Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Quantifying LULC changes in Urmia Lake Basin using machine learning techniques, intensity analysis and a combined method of cellular automata (CA) and artificial neural networks (ANN) (CA-ANN)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Modeling Earth Systems and Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The land use and land cover (LULC) classification accuracy of six machine learning models were compared in Urmia Lake Basin using Landsat images. The overall accuracy confirms that the random forest (RF) (0.957), regularized random forest (RRF) (0.957), the combined method of genetic algorithm and random forest (GA-RF) (0.959) and the combined method of simulated annealing and random forest (SA-RF) (0.957) perform slightly better than the support vector machine (SVM) (0.946) and conditional inference random forest (CIRF) (0.947) though this difference was negligible. The worst classifier was the CIRF with only 43.8% of the grassland pixels correctly assigned to the respective class whereas the GA-RF, SA-RF and RRF performed significantly better with 60.4% of correct classification. Except for the grassland class, the performance of the GA-RF and the SA-RF for the rest of LULC classes were similar (greater than 90%). The magnitude and extent of LULC change was examined using intensity analysis including the interval, category, and transition levels of change. The maximum intensity was from 2006 to 2013, with an annual change in area of 5% which is attributed to the building of the Shahrchay Dam in 2006. The LULC predicted using the combined method of cellular automata (CA) and artificial neural networks (ANN) model (CA-ANN) indicated the soil and rangeland classes are estimated to experience the largest decrease (-5.48%) and increase (7.21%) by year 2035.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data are available on request from the authors.

References

  • Abd El-Kawy OR, Rød JK, Ismail HA, Suliman AS (2011) Land use and land cover change detection in the western Nile delta of Egypt using remote sensing data. Appl Geogr 31(2):483–494

    Google Scholar 

  • Abedini A, Khalili A, Asadi N (2020) Urban sprawl evaluation using landscape metrics and black-and-white hypothesis (Case Study: Urmia City). J Indian Soc Remote Sens 48:1021–1034

    Google Scholar 

  • Adam E, Mutanga O, Odindi J, Abdel-Rahman EM (2014) Land-use/cover classification in a heterogeneous coastal landscape using RapidEye imagery: evaluating the performance of random forest and support vector machines classifiers. Int J Remote Sens 35:3440–3458

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldwaik SZ, Pontius RG Jr (2012) Intensity analysis to unify measurements of size and stationarity of land changes by interval, category, and transition. Landscape Urban Plann 106:103–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Alencar A, Shimbo JZ, Lenti F, Balzani Marques C, Zimbres B, Rosa M, Barroso M (2020) Mapping three decades of changes in the brazilian savanna native vegetation using landsat data processed in the google earth engine platform. Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12060924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alizade Govarchin Ghale Y, Altunkaynak A, Unal A (2018) Investigation anthropogenic impacts and climate factors on drying up of Urmia Lake using water budget and drought analysis. Water Resour Manage 32:325–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Amini S, Saber M, Rabiei-Dastjerdi H, Homayouni S (2022) Urban land use and land cover change analysis using random forest classification of landsat time series. Remote Sensing 14:2654

    Google Scholar 

  • Arif M, Sengupta S, Mohinuddin SK, Gupta K (2023) Dynamics of land use and land cover change in peri urban area of Burdwan city, India: a remote sensing and GIS based approach. GeoJournal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-023-10860-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arjasakusuma S, Swahyu Kusuma S, Phinn S (2020) Evaluating variable selection and machine learning algorithms for estimating forest heights by combining lidar and hyperspectral data. ISPRS Int J Geo-Inf 9:507

    Google Scholar 

  • Asadi M, Oshnooei-Nooshabadi A, Saleh SS, Habibnezhad F, Sarafraz-Asbagh S, Van Genderen JL (2022) Urban Sprawl Simulation Mapping of Urmia (Iran) by Comparison of Cellular Automata–Markov Chain and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) Modeling Approach. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142315625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Astou Sambou MH, Albergel J, Vissin EW, Liersch S, Koch H, Szantoi Z et al (2023) Prediction of land use and land cover change in two watersheds in the Senegal River basin (West Africa) using the Multilayer Perceptron and Markov chain model. Eur J Remote Sens. https://doi.org/10.1080/22797254.2023.2231137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barhagh SE, Zarghami M, Ghale YAG, Shahbazbegian MR (2021) System dynamics to assess the effectiveness of restoration scenarios for the Urmia Lake: A prey-predator approach for the human-environment uncertain interactions. J Hydrol 593:125891

    Google Scholar 

  • Basheer S, Wang X, Farooque AA, Nawaz RA, Liu K, Adekanmbi T, Liu S (2022) Comparison of land use land cover classifiers using different satellite imagery and machine learning techniques. Remote Sensing 14:4978

    Google Scholar 

  • Biswas G, Sengupta A (2022) Assessment of agricultural prospects in relation to land use change and population pressure on a spatiotemporal framework. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:43267–43286

    Google Scholar 

  • Breiman L, Cutler A (2005) Random Forests. http://www.stat.berkeley.edu/~breiman/RandomForests/cc_home.htm (Accessed July 2023).

  • Chachondhia P, Shakya A, Kumar G (2021) Performance evaluation of machine learning algorithms using optical and microwave data for LULC classification. Remote Sens Appl Soc Environ 23:100599

    Google Scholar 

  • Chavez PS Jr (1988) An improved dark-object subtraction technique for atmospheric scattering correction of multispectral data. Remote Sens Environ 24:459–479

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherif K, Yahia N, Bilal B, Bilal B (2023) Erosion potential model-based ANN-MLP for the spatiotemporal modeling of soil erosion in wadi Saida watershed. Model Earth Syst Environ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-022-01657-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuba N (2015) Research note: Sankey diagrams for visualizing land cover dynamics. Landscape Urban Plann 139:163–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Delgado-Artés R, Garófano-Gómez V, Oliver-Villanueva JV, Rojas-Briales E (2022) Land use/cover change analysis in the Mediterranean region: A regional case study of forest evolution in Castelló (Spain) over 50 years. Land Use Policy 114:105967

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng H, Runger G (2012) Feature selection via regularized trees. In: Proceedings of the the 2012 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), Brisbane, Australia, 10–15 June 2012; pp. 1–8.

  • Deng H, Runger G (2013) Gene selection with guided regularized random forest. Pattern Recognit 46:3483–3489

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolui S, Sarkar S (2023) Modelling landuse dynamics of ecologically sensitive peri-urban space by incorporating an ANN cellular automata-Markov model for Siliguri urban agglomeration. Model Earth Syst Environ, India. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-023-01771-w

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Eimanifar A, Mohebbi F (2007) Urmia Lake (northwest Iran): a brief review. Saline Systems 3:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekumah B, Armah FA, Afrifa EK, Aheto DW, Odoi JO, Afitiri AR (2020) Assessing land use and land cover change in coastal urban wetlands of international importance in Ghana using Intensity Analysis. Wetlands Ecol Manage 28:271–284

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Tantawi AM, Bao A, Chang C, Liu Y (2019) Monitoring and predicting land use/cover changes in the Aksu-Tarim River Basin, Xinjiang-China (1990–2030). Environ Monit Assess 191:1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Exavier R, Zeilhofer P (2020) OpenLand: Software for Quantitative Analysis and Visualization of Land Use and Cover Change. R J 12:359

    Google Scholar 

  • Fazel N, Haghighi AT, Kløve B (2017) Analysis of land use and climate change impacts by comparing river flow records for headwaters and lowland reaches. Global Planet Change 158:47–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Feizizadeh B, Omarzadeh D, Kazemi Garajeh M, Lakes T, Blaschke T (2023) Machine learning data-driven approaches for land use/cover mapping and trend analysis using Google Earth Engine. J Environ Plann Manage 66:665–697

    Google Scholar 

  • Gashaw T, Tulu T, Argaw M, Worqlul AW (2018) Modeling the hydrological impacts of land use/land cover changes in the Andassa watershed, Blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia. Sci Total Environ 619:1394–1408

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaur S, Singh R (2023) A comprehensive review on land use/land cover (LULC) change modeling for urban development: current status and future prospects. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15020903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaur S, Mittal A, Bandyopadhyay A, Holman I, Singh R (2020) Spatio-temporal analysis of land use and land cover change: a systematic model inter-comparison driven by integrated modelling techniques. Int J Remote Sens 41:9229–9255

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghafari S, Ghorbani A, Moameri M, Mostafazadeh R, Bidarlord M (2018) Composition and structure of species along altitude gradient in Moghan-Sabalan rangelands. Iran J Mountain Sci 15:1209–1228

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghale YAG, Baykara M, Unal A (2019) Investigating the interaction between agricultural lands and Urmia Lake ecosystem using remote sensing techniques and hydro-climatic data analysis. Agric Water Manage 221:566–579

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh P, Bagchi MC (2009) QSAR modeling for quinoxaline derivatives using genetic algorithm and simulated annealing based feature selection. Curr Med Chem 16:4032–4048

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh P, Mukhopadhyay A, Chanda A, Mondal P, Akhand A, Mukherjee S et al (2017) Application of Cellular automata and Markov-chain model in geospatial environmental modeling-A review. Remote Sens Appl: Soc Environ 5:64–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Gong X, Bian J, Wang Y, Jia Z, Wan H (2019) Evaluating and predicting the effects of land use changes on water quality using SWAT and CA–Markov models. Water Resour Manage 33:4923–4938

    Google Scholar 

  • Guidigan MLG, Sanou CL, Ragatoa DS, Fafa CO, Mishra VN (2019) Assessing land use/land cover dynamic and its impact in Benin Republic using land change model and CCI-LC products. Earth Syst Environ 3:127–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamzekhani FG, Saghafian B, Araghinejad S (2016) Environmental management in Urmia Lake: thresholds approach. Int J Water Resour Dev 32:77–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesami A, Amini A (2016) Changes in irrigated land and agricultural water use in the Lake Urmia basin. Lake Reservoir Manage 32:288–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosseini-Moghari SM, Araghinejad S, Tourian MJ, Ebrahimi K, Döll P (2020) Quantifying the impacts of human water use and climate variations on recent drying of Lake Urmia basin: the value of different sets of spaceborne and in situ data for calibrating a global hydrological model. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 24:1939–1956

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosseiny B, Abdi AM, Jamali S (2022) Urban land use and land cover classification with interpretable machine learning–A case study using Sentinel-2 and auxiliary data. Remote Sens Appl: Soc Environ 28:100843

    Google Scholar 

  • Hothorn T, Hornik K, Zeileis A (2006) Unbiased recursive partitioning: A conditional inference framework. J Comput Graph Stat 15:651–674

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussien K, Kebede A, Mekuriaw A, Asfaw Beza S, Haile Erena S (2023) Modelling spatiotemporal trends of land use land cover dynamics in the Abbay River Basin, Ethiopia. Model Earth Syst Environ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-022-01487-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamaraj M, Rangarajan S (2022) Predicting the future land use and land cover changes for Bhavani basin, Tamil Nadu, India, using QGIS MOLUSCE plugin. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 29:86337–86348

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaptan S (2021) Changes in forest areas and land cover and their causes using intensity analysis: the case of Alabarda forest planning unit. Environ Monit Assess 193:387

    Google Scholar 

  • Karimi H, Jafarnezhad J, Khaledi J, Ahmadi P (2018) Monitoring and prediction of land use/land cover changes using CA-Markov model: a case study of Ravansar County in Iran. Arabian J Geosci 11:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn M, Johnson K (2019) Feature engineering and selection: A practical approach for predictive models. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Kassawmar T, Eckert S, Hurni K, Zeleke G, Hurni H (2018) Reducing landscape heterogeneity for improved land use and land cover (LULC) classification across the large and complex Ethiopian highlands. Geocarto Int 33:53–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Khoshnood Motlagh S, Sadoddin A, Haghnegahdar A, Razavi S, Salmanmahiny A, Ghorbani K (2021) Analysis and prediction of land cover changes using the land change modeler (LCM) in a semiarid river basin. Iran Land Degrad Dev 32:3092–3105

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulithalai Shiyam Sundar P, Deka PC (2022) Spatio-temporal classification and prediction of land use and land cover change for the Vembanad Lake system, Kerala: a machine learning approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:86220–86236

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar V, Agrawal S (2023) A multi-layer perceptron–Markov chain based LULC change analysis and prediction using remote sensing data in Prayagraj district. Environ Monit Assess, India. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-11205-w

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar V, Singh VK, Gupta K, Jha AK (2021) Integrating cellular automata and agent-based modeling for predicting urban growth: A case of Dehradun City. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 49:2779–2795

    Google Scholar 

  • Larkin TK (2017) Advanced analytical tools for geomagnetic storm prediction: Ensembles and their insights. PhD thesis, The University of Alabama.‏

  • Leta MK, Demissie TA, Tränckner J (2021) Modeling and prediction of land use land cover change dynamics based on land change modeler (Lcm) in nashe watershed, upper blue nile basin. Ethiopia Sustainability 13:3740

    Google Scholar 

  • Li B, Deng C, Li S (2015) High resolution remote sensing image classification based on particle swarm optimization and support vector machine. Computer Model New Technol 19:22–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin C, Doyog ND (2023) Challenges of Retrieving LULC Information in Rural-Forest Mosaic Landscapes Using Random Forest Technique. Forests. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14040816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Shen Z, Chen L (2018) Assessing how spatial variations of land use pattern affect water quality across a typical urbanized watershed in Beijing, China. Landscape Urban Plann 176:51–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu D, Weng Q (2007) A survey of image classification methods and techniques for improving classification performance. Int J Remote Sens 28:823–870

    Google Scholar 

  • Manzoor SA, Griffiths GH, Robinson E, Shoyama K, Lukac M (2022) Linking pattern to process: intensity analysis of land-change dynamics in Ghana as correlated to past socioeconomic and policy contexts. Land. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11071070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marondedze AK, Schütt B (2021) Predicting the impact of future land use and climate change on potential soil erosion risk in an urban district of the Harare Metropolitan Province. Zimbabwe Remote Sens 13:4360

    Google Scholar 

  • Martins S, Bernardo N, Ogashawara I, Alcantara E (2016) Support vector machine algorithm optimal parameterization for change detection mapping in Funil Hydroelectric Reservoir (Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil). Model Earth Syst Environ 2:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Menendez HM III, Wuellner MR, Turner BL, Gates RN, Dunn BH, Tedeschi LO (2020) A spatial landscape scale approach for estimating erosion, water quantity, and quality in response to South Dakota grassland conversion. Nat Resour Model 33:e12243

    Google Scholar 

  • Ming D, Zhou T, Wang M, Tan T (2016) Land cover classification using random forest with genetic algorithm-based parameter optimization. J Appl Remote Sens 10:035021–035021

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohammadi J, Zarabi A, Mobaraki O (2012) Urban sprawl pattern and effective factors on them: The case of Urmia city, Iran. J Urban Regional Analysis 4:77–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Mondal I, Bandyopadhyay J, Dhara S (2017) Detecting shoreline changing trends using principle component analysis in Sagar Island, West Bengal, India. Spatial Inf Res 25:67–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosciaro MJ, Seghezzo L, Texeira M, Paruelo J, Volante J (2023) Where did the forest go? Post-deforestation land use dynamics in the Dry Chaco region in Northwestern Argentina. Land Use Policy 129:106650

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudereri BT, Dube T, Adel-Rahman EM, Niassy S, Kimathi E, Khan Z, Landmann T (2019) A comparative analysis of PlanetScope and Sentinel-2 space-borne sensors in mapping Striga weed using Guided Regularised Random Forest classification ensemble. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci 42:701–708

    Google Scholar 

  • Muhammad R, Zhang W, Abbas Z, Guo F, Gwiazdzinski L (2022) Spatiotemporal change analysis and prediction of future land use and land cover changes using QGIS MOLUSCE plugin and remote sensing big data: a case study of Linyi. China Land 11:419

    Google Scholar 

  • Mushore TD, Mutanga O, Odindi J (2022) Determining the influence of long-term urban growth on surface urban heat islands using local climate zones and intensity analysis techniques. Remote Sensing 14:2060

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen HTT, Doan TM, Tomppo E, McRoberts RE (2020) Land Use/land cover mapping using multitemporal Sentinel-2 imagery and four classification methods—A case study from Dak Nong. Vietnam Remote Sensing 12:1367

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicodemus KK (2011) On the stability and ranking of predictors from random forest variable importance measures. Brief Bioinformatics 12:369–373

    Google Scholar 

  • Palamuleni LG, Ndomba PM, Annegarn HJ (2011) Evaluating land cover change and its impact on hydrological regime in Upper Shire river catchment, Malawi. Reg Environ Change 11:845–855

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsinejad M, Rosenberg DE, Ghale YAG, Khazaei B, Null SE et al (2022) 40-years of Lake Urmia restoration research: Review, synthesis and next steps. Sci Total Environ 832:155055

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Piao Y, Jeong S, Park S, Lee D (2021) Analysis of land use and land cover change using time-series data and random forest in North Korea. Remote Sensing 13:3501

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahaman ZA, Kafy AA, Faisal AA, Al Rakib A, Jahir DMA, Fattah MA et al (2022) Predicting microscale land use/land cover changes using cellular automata algorithm on the northwest coast of peninsular Malaysia. Earth Syst Environ 6:817–835

    Google Scholar 

  • Ren Y, Lü Y, Comber A, Fu B, Harris P, Wu L (2019) Spatially explicit simulation of land use/land cover changes: Current coverage and future prospects. Earth Sci Rev 190:398–415

    Google Scholar 

  • Roushangar K, Alami MT, Golmohammadi H (2023) Modeling the effects of land use/land cover changes on water requirements of Urmia Lake basin using CA-Markov and NETWAT models. Modeling Earth Syst Environ 9:2569–2581

    Google Scholar 

  • Saemian P, Elmi O, Vishwakarma BD, Tourian MJ, Sneeuw N (2020) Analyzing the Lake Urmia restoration progress using ground-based and spaceborne observations. Sci Total Environ 739:139857

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sankarrao L, Ghose DK, Rathinsamy M (2021) Predicting land-use change: Intercomparison of different hybrid machine learning models. Environ Model Softw 145:105207

    Google Scholar 

  • Saputra MH, Lee HS (2019) Prediction of land use and land cover changes for north sumatra, indonesia, using an artificial-neural-network-based cellular automaton. Sustainability 11:3024

    Google Scholar 

  • Schober B, Hauer C, Habersack H (2020) Floodplain losses and increasing flood risk in the context of recent historic land use changes and settlement developments: Austrian case studies. J Flood Risk Manage 13:e12610

    Google Scholar 

  • Serneels S, Said MY, Lambin EF (2001) Land cover changes around a major east African wildlife reserve: the Mara Ecosystem (Kenya). Int J Remote Sens 22:3397–3420

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheykhmousa M, Mahdianpari M, Ghanbari H, Mohammadimanesh F, Ghamisi P, Homayouni S (2020) Support vector machine versus random forest for remote sensing image classification: A meta-analysis and systematic review. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Obs Remote Sens 13:6308–6325

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh SK, Mustak S, Srivastava PK, Szabó S, Islam T (2015) Predicting spatial and decadal LULC changes through cellular automata Markov chain models using earth observation datasets and geo-information. Environ Processes 2:61–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Speiser JL, Miller ME, Tooze J, Ip E (2019) A comparison of random forest variable selection methods for classification prediction modeling. Expert Syst Appl 134:93–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Strobl C, Boulesteix AL, Zeileis A, Hothorn T (2007) Bias in random forest variable importance measures: Illustrations, sources and a solution. BMC Bioinf 8:1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan K, Wang H, Chen L, Du Q, Du P, Pan C (2020) Estimation of the spatial distribution of heavy metal in agricultural soils using airborne hyperspectral imaging and random forest. J Hazard Mater 382:120987

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thien BB, Phuong VT, Huong DT (2023) Detection and assessment of the spatio-temporal land use/cover change in the Thai Binh province of Vietnam’s Red River delta using remote sensing and GIS. Model Earth Syst Environ 9:2711–2722

    Google Scholar 

  • Ustuner M, Sanli FB, Dixon B (2015) Application of support vector machines for landuse classification using high-resolution rapideye images: A sensitivity analysis. Eur J Remote Sens 48:403–422

    Google Scholar 

  • Valiallahi J (2020) Evaluating groundwater level and water-quality variation in Oshnaveh-Naqadeh Plain, Urmia Lake basin, northwestern Iran. Int J Energy Water Resour 4:27–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Valizadeh Kamran K, Khorrami B (2018) Change detection and prediction of Urmia Lake and its surrounding environment during the past 60 years applying geobased remote sensing analysis. Int Arch Photogramm 42:519–525

    Google Scholar 

  • Verma P, Raghubanshi A, Srivastava PK, Raghubanshi AS (2020) Appraisal of kappa-based metrics and disagreement indices of accuracy assessment for parametric and nonparametric techniques used in LULC classification and change detection. Model Earth Syst Environ 6:1045–1059

    Google Scholar 

  • Woldemariam GW, Tibebe D, Mengesha TE, Gelete TB (2022) Machine-learning algorithms for land use dynamics in Lake Haramaya Watershed, Ethiopia. Model Earth Syst Environ 8:3719–3736

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang K, Hou H, Li Y, Chen Y, Wang L, Wang P, Hu T (2022) Future urban waterlogging simulation based on LULC forecast model: A case study in Haining City, China. Sustain Cities Soc 87:104167

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin J, He F, Xiong YJ, Qiu GY (2017) Effects of land use/land cover and climate changes on surface runoff in a semi-humid and semi-arid transition zone in northwest China. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 21:183–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Yushanjiang A, Zhang F, Kung HT, Li Z (2018) Spatial–temporal variation of ecosystem service values in Ebinur Lake Wetland National Natural Reserve from 1972 to 2016, Xinjiang, arid region of China. Environ Earth Sci 77:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiong X, Grunwald S, Myers DB, Kim J, Harris WG, Comerford NB (2014) Holistic environmental soil-landscape modeling of soil organic carbon. Environ Model Softw 57:202–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang F, Yang X (2020) Improving land cover classification in an urbanized coastal area by random forests: The role of variable selection. Remote Sens Environ 251:112105

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang S, Yang P, Xia J, Wang W, Cai W, Chen N, Zhan C (2022) Land use/land cover prediction and analysis of the middle reaches of the Yangtze River under different scenarios. Sci Total Environ 833:155238

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author of this paper would like to express his gratitude to the USGS for providing the freely available products applied in the current research for LULC classification and change detection. The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work. The data applied in the current research can be shared upon request from the corresponding author.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohamad Sakizadeh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors wish to declare that there is no conflict of interest. The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 5297 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sakizadeh, M., Milewski, A. Quantifying LULC changes in Urmia Lake Basin using machine learning techniques, intensity analysis and a combined method of cellular automata (CA) and artificial neural networks (ANN) (CA-ANN). Model. Earth Syst. Environ. 10, 2011–2030 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-023-01895-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-023-01895-z

Keywords

Navigation