Skip to main content
Log in

Neural Simulation of Surface Generated During Magnetic Abrasive Flow Machining of Hybrid Al/SiC/B4C-MMCs

  • Published:
Journal of Bio- and Tribo-Corrosion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Modern manufacturing processes like abrasive flow machining (AFM) are often employed for finishing the conventionally inaccessible surfaces that include the inner surfaces of cylindrical workpieces. This process is used for accurate prediction of the generated surfaces. As such, regression models are useful for such a prediction. In the existing AFM setup, the nylon fixture is replaced by an aluminum fixture, and a modified MAFM setup is fabricated by including the effect of magnetization. The research explores the MAFM process for finishing the hybrid metal matrix composites (MMCs) of SiC/B4C using aluminum-6063 as a base material. The paper employs artificial neural networks to model and simulate the response characteristics during the MAFM process, developed in the MATLAB 2016 b environment. The neural networks are trained for finishing the cylindrical components of Al/SiC/B4C-MMCs. A neural network having a configuration of generalized back-propagation is employed with six inputs, two outputs, and two hidden layers. The experimentally observed data take into account the influence of MAFM process parameters including the number of cycles, extrusion pressure, the concentration of abrasives, magnetic flux density, mesh size, and workpiece material. The process responses are characterized as material removal rate (MRR; μg/s) and change in surface roughness (ΔRa; μm). Moreover, the microstructure analysis of workpiece materials is also done using scanning electron microscope.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author, [initials]. The data are not publicly available due to [restrictions. e.g., their containing information that could compromise the privacy of research participants].

Abbreviations

AFM:

Abrasive flow machining

MAFM:

Magnetic abrasive flow machining

ANN:

Artificial neural networks

MMCs:

Metal matrix composites

SEM:

Scanning electron microscope

MSE:

Mean square error

MRR:

Material removal rate

RSM:

Response surface methodology

BBD:

Box-Behnken design

ΔR a :

Change in surface roughness

trainbr:

Bayesian regularization training algorithm

lr:

Learning rate of ANN

GA:

Genetic algorithm

References

  1. Sankar MR, Jain VK, RamKumar J (2011) Abrasive flow machining (AFM): an overview. INDO-US workshop on smart machine tools, intelligent machining systems and multi-scale manufacturing, pp 1‒9

  2. Jain RK, Jain VK, Dixit PM (1999) Modeling of material removal and surface roughness in Abrasive flow machining process. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 39:1903–1923

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jain VK, Adsul SG (2000) Experimental investigations into abrasive flow machining (AFM). Int J Mach Tool Manuf 40:1003–1021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Santhosh KS, Somashekhar SH (2016) A review on abrasive flow machining (AFM). Global Colloq Recent Adv Effect Res Eng Sci Technol 25:1297–1304

    Google Scholar 

  5. Singh S, Shan HS (2002) Development of magneto abrasive flow machining process. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 42:953–959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Liao TW, Chen LJ (1994) A neural network approach for grinding processes: modeling and optimization. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 34(7):919–937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jain RK, Jain VK, Kalra PK (1999) Modelling of abrasive flow machining process: a neural network approach. Wear 231:242–248

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jain RK, Jain VK (2000) Optimum selection of machining conditions in abrasive flow machining using neural network. J Mater Process Tech 108:62–67

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hagan MT, Demuth HB, Beale M (1996) Neural network design. PWS Publishing Co., Boston, NY

    Google Scholar 

  10. Haykin S (1999) Neural networks: a comprehensive foundation, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chan WL, Fu MW, Lu J (2008) An integrated FEM and ANN methodology for metal-formed product design. Eng Appl Artif Intell 21:1170–1181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cheng L, Zhao G, Cheng J, Zhao X (2010) Application of neural network in complex forging die design. Int J Mater Prod Technol 38(2/3):237–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tawakoli T, Rabiey M, Lewis M (2009) Neural network prediction of dry grinding by CBN grinding wheel using special conditioning. Int J Mater Prod Technol 35(1/2):118–133

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. El-Sonbaty IA, Khashaba UA, Selmy AI, Ali AI (2008) Prediction of surface roughness profiles for milled surfaces using an artificial neural network and fractal geometry approach. J Mater Process Technol 200:271–278

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Abburi NR, Dixit US (2006) A knowledge-based system for the prediction of surface roughness in turning process. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 22:363–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kadhum AH, Mustafa FF, Qate’a MK (2016) Prediction and estimation of magnetic abrasive finishing system using artificial neural networks model. In: The Iraqi Journal for Mechanical and Material Engineering, Special Volume Babylon First International Engineering Conference Issue (B), pp 282‒294

  17. Lam SSY, Smith AE (1998) Process monitoring of abrasive flow machining using a neural network predictive model. University of Pittsburgh, pp 1‒6

  18. Smith AE, Slaughter WS (1998) Neural network modeling of abrasive flow machining. University of Pittsburgh, pp 1‒8

  19. Djavanroodi F (2013) Artificial neural network modeling of surface roughness in magnetic abrasive finishing process. Res J Appl Sci Eng Technol 6(11):1976–1983

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Jain RK, Jain VK (2000) Optimum selection of machining conditions in abrasive flow machining using neural network. J Mater Process Technol 108:62–67

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Petri KL, Billo RE, Bidanda B (1998) A neural network process model for abrasive flow machining operations. J Manuf Syst 17(1):52–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lam SSY, Smith AE (1998) Cascade-Correlation neural network modeling of the abrasive flow machining process. University of Pittsburgh, pp 1‒8

  23. Ali-Tavoli M, Nariman-Zadeh N, Khakhali A, Mehran M (2006) Multi-objective optimization of abrasive flow machining processes using polynomial neural Networks and genetic algorithms. Mach Sci Technol 10:491–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mali HS, Manna A (2012) Simulation of surface generated during abrasive flow finishing of Al/SiCp-MMC using neural networks. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 61:1263–1268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sangwan KS, Saxena S, Kant G (2015) Optimization of machining parameters to minimize surface roughness using integrated ANN-GA approach. Proc CIRP 29:305–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ranganathan S, Senthilvelan T, Sriram G (2010) Evaluation of machining parameters of hot turning of stainless steel (Type 316) by applying ANN and RSM. Mater Manuf Process 25:1131–1141

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kathiresan S, Hariharan K, Mohan B (2015) Prediction of surface roughness in magneto rheological abrasive flow finishing process by artificial neural networks and regression analysis. Appl Mech Mater 766–767:1076–1084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Chawla G, Mittal VK, Mittal S (2019) Design and development of fixture and modification of existing AFM setup to magnetic abrasive flow machining (MAFM) process setup. J Phys Conf Ser 1240:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  29. Chawla G, Kumar V, Kumar A (2021) Investigation and optimization of parameters in micro-finishing of hybrid Al/SiC/B4C MMCs by novel MAFM process through RSM. SILICON. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-020-00838-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kumar A, Kumar V, Kumar J (2013) Investigation of machining parameters and surface integrity in wire electric discharge machining of pure titanium. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B J Eng Manuf 227(7):972–992

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Kumar A, Kumar V, Kumar J (2013) Multi-response optimization of process parameters based on response surface methodology for pure titanium using WEDM process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-4861-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Derringer G, Suich R (1980) Simultaneous optimization of several response variables. J Qual Technol 12(4):214–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Manna A, Bhattacharyya B (2004) Investigation for optimal parametric combination for achieving better surface finish during turning of Al/SiC-MMC. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 23:658–665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Mali HS, Manna A (2010) Optimum selection of abrasive flow machining conditions during fine finishing of Al/15 wt% SiC-MMC using Taguchi method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 50:1013–1024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Tzeng HJ, Yan BH, Hsu RT, Lin YC (2007) Self-modulating abrasive medium and its application to abrasive flow machining for finishing micro channel surfaces. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 32:1163–1169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kim JD, Kim KD (2004) Deburring of burrs in spring collets by abrasive flow machining. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 24:469–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Vemuri AT, Polycarpou MM (2004) A methodology for faulty diagnosis in robotic systems using neural networks. Robotica 22:419–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Sehijpal S, Shan HS, Kumar P (2002) Wear behavior of materials in magnetically assisted abrasive flow machining. J Mater Process Technol 128:155–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Singh DK, Jain VK, Raghuram V (2004) Parametric study of magnetic abrasive finishing process. J Mater Process Technol 149:22–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Jayswal SC, Jain VK, Dixit PM (2005) Modeling and simulation of magnetic abrasive finishing process. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 26:477–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Wani AM, Yadava V, Khatri A (2007) Simulation for the prediction of surface roughness in magnetic abrasive flow finishing (MAFF). J Mater Process Technol 190:282–290

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Jha S, Jain VK, Komanduri R (2007) Effect of extrusion pressure and number of finishing cycles on surface roughness in magnetorheological abrasive flow finishing (MRAFF)process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 33:725–729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Das M, Jain VK, Ghoshdastidar PS (2008) Fluid flow analysis of magnetorheological abrasive flow finishing (MRAFF) process. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 48:415–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Sadiq A, Shunmugam MS (2010) A novel method to improve finish on non-magnetic surfaces in magneto-rheological abrasive honing process. Tribol Int 43:1122–1126

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Brar BS, Walia RS, Singh VP, Sharma M (2011) Development of a robust abrasive flow machining process setup. Int J Surf Eng Mater Technol 1(1):17–23

    Google Scholar 

  46. Brar BS, Walia RS, Singh VP, Sharma M (2012) Helical abrasive flow machining (HLX-AFM) process. Int J Surf Eng Mater Technol 2(2):48–52

    Google Scholar 

  47. Mulik RS, Pandey PM (2012) Experimental investigations and modeling of finishing force and torque in ultrasonic assisted magnetic abrasive finishing. J Manuf Sci Eng 134:0510081–05100812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Judal KB, Yadava V, Pathak D (2013) Experimental investigation of vibration assisted cylindrical-magnetic abrasive finishing of aluminum workpiece. Mater Manuf Processes 28:1196–1202

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Mittal S, Kumar V, Kumar H (2016) Multi-objective optimization of process parameters involved in micro-finishing of Al/SiC MMCs by abrasive flow machining process. J Mater Design Appl. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464420715627292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Ahmad S, Gangwar S, Yadav PC, Singh DK (2017) Optimization of process parameters affecting surface roughness in magnetic abrasive finishing process. Mater Manuf Processes 32(15):1723–1729

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Verma GC, Kala P, Pandey PM (2017) Experimental investigations into internal magnetic abrasive finishing of pipes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 88:1657–1668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Kathiresan S, Mohan B (2017) Experimental analysis of magneto rheological abrasive flow finishing process on AISI stainless steel 316L. Mater Manuf Process 33:422–432

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Nagdeve L, Jain VK, Ramkumar J (2018) Differential finishing of freeform surfaces (knee joint) using R-MRAFF process and negative replica of workpiece as a fixture. Mach Sci Technol 22:671–695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Nagdeve L, Sidpara A, Jain VK, Ramkumar J (2018) On the effect of relative size of magnetic particles and abrasive particles in MR fluid-based finishing process. Mach Sci Technol 22(3):493–506

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Singh RK, Gangwar S, Singh DK (2019) Experimental investigation on temperature affected magnetic abrasive finishing of aluminum 6060. Mater Manuf Processes. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2019.1628263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Kajal S, Jain VK, Ramkumar J, Nagdeve L (2019) Experimental and theoretical investigations into internal magnetic abrasive finishing of a revolver barrel. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 100:1105–1122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Yunus M, Alsoufi MS (2020) Genetic based experimental investigation on finishing characteristics of AlSiCp-MMC by abrasive flow machining. Int J Eng Technol Innov 10(4):293–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Guo J, Feng W, Jong HJH, Suzukic H, Kanga R (2020) Finishing of rectangular microfeatures by localized vibration-assisted magnetic abrasive polishing method. J Manuf Process 49:204–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the National Institute of Technology, Kurukshetra, Haryana, India, for providing the necessary facilities to fabricate the MAFM setup for experimentation.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

GC: Contributed substantially to the conception and design of the study, the acquisition of data, or the analysis and interpretation. VK: Drafted or provided critical revision of the article. RSS: Agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or the integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gagandeep Chawla.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declare(s) that there is no conflict of interest.

Consent to participate

The authors have given the consent to participate.

Consent to publish

The authors give the publisher the consent to publish the work.

Ethical approval

This research does not deal with human subjects, so we do not need an ethical approval. The authors whose names are listed immediately below certify that they have NO affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge, or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chawla, G., Kumar, V. & Sharma, R.S. Neural Simulation of Surface Generated During Magnetic Abrasive Flow Machining of Hybrid Al/SiC/B4C-MMCs. J Bio Tribo Corros 7, 153 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40735-021-00587-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40735-021-00587-4

Keywords

Navigation