Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Delineation of host rocks of uranium in western part of YSR district, A.P., India using geochemical and geospatial modeling approaches

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Modeling Earth Systems and Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of the research is to delineate the host rock of uranium in the semi-arid regions of Andhra Pradesh, India. Uranium is one of India's major rich resources explored in recent decades, and many parts of the country in general and Tummalapalli, Andhra Pradesh and Jadughuda, Jharkhand in particular, are established locations at present. The present study location is situated in the crescent-shaped Proterozoic Cuddapah basin. The Cuddapah basin that occurs in Andhra Pradesh is a unique middle–upper Proterozoic basin with rich minerals of economic significance along with inter-strata uranium deposits along the non-conformity. Host rocks are dolomites of the Vempalli formation of the Cuddapah Supergroup, while granites of the Archaean basement are the source rocks for uranium mineralization, especially in the Cuddapah basin. The dolomites of the composition CaMg(CO3)2 belong to the formation of Vempalli particularly in this region and phosphatic contain silica and chert mineral inclusions; hence, they are called dolostones. It occurs primarily in the area of Thummalapalli in the YSR district of Andhra Pradesh. The present research is intended to analyze by integrating geochemistry using X-Ray Fluorescence, Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry for major, minor, and trace elemental analyses along with the geospatial techniques of the host rock formations of uranium mineralization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig. 28
Fig. 29
Fig. 30
Fig. 31
Fig. 32
Fig. 33
Fig. 34
Fig. 35
Fig. 36
Fig. 37
Fig. 38
Fig. 39
Fig. 40
Fig. 41
Fig. 42
Fig. 43
Fig. 44
Fig. 45
Fig. 46

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmed AY, Abdullah MP, Wood AK, Hamza MS, Othman MR (2013) Determination of some trace elements in marine sediment using ICP-MS and XRF (a comparative study). Orient J Chem 29(2):645–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anand M, Gibson SA, Subbarao KV, Kelley SP, Dickin AP (2003) Early proterozoic melt generation processes beneath the intra-cratonic Cuddapah Basin, southern India. J Petrol 44(12):2139–2171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babu KR, Raju GS (2012) Application of remote sensing for delineation of uranium bearing Vempalli dolomites in and around Tummalapalli area, Cuddapah Basin, India. Int J Geomat Geosci 2(3):842–852

    Google Scholar 

  • Basu H, Dandele PS, Kumar KR, Achar KK, Umamaheswar K (2017) Geochemistry of black shales from the mesoproterozoic srisailam formation, Cuddapah basin, India: implications for provenance, palaeoweathering, tectonics, and timing of Columbia breakup. Geochemistry 77(4):596–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins AS, Patranabis-Deb S, Alexander E, Bertram CN, Falster GM, Gore RJ, Wade BP (2015) Detrital mineral age, radiogenic isotopic stratigraphy and tectonic significance of the Cuddapah Basin. India Gondwana Research 28(4):1294–1309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goswami S, Bhagat S, Zakaulla S, Kumar S, Rai AK (2017) Role of organic matter in uranium mineralisation in Vempalle dolostone; Cuddapah basin, India. J Geol Soc India 89(2):145–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goswami S, Upadhyay PK, Natarajan V (2021) Importance of fracturing in uranium mineralization in gulcheru quartzite host: a case from Ambakapalle area, Cuddapah Basin, Andhra Pradesh, India. Struct Geol Tecton Field Guidebook 1:577–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GSI report (2015) Geology and mineral resources of Andhra Pradesh. Miscellaneous publications No.30 part—VIII B, 64–65

  • Jeyagopal AV, Kumar P, Sinha RM (1996) Uranium mineralization in the palnad sub-basin, Cuddapah basin, Andhra Pradesh, India. Curr Sci (bangalore) 71(12):957–959

    Google Scholar 

  • Keegan E, Richter S, Kelly I, Wong H, Gadd P, Kuehn H, Alonso-Munoz A (2008) The provenance of Australian uranium ore concentrates by elemental and isotopic analysis. Appl Geochem 23(4):765–777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar BP, Babu KR, Rajasekhar M, Ramachandra M (2020) Identification of land degradation hotspots in semiarid region of Anantapur district, Southern India, using geospatial modeling approaches. Model Earth Syst Environ 6(3):1841–1852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liritzis I, Zacharias N (2011) Portable XRF of archaeological artifacts: current research, potentials and limitations. X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (XRF) in geoarchaeology. Springer, New York, pp 109–142

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Majumder T, Patranabis-Deb S (2020) Classification of the paleoproterozoic gulcheru formation: implications on early paleogeographic and tectonic evolution of the Cuddapah Basin, India. J Geol Soc India 96(2):151–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meijerink AMJ, Rao DP, Rupke J (1984) Stratigraphic and structural development of the Precambrian Cuddapah Basin, SE India. Precambrian Res 26(1):57–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee S, Goswami S, Mukherjee A (2019) Structures and their tectonic implications of the southern part of Cuddapah Basin, Andhra Pradesh, India. Iran J Sci Technol Trans A Sci 43(2):489–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagaraja Rao BK, Rajurkar ST, Ramalingaswamy G, Ravindra Babu B (1987) Stratigraphy, structure and evolution of the Cuddapah basin. Mem Geol Soc India 6:33–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesbitt RW, Hirata T, Butler IB, Milton JA (1997) UV laser ablation ICP-MS: some applications in the earth sciences. Geostand Newsl 21(2):231–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman M, Robinson P, Clark D (2003) Major-and trace-element analysis of sulfide ores by laser-ablation ICP–MS, solution ICP–MS, and XRF: new data on international reference materials. Can Mineral 41(2):293–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raju RD (2009) Cuddapah basin: India’s emerging uranium-hub. J Indian Assoc Sedimentol 28(2):15–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramam PK (1999) Mineral resources of Andhra Pradesh. GSI Publications 2(1)

  • Santos JS, Teixeira LS, Dos Santos WN, Lemos VA, Godoy JM, Ferreira SL (2010) Uranium determination using atomic spectrometric techniques: an overview. Analyticachimicaacta 674(2):143–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinha RM, Shrivastava VK, Sarma GV, Parthasarathy TN (1995) Geological favourability for unconformity-related uranium deposits in northern parts of the Cuddapah basin: Evidence from Lambapur uranium occurrence, Andhra Pradesh, India. Explor Res At Mineral 8

  • Srinivas D, Babu VR, Patra I, Tripathi S, Ramayya MS, Chaturvedi AK (2017) Assessment of background gamma radiation levels using airborne gamma ray spectrometer data over uranium deposits, Cuddapah Basin, India–a comparative study of dose rates estimated by AGRS and PGRS. J Environ Radioact 167:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas PK, Thomas T, Thomas J, Pandian MS, Banerjee R, Babu PR, Vimal R (2014) Role of hydrothermal activity in uranium mineralisation in Palnad Sub-basin, Cuddapah Basin, India. J Asian Earth Sci 91:280–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tripathy V, Saha D (2013) Plate margin paleostress variations and intracontinental deformations in the evolution of the Cuddapah basin through Proterozoic. Precambr Res 235:107–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tripathy V, Mitra SK, Sai VS (2019) Fold-thrust belt architecture and structural evolution of the Northern part of the Nallamalai Fold Belt, Cuddapah basin, Andhra Pradesh, India. Tectonics and structural geology: Indian context. Springer, Cham, pp 219–252

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tuovinen H, Vesterbacka D, Pohjolainen E, Read D, Solatie D, Lehto J (2015) A comparison of analytical methods for determining uranium and thorium in ores and mill tailings. J Geochem Explor 148:174–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Umamaheswar K, Basu H, Patnaik JK, Ali MA, Banerjee DC (2001) Uranium mineralisation in the Mesoproterozoic quartzites of Cuddapah Basin in Gandi area, Cuddapah District, Andhra Pradesh: a new exploration target for uranium. J Geol Soc India 57(5):405–410

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We sincerely pay thanks to NGRI, Hyderabad for providing Laboratory analysis of ICPMS and XRF. Also thankful to the USGS for utilization of Remote Sensing data, and also extends my thanks to Department of Geology, Yogi Vemana University for providing the Laboratory, ERDAS and GIS Software during the progress of the work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Raghu Babu.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Babu, K.R., Kumar, B.P., Reddy, P.S.K. et al. Delineation of host rocks of uranium in western part of YSR district, A.P., India using geochemical and geospatial modeling approaches. Model. Earth Syst. Environ. 8, 2095–2114 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-021-01212-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-021-01212-6

Keywords

Navigation