Abstract
The health of the population is intertwined with the availability and supply of potable water. With many people around the world resorting to groundwater resources as a source potable water supply, it becomes imperative that the state of groundwater susceptibility to contamination is known. The DRASTIC model has been applied to determine the state of aquifer vulnerability to contaminants. The seven hydrogeological parameters were considered in the standard model and the resulting vulnerability, DI were classified into three vulnerability zones; low, moderate and high. The model was then modified to include land use/land cover (LU) and lineament density (LIN) parameters and net recharge (rm). The modified vulnerability indices were designated as DI-LU, DI-LIN, DIrm and MDI (combined modification). The results revealed the land area under high vulnerability under DI, DI-LU, DI-LIN, DIrm and MDI were 32.2, 26.2, 33.7, 26.2 and 40.4% respectively. There were no significant difference between the standard moderate vulnerability class and the modified derivatives (DI + LU, DI + Lin). The combined modification (MDI) however led to 17% decrease in this class of vulnerability. The model was validated using a nitrate concentration of 36 samples collected for the purpose. The validation assessment revealed that the performance of the model was improved with modification.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agyare A, Anornu GK, Kabo-bah AT (2017) Assessing the vulnerability of aquifer systems in the Volta river basin: a case-study on Afram Plains, Ghana. Model Earth Syst Environ 3(3):1141–1159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-017-0363-3
Albuquerque MTD, Sanz G, Oliveira SF, Martínez-Alegría R, Antunes IMHR (2013) Spatio-temporal groundwater vulnerability assessment—a coupled remote sensing and GIS approach for historical land cover reconstruction. Water Resour Manag 27(13):4509–4526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-013-0422-0
Aller L, Bennett T, Lehr JH, Petty RJ, Hackett G (1987) DRASTIC: a standardized system for evaluating groundwater pollution potential using hydrogeologic settings. US EPA, Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Laboratory, Ada, OK
Anornu GK, Kabo-bah AT, Anim-Gyampo M (2012) Evaluation of groundwater vulnerability in the Densu river basin of Ghana. Am J Hum Ecol 1(3):79–86. https://doi.org/10.11634/216796221403191
Asiedu DK, Atta-Peters D, Peprah R (2000) Depositional environment of the Takoradi Sandstone formation of the Sekondian Group, western Ghana, as revealed by textural analysis. Ghana Min J 6:53–58
Asiedu DK, Hegner E, Rocholl A, Atta-Peters D (2005) Provenance of late Ordovician to early Cretaceous sedimentary rocks from southern Ghana, as inferred from Nd isotopes and trace elements. J Afr Earth Sc 41(4):316–328
Atta-Peters D (2000) Early Cretaceous miospores from Essikado sandstone formation of the Sekondian Group of Ghana. Revista española de micropaleontología 32(2):245–258
Awawdeh MM, Jaradat RA (2010) Evaluation of aquifers vulnerability to contamination in the Yarmouk River basin, Jordan, based on DRASTIC method. Arab J Geosci 3(3):273–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-009-0074-9
Babiker IS, Mohamed MA, Hiyama T, Kato K (2005) A GIS-based DRASTIC model for assessing aquifer vulnerability in Kakamigahara Heights, Gifu Prefecture, central Japan. Sci Total Environ 345(1–3):127–140
Barbash JE, Resek EA (1996) Pesticides in ground water: distribution, trends, and governing factors. Ann Arbor Press, Chelsea
Bordbar M, Neshat A, Javadi S (2019) A new hybrid framework for optimization and modification of groundwater vulnerability in coastal aquifer. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(21):21808–21827. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04853-4
Buamah R, Petrusevski B, Schippers JC (2008) Presence of arsenic, iron and manganese in groundwater within the gold-belt zone of Ghana. J Water Supply Res Technol AQUA 57(7):519–529. https://doi.org/10.2166/aqua.2008.149
Chitsazan M, Akhtari Y (2009) A GIS-based DRASTIC model for assessing aquifer vulnerability in Kherran Plain, Khuzestan, Iran. Water Resour Manag 23(6):1137–1155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-008-9319-8
Crow AT (1952) The rocks of the Sekondi Series of the Gold Coast (No. 18). Published under the authority of the Government of the Gold Coast
Denny SC, Allen DM, Journeay JM (2007) DRASTIC-Fm: a modified vulnerability mapping method for structurally controlled aquifers in the southern Gulf Islands, British Columbia, Canada. Hydrogeol J 15(3):483
Dunne T, Leopold LB (1978) Water in environmental planning. Macmillan, San Francisco
Evans BM, Myers WL (1990) A GIS-based approach to evaluating regional groundwater pollution potential with DRASTIC. J Soil Water Conserv 2(45):242–245
Ewusi A, Seidu J, Gyeabour L (2016) Groundwater vulnerability assessment using drastic index and GIS in Kumasi Metropolitan Assembly, Ghana. Ghana Min J 16(1):21–30. https://doi.org/10.4314/gm.v16i1.3
Ghana Statistical Service (2010) Population by region, district, locality of residence, age groups and sex 2010. J Bus Res 84(June 2016):12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.11.014
Ghosh T, Kanchan R (2016) Aquifer vulnerability assessment in the Bengal alluvial tract, India, using GIS based DRASTIC model. Model Earth Syst Environ 2(3):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-016-0208-5
Gleeson T, Smith L, Moosdorf N, Hartmann J, Dürr HH, Manning AH, Van Beek LPH, Jellinek AM (2011) Mapping permeability over the surface of the Earth. Geophys Res Lett 38(2):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL045565
Gogu RC, Hallet V, Dassargues A (2003) Comparison of aquifer vulnerability assessment techniques. Application to the Néblon river basin (Belgium). Environ Geol 44(8):881–892. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-003-0842-x
Hamza SM, Ahsan A, Ghazali MAIAH (2017) GIS-based FRASTIC model for pollution vulnerability assessment of fractured-rock aquifer systems. Environ Earth Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-6520-1
Hasiniaina F, Zhou J, Guoyi L (2010) Regional assessment of groundwater vulnerability in Tamtsag basin, Mongolia using drastic model. J Am Sci 6(11):1545–1003. https://www.americanscience.orgeditor@americanscience.org
Hassan A, Hallaq A, Sofyan B, Elaish A (2012) Assessment of aquifer vulnerability to contamination in Khanyounis Governorate, Gaza Strip—Palestine, using the DRASTIC model within GIS environment. Arab J Geosci 5(4):833–847. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-011-0284-9
Herlinger R, Viero AP (2007) Groundwater vulnerability assessment in coastal plain of Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil, using DRASTIC and adsorption capacity of soils. Environ Geol 52(5):819–829. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-006-0518-4
Hussain Y, Ullah SF, Aslam AQ, Hussain MB, Akhter G, Martinez-Carvajal HE, Satgé F, Ashraf A, Iqbal B, Cárdenas-Soto M (2017) Vulnerability assessment of an agro-stressed aquifer using a source-pathway-receptor model in GIS. Model Earth Syst Environ 3(2):595–604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-017-0320-1
Kattaa B, Al-fares W, Rahman A, Charideh A (2010) Groundwater vulnerability assessment for the Banyas Catchment of the Syrian coastal area using GIS and the RISKE method. J Environ Manag 91(5):1103–1110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.12.008
Lad S, Ayachit R, Kadam A, Umrikar B (2019) Groundwater vulnerability assessment using DRASTIC model: a comparative analysis of conventional, AHP, fuzzy logic and frequency ratio method. Model Earth Syst Environ 5(2):543–553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-018-0545-7
Lahjouj A, El Hmaidi A, Bouhafa K, Boufala M (2020) Mapping specific groundwater vulnerability to nitrate using random forest: case of Sais basin, Morocco. Model Earth Syst Environ 6(3):1451–1466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-020-00761-6
Li R, Merchant JW (2013) Modeling vulnerability of groundwater to pollution under future scenarios of climate change and biofuels-related land use change : a case study in North Dakota, USA. Sci Total Environ 447:32–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.01.011
Merchant JW (1994) GIS-based groundwater pollution hazard assessment: a critical review of the DRASTIC model. Photogram Eng Remote Sens 60(9):1117–1127
Napolitano P, Fabbri AG (1996) Single parameter sensitivity analysis for aquifer vulnerability assessment using DRASTIC and SINTACS. In: Proceedings of the 2nd HydroGIS conference, IAHS publication: application of geographic information systems in hydrology and water resources management, Proceedings of the Vienna conference, April 1996. IAHS Publ. No. 235, 1996, 235, pp 559–566
Nazzal Y, Howari FM, Iqbal J, Ahmed I, Orm NB, Yousef A (2019) Investigating aquifer vulnerability and pollution risk employing modified DRASTIC model and GIS techniques in Liwa area, United Arab Emirates. Groundw Sustain Dev 8:567–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2019.02.006
Neshat A, Pradhan B, Shafri HZM (2014a) An integrated GIS based statistical model to compute groundwater vulnerability index for decision maker in agricultural area. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 42(4):777–788. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-014-0376-6
Neshat A, Pradhan B, Dadras M (2014b) Groundwater vulnerability assessment using an improved DRASTIC method in GIS. Resour Conserv Recycl 86:74–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.02.008
Obuobie E, Agyekum W, Appiah-Adjei EK, Upton K, Dochartaigh ÓBÉ, Bellwood-Howard I (2018) Africa groundwater atlas: hydrogeology of Ghana. British Geological Survey. https://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php/Hydrogeology_of_Ghana. Accessed 21 Dec 2018
Ojuri OO, Bankole OTO (2013) Groundwater vulnerability assessment and validation for a fast growing City in Africa: a case study of Lagos, Nigeria. J Environ Prot 4(5):454–465. https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.21252
Omotola OO, Oladapo MI, Akintorinwa OJ (2020) Modeling assessment of groundwater vulnerability to contamination risk in a typical basement terrain case of vulnerability techniques application comparison study. Model Earth Syst Environ 6(3):1253–1280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-020-00720-1
Ouedraogo I, Defourny P, Vanclooster M (2016) Mapping the groundwater vulnerability for pollution at the pan African scale. Sci Total Environ 544:939–953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.11.135
Panagopoulos GP, Antonakos AK, Lambrakis NJ (2006) Optimization of the DRASTIC method for groundwater vulnerability assessment via the use of simple statistical methods and GIS. Hydrogeol J 14(6):894–911
Piscopo G (2001) Groundwater vulnerability map explanatory notes—Castlereagh Catchment. NSW Department of Land and Water Conservation, Australia
Pokhriyal P, Rehman S, Areendran G, Raj K, Pandey R, Kumar M, Sahana M, Sajjad H (2020) Assessing forest cover vulnerability in Uttarakhand, India using analytical hierarchy process. Model Earth Syst Environ 6(2):821–831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-019-00710-y
Rahman A (2008) A GIS based DRASTIC model for assessing groundwater vulnerability in shallow aquifer in Aligarh, India. Appl Geogr 28(1):32–53
Rosen L (1994) A study of the DRASTIC methodology with emphasis on Swedish conditions. Groundwater 32(2):278–285
Rundquist DC, Peters AJ, Di L, Rodekohr DA, Ehrman RL, Murray G (1991) Statewide groundwater-vulnerability assessment in Nebraska using the drastic/GIS model. Geocarto Int 6(2):51–58
Saidi S, Bouri S, Ben Dhia H, Anselme B (2011) Assessment of groundwater risk using intrinsic vulnerability and hazard mapping: application to Souassi aquifer, Tunisian Sahel. Agric Water Manag 98(10):1671–1682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2011.06.005
Sener E, Davraz A (2013) Assessment of groundwater vulnerability based on a modified DRASTIC model, GIS and an analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method: the case of Egirdir Lake basin (Isparta, Turkey). Hydrogeol J 21(3):701–714. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-012-0947-y
Shirazi SM, Imran HM, Akib S (2012) GIS-based DRASTIC method for groundwater vulnerability assessment: a review. J Risk Res 15(8):991–1011. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2012.686053
Shirazi SM, Imran HM, Akib S, Yusop Z, Harun ZB (2013) Groundwater vulnerability assessment in the Melaka State of Malaysia using DRASTIC and GIS techniques. Environ Earth Sci 70(5):2293–2304
Tai T, Wang J, Wang Y, Bai L (2012) Groundwater pollution risk evaluation method research progress in our country. J Beijing Norm Univ Nat Sci 6:648–653
Tesoriero AJ, Inkpen EL, Voss FD (1998) Proceedings for the source water assessment and protection 98 conference, Dallas, TX, pp 157–165
Thapinta A, Hudak PF (2003) Use of geographic information systems for assessing groundwater pollution potential by pesticides in Central Thailand. Environ Int 29(1):87–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-4120(02)00149-6
Tovar M, Rodríguez R (2004) Vulnerability assessment of aquifers in an urban-rural environment and territorial ordering in Leon, Mexico. Geofísica Int 43(4):603–609
Wang J, He J, Chen H (2012) Assessment of groundwater contamination risk using hazard quantification, a modified DRASTIC model and groundwater value, Beijing Plain, China. Sci Total Environ 432:216–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.06.005
Zouhri L, Armand R (2019) Groundwater vulnerability assessment of the chalk aquifer in the northern part of France. Geocarto Int. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2019.1637465
Acknowledgements
This study was funded by the Regional Water and Environmental Sanitation Centre Kumasi (RWESCK) at the Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi with funding from Ghana Government through the World Bank under the Africa Centre's of Excellence project.' The views expressed in this paper do not reflect those of the World Bank, Ghana Government and KNUST.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors decalre that they have no competing interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yankey, R.K., Anornu, G.K., Osae, S.K. et al. Drastic model application to groundwater vulnerability elucidation for decision making: the case of south western coastal basin, Ghana. Model. Earth Syst. Environ. 7, 2197–2213 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-020-01031-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-020-01031-1