Skip to main content
Log in

Derived Relational Responding and Intelligence: Assessing the Relationship Between the PEAK-E Pre-assessment and IQ with Individuals with Autism and Related Disabilities

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study evaluated the relationship between derived relational responding demonstrated by 64 individuals with developmental or intellectual disabilities (90.63% of which had an autism diagnosis) and their corresponding performance on standardized IQ assessments. Participants’ relational abilities were assessed using the Promoting the Emergence of Advanced Knowledge Equivalence Pre-Assessment (PEAK-E-PA), and IQ was assessed using either the WISC-IV Short Form assessment or the WPPSI-III Short Form assessment. The data indicated a strong, significant correlation between participant scores on the PEAK-E-PA and IQ both in terms of raw IQ (r = .843, p < .01), as well as full scale IQ (r = .804, p < .01), which is further analyzed in terms of each of the four subtests of the PEAK-E-PA (reflexivity, symmetry, transitivity, and equivalence). The obtained results have implications for a behavior analytic understanding of factors that relate to the development of intelligent behavior in individuals with disabilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boyle, C. A., Boulet, S., Schieve, L. A., Cohen, R. A., Blumberg, S. J., Yeargin-Allsopp, M., & Kogan, M. D. (2011). Trends in the prevalence of developmental disabilities in US children, 1997–2008. Pediatrics, 127, 1034–1042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brody, N. (1997). Intelligence, schooling, and society. American Psychologist, 52, 1046–1050. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.10.1046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassidy, S., Roche, B., & Hayes, S. C. (2011). A relational frame training intervention to raise intelligence quotients: A pilot study. The Psychological Record, 61, 173–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassidy, S., Roche, B., & O’Hora, D. (2010). Relational frame theory and human intelligence. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 11, 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/15021149.2010.11434333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charman, T., Pickles, A., Simonoff, E., Chandler, S., Loucas, T., & Baird, G. (2011). IQ in children with autism spectrum disorders: Data from the Special Needs and Autism Project (SNAP). Psychological Medicine, 41, 619–627. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291710000991.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1959). A review of BF Skinner’s verbal behavior. Language, 35, 26–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deary, I. J., Penke, L., & Johnson, W. (2010). The neuroscience of human intelligence differences. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11, 201–211. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2793.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, M. R. (2014a). PEAK relational training system: Direct training module. Carbondale: Shawnee Scientific Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, M. R. (2014b). PEAK relational training system: Generalization module. Carbondale: Shawnee Scientific Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, M. R. (2015). PEAK relational training system: Equivalence module. Carbondale: Shawnee Scientific Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, M. R., Belisle, J., Rowsey, K. E., Speelman, R. C., Stanley, C. R., & Kime, D. (2017). Evaluating emergent naming relations through representational drawing with individuals with developmental disabilities using the PEAK-E curriculum. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 17, 92–97. https://doi.org/10.1037/bar0000055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, M. R., Belisle, J., Stanley, C. R., Speelman, R. C., Rowsey, K. E., Kime, D., & Daar, J. H. (2016a). Establishing derived variable categorical responding in children with disabilities using the PEAK-E curriculum. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 50, 134–145. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.355.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, M. R., Belisle, J., Stanley, C., Daar, J. H. & Williams, L. A. (2016b). Derived equivalence relations of geometry skills in students with autism: An application of the PEAK-E curriculum. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 32, 38–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-016-0051-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, M. R., Belisle, J., Whiting, S. W., & Rowsey, K. E. (2014a). Normative sample of the PEAK relational training system: Direct training module and subsequent comparisons to individuals with autism. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 8, 1597–1606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2014.07.020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, M. R., Small, S. L., & Rosales, R. (2007). Extended analysis of empirical citations with Skinner’s verbal behavior: 1984-2004. Behavior Analyst, 30, 197–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, M. R., Whiting, S. W., Rowsey, K., & Belisle, J. (2014b). Assessing the relationship between intelligence and the PEAK relational training system. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 8, 1208–1213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2014.05.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dymond, S., May, R. J., Munnelly, A., & Hoon, A. E. (2010). Evaluating the evidence base for relational frame theory: A citation analysis. Behavior Analyst, 33, 97–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dymond, S., O Hora, D., Whelan, R., & O’Donovan, A. (2006). Citation analysis of Skinner’s verbal behavior: 1984-2004. Behavior Analyst, 29, 75–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gore, N. G., Barnes-Holmes, Y., & Murphy, G. (2010). The relationship between intellectual functioning and relational perspective-taking. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 10, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (2001). Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy, O., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Smeets, P. M. (2000). Derived relational responding as generalized operant behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 74, 207–227. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2000.74-207.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lovaas, O. I. (1987). Behavioral treatment and normal educational and intellectual functioning in young autistic children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.55.1.3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Magiati, I., & Howlin, P. (2001). Monitoring the progress of preschool children with autism enrolled in early intervention programmes: Problems in cognitive assessment. Autism, 5, 399–406. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361301005004005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O'Donnell, J., & Saunders, K. J. (2003). Equivalence relations in individuals with language limitations and mental retardation. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 80, 131–157. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2003.80-131.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • O'Hora, D., Peláez, M., Barnes-Holmes, D., Rae, G., Robinson, K., & Chaudhary, T. (2008). Temporal relations and intelligence: Correlating relational performance with performance on the WAIS-III. The Psychological Record, 58, 569–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O'Toole, C., Barnes-Holmes, D., Murphy, C., O'Connor, J., & Barnes-Holmes, Y. (2009). Relational flexibility and human intelligence: Extending the remit of Skinner’s verbal behavior. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 9, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partington, J. (2006). Assessment of basic language and learning skills-revised (the ABLLS-R). Pleasant Hill: Behavior Analysts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, P., Osborne, L., & Corness, M. (2005). The effectiveness of early intervention programmes for autistic spectrum disorders. A report for the South East Regional Special Educational Need Partnership. Research Partners: Bexley, Brighton & Hove, East Sussex, Kent, Midway, Surrey, West Sussex.

  • Rehfeldt, R. A. (2011). Toward a technology of derived stimulus relations: An analysis of articles published in the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1992–2009. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44, 109–119. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2011.44-109.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sallows, G. O., & Graupner, T. D. (2005). Intensive behavioral treatment for children with autism: Four-year outcome and predictors. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 110, 417–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sattler, J. M., & Dumont, R. (2004). Assessment of children: WISC-IV and WPPSI-III supplement. San Diego, CA: Sattler Publisher, Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlinger, H. D. (1992). Intelligence: Real or artificial? The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 10, 125–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlinger, H. D. (2003). The myth of intelligence. The Psychological Record, 53, 15–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidman, M. (1971). Reading and auditory-visual equivalences. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 14, 5–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidman, M., & Tailby, W. (1982). Conditional discrimination vs. matching to sample: An expansion of the testing paradigm. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1982.37-5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sidman, M. (1994). Stimulus equivalence: A research story. Boston: Authors Cooperative.

  • Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T., Eikeseth, S., Klevstrand, M., & Lovaas, O. I. (1997). Intensive behavioral treatment for preschoolers with severe mental retardation and pervasive developmental disorder. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 102, 238–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spearman, C. (1904). “General Intelligence,” objectively determined and measured. American Journal of Psychology, 15, 238–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., Grigorenko, E., & Bundy, D. A. (2001). The predictive value of IQ. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 47, 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1353/mpq.2001.0005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., & Detterman, D. R. (1986). What is intelligence? Contemporary viewpoints on its nature and definition. Norwood: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundberg, M. L. (2008). VB-MAPP: Verbal behavior milestones assessment and placement program. Concord: AVB Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundberg, M. L., & Michael, J. (2001). The benefits of Skinner’s analysis of verbal behavior for children with autism. Behavior Modification, 25, 698–724. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445501255003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Terman, L. M. (1921). II. Intelligence and its measurement: A symposium. Journal of Educational Psychology, 12, 127–133. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0064940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. K. (1997). Intelligence, training, and employment. American Psychologist, 52, 1059–1069. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.10.1059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (1997). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale: Third Edition (WAIS-III) [Assessment instrument]. San Antonio: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (2002). Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of intelligence: Third Edition (WPPSI-III) [Assessment instrument]. San Antonio: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (2003). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children: Fourth Edition (WISC-IV) [Assessment instrument]. San Antonio: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (2014). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children: Fifth Edition (WISC-IV) [Assessment instrument]. San Antonio: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge the contributions of Allison Ribley, Maureen O’Connor, and Jomi Hirata for their contributions and time dedicated to collecting the data presented in the current study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark R. Dixon.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Mark R. Dixon receives small royalties from the sales of the PEAK curriculum. All remaining authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Institutional and/or National Research Committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants, guardians, and/or agencies who were included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dixon, M.R., Belisle, J. & Stanley, C.R. Derived Relational Responding and Intelligence: Assessing the Relationship Between the PEAK-E Pre-assessment and IQ with Individuals with Autism and Related Disabilities. Psychol Rec 68, 419–430 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-018-0284-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-018-0284-1

Keywords

Navigation