Skip to main content
Log in

On the Efficiency of Italian Universities: A Comment

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Italian Economic Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Inspired by their analysis of universities’ efficiency, Agasisti and Ricca (Ital Econ 2(1):57–89, 2016) on this Journal make a controversial policy proposal on the financing of private universities in Italy. We point out a number of shortcomings in their empirical analysis, interpretation of results and suggestions of policy implications. We show that Agasisti and Ricca’s claims, that universities in the South and public universities are less efficient than private universities and universities in the North, do not rest on solid empirical and conceptual analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We do not refer here to students’ productivity, because as explained in the next section we do not share the view that students should be considered as inputs in universities’ production process. However, the statistical correlation between the number of enrolled students and universities’ efficiency scores (if it was not computed including students among the inputs) could nonetheless denote economies of scale, in so far as the number of students is positively correlated with the number of university staff and the value of revenues and costs.

  2. While in the private sector, firm size is often found to correlate with innovation and R&D activities (for the case of Italy, see Cebula and Rossi 2015), anecdotal evidence and newspaper reports usually identify the larger, public universities with the least efficiency. For this reason, ANVUR’s first research assessment exercise (the Valutazione Triennale della Ricerca, VTR 2001–2003) already produced separate university rankings, dividing Italy’s universities into three size groups.

  3. For a discussion of the role of public and private production of goods and services in recent Italian economic thought, see Biasco (2016).

  4. AR exclude from their sample all online (“telematiche”) universities, but since their policy proposal would apparently benefit them as well, or else we do not see on what basis they would be excluded from an allocation of funding on mere efficiency terms, we decided to keep them in the analysis.

References

  • Agasisti T, Ricca L (2016) Comparing the efficiency of Italian Public and Private Universities (2007–2011): an empirical analysis. Ital Econ J 2(1):57–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biasco S (2016) Due culture, due concezioni dell’impresa pubblica. Moneta e Credito 69(274):207–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Cebula RJ, Rossi F (2015) Ownership structure and R&D: an empirical analysis of Italian listed companies. PSL Q Rev 68(275):297–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Corsi M, D’Ippoliti C, Lucidi F (2010) Pluralism at risk? Heterodox economic approaches and the evaluation of economic research in Italy. Am J Econ Sociol 69:1495–1529

  • Corsi M, D’Ippoliti C, Lucidi F (2011) On the evaluation of economic research: the case of Italy. Econ Politica 3:369–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale SB, Krueger AB (2002) Estimating the payoff of attending a more selective college: an application of selection on observables and unobservables. Q J Econ 107(4):1491–1527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcuzzo MC, Zacchia G (2007) L’Econlit come strumento per la valutazione della ricerca in economia. Rivista italiana degli economisti 2:277–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcuzzo MC, Zacchia G (2010) Peso alle citazioni o alla numerosità? La valutazione degli economisti accademici italiani. Politica Econ 3:409–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Viesti G (ed) (2016) Università in declino. Un’indagine sugli atenei da Nord a Sud, Rapporto di ricerca 2015 della Fondazione Res. Donzelli, Rome

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from the Institute for New Economic Thinking (INET), grant # INO1500040.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlo D’Ippoliti.

Additional information

We wish to thank Alessandro Roncaglia for the initial suggestion of considering the widespread use among private universities of adjunct faculty who often work as tenured professors in public ones, as a form of potentially distortionary cost competition. The authors remain the sole responsible for all remaining errors and the usual disclaimers apply.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

D’Ippoliti, C., Zacchia, G. On the Efficiency of Italian Universities: A Comment. Ital Econ J 3, 113–123 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40797-016-0042-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40797-016-0042-y

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation