Skip to main content
Log in

Internal Balance and International Competitiveness: Sports Leagues Decision Models

  • Research paper
  • Published:
Italian Economic Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we consider the sports industry and in particular we focus our study on the European Football. In this market, the more the league is balanced with good teams and the more it becomes profitable. However, empirical data suggest that the top teams involved in more balanced national championships have less probability to win the international competitions. Starting from these considerations, we propose a model which examines, from the point of view of a profit-maximizer sports league, the opportunity to introduce measures in order to foster a balanced internal championship, taking into due account the competitiveness of the internal teams in the international competitions. Then we extend the model in order to include strategic interactions between more leagues in a non-cooperative game setting, and compare the Nash Equilibrium of the game with the cooperative outcome, in which the leagues maximize their joint expected profits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For a survey of previous contributions, see Szymanski (2003).

  2. For an analysis of other factors influencing the impact of revenue sharing on competitive balance, see Késenne (2006) and Dietl et al. (2011).

  3. For a discussion on the different measures of competitive balance, see Fort and Maxcy (2003).

  4. The same result holds if we also consider the Europa League (UEFA Cup, until 2008–2009) winners, since in the considered time period the Spanish teams won it eight times (five times Sevilla, three times Atletico de Madrid), much more than every other league’s teams.

  5. To formalize, denote with X the random variable which takes value b if the internal championship is balanced and \({{\bar{b}}}\) otherwise. Similarly, denote with Y the random variable which takes value c if an internal team wins the international cup and \({\bar{c}}\) otherwise. We are thus assuming that: \({\mathbb {P}}[X=b|Y=c]={\mathbb {P}}[X=b]=p(a),{\mathbb {P}}[Y=c|X=b]={\mathbb {P}}[Y=c]=q(a)\).

  6. In particular, we have:

    $$\begin{aligned}&\frac{\partial (p(a^*)-q(a^*))}{\partial {\overline{\delta }}}=-\frac{C\varDelta _\delta [4B^2\varDelta _\epsilon ^2 + BC\varDelta _\epsilon (3\varDelta _\delta + 2\varDelta _\epsilon ) + C^2\varDelta _\delta ^2]}{(B\varDelta _\epsilon + C\varDelta _\delta )^3}<0,\\&\frac{\partial (p(a^*)-q(a^*))}{\partial {\overline{\epsilon }}}=\frac{B^3\varDelta _\epsilon ^3 + B^2C\varDelta _\delta \varDelta _\epsilon (2\varDelta _\delta + 3\varDelta _\epsilon ) + 4BC^2\varDelta _\delta ^2\varDelta _\epsilon }{(B\varDelta _\epsilon + C\varDelta _\delta )^3}>0,\\&\frac{\partial (p(a^*)-q(a^*))}{\partial {\underline{\delta }}}= -\frac{B\varDelta _\epsilon ^2[b^2\varDelta _\epsilon - BC\varDelta _\delta - 2C^2\varDelta _\delta ]}{(B\varDelta _\epsilon + C\varDelta _\delta )^3},\\&\frac{\partial (p(a^*)-q(a^*))}{\partial {\underline{\epsilon }}}=-\frac{C\varDelta _\delta ^2[2B^2\varDelta _\epsilon + BC\varDelta _\epsilon - C^2\varDelta _\delta ]}{(B\varDelta _\epsilon + C\varDelta _\delta )^3}. \end{aligned}$$
  7. According to compactness and closeness hypothesis on strategy sets and by using the continuity and concavity of objective functions, the existence of a Nash Equilibrium is guaranteed (see, e.g., Gibbons 1992).

References

  • Buraimo B, Simmons R (2009) A tale of two audiences: spectators, television viewers and outcome uncertainty in Spanish football. J Econ Bus 61(4):326–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buraimo B, Simmons R (2008) Do sports fans really value uncertainty of outcome? Evidence from the English premier league. Int J Sport Finance 3(3):146–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietl H, Grossmann M, Lang M (2011) Competitive balance and revenue sharing in sports leagues with utility-maximizing teams. J Sports Econ 12(3):284–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doms G, Stuckler D, Basu S, McKee M (2015) A global social support system: What the international community could learn from the United States’ national basketball association’s scheme for redistribution of new talent. Int J Health Policy Manag 4(11):715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Hodiri M, Quirk J (1971) An economic model of professional sports leagues. J Polit Econ 79(6):1302–1319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falck O, Gollier C, Woessmann L (eds) (2011) Industrial policy for national champions. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Feess E, Stähler F (2009) Revenue sharing in professional sports leagues. Scott J Political Econ 56(2):255–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fort R, Maxcy J (2003) Competitive balance in sports leagues: an introduction. J Sports Econ 4(2):154–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-del-Barrio P, Szymanski S (2009) Goal! profit maximization versus win maximization in soccer. Rev Ind Organ 34(1):45–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons R (1992) Game theory for applied economists. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossmann M, Dietl H, Lang M (2010) Revenue sharing and competitive balance in a dynamic contest model. Rev Ind Organ 36(1):17–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Késenne S (2005) Revenue sharing and competitive balance: Does the invariance proposition hold? J Sports Econ 6(1):98–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Késenne S (2006) Competitive balance in team sports and the impact of revenue sharing. J Sport Manag 20(1):39–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Késenne S (2014) The economic theory of professional team sports. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Madden P (2011) Game theoretic analysis of basic team sports leagues. J Sports Econ 12(4):407–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neale WC (1964) The Peculiar Economics of Professional Sports, A Contribution to the Theory of the Firm in Sporting Competition and in Market Competition. Q J Econ 78(1):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palomino F, Sákovics J (2004) Inter-league competition for talent vs. competitive balance. Int J Ind Organ 22(6):783–797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pawlowski T, Breuer C, Hovemann A (2010) Top clubs’ performance and the competitive situation in European domestic football competitions. J Sports Econ 11(2):186–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rottenberg S (1956) The baseball players’ labour market. J Polit Econ 64(3):242–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sloane PJ (1971) The Economics of Professional Football, The football club as utility maximizer. Scott J Political Econ 4(2):87–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Szymanski S (2003) The economic design of sporting contests. J Econ lit 41(4):1137–1187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szymanski S, Késenne S (2004) Competitive balance and gate revenue sharing in team sports. J Ind Econ 52(1):165–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to two anonymous referees for their very helpful comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michele Bisceglia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bisceglia, M., Caputi, A.G., Grilli, L. et al. Internal Balance and International Competitiveness: Sports Leagues Decision Models. Ital Econ J 4, 567–578 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40797-018-0079-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40797-018-0079-1

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation