, J. Fu, B. Liu, C. Cai, H. Li et al., Passivation of Cu nanosheet dissolution with Cu2+-containing electrolytes for selective electroreduction of CO2 to CH4. Environ. Sci-Nano 9(9), 3312–3317 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1039/D2EN00561A
J. Li, Z.Y. Wang, C. McCallum, Y. Xu, F.W. Li et al., Constraining CO coverage on copper promotes high-efficiency ethylene electroproduction. Nat. Catal. 2(12), 1124–1131 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-019-0380-x
K.J.P. Schouten, E. Pérez Gallent, M.T.M. Koper, Structure sensitivity of the electrochemical reduction of carbon monoxide on copper single crystals. ACS Catal. 3(6), 1292–1295 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1021/cs4002404
D. Wakerley, S. Lamaison, J. Wicks, A. Clemens, J. Feaster et al., Gas diffusion electrodes, reactor designs and key metrics of low-temperature CO2 electrolysers. Nat. Energy 7(2), 130–143 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-021-00973-9
D.M. Weekes, D.A. Salvatore, A. Reyes, A. Huang, C.P. Berlinguette, Electrolytic CO2 reduction in a flow cell. Acc. Chem. Res. 51(4), 910–918 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00010
X. Zhou, H. Liu, B.Y. Xia, K. Ostrikov, Y. Zheng et al., Customizing the microenvironment of CO2 electrocatalysis via three-phase interface engineering. SmartMat 3(1), 111–129 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/smm2.1109
A.K. Buckley, M. Lee, T. Cheng, R.V. Kazantsev, D.M. Larson et al., Electrocatalysis at organic-metal interfaces: Identification of structure-reactivity relationships for CO2 reduction at modified Cu surfaces. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141(18), 7355–7364 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.8b13655
H. Noda, S. Ikeda, Y. Oda, K. Ito, Potential dependencies of the products on electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide at a copper electrode. Chem. Lett. 18(2), 289–292 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1246/cl.1989.289
Z. Wang, Y. Li, X. Zhao, S. Chen, Q. Nian et al., Localized alkaline environment via in situ electrostatic confinement for enhanced CO2-to-ethylene conversion in neutral medium. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145(11), 6339–6348 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.2c13384
F.P. Pan, Y. Yang, Designing CO2 reduction electrode materials by morphology and interface engineering. Energy Environ. Sci. 13(8), 2275–2309 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ee00900h
Y. Xia, Y. Xiong, B. Lim, S.E. Skrabalak, Cover picture: Shape-controlled synthesis of metal nanocrystals: simple chemistry meets complex physics? Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48(1), 90275 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200890275
Y.F. Shi, Z.H. Lyu, M. Zhao, R.H. Chen, Q.N. Nguyen et al., Noble-metal nanocrystals with controlled shapes for catalytic and electrocatalytic applications. Chem. Rev. 121(2), 649–735 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00454
D.H. Chi, H.P. Yang, Y.F. Du, T. Lv, G.J. Sui et al., Morphology-controlled CuO nanoparticles for electroreduction of CO2 to ethanol. RSC Adv. 4(70), 37329–37332 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1039/c4ra05415f
J.W. Yin, J. Wang, Y.B. Ma, J.L. Yu, J.W. Zhou et al., Recent advances in the controlled synthesis and catalytic applications of two-dimensional rhodium nanomaterials. ACS Mater. Lett. 3(1), 121–133 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmaterialslett.0c00473
H.Y. Zhang, Y.J. Zhang, Y.Y. Li, S. Ahn, G.T.R. Palmore et al., Cu nanowire- catalyzed electrochemical reduction of CO or CO2. Nanoscale 11(25), 12075–12079 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1039/c9nr03170g
Q. Li, W.L. Zhu, J.J. Fu, H.Y. Zhang, G. Wu et al., Controlled assembly of Cu nanoparticles on pyridinic-n rich graphene for electrochemical reduction of CO2 to ethylene. Nano Energy 24, 1–9 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.03.024
N.T. Suen, Z.R. Kong, C.S. Hsu, H.C. Chen, C.W. Tung et al., Morphology manipulation of copper nanocrystals and product selectivity in the electrocatalytic reduction of carbon dioxide. ACS Catal. 9(6), 5217–5222 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.9b00790
Z.Y. Chang, S.J. Huo, W. Zhang, J.H. Fang, H.L. Wang, The tunable and highly selective reduction products on Ag@Cu bimetallic catalysts toward CO2 electrochemical reduction reaction. J. Phys. Chem. C 121(21), 11368–11379 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b01586
J.J. Lv, M. Jouny, W. Luc, W.L. Zhu, J.J. Zhu et al., A highly porous copper electrocatalyst for carbon dioxide reduction. Adv. Mater. 30(49), 1803111 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201803111
Y. Hori, in Electrochemical CO2 Reduction on Metal Electrodes. ed. by C.G. Vayenas, R.E. White, M.E. Gamboa-aldeco (Springer, New York, 2008), pp.89–189
J.H. Baricuatro, Y.-G. Kim, C.L. Korzeniewski, M.P. Soriaga, Seriatim ECSTM-ECPMIRS of the adsorption of carbon monoxide on Cu(100) in alkaline solution at CO2-reduction potentials. Electrochem. Commun. 91, 1–4 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2018.04.016
W. Liu, P. Zhai, A. Li, B. Wei, K. Si et al., Electrochemical CO2 reduction to ethylene by ultrathin CuO nanoplate arrays. Nat. Commun. 13(1), 1877 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-29428-9
T. Burdyny, P.J. Graham, Y.J. Pang, C.T. Dinh, M. Liu et al., Nanomorphology-enhanced gas-evolution intensifies CO2 reduction electrochemistry. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 5(5), 4031–4040 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b00023
H. Kakizaki, H. Ooka, T. Hayashi, A. Yamaguchi, N. Bonnet-Mercier et al., Evidence that crystal facet orientation dictates oxygen evolution intermediates on rutile manganese oxide. Adv. Funct. Mater. 28(24), 1706319 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201706319
T. Wu, M.L. Stone, M.J. Shearer, M.J. Stolt, I.A. Guzei et al., Crystallographic facet dependence of the hydrogen evolution reaction on cops: theory and experiments. ACS Catal. 8(2), 1143–1152 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.7b03167
S.C. Wang, G. Liu, L.Z. Wang, Crystal facet engineering of photoelectrodes for photoelectrochemical water splitting. Chem. Rev. 119(8), 5192–5247 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00584
Y. Hori, I. Takahashi, O. Koga, N. Hoshi, Electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide at various series of copper single crystal electrodes. J. Mol. Catal. A-Chem. 199(1–2), 39–47 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1381-1169(03)00016-5
Y. Hori, I. Takahashi, O. Koga, N. Hoshi, Selective formation of C2 compounds from electrochemical reduction of CO2 at a series of copper single crystal electrodes. J. Phys. Chem. B 106(1), 15–17 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1021/jp013478d
Y. Hori, H. Wakebe, T. Tsukamoto, O. Koga, Adsorption of CO accompanied with simultaneous charge transfer on copper single crystal electrodes related with electrochemical reduction of CO2 to hydrocarbons. Surf. Sci. 335, 258–263 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-6028(95)00441-6
W.J. Luo, X.W. Nie, M.J. Janik, A. Asthagiri, Facet dependence of CO2 reduction paths on Cu electrodes. ACS Catal. 6(1), 219–229 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.5b01967
Y. Huang, A.D. Handoko, P. Hirunsit, B.S. Yeo, Electrochemical reduction of CO2 using copper single-crystal surfaces: effects of *CO coverage on the selective formation of ethylene. ACS Catal. 7(3), 1749–1756 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.6b03147
G.L. De Gregorio, T. Burdyny, A. Loiudice, P. Iyengar, W.A. Smith et al., Facet-dependent selectivity of Cu catalysts in electrochemical CO2 reduction at commercially viable current densities. ACS Catal. 10(9), 4854–4862 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.0c00297
H. Li, P. Yu, R. Lei, F. Yang, P. Wen et al., Facet-selective deposition of ultrathin Al2O3 on copper nanocrystals for highly stable CO2 electroreduction to ethylene. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60(47), 24838–24843 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202109600
C.S. Chen, A.D. Handoko, J.H. Wan, L. Ma, D. Ren et al., Stable and selective electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide to ethylene on copper mesocrystals. Catal. Sci. Technol. 5(1), 161–168 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/c4cy00906a
Y.H. Wang, Z.Y. Wang, C.T. Dinh, J. Li, A. Ozden et al., Catalyst synthesis under CO2 electroreduction favours faceting and promotes renewable fuels electrosynthesis. Nat. Catal. 3(2), 98–106 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-019-0397-1
H. Luo, B. Li, J.G. Ma, P. Cheng, Surface modification of nano-CuO2 for controlling CO2 electrochemical reduction to ethylene and syngas. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61(11), e202116736 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202116736
H. Deng, C. Guo, P. Shi, G. Zhao, Amino assisted protonation for carbon-carbon coupling during electroreduction of carbon dioxide to ethylene on copper(i) oxide. ChemCatChem 13(20), 4325–4333 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/cctc.202100620
L. Li, A.H. Larsen, N.A. Romero, V.A. Morozov, C. Glinsvad et al., Investigation of catalytic finite-size-effects of platinum metal clusters. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 4(1), 222–226 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1021/jz3018286
R. Reske, H. Mistry, F. Behafarid, B. Roldan Cuenya, P. Strasser, Particle size effects in the catalytic electroreduction of CO2 on Cu nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136(19), 6978–6986 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja500328k
A. Loiudice, P. Lobaccaro, E.A. Kamali, T. Thao, B.H. Huang et al., Tailoring copper nanocrystals towards C2 products in electrochemical CO2 reduction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55(19), 5789–5792 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201601582
A.D. Handoko, C.W. Ong, Y. Huang, Z.G. Lee, L.Y. Lin et al., Mechanistic insights into the selective electroreduction of carbon dioxide to ethylene on Cu2O-derived copper catalysts. J. Phys. Chem. C 120(36), 20058–20067 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b07128
D.H. Nam, P. De Luna, A. Rosas-Hernandez, A. Thevenon, F.W. Li et al., Molecular enhancement of heterogeneous CO2 reduction. Nat. Mater. 19(3), 266–276 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-020-0610-2
X.F. Li, Q.L. Zhu, Mof-based materials for photo- and electrocatalytic CO2 reduction. Energychem 2(3), 100033 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enchem.2020.100033
J.L. Yu, J. Wang, Y.B. Ma, J.W. Zhou, Y.H. Wang et al., Recent progresses in electrochemical carbon dioxide reduction on copper-based catalysts toward multicarbon products. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31(37), 2102151 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202102151
Z. Weng, J.B. Jiang, Y.S. Wu, Z.S. Wu, X.T. Guo et al., Electrochemical CO2 reduction to hydrocarbons on a heterogeneous molecular Cu catalyst in aqueous solution. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138(26), 8076–8079 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.6b04746
C.F. Wen, M. Zhou, P.F. Liu, Y. Liu, X. Wu et al., Highly ethylene-selective electrocatalytic CO2 reduction enabled by isolated Cu-S motifs in metal-organic framework based precatalysts. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61(2), e202111700 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202111700
X.-F. Qiu, H.-L. Zhu, J.-R. Huang, P.-Q. Liao, X.-M. Chen, Highly selective CO2 electroreduction to C2H4 using a metal-organic framework with dual active sites. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143(19), 7242–7246 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.1c01466
L.-L. Zhuo, P. Chen, K. Zheng, X.-W. Zhang, J.-X. Wu et al., Flexible cuprous triazolate frameworks as highly stable and efficient electrocatalysts for CO2 reduction with tunable C2H4/CH4 selectivity. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61(28), e202204967 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202204967
J. Gao, D. Ren, X.Y. Guo, S.M. Zakeeruddin, M. Gratzel, Sequential catalysis enables enhanced C–C coupling towards multi-carbon alkenes and alcohols in carbon dioxide reduction: a study on bifunctional Cu/Au electrocatalysts. Faraday Discuss 215, 282–296 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1039/c8fd00219c
J. Gao, H. Zhang, X.Y. Guo, J.S. Luo, S.M. Zakeeruddin et al., Selective C–C coupling in carbon dioxide electroreduction via efficient spillover of intermediates as supported by operando raman spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141(47), 18704–18714 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.9b07415
D. Ren, B.S.H. Ang, B.S. Yeo, Tuning the selectivity of carbon dioxide electroreduction toward ethanol on oxide-derived CuxZn catalysts. ACS Catal. 6(12), 8239–8247 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.6b02162
X.S. Su, Y.M. Sun, L. Jin, L. Zhang, Y. Yang et al., Hierarchically porous Cu/Zn bimetallic catalysts for highly selective CO2 electroreduction to liquid C2 products. Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 269, 118800 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.118800
A. Dutta, I.Z. Montiel, R. Erni, K. Kiran, M. Rahaman et al., Activation of bimetallic AgCu foam electrocatalysts for ethanol formation from CO2 by selective Cu oxidation/reduction. Nano Energy 68, 104331 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.104331
T.T.H. Hoang, S. Verma, S.C. Ma, T.T. Fister, J. Timoshenko et al., Nanoporous copper silver alloys by additive-controlled electrodeposition for the selective electroreduction of CO2 to ethylene and ethanol. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140(17), 5791–5797 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.8b01868
Z. Yin, J. Yu, Z. Xie, S.-W. Yu, L. Zhang et al., Hybrid catalyst coupling single-atom ni and nanoscale Cu for efficient CO2 electroreduction to ethylene. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144(45), 20931–20938 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.2c09773
Y.B. Ma, J.L. Yu, M.Z. Sun, B. Chen, X.C. Zhou et al., Confined growth of silver-copper janus nanostructures with 100 facets for highly selective tandem electrocatalytic carbon dioxide reduction. Adv. Mater. 34(19), 2110607 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202110607
M. Hirsimaki, M. Lampimaki, K. Lahtonen, I. Chorkendoff, M. Valden, Investigation of the role of oxygen induced segregation of Cu during Cu2O formation on Cu{100}, Ag/Cu{100} and Cu(Ag) alloy. Surf. Sci. 583(2–3), 157–165 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susc.2005.03.035
J. Choi, M.J. Kim, S.H. Ahn, I. Choi, J.H. Jang et al., Electrochemical CO2 reduction to CO on dendritic Ag-Cu electrocatalysts prepared by electrodeposition. Chem. Eng. J. 299, 37–44 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.04.037
J.Q. Wang, Z. Li, C.K. Dong, Y. Feng, J. Yang et al., Silver/copper interface for relay electroreduction of carbon dioxide to ethylene. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11(3), 2763–2767 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b20545
J.F. Huang, M. Mensi, E. Oveisi, V. Mantella, R. Buonsanti, Structural sensitivities in bimetallic catalysts for electrochemical CO2 reduction revealed by Ag-Cu nanodimers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141(6), 2490–2499 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.8b12381
Y. Feng, Z. Li, H. Liu, C.K. Dong, J.Q. Wang et al., Laser-prepared cuzn alloy catalyst for selective electrochemical reduction of CO2 to ethylene. Langmuir 34(45), 13544–13549 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b02837
S. Ma, M. Sadakiyo, M. Heima, R. Luo, R.T. Haasch et al., Electroreduction of carbon dioxide to hydrocarbons using bimetallic Cu-Pd catalysts with different mixing patterns. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139(1), 47–50 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.6b10740
L.K. Xiong, X. Zhang, H. Yuan, J. Wang, X.Z. Yuan et al., Breaking the linear scaling relationship by compositional and structural crafting of ternary Cu-Au/Ag nanoframes for electrocatalytic ethylene production. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60(5), 2508–2518 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202012631
Q.C. Wang, Y.P. Lei, D.S. Wang, Y.D. Li, Defect engineering in earth-abundant electrocatalysts for CO2 and N2 reduction. Energy Environ. Sci. 12(6), 1730–1750 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1039/c8ee03781g
Y.F. Wang, P. Han, X.M. Lv, L.J. Zhang, G.F. Zheng, Defect and interface engineering for aqueous electrocatalytic CO2 reduction. Joule 2(12), 2551–2582 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2018.09.021
H.S. Jeon, S. Kunze, F. Scholten, B. Roldan Cuenya, Prism-shaped Cu nanocatalysts for electrochemical CO2 reduction to ethylene. ACS Catal. 8(1), 531–535 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.7b02959
K.D. Yang, W.R. Ko, J.H. Lee, S.J. Kim, H. Lee et al., Morphology-directed selective production of ethylene or ethane from CO2 on a Cu mesopore electrode. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56(3), 796–800 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201610432
Y.W. Jiang, X.Y. Wang, D.L. Duan, C.H. He, J. Ma et al., Structural reconstruction of cu2o superparticles toward electrocatalytic CO2 reduction with high C2+ products selectivity. Adv. Sci. 9, 2105292 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202105292
Z.X. Gu, N. Yang, P. Han, M. Kuang, B.B. Mei et al., Oxygen vacancy tuning toward efficient electrocatalytic CO2 reduction to C2H4. Small Methods 3(2), 1800449 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/smtd.201800449
X. Liu, X. Wang, B. Zhou, W.-C. Law, A.N. Cartwright et al., Size-controlled synthesis of Cu2-xE (E = S, Se) nanocrystals with strong tunable near-infrared localized surface plasmon resonance and high conductivity in thin films. Adv. Funct. Mater. 23(10), 1256–1264 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201202061
J.M. Luther, P.K. Jain, T. Ewers, A.P. Alivisatos, Localized surface plasmon resonances arising from free carriers in doped quantum dots. Nat. Mater. 10(5), 361–366 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat3004
T.-T. Zhuang, Z.-Q. Liang, A. Seifitokaldani, Y. Li, P. De Luna et al., Steering post-C–C coupling selectivity enables high efficiency electroreduction of carbon dioxide to multi-carbon alcohols. Nat. Catal. 1(6), 421–428 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-018-0084-7
I. Kasatkin, P. Kurr, B. Kniep, A. Trunschke, R. Schlögl, Role of lattice strain and defects in copper particles on the activity of Cu/ZnO/Al2O3 catalysts for methanol synthesis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 46(38), 7324–7327 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200702600
T.-N. Ye, S.-W. Park, Y. Lu, J. Li, M. Sasase et al., Vacancy-enabled N2 activation for ammonia synthesis on an Ni-loaded catalyst. Nature 583(7816), 391–395 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2464-9
Y. Jing, S. Huang, J. Wu, M. Meng, X. Li et al., A single-electron transistor made of a 3d topological insulator nanoplate. Adv. Mater. 31(42), 1903686 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201903686
C. Peng, G. Luo, Z. Xu, S. Yan, J. Zhang et al., Lithiation-enabled high-density nitrogen vacancies electrocatalyze CO2 to C2 products. Adv. Mater. 33(40), 2103150 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202103150
H. Xu, L. Chen, J. Shi, Advanced electrocatalytic systems for enhanced atom/electron utilization. Energy Environ. Sci. 16(4), 1334–1363 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1039/D2EE03323B
Z.Y. Yin, C. Yu, Z.L. Zhao, X.F. Guo, M.Q. Shen et al., Cu3N nanocubes for selective electrochemical reduction of CO2 to ethylene. Nano Lett. 19(12), 8658–8663 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b03324
Y.Y. Mi, X.Y. Peng, X.J. Liu, J. Luo, Selective formation of C2 products from electrochemical CO2 reduction over Cu1.8Se nanowires. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 1(10), 5119–5123 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.8b00744
J. Li, A. Ozden, M.Y. Wan, Y.F. Hu, F.W. Li et al., Silica-copper catalyst interfaces enable carbon-carbon coupling towards ethylene electrosynthesis. Nat. Commun. 12(1), 2808 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-23023-0
F.P.G. de Arquer, C.T. Dinh, A. Ozden, J. Wicks, C. McCallum et al., CO2 electrolysis to multicarbon products at activities greater than 1 A cm-2. Science 367(6478), 661–666 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay4217
H.Q. Liang, S. Zhao, X.M. Hu, M. Ceccato, T. Skrydstrup et al., Hydrophobic copper interfaces boost electroreduction of carbon dioxide to ethylene in water. ACS Catal. 11(2), 958–966 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.0c03766
R.X. Chen, H.Y. Su, D.Y. Liu, R. Huang, X.G. Meng et al., Highly selective production of ethylene by the electroreduction of carbon monoxide. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59(1), 154–160 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201910662
X. Wei, Z.L. Yin, K.J. Lyu, Z. Li, J. Gong et al., Highly selective reduction of CO2 to C2+ hydrocarbons at copper/polyaniline interfaces. ACS Catal. 10(7), 4103–4111 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.0c00049
A. Thevenon, A. Rosas-Hernandez, J.C. Peters, T. Agapie, In-situ nanostructuring and stabilization of polycrystalline copper by an organic salt additive promotes electrocatalytic CO2 reduction to ethylene. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58(47), 16952–16958 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201907935
X.Y. Chen, J.F. Chen, N.M. Alghoraibi, D.A. Henckel, R.X. Zhang et al., Electrochemical CO2-to-ethylene conversion on polyamine-incorporated Cu electrodes. Nat. Catal. 4(1), 20–27 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-020-00547-0
L. Yuan, L. Zhang, J. Feng, C. Jiang, J. Feng et al., Upscaling studies for efficiently electric-driven CO2 reduction to CO in ionic liquid-based electrolytes. Chem. Eng. J. 450, 138378 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2022.138378
Y. Wang, W. Wang, J. Xie, C.-H. Wang, Y.-W. Yang et al., Electrochemical reduction of CO2 in ionic liquid: Mechanistic study of Li-CO2 batteries via in situ ambient pressure x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Nano Energy 83, 105830 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.105830
Y.F. Sha, J.L. Zhang, X.Y. Cheng, M.Z. Xu, Z.Z. Su et al., Anchoring ionic liquid in copper electrocatalyst for improving CO2 conversion to ethylene. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61, 13 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202200039
C.L. Xiao, J. Zhang, Architectural design for enhanced C2 product selectivity in electrochemical CO2 reduction using Cu-based catalysts: a review. ACS Nano 15(5), 7975–8000 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.0c10697
J. Wang, H.-Y. Tan, Y. Zhu, H. Chu, H.M. Chen, Linking the dynamic chemical state of catalysts with the product profile of electrocatalytic CO2 reduction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60(32), 17254–17267 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202017181
P.P. Yang, X.L. Zhang, F.Y. Gao, Y.R. Zheng, Z.Z. Niu et al., Protecting copper oxidation state via intermediate confinement for selective CO2 electroreduction to C2+ fuels. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142(13), 6400–6408 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.0c01699
H. Xiao, W.A. Goddard, T. Cheng, Y.Y. Liu, Cu metal embedded in oxidized matrix catalyst to promote CO2 activation and CO dimerization for electrochemical reduction of CO2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 114(26), 6685–6688 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1702405114
T.C. Chou, C.C. Chang, H.L. Yu, W.Y. Yu, C.L. Dong et al., Controlling the oxidation state of the Cu electrode and reaction intermediates for electrochemical CO2 reduction to ethylene. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142(6), 2857–2867 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.9b11126
P. De Luna, R. Quintero-Bermudez, C.T. Dinh, M.B. Ross, O.S. Bushuyev et al., Catalyst electro-redeposition controls morphology and oxidation state for selective carbon dioxide reduction. Nat. Catal. 1(2), 103–110 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-017-0018-9
X. Yuan, S. Chen, D. Cheng, L. Li, W. Zhu et al., Controllable Cu0-Cu+ sites for electrocatalytic reduction of carbon dioxide. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60(28), 15344–15347 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202105118
X. Li, Q. Liu, J. Wang, D. Meng, Y. Shu et al., Enhanced electroreduction of CO2 to C2+ products on heterostructured Cu/oxide electrodes. Chem 8(8), 2148–2162 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chempr.2022.04.004
D. Gao, I. Sinev, F. Scholten, R.M. Arán-Ais, N.J. Divins et al., Selective CO2 electroreduction to ethylene and multicarbon alcohols via electrolyte-driven nanostructuring. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 131(47), 17203–17209 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201910155
W. Zhang, C. Huang, Q. Xiao, L. Yu, L. Shuai et al., Atypical oxygen-bearing copper boosts ethylene selectivity toward electrocatalytic CO2 reduction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142(26), 11417–11427 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.0c01562
H. Sun, L. Chen, L. Xiong, K. Feng, Y. Chen et al., Promoting ethylene production over a wide potential window on Cu crystallites induced and stabilized via current shock and charge delocalization. Nat. Commun. 12(1), 6823 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-27169-9
S. Sultan, H. Lee, S. Park, M.M. Kim, A. Yoon et al., Interface rich CuO/Al2CuO4 surface for selective ethylene production from electrochemical CO2 conversion. Energy Environ. Sci. 15(6), 2397–2409 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1039/D1EE03861C
A. Guan, Z. Chen, Y. Quan, C. Peng, Z. Wang et al., Boosting CO2 electroreduction to CH4 via tuning neighboring single-copper sites. ACS Energy Lett. 5(4), 1044–1053 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.0c00018
P. Shao, H.X. Zhang, Q.L. Hong, L. Yi, Q.H. Li et al., Enhancing CO2 electroreduction to ethylene via copper-silver tandem catalyst in boron-imidazolate framework nanosheet. Adv. Energy Mater. 13(19), 2300088 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202300088
A. Ozden, F. Li, F.P. Garcıá de Arquer, A. Rosas-Hernández, A. Thevenon et al., High-rate and efficient ethylene electrosynthesis using a catalyst/promoter/transport layer. ACS Energy Lett. 5(9), 2811–2818 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.0c01266
R. Wang, J. Liu, Q. Huang, L.Z. Dong, S.L. Li et al., Partial coordination-perturbed bi-copper sites for selective electroreduction of CO2 to hydrocarbons. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60(36), 19829–19835 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202105343
M. Balamurugan, H.Y. Jeong, V.S.K. Choutipalli, J.S. Hong, H. Seo et al., Electrocatalytic reduction of CO2 to ethylene by molecular Cu-complex immobilized on graphitized mesoporous carbon. Small 16(25), 2000955 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202000955
X. Xie, X. Zhang, M. Xie, L. Xiong, H. Sun et al., Au-activated N motifs in non-coherent cupric porphyrin metal organic frameworks for promoting and stabilizing ethylene production. Nat. Commun. 13(1), 63 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-27768-6
Y.-R. Lin, D.U. Lee, S. Tan, D.M. Koshy, T.Y. Lin et al., Vapor-fed electrolyzers for carbon dioxide reduction using tandem electrocatalysts: cuprous oxide coupled with nickel-coordinated nitrogen-doped carbon. Adv. Funct. Mater. 32(28), 2113252 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202113252
W.H. Lee, C. Lim, S.Y. Lee, K.H. Chae, C.H. Choi et al., Highly selective and stackable electrode design for gaseous CO2 electroreduction to ethylene in a zero-gap configuration. Nano Energy 84, 105859 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.105859
A. Ozden, Y. Wang, F. Li, M. Luo, J. Sisler et al., Cascade CO2 electroreduction enables efficient carbonate-free production of ethylene. Joule 5(3), 706–719 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2021.01.007
Y.N. Xu, W. Li, H.Q. Fu, X.Y. Zhang, J.Y. Zhao et al., Tuning the microenvironment in monolayer mgal layered double hydroxide for CO2-to-ethylene electrocatalysis in neutral media. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 135(19), 2217296 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.202217296
Y. Zhou, F. Che, M. Liu, C. Zou, Z. Liang et al., Dopant-induced electron localization drives CO2 reduction to C2 hydrocarbons. Nat. Chem. 10(9), 974–980 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-018-0092-x
S.Y. Lee, H. Jung, N.-K. Kim, H.-S. Oh, B.K. Min et al., Mixed copper states in anodized Cu electrocatalyst for stable and selective ethylene production from CO2 reduction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140(28), 8681–8689 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.8b02173
H. Mistry, A.S. Varela, C.S. Bonifacio, I. Zegkinoglou, I. Sinev et al., Highly selective plasma-activated copper catalysts for carbon dioxide reduction to ethylene. Nat. Commun. 7(1), 12123 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12123
H. Chen, Z. Wang, X. Wei, S. Liu, P. Guo et al., Promotion of electrochemical CO2 reduction to ethylene on phosphorus-doped copper nanocrystals with stable Cuδ+ sites. Appl. Surf. Sci. 544, 148965 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.148965
H. Li, T. Liu, P. Wei, L. Lin, D. Gao et al., High-rate CO2 electroreduction to C2+ products over a copper-copper iodide catalyst. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 133(26), 14450–14454 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.202102657
A. Vasileff, C. Xu, Y. Jiao, Y. Zheng, S.-Z. Qiao, Surface and interface engineering in copper-based bimetallic materials for selective CO2 electroreduction. Chem 4(8), 1809–1831 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chempr.2018.05.001
D. Kim, J. Resasco, Y. Yu, A.M. Asiri, P. Yang, Synergistic geometric and electronic effects for electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide using gold-copper bimetallic nanoparticles. Nat. Commun. 5, 4948 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5948
S. Popović, M. Smiljanić, P. Jovanovič, J. Vavra, R. Buonsanti et al., Stability and degradation mechanisms of copper-based catalysts for electrochemical CO2 reduction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59(35), 14736–14746 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202000617
S.H. Lee, J.C. Lin, M. Farmand, A.T. Landers, J.T. Feaster et al., Oxidation state and surface reconstruction of Cu under CO2 reduction conditions from in situ X-ray characterization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143(2), 588–592 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.0c10017
T. Burdyny, W.A. Smith, CO2 reduction on gas-diffusion electrodes and why catalytic performance must be assessed at commercially-relevant conditions. Energy Environ. Sci. 12(5), 1442–1453 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1039/C8EE03134G
Y. Luo, K. Zhang, Y. Li, Y. Wang, Valorizing carbon dioxide via electrochemical reduction on gas-diffusion electrodes. InfoMat 3(12), 1313–1332 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/inf2.12253
Q. Gong, P. Ding, M. Xu, X. Zhu, M. Wang et al., Structural defects on converted bismuth oxide nanotubes enable highly active electrocatalysis of carbon dioxide reduction. Nat. Commun. 10(1), 1–10 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10819-4
J.Y.T. Kim, P. Zhu, F.-Y. Chen, Z.-Y. Wu, D.A. Cullen et al., Recovering carbon losses in CO2 electrolysis using a solid electrolyte reactor. Nat. Catal. 5(4), 288–299 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-022-00763-w
W. Luc, B.H. Ko, S. Kattel, S. Li, D. Su et al., SO2-induced selectivity change in CO2 electroreduction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141(25), 9902–9909 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.9b03215
C. Chen, X. Yan, S. Liu, Y. Wu, Q. Wan et al., Highly efficient electroreduction of CO2 to C2+ alcohols on heterogeneous dual active sites. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59(38), 16459–16464 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202006847
Acknowledgments
This work was financially supported via Australian Research Council (FT180100705). Y. Z. acknowledges the support by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (22209103). J. Z. thanks the support from UTS Chancellor’s Research Fellowships. All authors thank the support from Open Project of State Key Laboratory of Advanced Special Steel, the Shanghai Key Laboratory of Advanced Ferrometallurgy, Shanghai University (SKLASS 2021-**), Joint International Laboratory on Environmental and Energy Frontier Materials, and Innovation Research Team of High-Level Local Universities in Shanghai.
Funding
Open access funding provided by Shanghai Jiao Tong University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no interest conflict. They have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Qu, J., Cao, X., Gao, L. et al. Electrochemical Carbon Dioxide Reduction to Ethylene: From Mechanistic Understanding to Catalyst Surface Engineering. Nano-Micro Lett. 15, 178 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-023-01146-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-023-01146-x