Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Constipation in Children: A guide to Prompt Diagnosis and Effective Treatment

  • General Surgery (E Barksdale, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Treatment Options in Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of review

Constipation Is a common pediatric symptom that can affect children of all ages. It impacts children both physically and psychosocially while also causing significant emotional and financial stress to their families. Constipation presenting early in life can be secondary to conditions such as anorectal malformations, anal stenosis, Hirschsprung disease, spine abnormalities, cystic fibrosis, or metabolic dysfunction. Yet, the majority of children and adolescents who struggle with constipation do so as a result of a functional disorder. Diagnosis Is primarily based on fulfilling defined clinical criteria. Despite being so prevalent, functional constipation is often misdiagnosed and inappropriately treated. Laxative use Is often avoided due to misconceptions related to their efficacy and safety. This review addresses how to effectively diagnose and treat functional constipation in children of different ages and with variable severity at the time of presentation.

Recent findings

Guidelines from several medical societies for the evaluation and treatment of a child presenting with constipation have been published. It has become increasingly clear that early treatment of functional constipation is associated with improved long-term outcomes. The diagnostic role of anorectal and colonic manometry has been clarified and these tests have been standardized in the pediatric population. New medical and surgical treatments have been developed and Are leading to improved outcomes in children who fail conventional medical and behavioral interventions.

Summary

Childhood constipation Requires a comprehensive therapeutic plan, comprised of education, behavioral intervention, and medication that jointly produce effective defecation. Children with chronic constipation who Are unresponsive to maximal medical treatment benefit from further evaluation with colonic transit studies, anorectal and colonic manometry, imaging studies of the spine, and defecography—especially if more invasive interventions such as anal sphincter botulinum toxin injection, appendicostomy, cecostomy, colonic resection, ileostomy, and sacral nerve stimulation are being considered. These children Are best evaluated in specialized centers that offer a multi-disciplinary approach to both the physical and psychosocial components of chronic constipation treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Mugie SM, Benninga MA, Di Lorenzo C. Epidemiology of constipation in children and adults: a systematic review. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2011;25(1):3–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Loening-Baucke V. Chronic constipation in children. Gastroenterology. 1993;105(5):1557–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Corkins MR. Are diet and constipation related in children? Nutr Clin Pract. 2005;20(5):536–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Peeters B, Benninga MA, Hennekam RC. Childhood constipation; an overview of genetic studies and associated syndromes. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2011;25(1):73–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Steer CD, Emond AM, Golding J, Sandhu B. The variation in stool patterns from 1 to 42 months: a population-based observational study. Arch Dis Child. 2009;94(3):231–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Liem O, Harman J, Benninga M, Kelleher K, Mousa H, Di Lorenzo C. Health utilization and cost impact of childhood constipation in the United States. J Pediatr. 2009;154(2):258–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lindgren H, Nejstgaard MC, Salo M, Stenstrom P. Evaluation of bowel function in healthy children: untreated constipation is common. Acta Paediatr. 2018;107(5):875–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tabbers MM, DiLorenzo C, Berger MY, Faure C, Langendam MW, Nurko S, et al. Evaluation and treatment of functional constipation in infants and children: evidence-based recommendations from ESPGHAN and NASPGHAN. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2014;58(2):258–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ghosh A, Griffiths DM. Rectal biopsy in the investigation of constipation. Arch Dis Child. 1998;79(3):266–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Jung PM. Hirschsprung's disease: one surgeon's experience in one institution. J Pediatr Surg. 1995;30(5):646–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. •• Hyams JS, Di Lorenzo C, Saps M, Shulman RJ, Staiano A, van Tilburg M. Functional Disorders: Children and Adolescents. Gastroenterology. 2016;150(6):1456–1468This study updates the Rome diagnostic criteria of all pediatric functional disorders. The criteria related to defecation disorders in children were only slightly modified from the previous version, as they were found to adequately differentiate functional constipation from organic diseases.

  12. • Vriesman MH, Velasco-Benitez CA, Ramirez CR, Benninga MA, Di Lorenzo C, Saps M. Assessing Children's Report of Stool Consistency: Agreement Between the Pediatric Rome III Questionnaire and the Bristol Stool Scale. J Pediatr. 2017;190:69–73 This study highlights that the Bristol Stool Scale should not be used in isolation to make a diagnosis of constipation and suggests that better instruments are needed to assess the consistency of stools with a high degree of reliability, both in research and in the clinical setting.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Barr RG, Levine MD, Wilkinson RH, Mulvihill D. Chronic and occult stool retention: a clinical tool for its evaluation in school-aged children. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 1979;18(11):674 6, 7–9, passim.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Benninga MA, Buller HA, Staalman CR, Gubler FM, Bossuyt PM, van der Plas RN, et al. Defaecation disorders in children, colonic transit time versus the Barr-score. Eur J Pediatr. 1995;154(4):277–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Leech SC, McHugh K, Sullivan PB. Evaluation of a method of assessing faecal loading on plain abdominal radiographs in children. Pediatr Radiol. 1999;29(4):255–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. de Lorijn F, van Rijn RR, Heijmans J, Reitsma JB, Voskuijl WP, Henneman OD, et al. The Leech method for diagnosing constipation: intra- and interobserver variability and accuracy. Pediatr Radiol. 2006;36(1):43–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Blethyn AJ, Verrier Jones K, Newcombe R, Roberts GM, Jenkins HR. Radiological assessment of constipation. Arch Dis Child. 1995;73(6):532–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Maurer AH, Krevsky B. Whole-gut transit scintigraphy in the evaluation of small-bowel and colon transit disorders. Semin Nucl Med. 1995;25(4):326–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Metcalf AM, Phillips SF, Zinsmeister AR, MacCarty RL, Beart RW, Wolff BG. Simplified assessment of segmental colonic transit. Gastroenterology. 1987;92(1):40–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mugie SM, Perez ME, Burgers R, Hingsbergen EA, Punati J, Mousa H, et al. Colonic manometry and colonic scintigraphy as a diagnostic tool for children with severe constipation. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2013;57(5):598–602.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rao SS, Singh S. Clinical utility of colonic and anorectal manometry in chronic constipation. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2010;44(9):597–609.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rao SS, Azpiroz F, Diamant N, Enck P, Tougas G, Wald A. Minimum standards of anorectal manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2002;14(5):553–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mugie SM, Bates DG, Punati JB, Benninga MA, Di Lorenzo C, Mousa HM. The value of fluoroscopic defecography in the diagnostic and therapeutic management of defecation disorders in children. Pediatr Radiol. 2015;45(2):173–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. •• Rodriguez L, Sood M, Di Lorenzo C, Saps M. An ANMS-NASPGHAN consensus document on anorectal and colonic manometry in children. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2017;29(1) e12944 This is an improtant review that clarifies when and how manometry studies should be used in the investigation of a child presenting with constipation. It is a consensus based document which was endorsed by two of the leading medical societies in the field.

  25. Villarreal J, Sood M, Zangen T, Flores A, Michel R, Reddy N, et al. Colonic diversion for intractable constipation in children: colonic manometry helps guide clinical decisions. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2001;33(5):588–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Di Lorenzo C, Flores AF, Reddy SN, Hyman PE. Use of colonic manometry to differentiate causes of intractable constipation in children. J Pediatr. 1992;120(5):690–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. • Wessel S, Koppen IJ, Wiklendt L, Costa M, Benninga MA, Dinning PG. Characterizing colonic motility in children with chronic intractable constipation: a look beyond high-amplitude propagating sequences. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016;28(5):743–57 This study suggests that newly identified colonic motor patterns may increase our understanding of why some children develop more difficult-to-treat constipation.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Pijpers MA, Bongers ME, Benninga MA, Berger MY. Functional constipation in children: a systematic review on prognosis and predictive factors. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2010;50(3):256–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Tabbers MM, Boluyt N, Berger MY, Benninga MA. Constipation in children. BMJ Clin Evid. 2010;04:303.

  30. Loening-Baucke V, Miele E, Staiano A. Fiber (glucomannan) is beneficial in the treatment of childhood constipation. Pediatrics. 2004;113(3 Pt 1):e259–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Williams CL, Bollella M, Wynder EL. A new recommendation for dietary fiber in childhood. Pediatrics. 1995;96(5 Pt 2):985–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Okuda M, Kunitsugu I, Yoshitake N, Sasaki S. The relationship between functional constipation and dietary habits in school-age Japanese children. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo). 2019;65(1):38–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Roma E, Adamidis D, Nikolara R, Constantopoulos A, Messaritakis J. Diet and chronic constipation in children: the role of fiber. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1999;28(2):169–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Young RJ, Beerman LE, Vanderhoof JA. Increasing oral fluids in chronic constipation in children. Gastroenterol Nurs. 1998;21(4):156–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Farrell RJ, Kelly CP. Celiac sprue. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(3):180–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. •• Little LM, Benton K, Manuel-Rubio M, Saps M, Fishbein M. Contribution of Sensory Processing to Chronic Constipation in Preschool Children. J Pediatr. 2019;210:141–5 Finding from this study reveal that children with chronic constipation have sensory characteristics that contribute to difficulties at the time of toilet training. By identifying such sensory processing changes, medical providers may be able to optimize behavioral interventions to complement use of laxatives in this population.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Taubman B. Toilet training and toileting refusal for stool only: a prospective study. Pediatrics. 1997;99(1):54–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Taubman B, Blum NJ, Nemeth N. Stool toileting refusal: a prospective intervention targeting parental behavior. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003;157(12):1193–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Muddasani S, Moe A, Semmelrock C, Gilbert CL, Enemuo V, Chiou EH, et al. Physical therapy for fecal incontinence in children with pelvic floor Dyssynergia. J Pediatr. 2017;190:74–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. •• van Engelenburg-van Lonkhuyzen ML, Bols EM, Benninga MA, Verwijs WA, de Bie RA. Effectiveness of Pelvic Physiotherapy in Children With Functional Constipation Compared With Standard Medical Care. Gastroenterology. 2017;152(1):82–91 Important randomized controlled trial study of pelvic physiotherapy in children 5–16 years old with functional constipation showing that physiotherapy was more effective than standard medical treatment on family perceived benefit and ability to stop use of laxatives.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Jarzebicka D, Sieczkowska J, Dadalski M, Kierkus J, Ryzko J, Oracz G. Evaluation of the effectiveness of biofeedback therapy for functional constipation in children. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2016;27(5):433–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. • Modin L, Walsted AM, Dalby K, Jakobsen MS. Polyethylene Glycol Maintenance Treatment for Childhood Functional Constipation: A Randomized, Placebo-controlled Trial. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2018;67(6):732–7 A double blind plecebo controlled treatment study which confirms the efficacy and safety of polyethylene glycol in preventing relapse of symptoms of constipation during long-term maintenance treatment in children.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Nurko S, Youssef NN, Sabri M, Langseder A, McGowan J, Cleveland M, et al. PEG3350 in the treatment of childhood constipation: a multicenter, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. J Pediatr. 2008;153(2):254–61, 61 e1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Thomson MA, Jenkins HR, Bisset WM, Heuschkel R, Kalra DS, Green MR, et al. Polyethylene glycol 3350 plus electrolytes for chronic constipation in children: a double blind, placebo controlled, crossover study. Arch Dis Child. 2007;92(11):996–1000.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. •• Williams KC, Rogers LK, Hill I, Barnard J, Di Lorenzo C. PEG 3350 Administration Is Not Associated with Sustained Elevation of Glycol Levels. J Pediatr. 2018;195:148–53 e1 This study performed in a small group of patients suggests that adminsitration of PEG 3350 is not associated with serum concentration of glycol metabolites at levels considered to be harmful.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. • Vilanova-Sanchez A, Gasior AC, Toocheck N, Weaver L, Wood RJ, Reck CA, et al. Are Senna based laxatives safe when used as long term treatment for constipation in children? J Pediatr Surg. 2018;53(4):722–7 The authors found that long term administration of the stimulant laxative senna is safe and effective. They caution that high doses of the medication may be assocaited with development of perianal rashes.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Love BL. Plecanatide for treatment of chronic constipation and irritable bowel syndrome. Am J Med. 2019;132(5):572–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Lee N, Wald A. The pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, clinical efficacy, safety and tolerability of linaclotide. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2011;7(5):651–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Love BL, Johnson A, Smith LS. Linaclotide: a novel agent for chronic constipation and irritable bowel syndrome. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2014;71(13):1081–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Mugie SM, Korczowski B, Bodi P, Green A, Kerstens R, Ausma J, et al. Prucalopride is no more effective than placebo for children with functional constipation. Gastroenterology. 2014;147(6):1285–95 e1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. • Wood RJ, Yacob D, Levitt MA, et al. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2016;28(3):370–9 This manuscript describes the different surgical options available of the treament of the most severe cases of childhood constipation. It emphasizes that the surgical evaluation and treatment of children with constipation needs to be protocolized and studied in a prospective manner using validated outcomes measures.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Keshtgar AS, Ward HC, Sanei A, Clayden GS. Botulinum toxin, a new treatment modality for chronic idiopathic constipation in children: long-term follow-up of a double-blind randomized trial. J Pediatr Surg. 2007;42(4):672–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Halleran DR, Lu PL, Ahmad H, Paradiso MM, Lehmkuhl H, Akers A, et al. Anal sphincter botulinum toxin injection in children with functional anorectal and colonic disorders: a large institutional study and review of the literature focusing on complications. J Pediatr Surg. 2019;54(11):2305–2310.

  54. Rodriguez L, Nurko S, Flores A. Factors associated with successful decrease and discontinuation of antegrade continence enemas (ACE) in children with defecation disorders: a study evaluating the effect of ACE on colon motility. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2013;25(2):140–e81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Flageole H, Ouahed J, Walton JM, Yousef Y. Abdominal compartment syndrome secondary to chronic constipation. Case Rep Pediatr. 2011;2011:562730.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Desale Yacob MD.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Desale Yacob declares that he has functioned as a consultant for QOL, Inc. Carlo Di Lorenzo declares that he has functioned as a consultant for QOL Inc., Mallinckrodt, Mahana, Sucampo, Allergan, Shire.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on General Surgery

The authors wish to thank Dr. John Schneider for reviewing their manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yacob, D., Di Lorenzo, C. Constipation in Children: A guide to Prompt Diagnosis and Effective Treatment. Curr Treat Options Peds 6, 101–115 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40746-020-00193-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40746-020-00193-5

Keywords

Navigation