Skip to main content
Log in

Gain–Loss Asymmetry in Experiential Probability Discounting

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Probability discounting is loss in reinforcer value as a function of uncertainty. In typical tasks measuring probability discounting, participants repeatedly choose between a smaller, certain amount and a larger amount at one of several probabilities, and do not experience the outcome they select. Most participants show a gain–loss asymmetry, discounting gains more steeply than losses. We examined whether gain–loss asymmetry also occurred when participants received feedback about the number of points they had gained or lost following choices, and whether discounting rates changed as participants accrued experience of outcomes across the session. We assessed discounting of hypothetical monetary gains and losses twice using a mixed description-experience task. In these tasks, participants chose repeatedly between options that were described, where each choice was then followed by feedback on the number of points gained or lost from the chosen option, but not the unchosen option (i.e. a partial feedback procedure). Neither the first nor second task showed a consistent mean difference in discounting of gains and losses. Discounting in the first task was affected by an interaction of condition order and type of outcome (gains or losses). Furthermore, discounting of losses was more stable across task administrations than discounting of gains. Participants’ tendency to choose the probabilistic option was significantly correlated across conditions. Together, this highlights the crucial role of recent experience of outcomes on probability discounting of gains and losses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rana Asgarova.

Ethics declarations

Declarations of potential conflicts of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Data availability

The datasets analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Asgarova, R., Macaskill, A.C. & Hunt, M.J. Gain–Loss Asymmetry in Experiential Probability Discounting. Psychol Rec 70, 359–371 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-020-00379-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-020-00379-1

Keywords

Navigation