Abstract
Modern manufacturing processes like abrasive flow machining (AFM) are often employed for finishing the conventionally inaccessible surfaces that include the inner surfaces of cylindrical workpieces. This process is used for accurate prediction of the generated surfaces. As such, regression models are useful for such a prediction. In the existing AFM setup, the nylon fixture is replaced by an aluminum fixture, and a modified MAFM setup is fabricated by including the effect of magnetization. The research explores the MAFM process for finishing the hybrid metal matrix composites (MMCs) of SiC/B4C using aluminum-6063 as a base material. The paper employs artificial neural networks to model and simulate the response characteristics during the MAFM process, developed in the MATLAB 2016 b environment. The neural networks are trained for finishing the cylindrical components of Al/SiC/B4C-MMCs. A neural network having a configuration of generalized back-propagation is employed with six inputs, two outputs, and two hidden layers. The experimentally observed data take into account the influence of MAFM process parameters including the number of cycles, extrusion pressure, the concentration of abrasives, magnetic flux density, mesh size, and workpiece material. The process responses are characterized as material removal rate (MRR; μg/s) and change in surface roughness (ΔRa; μm). Moreover, the microstructure analysis of workpiece materials is also done using scanning electron microscope.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author, [initials]. The data are not publicly available due to [restrictions. e.g., their containing information that could compromise the privacy of research participants].
Abbreviations
- AFM:
-
Abrasive flow machining
- MAFM:
-
Magnetic abrasive flow machining
- ANN:
-
Artificial neural networks
- MMCs:
-
Metal matrix composites
- SEM:
-
Scanning electron microscope
- MSE:
-
Mean square error
- MRR:
-
Material removal rate
- RSM:
-
Response surface methodology
- BBD:
-
Box-Behnken design
- ΔR a :
-
Change in surface roughness
- trainbr:
-
Bayesian regularization training algorithm
- lr:
-
Learning rate of ANN
- GA:
-
Genetic algorithm
References
Sankar MR, Jain VK, RamKumar J (2011) Abrasive flow machining (AFM): an overview. INDO-US workshop on smart machine tools, intelligent machining systems and multi-scale manufacturing, pp 1‒9
Jain RK, Jain VK, Dixit PM (1999) Modeling of material removal and surface roughness in Abrasive flow machining process. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 39:1903–1923
Jain VK, Adsul SG (2000) Experimental investigations into abrasive flow machining (AFM). Int J Mach Tool Manuf 40:1003–1021
Santhosh KS, Somashekhar SH (2016) A review on abrasive flow machining (AFM). Global Colloq Recent Adv Effect Res Eng Sci Technol 25:1297–1304
Singh S, Shan HS (2002) Development of magneto abrasive flow machining process. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 42:953–959
Liao TW, Chen LJ (1994) A neural network approach for grinding processes: modeling and optimization. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 34(7):919–937
Jain RK, Jain VK, Kalra PK (1999) Modelling of abrasive flow machining process: a neural network approach. Wear 231:242–248
Jain RK, Jain VK (2000) Optimum selection of machining conditions in abrasive flow machining using neural network. J Mater Process Tech 108:62–67
Hagan MT, Demuth HB, Beale M (1996) Neural network design. PWS Publishing Co., Boston, NY
Haykin S (1999) Neural networks: a comprehensive foundation, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, New Jersey
Chan WL, Fu MW, Lu J (2008) An integrated FEM and ANN methodology for metal-formed product design. Eng Appl Artif Intell 21:1170–1181
Cheng L, Zhao G, Cheng J, Zhao X (2010) Application of neural network in complex forging die design. Int J Mater Prod Technol 38(2/3):237–247
Tawakoli T, Rabiey M, Lewis M (2009) Neural network prediction of dry grinding by CBN grinding wheel using special conditioning. Int J Mater Prod Technol 35(1/2):118–133
El-Sonbaty IA, Khashaba UA, Selmy AI, Ali AI (2008) Prediction of surface roughness profiles for milled surfaces using an artificial neural network and fractal geometry approach. J Mater Process Technol 200:271–278
Abburi NR, Dixit US (2006) A knowledge-based system for the prediction of surface roughness in turning process. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 22:363–372
Kadhum AH, Mustafa FF, Qate’a MK (2016) Prediction and estimation of magnetic abrasive finishing system using artificial neural networks model. In: The Iraqi Journal for Mechanical and Material Engineering, Special Volume Babylon First International Engineering Conference Issue (B), pp 282‒294
Lam SSY, Smith AE (1998) Process monitoring of abrasive flow machining using a neural network predictive model. University of Pittsburgh, pp 1‒6
Smith AE, Slaughter WS (1998) Neural network modeling of abrasive flow machining. University of Pittsburgh, pp 1‒8
Djavanroodi F (2013) Artificial neural network modeling of surface roughness in magnetic abrasive finishing process. Res J Appl Sci Eng Technol 6(11):1976–1983
Jain RK, Jain VK (2000) Optimum selection of machining conditions in abrasive flow machining using neural network. J Mater Process Technol 108:62–67
Petri KL, Billo RE, Bidanda B (1998) A neural network process model for abrasive flow machining operations. J Manuf Syst 17(1):52–64
Lam SSY, Smith AE (1998) Cascade-Correlation neural network modeling of the abrasive flow machining process. University of Pittsburgh, pp 1‒8
Ali-Tavoli M, Nariman-Zadeh N, Khakhali A, Mehran M (2006) Multi-objective optimization of abrasive flow machining processes using polynomial neural Networks and genetic algorithms. Mach Sci Technol 10:491–510
Mali HS, Manna A (2012) Simulation of surface generated during abrasive flow finishing of Al/SiCp-MMC using neural networks. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 61:1263–1268
Sangwan KS, Saxena S, Kant G (2015) Optimization of machining parameters to minimize surface roughness using integrated ANN-GA approach. Proc CIRP 29:305–310
Ranganathan S, Senthilvelan T, Sriram G (2010) Evaluation of machining parameters of hot turning of stainless steel (Type 316) by applying ANN and RSM. Mater Manuf Process 25:1131–1141
Kathiresan S, Hariharan K, Mohan B (2015) Prediction of surface roughness in magneto rheological abrasive flow finishing process by artificial neural networks and regression analysis. Appl Mech Mater 766–767:1076–1084
Chawla G, Mittal VK, Mittal S (2019) Design and development of fixture and modification of existing AFM setup to magnetic abrasive flow machining (MAFM) process setup. J Phys Conf Ser 1240:1–9
Chawla G, Kumar V, Kumar A (2021) Investigation and optimization of parameters in micro-finishing of hybrid Al/SiC/B4C MMCs by novel MAFM process through RSM. SILICON. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-020-00838-y
Kumar A, Kumar V, Kumar J (2013) Investigation of machining parameters and surface integrity in wire electric discharge machining of pure titanium. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B J Eng Manuf 227(7):972–992
Kumar A, Kumar V, Kumar J (2013) Multi-response optimization of process parameters based on response surface methodology for pure titanium using WEDM process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-4861-9
Derringer G, Suich R (1980) Simultaneous optimization of several response variables. J Qual Technol 12(4):214–219
Manna A, Bhattacharyya B (2004) Investigation for optimal parametric combination for achieving better surface finish during turning of Al/SiC-MMC. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 23:658–665
Mali HS, Manna A (2010) Optimum selection of abrasive flow machining conditions during fine finishing of Al/15 wt% SiC-MMC using Taguchi method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 50:1013–1024
Tzeng HJ, Yan BH, Hsu RT, Lin YC (2007) Self-modulating abrasive medium and its application to abrasive flow machining for finishing micro channel surfaces. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 32:1163–1169
Kim JD, Kim KD (2004) Deburring of burrs in spring collets by abrasive flow machining. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 24:469–473
Vemuri AT, Polycarpou MM (2004) A methodology for faulty diagnosis in robotic systems using neural networks. Robotica 22:419–438
Sehijpal S, Shan HS, Kumar P (2002) Wear behavior of materials in magnetically assisted abrasive flow machining. J Mater Process Technol 128:155–161
Singh DK, Jain VK, Raghuram V (2004) Parametric study of magnetic abrasive finishing process. J Mater Process Technol 149:22–29
Jayswal SC, Jain VK, Dixit PM (2005) Modeling and simulation of magnetic abrasive finishing process. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 26:477–490
Wani AM, Yadava V, Khatri A (2007) Simulation for the prediction of surface roughness in magnetic abrasive flow finishing (MAFF). J Mater Process Technol 190:282–290
Jha S, Jain VK, Komanduri R (2007) Effect of extrusion pressure and number of finishing cycles on surface roughness in magnetorheological abrasive flow finishing (MRAFF)process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 33:725–729
Das M, Jain VK, Ghoshdastidar PS (2008) Fluid flow analysis of magnetorheological abrasive flow finishing (MRAFF) process. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 48:415–426
Sadiq A, Shunmugam MS (2010) A novel method to improve finish on non-magnetic surfaces in magneto-rheological abrasive honing process. Tribol Int 43:1122–1126
Brar BS, Walia RS, Singh VP, Sharma M (2011) Development of a robust abrasive flow machining process setup. Int J Surf Eng Mater Technol 1(1):17–23
Brar BS, Walia RS, Singh VP, Sharma M (2012) Helical abrasive flow machining (HLX-AFM) process. Int J Surf Eng Mater Technol 2(2):48–52
Mulik RS, Pandey PM (2012) Experimental investigations and modeling of finishing force and torque in ultrasonic assisted magnetic abrasive finishing. J Manuf Sci Eng 134:0510081–05100812
Judal KB, Yadava V, Pathak D (2013) Experimental investigation of vibration assisted cylindrical-magnetic abrasive finishing of aluminum workpiece. Mater Manuf Processes 28:1196–1202
Mittal S, Kumar V, Kumar H (2016) Multi-objective optimization of process parameters involved in micro-finishing of Al/SiC MMCs by abrasive flow machining process. J Mater Design Appl. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464420715627292
Ahmad S, Gangwar S, Yadav PC, Singh DK (2017) Optimization of process parameters affecting surface roughness in magnetic abrasive finishing process. Mater Manuf Processes 32(15):1723–1729
Verma GC, Kala P, Pandey PM (2017) Experimental investigations into internal magnetic abrasive finishing of pipes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 88:1657–1668
Kathiresan S, Mohan B (2017) Experimental analysis of magneto rheological abrasive flow finishing process on AISI stainless steel 316L. Mater Manuf Process 33:422–432
Nagdeve L, Jain VK, Ramkumar J (2018) Differential finishing of freeform surfaces (knee joint) using R-MRAFF process and negative replica of workpiece as a fixture. Mach Sci Technol 22:671–695
Nagdeve L, Sidpara A, Jain VK, Ramkumar J (2018) On the effect of relative size of magnetic particles and abrasive particles in MR fluid-based finishing process. Mach Sci Technol 22(3):493–506
Singh RK, Gangwar S, Singh DK (2019) Experimental investigation on temperature affected magnetic abrasive finishing of aluminum 6060. Mater Manuf Processes. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2019.1628263
Kajal S, Jain VK, Ramkumar J, Nagdeve L (2019) Experimental and theoretical investigations into internal magnetic abrasive finishing of a revolver barrel. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 100:1105–1122
Yunus M, Alsoufi MS (2020) Genetic based experimental investigation on finishing characteristics of AlSiCp-MMC by abrasive flow machining. Int J Eng Technol Innov 10(4):293–305
Guo J, Feng W, Jong HJH, Suzukic H, Kanga R (2020) Finishing of rectangular microfeatures by localized vibration-assisted magnetic abrasive polishing method. J Manuf Process 49:204–213
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the National Institute of Technology, Kurukshetra, Haryana, India, for providing the necessary facilities to fabricate the MAFM setup for experimentation.
Funding
The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
GC: Contributed substantially to the conception and design of the study, the acquisition of data, or the analysis and interpretation. VK: Drafted or provided critical revision of the article. RSS: Agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or the integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declare(s) that there is no conflict of interest.
Consent to participate
The authors have given the consent to participate.
Consent to publish
The authors give the publisher the consent to publish the work.
Ethical approval
This research does not deal with human subjects, so we do not need an ethical approval. The authors whose names are listed immediately below certify that they have NO affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge, or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chawla, G., Kumar, V. & Sharma, R.S. Neural Simulation of Surface Generated During Magnetic Abrasive Flow Machining of Hybrid Al/SiC/B4C-MMCs. J Bio Tribo Corros 7, 153 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40735-021-00587-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40735-021-00587-4