Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Pros and Cons of Fontan Fenestration: a Review of the Recent Literature

  • Cardiology/CT Surgery (K Gist, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Treatment Options in Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Currently, there is no clear consensus about risk–benefit profile of placing a fenestration in the Fontan circulation, much less if this surgical modification should be done routinely for all patients. In this manuscript, we review the proposed advantages and disadvantages to fenestration of the Fontan operation and evaluate the recent literature on this topic.

Recent Findings

Based on several recent meta-analyses, there are few differences in a variety of both physiologic outcomes (mean pulmonary artery pressure and cardiac output) or practical outcomes (length of stay, overall mortality, and morbidity) between fenestrated and non-fenestrated patients. Fontan fenestration does seem to reduce the risk of significant post-operative pleural effusion. There is a clear trend towards lower saturations in both the short and long term in those with fenestrations. There are conflicting results as to if Fontan fenestration increases the risk of stroke or impacts exercise tolerance.

Summary

Given the largely equivocal, or even conflicting findings, there is still no clear consensus as to which patients should undergo Fontan fenestration. It does seem that high-risk patients such as younger patients or those with higher pre-operative pulmonary artery pressures do seem to benefit from fenestration. An individualized approach with careful analysis of each patient’s pre-operative risk-factors should help determine the optimal surgical approach for the Fontan procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Fontan F, Baudet E. Surgical repair of tricuspid atresia. Thorax. 1971;26(3):240–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mazza GA, Gribaudo E, Agnoletti G. The pathophysiology and complications of Fontan circulation. Acta Biomed. 2021;92(5):e2021260.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gewillig M, Brown SC. The Fontan circulation after 45 years: update in physiology. Heart. 2016;102(14):1081–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bridges ND, Lock JE, Castaneda AR. Baffle fenestration with subsequent transcatheter closure. Modification of the Fontan operation for patients at increased risk. Circ. 1990;82(5):1681–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. de Vivie ER, Rupprath G. Long-term results after Fontan procedure and its modifications. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1986;91(5):690–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. DeLeon SY, Ilbawi MN, Idriss FS, Muster AJ, Gidding SS, Berry TE, et al. Fontan type operation for complex lesions. Surgical considerations to improve survival. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1986;92(6):1029–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gale AW, Danielson GK, McGoon DC, Mair DD. Modified Fontan operation for univentricular heart and complicated congenital lesions. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1979;78(6):831–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bridges ND, Mayer JE, Lock JE, Jonas RA, Hanley FL, Keane JF, et al. Effect of baffle fenestration on outcome of the modified Fontan operation. Circ. 1992;86(6):1762–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bridges ND. Fenestration of the Fontan baffle: benefits and complications. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Annu. 1998;1:9–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bridges ND, Lock JE, Mayer JE, Burnett J, Castaneda AR. Cardiac catheterization and test occlusion of the interatrial communication after the fenestrated Fontan operation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;25(7):1712–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Saiki H, Kuwata S, Iwamoto Y, Ishido H, Taketazu M, Masutani S, et al. Fenestration in the Fontan circulation as a strategy for chronic cardioprotection. Heart. 2019;105(16):1266–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bouhout I, Ben-Ali W, Khalaf D, Raboisson MJ, Poirier N. Effect of fenestration on Fontan procedure outcomes: a meta-analysis and review. Ann Thorac Surg. 2020;109(5):1467–74. This meta-analysis compiled a total of 19 studies, with a total of 4806 patients and demonstrated that patients undergoing a fenestrated Fontan procedure had lower need for pleural drainage, lower mean pulmonary artery pressures, and lower oxygen saturations — but no significant difference in in Fontan failure or stroke occurrence.

  13. Li D, Li M, Zhou X, An Q. Comparison of the fenestrated and non-fenestrated Fontan procedures: a meta-analysis. Med (Baltimore). 2019;98(29):e16554. This study complied data from 14 prior studies looking at the early and late outcomes of patients undergoing a fenestrated Fontan procedure. They found essentially no difference in outcome between the two groups, aside from longer cardiopulmonary bypass time and lower early oxygen saturations.

  14. Lemler MS, Scott WA, Leonard SR, Stromberg D, Ramaciotti C. Fenestration improves clinical outcome of the fontan procedure: a prospective, randomized study. Circ. 2002;105(2):207–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Airan B, Sharma R, Choudhary SK, Mohanty SR, Bhan A, Chowdhari UK, et al. Univentricular repair: is routine fenestration justified? Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;69(6):1900–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Talwar S, Paidi A, Sreeniwas V, Dutt Upadhyay A, Das S, Choudhary SK. Comparison of pleural effusion between fenestrated and nonfenestrated extracardiac Fontan: a prospective randomized study. J Card Surg. 2020;35(10):2688–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Atz AM, Travison TG, McCrindle BW, Mahony L, Quartermain M, Williams RV, et al. Late status of Fontan patients with persistent surgical fenestration. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57(24):2437–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Thompson LD, Petrossian E, McElhinney DB, Abrikosova NA, Moore P, Reddy VM, et al. Is it necessary to routinely fenestrate an extracardiac fontan? J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;34(2):539–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hsia TY, Khambadkone S, Redington AN, de Leval MR. Effect of fenestration on the sub-diaphragmatic venous hemodynamics in the total-cavopulmonary connection. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2001;19(6):785–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Barracano R, Merola A, Fusco F, Scognamiglio G, Sarubbi B. Protein-losing enteropathy in Fontan circulation: pathophysiology, outcome and treatment options of a complex condition. Int J Cardiol Congenit Heart Dis. 2022;7:100322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Vyas H, Driscoll DJ, Cabalka AK, Cetta F, Hagler DJ. Results of transcatheter Fontan fenestration to treat protein losing enteropathy. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007;69(4):584–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Daley M, Buratto E, King G, Grigg L, Iyengar A, Alphonso N, et al. Impact of Fontan fenestration on long-term outcomes: a propensity score-matched analysis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2022;11(11):e026087. This study examined over 1400 patients in the Australia and New Zealand Fontan registry and demonstrated no differences in survival, freedom of failure at 20 years when comparing patients with fenestrated Fontans. They did, however, note that freedom from thromboembolism was higher in the non-fenestrated group.

  23. Ravishankar C, Gerstenberger E, Sleeper LA, Atz AM, Affolter JT, Bradley TJ, et al. Factors affecting Fontan length of stay: results from the single ventricle reconstruction trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;151(3):669-75.e1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hosseinpour A-R, Sudarshan CD, Davies P, Nashef SAM, Barron DJ, Brawn WJ. The impact of altitude on early outcome following the Fontan operation. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006;1(1):31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Johnson JT, Lindsay I, Day RW, Van Dorn CS, Hoffman J, Everitt MD, et al. Living at altitude adversely affects survival among patients with a Fontan procedure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61(12):1283–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sandoval N, Chalela T, Giraldo-Grueso M, Sandoval-Trujillo P, Pineda-Rodriguez IG, Obando C, et al. 2640 Meters closer to the stars: does high altitude affect Fontan results? The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2022.

  27. Mitchell MB. The Fontan procedure at altitude: fenestrate or not? World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg. 2019;10(5):597–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Palacios-Macedo A, Díliz-Nava H, Tamariz-Cruz O, García-Benítez L, Pérez-Juárez F, Araujo-Martínez A, et al. Outcomes of the non-fenestrated Fontan procedure at high altitude. World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg. 2019;10(5):590–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Poterucha JT, Johnson JN, Qureshi MY, O’Leary PW, Kamath PS, Lennon RJ, et al. Magnetic resonance elastography: a novel technique for the detection of hepatic fibrosis and hepatocellular carcinoma after the Fontan operation. Mayo Clin Proc. 2015;90(7):882–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Schleiger A, Salzmann M, Kramer P, Danne F, Schubert S, Bassir C, et al. Severity of Fontan-associated liver disease correlates with Fontan hemodynamics. Pediatr Cardiol. 2020;41(4):736–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Rychik J, Atz AM, Celermajer DS, Deal BJ, Gatzoulis MA, Gewillig MH, et al. Evaluation and management of the child and adult with Fontan circulation: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circ. 2019;140(6):e234–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Smaś-Suska M, Róg B, Weryński P, Płazak W, Komar M, Olszowska M, et al. Long-term effects of percutaneous fenestration following the Fontan procedure in adult patients with congenital univentricular heart. Med Sci Monit. 2018;24:3506–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Materna O, Illinger V, Jičínská D, Koubský K, Kovanda J, Ložek M, et al. Influence of fenestration on long-term Fontan survival. Cardiol Young. 2021:1–6.

  34. Imielski BR, Woods RK, Mussatto KA, Cao Y, Simpson PM, Tweddell JS. Fontan fenestration closure and event-free survival. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;145(1):183–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Fiore AC, Tan C, Armbrecht E, Huddleston CB, Kim E, Goel N, et al. Comparison of fenestrated and nonfenestrated patients undergoing extracardiac Fontan. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;97(3):924–31 (discussion 30-1).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Stout KK, Daniels CJ, Aboulhosn JA, Bozkurt B, Broberg CS, Colman JM, et al. 2018 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of adults with congenital heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circ. 2019;139(14):e698–800.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Salazar JD, Zafar F, Siddiqui K, Coleman RD, Morales DL, Heinle JS, et al. Fenestration during Fontan palliation: now the exception instead of the rule. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;140(1):129–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Fan F, Liu Z, Li S, Yi T, Yan J, Yan F, et al. Effect of fenestration on early postoperative outcome in extracardiac Fontan patients with different risk levels. Pediatr Cardiol. 2017;38(4):643–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kotani Y, Chetan D, Saedi A, Zhu J, Grosse-Wortmann L, Coles JG, et al. Persistent fenestration may be a marker for physiologic intolerance after Fontan completion. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;148(6):2532–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Mays WA, Border WL, Knecht SK, Gerdes YM, Pfriem H, Claytor RP, et al. Exercise capacity improves after transcatheter closure of the Fontan fenestration in children. Congenit Heart Dis. 2008;3(4):254–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Meadows J, Lang P, Marx G, Rhodes J. Fontan fenestration closure has no acute effect on exercise capacity but improves ventilatory response to exercise. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52(2):108–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Heal ME, Jackson LB, Atz AM, Butts RJ. Effects of persistent Fontan fenestration patency on cardiopulmonary exercise testing variables. Congenit Heart Dis. 2017;12(4):399–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 13123 East 16thAvenue, Box 100, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA

    Charles T. Simpkin DO & Megan M. SooHoo MD

Authors
  1. Charles T. Simpkin DO
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Megan M. SooHoo MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Megan M. SooHoo MD.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Charles T. Simpkin declares that he has no conflict of interest. Megan M. SooHoo declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Cardiology/CT Surgery

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Simpkin, C.T., SooHoo, M.M. Pros and Cons of Fontan Fenestration: a Review of the Recent Literature. Curr Treat Options Peds 9, 1–10 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40746-023-00263-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40746-023-00263-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation