Abstract
The main aim of long term evolution is to provide very high rate for downlink and uplink, better multimedia services and more user flexibility than the current cellular networks. There is a very important role of resource allocation management in the network to achieve better performance in terms of data rate and quality of service. These scheduling algorithms/strategies are responsible to allocating the resources to the users. There are many existing scheduling algorithms. In this paper we analyzed the performance of proportional fair, modified largest weighted delay first, exponential proportional fairness and FLS algorithms on a single cell affected by interference for different flows named as VIDEO, Best Effort, and CBR. The comparative analysis is done in terms of packet loss ratio, fairness index, delay, spectral efficiency and throughput.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kumar P, Kumar S (2015) A survey on inter-cell interference co-ordination techniques of LTE networks. In J Adv Res Comput Eng Technol 04(06):2539–2544
Parkvall S, Dahlman E, Furuskar A, Jading Y, Olsson M, Wanstedt S, Zangi K (2008) LTE- advanced—evolving LTE towards IMT-Advanced. In: VTC Fall, pp. 1–5
A White Paper (2008) Long term evolution protocol overview. Document number: LTEPTCLOVWWP, Rev 0, 10, Freescale Semiconductor,Inc
Yong SC, Jaekwon K, Won YY, Chung-Gu K (2010) MIMO-OFDM wireless communications with MATLAB. Wiley, Singapore
Capozzi F, Piro G, Gricco LA, Boggia G, Camarda P (2013) Downlink packet scheduling in LTE cellular networks: key design issues and a survey. Commun Surv Tutor IEEE 15(2):678–700
Kitanov S, Janevski T (2010) Performance evaluation of scheduling strategies for LTE Networks in downlink direction. In: Proceedings IEEE of international conference ETAI
Trivedi RD, Patel MC (2014) Comparison of different scheduling algorithms for LTE. Int J Emerg Technol Adv Eng 8(5):334–339
Dardouri S, Bouallegue R (2013) Comparative study of scheduling algorithms for LTE networks. Int J Compu Electr Autom Control Inf Eng 8(03):445–450
Basukala R, Mohd Ramli H, Sandrasegaran K (2009) Performance analysis of EXP/PF and M-LWDF in downlink 3GPP LTE System. IEEE first Asian Himalayas conference, pp 1–5
Choi J, Bahk S (2007) Cell throughput analysis of the proportional fair scheduler in the single-cell environment. IEEE Trans Vehicular Technol 56(2):766–778
Ameigeiras P, Wigard J, Mogensen P (2004) Performance evaluation of the M-LWDF scheduling algorithm for streaming services in HSDPA. In: IEEE vehicular technology conference, pp 999–1003
Sulthana SF, Nakkeeran R (2014) Study of downlink scheduling algorithms in LTE networks. J Netw 9(12):3381–3391
Sahoo B (2013) Performance comparison of packet scheduling algorithm for video traffic in LTE cellular network. Int J Mob Netw Commun Telemat 3(3):9–18
Habaebi MH, Chebil J, AL-Sakkaf AG, Dhhawi TH (2013) Comparative study of scheduling algorithms for LTE networks. IIUM Eng J 14(1):67–76
Chandan SM, Akki CB (2013) A fair downlink scheduling algorithm for 3GPP LTE networks. Int J Comput Netw Inf Secur 6:34–41
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kumar, P., Kumar, S. & Dabas, C. Comparative Analysis of Downlink Scheduling Algorithms for a Cell Affected by Interference in LTE Network. Ann. Data. Sci. 3, 135–153 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40745-016-0076-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40745-016-0076-x