Skip to main content
Log in

Understanding vortex characteristics in hydraulic systems: a temperature-driven analysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Modeling Earth Systems and Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hydraulic engineers confront challenges posed by free surface vortices at pump and power intakes, influencing turbine efficiency and causing hydraulic losses and blockage. This study investigates the formation and strength of vortices under different conditions, focusing on the influence of water temperature. Numerical simulations using the OpenFOAM package model the flow field towards a vertical intake, employing the Volume Of Fluid (VOF) and Large Eddy Simulation (LES) approaches to simulate free surface and turbulence. Validated against experimental data across temperatures ranging from 10 to 40 °C, the results reveal a direct correlation between vortex characteristics and temperature. In particular, vortices exhibit mild flow rotations and a slight surface drop (Class C), increased strength with potential debris draw (Class B), or capture and transportation of air bubbles to the intake, posing system risks (Class A). For instance, a 10 °C temperature decrease leads to a 29.5% and 32.2% reduction in vortex strength for conditions analogous to vortex Classes A and C, respectively, compared to normal conditions. Furthermore, increasing temperature transforms vortices into varying characteristics, signifying diverse risks. This study provides valuable insights into the intricate interplay between temperature and vortex dynamics, contributing to a deeper understanding of free surface vortex phenomena and their diverse characteristics. The findings offer crucial considerations for optimizing hydraulic engineering applications and mitigating challenges posed by free surface vortices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available within the article.

References

  • Ahn S-H, Xiao Y, Wang Z, Zhou X, Luo Y (2017) Numerical prediction on the effect of free surface vortex on intake flow characteristics for tidal power station. Renew Energy 101:617–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anwar HO (1966) Formation of a weak vortex. J Hydraul Res 4:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azarpira M, Zarrati AR (2019) A 3D analytical model for vortex velocity field based on spiral streamline pattern. Water Sci Eng 12:244–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berga L (2016) The role of hydropower in climate change mitigation and adaptation: a review. Engineering 2:313–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen G, Xiong Q, Morris PJ, Paterson EG, Sergeev A, Wang Y (2014) OpenFOAM for computational fluid dynamics. Notices AMS 61:354–363

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Daggett LL, Keulegan GH (1974) Similitude in free-surface vortex formations. J Hydraul Div 100:1565–1581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Domfeh MK, Gyamfi S, Amo-Boateng M, Andoh R, Ofosu EA, Tabor G (2020a) Free surface vortices at hydropower intakes—a state-of-the-art review. Sci African 8:e00355

    Google Scholar 

  • Domfeh MK, Gyamfi S, Amo-Boateng M, Andoh R, Ofosu EA, Tabor G (2020b) Numerical simulation of an air-core vortex and its suppression at an intake using OpenFOAM. Fluids 5:221

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Drikakis D, Frank M, Tabor G (2019) Multiscale computational fluid dynamics. Energies 12:3272

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Drouineau M, Assoumou E, Mazauric V, Maïzi N (2015) Increasing shares of intermittent sources in Reunion Island: Impacts on the future reliability of power supply. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 46:120–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao X, Zhang H, Liu J, Sun B, Tian Y (2018) Numerical investigation of flow in a vertical pipe inlet/outlet with a horizontal anti-vortex plate: effect of diversion orifices height and divergence angle. Eng Appl Comput Fluid Mech 12:182–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidarian P, Neyshabouri SAAS, Khoshkonesh A, Bahmanpouri F, Nsom B, Eidi A (2022) Numerical study of flow characteristics and energy dissipation over the slotted roller bucket system. Model Earth Syst Environ 8:5337–5351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hite JE Jr, Mih WC (1994) Velocity of air-core vortices at hydraulic intakes. J Hydraul Eng 120:284–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knauss J (1987) Swirling flow problems at intakes: hydraulic structures design manual. Hydraulic design considerations. Balkema, Rotterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Kundu PK, Cohen IM (1990) Fluid mechanics. Academic Press, Pennsylvania, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Li H-f, Chen H-x, Ma Z, Zhou Y (2008) Experimental and numerical investigation of free surface vortex. J Hydrodyn 20:485–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li L, Lu J, Fang H, Yin Z, Wang T, Wang R, Fan X, Zhao L, Tan D, Wan Y (2020) Lattice Boltzmann method for fluid-thermal systems: status, hotspots, trends and outlook. IEEE Access 8:27649–27675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li L, Gu Z, Xu W, Tan Y, Fan X, Tan D (2023) Mixing mass transfer mechanism and dynamic control of gas–liquid–solid multiphase flow based on VOF-DEM coupling. Energy 272:127015

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Z, Huang Y, Sun L (2017) Studies on air core size in a simplex pressure-swirl atomizer. Int J Hydrogen Energy 42:18649–18657

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lucino C, Liscia S, Duro G (2010) Vortex detection in pump sumps by means of CFD. In: XXIV latin American congress on hydraulics

  • Mirjalili S, Jain SS, Dodd M (2017) Interface-capturing methods for two-phase flows: an overview and recent developments. Center Turbul Res Annu Res Briefs 2017:13

    Google Scholar 

  • Monji H, Shinozaki T, Kamide H, Sakai T (2010) Effect of experimental conditions on gas core length and downward velocity of free surface vortex in cylindrical vessel. J Eng Gas Turbines Power 10(1115/1):3078704

    Google Scholar 

  • Munson BR, Okiishi TH, Huebsch WW, Rothmayer AP (2013) Fluid mechanics. Wiley, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  • Naderi V, Farsadizadeh D, Lin C, Gaskin S (2019) A 3D study of an air-core vortex using HSPIV and flow visualization. Arab J Sci Eng 44:8573–8584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nazir K, Sohn CH (2018) Effect of water temperature on air-core generation and disappearance during draining. J Mech Sci Technol 32:703–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicoud F, Ducros F (1999) Subgrid-scale stress modelling based on the square of the velocity gradient tensor. Flow Turbul Combust 62:183–200

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Odgaard AJ (1986) Free-surface air core vortex. J Hydraul Eng 112:610–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsson E, Nilsson H (2017) A description of isoadvector–a numerical method for improved suface sharpness in two-phase flows. Chalmers University of Technology. https://www.tfd.chalmers.se/~hani/kurser/OS_CFD_2017/ElinOlsson/Presentation_ElinOlsson.pdf

  • Pakdel E, Majdzadeh Tabatabai MR, Sarkardeh H, Ghoreishi Najafabadi SH (2020) Elimination of vortices by wave generation as a hydraulic anti-vortex method. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 42:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pope SB (2000) Turbulent flows. Cambridge university Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rabe BK, Najafabadi SHG, Sarkardeh H (2017) Numerical simulation of air-core vortex at intake. Curr Sci 113(1):141–147

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rankine WJM (1877) A manual of applied mechanics. Griffin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichardt H (1951) Vollständige Darstellung der turbulenten Geschwindigkeitsverteilung in glatten Leitungen. ZAMM J Appl Math Mech Zeitschr Angew Math Mech 31:208–219

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Rodi W, Constantinescu G, Stoesser T (2013) Large-eddy simulation in hydraulics. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkardeh H, Zarrati AR, Roshan R (2010) Effect of intake head wall and trash rack on vortices. J Hydraul Res 48:108–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkardeh H, Jabbari E, Zarrati AR, Tavakkol S (2014a) Velocity field in a reservoir in the presence of an air-core vortex. In: Proceedings of the institution of civil engineers-water management. Thomas Telford Ltd, pp 356–364

  • Sarkardeh H, Reza Zarrati A, Jabbari E, Marosi M (2014b) Numerical simulation and analysis of flow in a reservoir in the presence of vortex. Eng Appl Comput Fluid Mech 8:598–608

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlichting H, Gersten K (2016) Boundary-layer theory. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Suerich-Gulick F, Gaskin SJ, Villeneuve M, Parkinson É (2014) Characteristics of free surface vortices at low-head hydropower intakes. J Hydraul Eng 140:291–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suerich-Gulick F, Gaskin S, Villeneuve M, Holder G, Parkinson E (2006) Experimental and numerical analysis of free surface vortices at a hydropower intake. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on hydroscience and engineering, pp 1–11

  • Sun H, Liu Y (2015) Theoretical and experimental study on the vortex at hydraulic intakes. J Hydraul Res 53:787–796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun Z, Jin H, Gu J, Huang Y, Wang X, Yang H, Shen X (2020) Studies on the online intelligent diagnosis method of undercharging sub-health air source heat pump water heater. Appl Therm Eng 169:114957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan D, Li L, Zhu Y, Zheng S, Yin Z, Li D (2019) Critical penetration condition and Ekman suction-extraction mechanism of a sink vortex. J Zhejiang Univ Sci A 20:61–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taştan K, Yildirim N (2010) Effects of dimensionless parameters on air-entraining vortices. J Hydraul Res 48:57–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timilsina AB, Mulligan S, Bajracharya TR (2018) Water vortex hydropower technology: a state-of-the-art review of developmental trends. Clean Technol Environ Policy 20:1737–1760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trefethen LM, Bilger R, Fink P, Luxton R, Tanner R (1965) The bath-tub vortex in the southern hemisphere. Nature 207:1084–1085

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Wei J, Li F, Yu B, Kawaguchi Y (2006) Swirling flow of a viscoelastic fluid with free surface—part I: experimental analysis of vortex motion by PIV. J Fluids Eng 128(1):69–76

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weickert M, Teike G, Schmidt O, Sommerfeld M (2010) Investigation of the LES WALE turbulence model within the lattice Boltzmann framework. Comput Math Appl 59:2200–2214

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Yang J, Liu T, Bottacin-Busolin A, Lin C (2014) Effects of intake-entrance profiles on free-surface vortices. J Hydraul Res 52:523–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yongzhi Z, Zhaolin G, Yongzhang Y, Yun L, Xiao F (2003) Numerical analysis of structure and evolution of free water vortex. J Xian Jiaotong Univ 37:85–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng G, Gu Z, Xu W, Lu B, Li Q, Tan Y, Wang C, Li L (2022) Gravitational surface vortex formation and suppression control: a review from hydrodynamic characteristics. Processes 11:42

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Eidi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix A: Grid independence analysis

Appendix A: Grid independence analysis

Determining appropriate grid dimensions is crucial for the accuracy of the simulation. Consequently, a sensitivity analysis was conducted with various mean grid sizes, as illustrated in Fig. 13. The filtered velocity field provides valuable insights into residual motions. The effectiveness of integrating this information into a Large Eddy Simulation (LES) study, accurately representing the impacts of residual motions, hinges on factors such as the level of detail in the filtered fields and whether they are characterized in physical space or wave number space. The intrinsic relationship between grid resolution and modeling becomes apparent; if the filtered fields are fully resolved in wave number space, the effects of residual motions are known, obviating the need for additional modeling (Pope 2000). In the current study, the average cell size was reduced to 6 mm from an initial value of approximately 10 mm, resulting in a 37% tangential velocity deviation. This adjustment led to a 6% deviation between the tangential velocity outputs of the numerical model and the corresponding experimental data. Consequently, a balance was achieved between computational cost and study accuracy, allowing for an optimal compromise between the two factors.

Fig. 13
figure 13

The numerical model’s sensitivity to mean grid dimension of the domain

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Amini, A.A., Sarkardeh, H., Jabbari, E. et al. Understanding vortex characteristics in hydraulic systems: a temperature-driven analysis. Model. Earth Syst. Environ. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-024-01969-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-024-01969-6

Keywords

Navigation