Abstract
Researchers have identified protocols to induce verbal behavior cusps and capabilities that put an individual’s repertoires in contact with new contingencies and allows the individual to learn in new ways; however, little is known about the relationship between different intensities (i.e., doses) of the protocols and inducing important repertoires. The Intensive Tact Instruction (ITI) has been found to reliably induce Bidirectional Naming (BiN), a capability whereby an individual is able to function simultaneously as a speaker and a listener, to acquire language incidentally after exposure to word–object relations in the environment. We matched eight participants into four dyads and participants in dyads experienced different intensities of the ITI protocol. The full intensity protocol included 100 additional tact learning opportunities each day and the accelerated intensity included 50 daily learning opportunities. We found varied results dependent on a participant’s degree of BiN at the onset of the intervention. Participants with Unidirectional Naming (UniN) acquired BiN under both intensities, but participants in the accelerated condition did so with fewer learning opportunities, suggesting the efficiency of the accelerated protocol. Students that demonstrated No-incidental Naming (NiN) demonstrated mixed results from the intervention, regardless of intervention intensity. The outcomes are discussed in terms of efficiency and cost effectiveness.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albers, A, & Greer, R. D. (1991). Is the three-term contingency trial a predictor of effective instruction? Journal of Behavioral Education, 1, 337–354.
Arntzen, E. (2004). Probability of equivalence formation: Familiar stimuli and training sequence. The Psychological Record, 54, 275–291.
Bijou, S. W., & Baer, D. M. (1961). The Century psychology series. Child development, Vol. 1. A systematic and empirical theory. East Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Brand, D., Henley, A. J., DiGennaro Reed, F. D., Gray, E., & Crabbs, B. (2019). A review of published studies involving parametric manipulations of treatment integrity. Journal of Behavioral Education, 1, 1–26.
Codding, S. R., & Lane, K. L. (2015). A spotlight on treatment intensity: An important and often overlooked component of intervention inquiry. Journal of Behavioral Education, 24, 1–10.
Costa, A., & Pelaez, M. (2014). Implementing intensive tact instruction to increase frequency of spontaneous mands and tacts in typically developing children. Behavioral Development Bulletin, 19, 19–24.
Delgado, J. A. P., & Oblak, M. (2007). The effects of daily intensive tact instruction on the emission of pure mands and tacts in non-instructional settings by three preschool children with developmental delays. Journal of Early & Intensive Behavior Intervention, 4, 392–411.
Dinsmoor, J. (1983). Observing and conditioned reinforcement. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 6, 693–704.
Du, L., Broto, J., & Greer, R. D. (2015). The effects of establishment of conditioned reinforcement for observing responses for 3D stimuli on generalized visual match-to-sample in children with autism spectrum disorders. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 16, 82–98.
Du, L., & Greer, R. D. (2014). Validation of adult generalized imitation topographies and the emergence of generalized imitation in young children with autism as a function of mirror training. The Psychological Record, 64, 161–177.
Erjavec, M., & Horne, P. J. (2008). Determinants of imitation of hand-to-body gestures in 2- and 3-year old children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 89, 183–207.
Fiorile, C. A., & Greer, R. D. (2007). The induction of Naming in children with no echoic-to-tact responses as a function of multiple exemplar instruction. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 23, 71–88.
Fryling, M. J., Johnston, C., & Hayes, L. J. (2011). Understanding observational learning: an interbehavioral approach. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 27(1), 191–203.
Fuller, J. L., & Fienup, D. M. (2018). A preliminary analysis of mastery criterion level: Effects on response maintenance. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 11, 1–8.
Greer, R. D. (2002). Designing teaching strategies: An applied behavior analysis system approach. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Greer, R. D. (2004). Opinion: The two subject matters of behavior analysis and early intervention. Journal of Early & Intensive Behavior Intervention, 1, 239–245.
Greer, R. D., & Du, L. (2010). Generic instruction versus intensive tact instruction and the emission of spontaneous speech. Journal of Speech & Language Pathology—Applied Behavior Analysis, 5, 1–19.
Greer, R. D., Dudek-Singer, J., & Gautreaux, G. (2006). Observational learning. International Journal of Psychology, 41, 486–499.
Greer, R. D., & Han, H. S. A. (2015). Establishment of conditioned reinforcement for visual observing and the emergence of generalized visual-identity matching. Behavioral Development Bulletin, 20, 227–252.
Greer, R. D., & Longano, J. (2010). A rose by naming: how we may learn how to do it. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 26, 73–106.
Greer, R. D., Pistoljevic, N., Cahill, C., & Du, L. (2011). Effects of conditioning voices as reinforcers for listener responses on rate of learning, awareness, and preference for listening to stories in preschoolers with autism. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 27, 103–124.
Greer, R. D., Pohl, P., Du, L., & Moschella, J. L. (2017). The separate development of children’s listener and speaker behavior and the intercept as behavioral metamorphosis. Journal of Behavioral & Brain Science, 7, 674–704.
Greer, R. D., & Ross, D. E. (2008). Verbal behavior analysis: Inducing and expanding new verbal capabilities in children with language delays. Boston, MA: Person Education.
Greer, R. D., & Speckman, J. (2009). The integration of speaker and listener responses: A theory of verbal development. The Psychological Record, 59, 449–488.
Greer, R. D., Stolfi, L., Chavez-Brown, M., & Rivera-Valdez, C. (2005). The emergence of the listener to speaker component of naming in children as a function of multiple exemplar instruction. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 21, 123–134.
Haq, S. S., Kodak, T., Kurtz-Nelson, E., Porritt, M., Rush, K., & Cariveau, T. (2015). Comparing the effects of massed and distributed practice on skill acquisition for children with autism: Comparison of massed and distributed practice. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 48, 454–459.
Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
Hawkins, E., Gautreaux, G., & Chiesa, M. (2018). Deconstructing common bidirectional naming: A proposed classification framework. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 34, 44–61.
Hawkins, E., Kingsdorf, S., Charnock, J., Szabo, M., & Gautreauz, G. (2009). Effects of multiple exemplar instruction on naming. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 10, 95–103.
Hayes, S. C., Rincover, A., & Solnick, J. V. (1980). The technical drift of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13, 275–285.
Horne, P. J., & Lowe, C. F. (1996). On the origins of naming and other symbolic behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 185–241.
Ingham, P., & Greer, R. D. (1992). Changes in student and teacher responses in observed and generalized settings as a function of supervisor observations. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 153–164.
Jennings, A. M., & Miguel, C. F. (2017). Training intraverbal bidirectional naming to establish generalized equivalence class performances. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 108, 269–289.
Johnston, J. M., & Pennypacker, H. S. (1993). Strategies and tactics for human behavioral research (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Keohane, D., & Greer, R. D. (2005). Teachers’ use of a verbally governed algorithm and student learning. International Journal of Behavioral Consultation and Therapy, 3, 252–271.
Lotfizadeh, A. D., Kazemi, E., Pompa-Craven, P., & Eldevik, S. (2018). Moderate effects of low-intensity behavioral intervention. Behavioral Interventions. Advanced Online Publication. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445518796204
Lovaas, O. I. (1987). Behavioral treatment and normal educational and intellectual functioning in young autistic children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 3–9.
Lydon, H., Healy, O., Leader, G., & Keohane, D.-D. (2009). The effects of intensive tact instruction on three verbal operants in non-instructional settings for two children with autism. Journal of Speech & Language Pathology—Applied Behavior Analysis, 3, 173–184.
Ma, M. L., Miguel, C. F., & Jennings, A. M. (2016). Training intraverbal naming to establish equivalence class performances. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 105, 409–426.
Majdalany, L., Wilder, D. A., Smeltz, L., & Lipschultz, J. L. (2016). The effects of brief delays to reinforcement on the acquisition of tacts in children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 49, 411–415.
Miguel, C. F. (2016). Common and intraverbal bidirectional naming. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 32, 125–138.
Miguel, C. F., & Petursdottir, A. I. (2009). Naming and frames of coordination. In R. A. Rehfeldt & Y. Barnes-Holmes (Eds.), Derived relational responding: Applications for learners with autism and other developmental disabilities (pp. 129–148). Oakland, CA: New Harbinger.
Pistoljevic, N., & Greer, R. D. (2006). The effects of daily intensive tact instruction on preschool students’ Emission of pure tacts and mands in non-instructional setting. Journal of Early & Intensive Behavior Intervention, 1, 103–120.
Poulson, C. L., & Kymissis, E. (1988). Generalized imitation in infants. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 46, 324–336.
Rosales-Ruiz, J., & Baer, D. M. (1997). Behavioral cusps: A developmental and pragmatic concept for behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 533–544.
Ross, D. E., Singer-Dudek, J., & Greer, R. D. (2005). The teacher performance rate and accuracy scale: Training as evaluation. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 40, 411–423.
Schmelzkopf, J., Greer, R. D., Singer-Dudek, J., & Du, L. (2017). Experiences that establish preschoolers’ interest in speaking and listening to others. Behavioral Development Bulletin, 22, 44–66.
Silverman, K., Anderson, S. R., Marshall, A. M., & Baer, D. M. (1986). Establishing and generalizing audience control of new language repertoires. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 6, 21–40.
Stromer, R., & Mackay, H. A. (1996). Naming and formation of stimulus classes. In T. R. Zentall & P. M. Smeets (Eds.), Stimulus class formation in humans and animals (pp. 221–252). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
Sy, J. R., & Borrero, J. C. (2009). Parametric analysis of presession exposure to edible and nonedible stimuli. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42, 833–837. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2009.42-833.
Taylor, B. A., & DeQuinzio, J. A. (2012). Observational learning and children with autism. Behavior Modification, 3, 341–360.
Availability of Data and Materials
Data and materials can be obtained by contacting the corresponding author.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The authors declare that s/he has no conflict of interests. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the respective university. We obtained parent permission for each participant described in this manuscript.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This article is based on a dissertation submitted by Rebecca M. Hotchkiss as partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Applied Behavior Analysis at Teachers College, Columbia University. We thank Dr. R. Douglas Greer, Dr. Laudan Jahromi, Dr. Kathleen O’Connell, and Dr. Anna Petursdottir for their support of this research and suggestions on an earlier version of this manuscript. We also thank Genevieve Karanian and Michaela Dunham for their assistance in conducting this research.
Appendix
Appendix
ITI Intervention Data
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hotchkiss, R.M., Fienup, D.M. A Parametric Analysis of a Protocol to Induce Bidirectional Naming: Effects of Protocol Intensity. Psychol Rec 70, 481–497 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-020-00383-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-020-00383-5