Skip to main content
Log in

An evaluation of WRF urban canopy models over Bengaluru, India

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Modeling Earth Systems and Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Numerical modeling of urban climate is essential for understanding mechanisms of the urban heat island (UHI) phenomenon. However, models must first be evaluated to identify their limitations. Over India, the evaluation of the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model is limited. Here, WRF was evaluated over Bengaluru, India diurnally during the dry and wet seasons. Simulations were performed for cases using no urban canopy model (No-UCM), the single-layer UCM (SLUCM), and the multi-layer UCM (MLUCM) with the Mellor-Yamada-Janjić and the Bougeault and Lacarrerè planetary boundary layer (PBL) schemes. The simulations were compared to land surface temperature (LST) observations from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer for their biases in urban LST, non-urban LST, and UHI intensity. Absorbed shortwave radiation, net longwave radiation, sensible heat, and latent heat were investigated for their possible role in driving the LST biases since they are calculated differently depending on which UCM is used. Results show urban LST was more sensitive to UCM choice than PBL scheme and the use of an UCM reduced urban LST biases, leading to improved simulations of the UHI. Non-urban LST was insensitive to UCM and PBL choice. For the best case, urban LST was underestimated by less than 1 °C during the dry season day and night, and was overestimated by 1.88 °C and 0.08 °C in the wet season day and night. In general, the SLUCM had the least bias for urban LST and UHI intensity due to a near-zero latent heat flux in No-UCM, too much trapping of shortwave and longwave radiation by the MLUCM during daytime, and too much surface cooling at nighttime by the MLUCM. These results can inform future WRF studies that evaluate UHI mitigation strategies over Bengaluru on the best model physics to use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The MODIS Terra and Aqua combined land cover dataset is available from https://e4ftl01.cr.usgs.gov/MOTA/MCD12Q2.006/2018.01.01/. The MODIS LST dataset is available from https://e4ftl01.cr.usgs.gov/MOLT/MOD11A2.061/ for Terra and https://e4ftl01.cr.usgs.gov/MOLA/MYD11A2.061/ for Aqua. The ERA5 reanalysis data is available from https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/cdsapp#!/dataset/reanalysis-era5-pressure-levels?tab=overview for pressure level data and https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/cdsapp#!/dataset/reanalysis-era5-single-levels?tab=overview for surface data. The WRF model can be downloaded from https://www.mmm.ucar.edu/models/wrf. The simulations presented in this study can be made available by contacting Heather Sussman (Heather.S.Sussman@usace.army.mil).

Code availability

All analyses and figure creations were carried out in MATLAB by MathWorks (https://www.mathworks.com/products/matlab.html). Code used for this study can be made available by contacting Heather Sussman (Heather.S.Sussman@usace.army.mil).

References

Download references

Funding

The research effort of HS is supported by the Science, Mathematics, and Research for Transformation (SMART) fellowship from the Department of Defense. AD acknowledges funding support from the National Science Foundation (grant nos. AGS-1353740 and OISE-1743738). LZ acknowledges funding support from the National Science Foundation (grant nos. AGS-1952745 and AGS-1854486).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

HS conceptualized the study. HS and AR performed the simulations and initial discussion of results. AD and LZ helped refine the methods. HS performed the calculations, made the figures, and wrote the first draft of this manuscript. AD, AR, and LZ helped revise this manuscript and provided feedback.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heather S. Sussman.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sussman, H.S., Dai, A., Raghavendra, A. et al. An evaluation of WRF urban canopy models over Bengaluru, India. Model. Earth Syst. Environ. 10, 1783–1802 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-023-01858-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-023-01858-4

Keywords

Navigation