Skip to main content
Log in

Modelling streamflow using the SWAT model and multi-site calibration utilizing SUFI-2 of SWAT-CUP model for high altitude catchments, NW Himalaya's

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Modeling Earth Systems and Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Modelling streamflow is important in developing effective long-term management, soil conservation planning, and utilization of water resource management strategies. The current study aims to establish a stable hydrological model simulating streamflow with minimal uncertainty amongst the calibration parameters. The SWAT 2012 model is utilized to simulate the Lidder catchment streamflow located in the Southeastern part of the Kashmir valley for the (2007–2015) periods. SWAT- CUP’s algorithm called Sequential Uncertainty Fitting 2 (SUFI-2) is employed in the study for multi-site model calibration and validation for monthly time steps. The calibration results for monthly simulation for the (2009–2012) period displayed an excellent model performance for flow rates with R2 of 0.89, 0.85, and 0.89, and NSE values obtained are 0.73, 0.72, and 0.83. However, the validation results for monthly simulation for the (2013–2015) period also displayed good model performance for flow rates with R2 values obtained as 0.86, 0.81, and 0.80, and NSE values of 0.76, 0.52, and 0.56. Following calibration, the combined impact of each used parameter is ranked by the SWAT-CUP global sensitivity function. A total of twenty parameters are optimized in the calibration. From the study, we find that the most sensitive parameters were Snowfall temperature (SMTMP), Temperature lapse rate (TLAPS), melt factor for snow (SFTMP), and initial SCS curve number value (CN2). Therefore, it is concluded that while developing a reliable hydrologic model, complete knowledge about the hydrological processes occurring within the river basins and awareness of an appropriate and meaningful set of parameters is important.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data

Daily Metrological data were obtained from Indian Meteorological Data (IMD) Pune and measured data of Stages and corresponding discharge for the gauging stations were obtained from the department of irrigation and flood control, Kashmir.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  • Abbaspour KC (2007) User manual for SWAT-CUP, SWAT calibration and uncertainty analysis programs. Eawag: Swiss Fed. Inst. Of Aquat. Sci. and Technol. Dubendorf, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbaspour KC, Vejdani M, Haghighat S (2007) SWAT-CUP calibration and uncertainty programs for SWAT. MODSIM 2007 International Congress on Modelling and Simulation, Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand 1596–1602

  • Abbaspouri KC (2015) SWAT-CUP: SWAT calibration and uncertainty programs—a user manual. Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Eawag, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambroise B, Beven K, Freer J (1996) Toward a generalization of the TOPMODEL concepts: topographic indices of hydrological similarity. Water Resour Res 32:2135–2145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrianaki M, Shrestha J, Kobierska F, Nikolaidis NP, Bernasconi SM (2019) Assessment of SWAT spatial and temporal transferability for a high-altitude glacierized catchment. Hydrol Earth SystSci 23:3219–3232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold JG, Allen PM, Bernhardt G (1993) A comprehensive surface-groundwater flow model. J Hydrol 142:47–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold J, Moriasi D, Gassman P, Abbaspour K, White M et al (2012) SWAT: model use, calibration, and validation. Trans ASABE 55:1491–1508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai J, Shen Z, Yan T (2017) A comparison of single- and multi-site calibration and validation: a case study of SWAT in the Miyun Reservoir watershed, China. Front Earth Sci 11:592–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bathurst J, Wicks J, O'Connell P, Singh V (1995) The SHE/SHESED basin-scale water flow and sediment transport modelling system. Comput Models Watershed Hydrol 26:563–594

    Google Scholar 

  • Bracmort K, Arabi M, Frankenberger J, Engel B, Arnold J (2006) Modeling long-term water quality impact of structural BMPs. Trans ASAE 49:367–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braunschweig F, Leitao P, Fernandes L, Pina P, Neves R (2004) The object-oriented design of the integrated water modelling system MOHID. Dev Water Sci 55:1079–1090

    Google Scholar 

  • ChaibouBegou J, Jomaa S, Benabdallah S et al (2016) Multi-site validation of the SWAT model on the bani catchment: model performance and predictive uncertainty. Water 8:178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cibin R, Sudheer K, Chaubey I (2010) Sensitivity and identifiability of streamflow generation parameters of the SWAT model. Hydrol Process 24:1133–1148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duan Y, Liu T, Meng F, Luo M, Frankl A, De Maeyer P, Feng X (2018) Inclusion of modified snow melting and flood processes in the SWAT model. Water 10(12):1715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easton ZM, Fuka DR, White ED, Collick AS, Ashagre B, McCartney M, Awulachew SB, Ahmed AA, Steenhuis TS (2010) A multi basin SWAT model analysis of runoff and sedimentation in the Blue Nile, Ethiopia. Hydrol Earth SystSci 14:1827–1841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epelde A, Cerro I, Sánchez-Pérez J, Sauvage S, Srinivasan R, Antigüedad I (2015) Application of the SWAT model to assess the impact of changes in agricultural management practices on water quality. HydrolSci J 60:825–843

    Google Scholar 

  • Gassman PW, Reyes MR, Green CH, Arnold JG (2007) The soil and water assessment tool: historical development, applications, and future research directions. Trans ASABE 50:1211–1250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta HV, Kling H, Yilmaz KK, Martinez GF (2009) Decomposition of the mean squared error and NSE performance criteria: implications for improving hydrological modelling. J Hydrol 377:80–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasan MA, Pradhanang SM (2017) Estimation of flow regime for a spatially varied Himalayan watershed using the improved multi-site calibration of the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model. Environ Earth Sci 76:787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holvoet K, van Griensven A, Seuntjens P, Vanrolleghem P (2005) Sensitivity analysis for hydrology and pesticide supply towards the river in SWAT. PhysChem Earth Parts A/B/C 30:518–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosseini SH, Khaleghi MR (2020) Application of SWAT model and SWAT-CUP software in simulation and analysis of sediment uncertainty in arid and semi-arid watersheds (case study: the Zoshk-Abardeh watershed). Model Earth Syst Environ 6:2003–2013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johanson RC, Imhoff JC, Kittle JL, Donigian AS (1984) Hydrological simulation program-FORTRAN (HSPF): user's manual for release 8.0: EPA- 600/3- 84- 066, USEPA,  Athens, Georgia, USA

  • Kumar N, Singh SK, Srivastava PK, Narsimlu B (2017) SWAT Model calibration and uncertainty analysis for streamflow prediction of the Tons River Basin, India, using Sequential Uncertainty Fitting (SUFI-2) algorithm. Model Earth Syst Environ 3:30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehan S, Neupane RP, Kumar S (2017) Coupling of SUFI 2 and SWAT for improving the simulation of streamflow in an agricultural watershed of South Dakota. HydrolCurr Res 8:280

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash J, Sutcliffe J (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I—a discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10:282–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neitsch S, Arnold J, Kiniry J, Williams J (2011) Soil and water assessment tool: theoretical documentation version 2009. Texas Water Resources Institute

    Google Scholar 

  • Neupane RP, Kumar S (2015) Estimating the effects of potential climate and land-use changes on hydrologic processes of a large agriculture-dominated watershed. J Hydrol 529:418–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neupane RP, Yao J, White JD, Alexander SE (2015) Projected hydrologic changes in monsoon-dominated Himalaya Mountain basins with changing climate and deforestation. J Hydrol 525:216–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odusanya AE, Mehdi B, Schürz C, Oke AO, Awokola OS, Awomeso JA, Schulz K (2019) Multi-site calibration and validation of SWAT with satellite-based evapotranspiration in a data-sparse catchment in southwestern Nigeria. Hydrol Earth SystSci 23:1113–1144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Refsgaard J, Storm B (1995) Mike She. In: Singh VP (ed) Chapter 23 in computer models of watershed hydrology. Water Resources Pub, pp 809–846

    Google Scholar 

  • Saltelli A, Chan K, Marian S (2000) Sensitivity analysis. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrestha MK, Recknagel F, Frizenschaf J, Meyer W (2016) Assessing SWAT models based on single and multi-site calibration for the simulation of flow and nutrient loads in the semi-arid Onkaparinga catchment in South Australia. Agric Water Manag 175:61–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sloboda M, Swayne D (2011) Autocalibration of environmental process models using a PAC learning hypothesis. Environ Softw Syst Frameworks Environ 329:528–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uniyal B, Jha MK, Verma AK (2015) Assessing climate change impact on water balance components of a river basin using SWAT Model. Water Resour Manage 29:4767–4785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Griensven A, Meixner T, Grunwald S, Bishop T, Diluzio M, Srinivasan R (2006) A global sensitivity analysis tool for the parameters of multi-variable catchment models. J Hydrol 324:10–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams J, Arnold J, Kiniry J, Gassman P, Green C (2008) History of model development at Temple, Texas. HydrolSci J 53:948–960

    Google Scholar 

  • Winchell M, Srinivasan R, Di Luzio M, Arnold JG (2013) ArcSWAT interface for SWAT2012: user’s guide. Soil and Water Research Laboratory, USDA Agricultural Research Service

    Google Scholar 

  • Xuan Y, Cluckie I, Wang Y (2009) Uncertainty analysis of hydrological ensemble forecasts in a distributed model utilizing short-range rainfall prediction. Hydrol Earth SystSci 13:293–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang J, Reichert P, Abbaspour K, Xia J, Yang H (2008) Comparing uncertainty analysis techniques for a SWAT application to the Chaohe Basin in China. J Hydrol 358:1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

MHRD, Government of India.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohd Ayoub Malik.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Malik, M.A., Dar, A.Q. & Jain, M.K. Modelling streamflow using the SWAT model and multi-site calibration utilizing SUFI-2 of SWAT-CUP model for high altitude catchments, NW Himalaya's. Model. Earth Syst. Environ. 8, 1203–1213 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-021-01145-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-021-01145-0

Keywords

Navigation