Abstract
This article provides an overview of cultural environmental factors that influence interactions between organized cultural groups and the recipients of their aggregate outcome. The discussion highlights the elaborated account of metacontingency with the primary focus on ways this perspective offers points of entry to alter contextual factors and change cultural practices. The concepts of metacontingency, macrobehavior, macrocontingency, and cultural milieu are emphasized in the behavior scientific analysis of cultural practices. In this process, interactions of verbally sophisticated cultural groups, the aggregate outcome, and their influence on the cultural environment will be examined. Moreover, the mediating role of verbal repertoires of individuals will be discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and materials
The data pertaining to the referenced research (supporting the theoretical theme of this article) are not available for sharing due to Institutional Review Board protocols.
References
Alavosius, M. P., Newsome, W. D., Houmanfar, R., & Biglan, A. (2016). A functional contextualist analysis of the behavior and organizational practices relevant to climate change. In R. Zettle, S. C. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes, & A. Biglan (Eds.), Handbook of contextual behavior science (pp. 513–530). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118489857.ch25
Alavosius, M. P., Houmanfar, R. A., Anbro, S., Burleigh, K., & Hebein, C. (2017). Leadership and crew resource management in high-reliability organizations: A competency framework for measuring behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 37, 142–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/01608061.2017.1325825
Alvero, A. M., Bucklin, B. R., & Austin, J. (2001). An objective review of the effectiveness and essential characteristics of performance feedback in organizational settings (1985–1998). Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 21(1), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1300/J075v21n01_02
Ardila Sánchez, J. G., Houmanfar, R. A., & Alavosius, M. P. (2019). A descriptive analysis of the effects of weather disasters on community resilience. Behavior & Social Issues, 28, 298–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42822-019-00015-w
Ardila Sánchez, J. G., Houmanfar, R. A., & Fleming, W. (2020). Interindividual performance in metacontingencies. Mexican Journal of Behavior Analysis, 46, 162–201. https://doi.org/10.5514/rmac.v46.i2.77878
Argyris, C. (1976). Single-loop and double-loop models in research on decision making. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(3), 363–375. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391848
Argyris, C. (1991). Teaching smart people how to learn. Harvard Business Review, 69(3), 99–109.
Baker, T., Schwenk, T., Piasecki, M., Smith, G. S., Reimer, D., Jacobs, N., Shonkwiler, G., Hagen, J., & Houmanfar, R. A. (2015). Cultural change in a medical school: A data-driven management of entropy. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 35, 95–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/01608061.2015.1035826
Balcazar, F., Hopkins, B., & Suarez, Y. (1985). A critical, objective review of performance feedback. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 7(3/4), 65–75. https://doi.org/10.1300/J075v07n03_05
Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Stewart, I., & Boles, S. (2010). A sketch of the implicit relational assessment procedure (IRAP) and the relational elaboration and coherence (REC) model. The Psychological Record, 60, 527–542. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395726
Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Luciano, C., & McEnteggart, C. (2017). From IRAP and REC model to a multi-dimensional multi-level framework for analyzing the dynamics of arbitrarily applicable relational responding. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 6(4), 473–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2017.08.001
Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., & McEnteggart, C. (2020). Updating RFT (more field than frame) and its implications for process-based therapy. The Psychological Record, 70, 605–624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-019-00372-3
Bar-Yam, Y. (1997). Dynamics of complex systems. Addison-Wesley.
Biglan, A. (2009). Increasing psychological flexibility to influence cultural evolution. Behavior & Social Issues, 18, 1–10.
Biglan, A. (2011). Corporate externalities: a challenge to the further success of prevention science. Prevention Science: The Official Journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 12(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-010-0190-5
Biglan, A. (2020). Rebooting capitalism: How we can forge a society that works for everyone. Values to Action.
Biglan, A., & Glenn, S. S. (2013). Toward prosocial behavior and environments: Behavioral and cultural contingencies in a public health framework. In G. J. Madden (Ed.), APA handbook of behavior analysis (pp. 255–275). American Psychological Association.
Brewer-Deluce, D., Sharma, B., Akhtar-Danesh, N., Jackson, T., & Wainman, B. C. (2020). Beyond average information: How Q-methodology enhances course evaluations in anatomy. Anatomical Sciences Education, 13(2), 137–148. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1885
Brown, S. R. (1980). Political subjectivity: Applications of Q methodology in political science. Yale University Press.
Brown, S. R. (1999). On the taking of averages: Variance and factor analyses compared. Operant Subjectivity, 22(3), 31–37. https://doi.org/10.15133/j.os.1999.003
Foxall, G. R. (2001). Foundations of consumer behaviour analysis. Marketing Theory, 1, 165–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/147059310100100202
Foxall, G. R. (2010). Invitation to consumer behavior analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 30, 92–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/01608061003756307
Foxall, G. (2015). Consumer behavior analysis and the marketing firm: Bilateral contingency in the context of environmental concern. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 35(1–2), 44–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/01608061.2015.1031426
Ghezzi, E. L., Houmanfar, R. A., & Crosswell, L. (2020). The motivative augmental effects of verbal stimuli on cooperative and conformity responding under a financially competing contingency in an analog work task. The Psychological Record, 70, 411–431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-020-00400-7
Glenn, S. S. (1988). Contingencies and metacontingencies: Toward a synthesis of behavior analysis and cultural materialism. The Behavior Analyst, 11, 161–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03392470
Glenn, S. S. (1991). Contingencies and metacontingencies: Relations among behavioral, cultural, and biological evolution. In P. A. Lamal (Ed.), Behavioral analysis of societies and cultural practices (pp. 39–73). Hemisphere.
Glenn, S. S. (2004). Individual behavior, culture, and social change. The Behavior Analyst, 27, 133–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393175
Glenn, S. S., & Malott, M. M. (2004). Complexity and selection: Implications for organizational change. Behavior & Social Issues, 13, 89–106. https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v13i2.378
Glenn, S. S., Malott, M., Andery, M., Benvenuti, M., Houmanfar, R. A., Sandaker, I., Todorov, & Vasconcelos, L. (2016). Toward consistent terminology in a behaviorist approach to cultural analysis. Behavior & Social Issues, 25, 11–27. https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v25i0.6634
Goldiamond, I. (2002). Toward a constructional approach to social problem: Ethical and conceptual issues raised by applied behavior analysis. Behaviorism, 2, 1–84. https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v11i2.92. (Originalworkpublished1974).
Hantula, D. A., DiClemente Brockman, D., & Smith, C. L. (2008). Online shopping as foraging. The effects of increasing delays on purchasing and patch residence. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 51, 147–154. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2008.2000340
Harte, C., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Barnes-Holmes, D., & McEnteggart, C. (2017). Persistent rule-following in the face of reversed reinforcement contingencies: The differential impact of direct versus derived rules. Behavior Modification, 41(6), 743–763. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445517715871
Harte, C., Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., & McEnteggart, C. (2018). The impact of high versus low levels of derivation for mutually and combinatorially entailed relations on persistent rule-following. Behavioural Processes, 157, 36–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2018.08.005
Harte, C., Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., & Kissi, A. (2020). The study of rule-governed behavior and derived stimulus relations: Bridging the gap. Perspectives on Behavior Science, 43(2), 361–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-020-00256-w
Hayes, S. C., & Sanford, B. T. (2014). Cooperation came first: Evolution and human cognition: cooperation and cognition. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 101(1), 112–129. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.64
Hayes, S. C., Zettle, R. D., & Rosenfarb, I. (1989). Rule-following. In S. C. Hayes (Ed.), Rule-governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies, and instructional control (pp. 191–218). Plenum Press.
Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (2001). Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. Springer.
Hayes, S. C., Bunting, K., Herbst, S., Bond, F. W., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2006). Expanding the scope of organizational behavior management: Relational frame theory and the experimental analysis of complex human behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 26, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1300/J075v26n01_01
Herbst, S. A., & Houmanfar, R. (2009). Psychological approaches to values in organizations and organizational behavior management. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, 47–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/016080/01608060802714210
Heyes, C. (2018). Cognitive gadgets: The cultural evolution thinking. Harvard University Press.
Holland, J. G. (1978). Behaviorism: Part of the problem or part of the solution. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11(1), 163–174. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1978,11-163
Hosoya, N., & Tourinho, E. (2016). Efeitos de interações verbais na seleção e manutenção de contingências comportamentais entrelaçadas [Effects of verbal interactions in the selection and maintenance of interlocking behavioral contingencies]. Acta Comportamentalia, 24(3), 331–345. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/2745/274546929006.pdf.
Houmanfar, R. A., & Johnson, R. (2003). Organizational implications of gossip and rumor. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 23, 117–138. https://doi.org/10.1300/J075v23n02_07
Houmanfar, R., & Rodrigues, N. J. (2006). Behavior analysis & cultural analysis: Points of contact and departure. Behavior and Social Issues, 15, 13–30.
Houmanfar, R. A., & Szarko, A. (2021). Utilizing values-based governance to promote well-being in organizations and beyond. In R. A. Houmanfar, M. Fryling, & M. P. Alavosius (Eds.), Applied behavior science in organizations: Consilience of historical and emerging trends in organizational behavior management (pp. 291–315). Taylor & Francis Group.
Houmanfar, R., Hayes, L. J., & Fredericks, D. W. (2001). Religion and cultural survival. Psychological Record, 51, 19–37.
Houmanfar, R. A., Rodrigues, N. J., & Smith, G. S. (2009). Role of communication networks in behavioral systems analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 29, 257–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/01608060903092102
Houmanfar, R. A., Rodrigues, N. J., & Ward, T. A. (2010). Emergence and metacontingency: Points of contact and departure. Behavior & Social Issues, 19, 53–78. https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v19i0.3065
Houmanfar, R. A., Alavosius, M. P., Morford, Z. H., Herbst, S. A., & Reimer, D. (2015). Functions of organizational leaders in cultural change: Financial and social well-being. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 35, 4–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/01608061.2015.1035827
Houmanfar, R. A., Ardila Sánchez, J. G., & Alavosius, M. P. (2020). Role of cultural milieu in cultural change: Mediating factor in points of contact. In T. Cihon & M. A. Mattaini (Eds.), Behavior science perspectives on culture and community. Springer.
Hughes, S., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2013). A functional approach to the study of implicit cognition: the implicit relational assessment procedure (IRAP) and the relational elaboration coherence (REC) model. In S. Dymond & B. Roche (Eds.), Advanced in relational frame theory: research and application (pp. 95–125). New Harbinger.
Hughes, S., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2016). Relational frame theory: The basic account. In R. D. Zettle, S. C. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes, & A. Biglan (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of contextual behavioral science (pp. 129–178). Wiley-Blackwell.
Jablonka, E., & Lamb, M. J. (2005). Evolution in four dimensions: Genetic, epigenetic, behavioral, and symbolic variation in the history of life. MIT Press.
Johnson, R. A., Houmanfar, R., & Smith, G. S. (2010). The effect of implicit and explicit rules on customer greeting and productivity in a retail organization. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 30, 38–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/01608060903529731
Kantor, J. R. (1982). Cultural psychology. Principia Press.
Kauffman, S. (1993). Origins of order: Self-organization and selection in evolution. Oxford University Press.
Luke, M., & Alavosius, M. P. (2012). Impacting community sustainability through behavior change. Behavior & Social Issues, 21, 54–79.
Makari, G. (2021). Of fear and strangers: A history of xenophobia. Norton.
Malott, M. E. (2003). Paradox of organizational change: Engineering organizations with behavioral systems analysis. Context Press.
Malott, M. E. (2021). Paradox of organizational change: A selectionist approach to improving complex systems. In R. A. Houmanfar, M. Fryling, & M. P. Alavosius (Eds.), Applied behavior science in organizations: Consilience of historical and emerging trends in organizational behavior management (pp. 129–160). Taylor & Francis Group.
Malott, M. E., & Glenn, S. S. (2006). Targets of interventions in cultural and behavioral change. Behavior & Social Issues, 15, 31–56. https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v15i1.344
Mangiapanello, K. A., & Hemmes, N. S. (2015). An analysis of feedback from a behavior analytic perspective. Behavior Analyst, 38(1), 51–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-014-0026-x
Maraccini, A. M., Houmanfar, R. A., Kemmelmeier, M., Piasecki, M., & Slonim, A. D. (2018). An inter-professional approach to train and evaluate communication accuracy and completeness during the delivery of nurse-physician student handoffs. Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice, 12, 65–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xjep.2018.06.003
Marion, R., & Uhl-bien, M. (2001). Leadership in complex organizations. Leadership Quarterly, 12, 389–418.
Mattaini, M. A. (2013). Strategic nonviolence power: The science of satyagraha. Athabasca University Press.
Mattaini, M. A. (2019). Out of the lab: Shaping an ecological and constructional cultural systems. Perspectives on Behavioral Science, 42(4), 713–731. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-019-00208-z
McKeown, B., & Thomas, D. B. (2013). Q methodology (2nd ed.). Sage Publication, Inc.
Monestés, J. L., Greville, W. J., & Hooper, N. (2017). Derived insensitivity: Rule-based insensitivity to contingencies propagated through equivalence. Learning & Motivation, 59, 55–63.
O’Hara, D., Barnes-Holmes, D., Roche, B., & Smeets, P. M. (2004). Derived relational networks and control by novel instructions: A possible model of generative verbal responding. The Psychological Record, 54, 437–460. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395484
O’Hora, D., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Stewart, I. (2014). Antecedent and consequential control of derived instruction-following. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 102(1), 66–85. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.95
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons. Cambridge University Press.
Palmer, A. (2020). How Amazon managed the coronavirus crisis and came out stronger. CNBC https://www.cnbc.com/2020/09/29/how-amazon-managed-the-coronavirus-crisis-and-came-out-stronger.html
Peláez, M., & Moreno, R. (1998). A taxonomy of rules and their correspondence to rule-governed behavior. Mexican Journal of Behavior Analysis, 24(2), 197–214.
Rafacz, S., Houmanfar, R., Smith, G., & Levin, M. (2018). Assessing the effects of motivative augmentals, pay for-performance, and implicit verbal responding on cooperation. The Psychological Record, 69, 49–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-018-0324-x
Sampaio, A., Araújo, L., Gonçalo, M., Ferraz, J., Filho, A., Brito, I., Barros, I., & Calado, J. (2013). Exploring the role of verbal behavior in a new experimental task for the study of metacontingencies. Behavior & Social Issues, 22, 87–101. https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v22i0.4180
Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. Free Press.
Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. Copley Publishing Group.
Skinner, B. F. (1990). Beyond freedom and dignity. Bantam Books. (Original work published 1971).
Smil, V. (2022). The science behind how we got here and where we’re going: How the world really works. Viking.
Smith, G. S., Houmanfar, R., & Louis, S. J. (2011). The participatory role of verbal behavior in an elaborated account of metacontingency: From theory to investigation. Behavior & Social Issues, 20, 112–145.
Smith, G. S., Houmanfar, R., & Denny, M. (2012). Impact of rule accuracy on productivity and rumor in an organizational analog. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 32, 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/01608061.2012.646839
Smith, G. S., Houmanfar, R. A., Jacobs, N. N., Froehlich, M., Szarko, A. J., Smith, B. M., Kemmelmeier, M., Baker, T. K., Piasecki, M., & Schwenk, T. L. (2022). Assessment of medical student burnout: Toward an implicit measure to address current issues. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 27, 375–386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-021-10089-0
Soares, P., Rocha, A., Guimaraes, T., Leite, F., Andery, M., & Tourinho, E. (2018). Effects of verbal and non-verbal cultural consequences on culturants. Behavior & Social Issues, 27, 31–46. https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v27i0.8252
Törneke, N., Luciano, C., & Salas, S. V. (2008). Rule-governed behavior and psychological problems. International Journal of Psychology & Psychological Therapy, 8(2), 141–156.
Tufte, E. R. (2006). Beautiful evidence. Graphics Press.
Vaughn, D. (2010). Normalization of deviance. In F. T. Cullen & P. Wilcox (Eds.), Encyclopedia of criminological theory. Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Ramona A. Houmanfar: conceptual development and original draft (introduction, overview of the literature, discussion, conclusion), and revisions (entire document). Mark P. Alavosius: original draft (overview of the literature, discussion, conclusion) and revisions (entire document). Elizabeth L. Ghezzi: original draft (four dimensions on relating) and associated revisions. Rita Olla: original draft (discussion and figures), and revisions.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
Reported data associated with human participants in the context of literature review (supporting the theoretical theme of this article) were approved by the Institutional Review Board at the University of Nevada, Reno.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Houmanfar, R.A., Alavosius, M.P., Ghezzi, E.L. et al. Verbal Repertoires and Contextual Factors in Cultural Change. Psychol Rec (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-024-00587-z
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-024-00587-z