Abstract
Rich research evidence supporting the strong, positive connections between spatial ability and mathematical ability has been well documented. Spatial tools, such as computer-aided-design (CAD) software, have been increasingly utilized and researched for promoting mathematics learning in K–12 (kindergarten to 12th grade). Tinkercad, a free online CAD program, offers a powerful spatial tool for expanding mathematics learning into space and improving mathematics learning through 3D modeling in an interactive virtual space. From the lens of embodied cognition research, the present paper illustrates the technological affordances of Tinkercad for leveraging the positive spatial-mathematical connections and discusses adopting action-based embodied design to create Tinkercad embodied spatial-mathematical learning experiences for elementary students. Specific Tinkercad embodied spatial-mathematical learning activities with closed-ended embodied actions and open-ended embodied actions are presented and implications for instruction and educational research are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
No datasets were generated or analyzed for the writing of this snapshot.
References
Abrahamson, D. (2014). Building educational activities for understanding: An elaboration on the embodied-design framework and its epistemic grounds. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 2, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2014.07.002
Abrahamson, D., Nathan, M. J., Williams-Pierce, C., Walkington, C., Ottmar, E. R., Soto, H., & Alibali, M. W. (2020). The future of embodied design for mathematics teaching and learning. Frontiers in Education, 5, 147. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00147
Bohmer, A. I., Sheppard, S., Kayser, L., & Lindemann, U. (2017). Prototyping as a thinking approach in design insights of problem-solving activities while designing a product. In 2017 International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC) (pp. 955–963). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE.2017.8279985
DeSutter, D., & Stieff, M. (2017). Teaching students to think spatially through embodied actions: Design principles for learning environments in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 2(1), 2–22.
Geary, D. C., Hoard, M. K., Nugent, L., & Scofield, J. E. (2021). In-class attention, spatial ability, and mathematics anxiety predict across-grade gains in adolescents’ mathematics achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(4), 754–769. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000487
Geary, D. C., Saults, S. J., Liu, F., & Hoard, M. K. (2000). Sex differences in spatial cognition, computational fluency, and arithmetical reasoning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 7(4), 337–353. https://doi.org/10.1006/jecp.2000.2594
Gunderson, E. A., Ramirez, G., Beilock, S. L., & Levine, S. C. (2012). The relation between spatial skill and early number knowledge: The role of the linear number line. Developmental Psychology, 48(5), 1229. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027433
Hsi, S., Linn, M. C., & Bell, J. E. (1997). The role of spatial reasoning in engineering and the design of spatial instruction. Journal of Engineering Education, 86(2), 151–158.
Kinach, B. M. (2012). Fostering spatial vs. metric understanding in geometry. The Mathematics Teacher, 105(7), 534–540.
Kris, D. F. (2016). How teaching spatial skills could be part of a school’s strategic plan. Retrieved June 16, 2022, from https://www.kqed.org/mindshift/43827/how-teaching-spatial-skills-could-be-part-of-a-schools-strategic-plan
Lakoff, G., & Núñez, R. E. (2000). Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. Basic Books.
Leung, A., Baccaglini-Frank, A., & Mariotti, M. A. (2013). Discernment of invariants in dynamic geometry environments. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 84(3), 439–460.
Lohman, D. F. (1996). Spatial ability and g. In I. Dennis & P. Tapsfield (Eds.), Human abilities: Their nature and measurement (pp. 97–116). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
Mix, K. S., & Cheng, Y. L. (2012). The relation between space and math: Developmental and educational implications. Advances in Child Development Behavior, 42, 197–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-394388-0.00006-x
Mix, K. S., Levine, S. C., Cheng, Y. L., Young, C. J., Hambrick, D. Z., & Konstantopoulos, S. (2017). The latent structure of spatial skills and mathematics: A replication of the two-factor model. Journal of Cognition and Development, 18(4), 465–492.
Mix, K. S., Levine, S. C., Cheng, Y. L., Young, C., Hambrick, D. Z., Ping, R., et al. (2016). Separate but correlated: The latent structure of space and mathematics across development. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(9), 1206–1227.
Nathan, M. J., Schenck, K. E., Vinsonhaler, R., Michaelis, J. E., Swart, M. I., & Walkington, C. (2021). Embodied geometric reasoning: Dynamic gestures during intuition, insight, and proof. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(5), 929–948.
Nathan, M. J., Walkington, C., Boncoddo, R., Pier, E., Williams, C. C., and Alibali, M. W. (2014). Actions speak louder with words: the roles of action and pedagogical language for grounding mathematical proof. Learning Instruction, 33, 182–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.07.001
Sella, F., Sader, E., Lolliot, S., & Cohen Kadosh, R. (2016). Basic and advanced numerical performances relate to mathematical expertise but are fully mediated by visuospatial skills. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(9), 1458–1472. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000249
Shapiro, L., & Spaulding, S. (2021). Embodied Cognition. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved June 16, 2022, from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/embodied-cognition/
Shea, D. L., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2001). Importance of assessing spatial ability in intellectually talented young adolescents: A 20-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(3), 604–614.
Sinclair, N., & Heyd-Metzuyanim, E. (2014). Learning number with TouchCounts: The role of emotions and the body in mathematical communication. Technology. Knowledge and Learning, 19(1–2), 81–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-014-9212-x
Smith, C. (2018). Body-based activities in secondary geometry: An analysis of learning and viewpoint. School Science and Mathematics, 118, 179–189. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12279
Szymanski, A. (2018). Prototype problem solving activities increasing creative learning opportunities using computer modeling and 3D printing. In V. Freiman & J. L. Tassell (Eds.), Creativity and Technology in Mathematics Education (pp. 323–344). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72381-5_13
Uttal, D. H., Meadow, N. G., Tipton, E., Hand, L. L., Alden, A. R., Warren, C., & Newcombe, N. S. (2013). The malleability of spatial skills: A meta-analysis of training studies. Psychological Bulletin, 139(2), 352–402. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028446
Wai, J., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2009). Spatial ability for STEM domains: Aligning over 50 years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(4), 817–835.
Worsley, M., Abrahamson, D., Blikstein, P., Grover, S., Schneider, B., & Tissenbaum, M. (2016). Situating multimodal learning analytics. International Conference for the Learning Sciences, 2016, 1346–1349.
Yang, W., Liu, H., Chen, N., Xu, P., & Lin, X. (2020). Is early spatial skills training effective? A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1938. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01938
Young, C., Levine, S., & Mix, K. (2018a). What processes underlie the relation between spatial skill and mathematics? In K. Mix & M. Battista (Eds.), Visualizing mathematics: The role of spatial reasoning in mathematical thought (pp. 117–148). Springer.
Young, C., Levine, S., & Mix, K. (2018b). The connection between spatial and mathematical ability across development. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 755.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
As the sole author of this manuscript, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Sun, Y. Action-based Embodied Design: Spatial-mathematical Learning Experiences with Tinkercad 3D Modeling for Elementary Students. Digit Exp Math Educ 9, 492–507 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-023-00129-2
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-023-00129-2