Abstract
Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) is a contextual–behavioral approach to psychotherapy and other behavioral health concerns that has progressively attracted attention from both researchers and clinicians. ACT’s psychological flexibility model relies on middle-level terms that, despite being less precise than behavioral principles, are seen as being valuable for teaching and practicing ACT. One such term is cognitive defusion, which refers to the reduction of stimulus function transformation that occurs through verbal relations. In other words, defusion aims to minimize the influence of verbal relations, such as thoughts, on behavior, when doing so leads to adaptive behavior and valued living. Recently, some authors have stressed the importance of functionally defining middle-level terms, establishing clear links between the concept and basic behavioral processes. This article begins this endeavor by analyzing these links with respect to cognitive defusion. First, we briefly contextualize ACT’s theoretical roots. Second, we present cognitive defusion as a therapeutic intervention, reviewing its objectives, procedures, outcomes, and hypothesized processes as stated in the relevant literature. Third, the outlined process of change is critically examined, leading to a new conceptualization of cognitive defusion. Finally, the conceptual, clinical, and research implications of this new conceptualization are considered.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
A-Tjak, J. G. L., Davis, M. L., Morina, N., Powers, M. B., Smits, J. A. J., & Emmelkamp, P. M. G. (2014). A meta-analysis of the efficacy of acceptance and commitment therapy for clinically relevant mental and physical health problems. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 84, 30–36.
Augustson, E. M., & Dougher, M. J. (1997). The transfer of avoidance evoking functions through stimulus equivalence classes. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 28, 181–191.
Ayduk, Ö., & Kross, E. (2008). Enhancing the pace of recovery: Self-distanced analysis of negative experiences reduces blood pressure reactivity. Psychological Science, 19, 229–231.
Bach, P. A., & Moran, D. J. (2008). ACT in practice: Case conceptualization in acceptance & commitment therapy. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger Publications.
Barnes-Holmes, Y., Hussey, I., McEnteggart, C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Foody, M. (2016). Scientific ambition: The relationship between relational frame theory and middle-level terms in acceptance and commitment therapy. In R. D. Zettle, S. C. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes, & A. Biglan (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of contextual behavioral science (pp. 365–382). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons.
Barrera, T. L., Szafranski, D. D., Ratcliff, C. G., Garnaat, S. L., & Norton, P. J. (2015). An experimental comparison of techniques: Cognitive defusion, cognitive restructuring, and in-vivo exposure for social anxiety. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 44, 249–254.
Baum, W. M. (2002). From molecular to molar: A paradigm shift in behavior analysis. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 78, 95–116.
Beadman, M., Das, R. K., Freeman, T. P., Scragg, P., West, R., & Kamboj, S. K. (2015). A comparison of emotion regulation strategies in response to craving cognitions: Effects on smoking behaviour, craving and affect in dependent smokers. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 69, 29–39.
Blackledge, J. T. (2007). Disrupting verbal processes: Cognitive defusion in acceptance and commitment therapy and other mindfulness-based psychotherapies. The Psychological Record, 57, 555–576.
Blackledge, J. T. (2015). Cognitive defusion in practice: A clinician’s guide to assessing, observing, and supporting change in your client. Oakland, CA: Context Press.
Blackledge, J. T., Moran, D. J., & Ellis, A. (2009). Bridging the divide: Linking basic science to applied psychotherapeutic interventions—A relational frame theory account of cognitive disputation in rational emotive behavior therapy. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 27, 232–248.
Bones, R., Keenan, M., Askin, D., Adams, L., Taylor, D., & Nicholas, O. (2001). The effects of response topography on functional equivalence class formation. The Psychological Record, 51, 89–110.
Bordieri, M. J., Kellum, K. K., Wilson, K. G., & Whiteman, K. C. (2015). Basic properties of coherence: Testing a core assumption of relational frame theory. The Psychological Record, 66, 83–98.
Bouton, M. E. (2002). Context, ambiguity, and unlearning: Sources of relapse after behavioral extinction. Biological Psychiatry, 52, 976–986.
Broothaerts, K. (2015). Acceptance and commitment therapy: A scientific assessment of the cognitive defusion technique (Unpublished master’s thesis). Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Brown, G. G., Reed, P., & Harris, C. C. (2002). Testing a place-based theory for environmental evaluation: An Alaska case study. Applied Geography, 22, 49–76.
Callaghan, G. M., & Darrow, S. M. (2015). The role of functional assessment in third wave behavioral interventions: Foundations and future directions for a fourth wave. Current Opinion in Psychology, 2, 60–64.
Cameron, G., Roche, B., Schlund, M. W., & Dymond, S. (2016). Learned, instructed and observed pathways to fear and avoidance. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 50, 106–112.
Cassidy, S., Roche, B., & O’Hora, D. (2010). Relational frame theory and human intelligence. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 11, 37–51.
Cordova, J. V. (2001). Acceptance in behavior therapy: Understanding the process of change. Behavior Analyst, 24, 213–226.
Craske, M. G., Treanor, M., Conway, C., Zbozinek, T., & Vervliet, B. (2014). Maximizing exposure therapy: An inhibitory learning approach. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 58, 10–23.
De Young, K. P., Lavender, J. M., Washington, L. A., Looby, A., & Anderson, D. A. (2010). A controlled comparison of the word repeating technique with a word association task. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 41, 426–432.
Deacon, B. J., Fawzy, T. I., Lickel, J. J., & Wolitzky-Taylor, K. B. (2011). Cognitive defusion versus cognitive restructuring in the treatment of negative self-referential thoughts: An investigation of process and outcome. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 25, 218–232.
Division 12 of the American Psychological Association. (2016). Research-supported psychological treatments. Retrieved from www.div12.org/psychological-treatments/
Dobson, K. S. (Ed.). (2009). Handbook of cognitive-behavioral therapies. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Dougher, M. (Ed.). (1999). Clinical behavior analysis. Oakland, CA: Context Press.
Dougher, M. J., Augustson, E., Markham, M. R., Greenway, D. E., & Wulfert, E. (1994). The transfer of respondent eliciting and extinction functions through stimulus equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 62, 331–351.
Dougher, M., Perkins, D. R., Greenway, D., Koons, A., & Chiasson, C. (2002). Contextual control of equivalence- based transformation of functions. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 78, 63–93.
Dougher, M. J., Hamilton, D. A., Fink, B. C., & Harrington, J. (2007). Transformation of the discriminative and eliciting functions of generalized relational stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 88, 179–197.
Dublin, R. A. (2012). Cognitive restructuring versus cognitive defusion for claustrophobic anxiety and avoidance (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3513681).
Dymond, S., & Roche, B. (Eds.). (2013). Advances in relational frame theory: Research and application. Oakland, CA: Context Press.
Dymond, S., Roche, B., Forsyth, J. P., Whelan, R., & Rhoden, J. (2007). Transformation of avoidance response functions in accordance with same and opposite relational frames. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 88, 249–262.
Dymond, S., Roche, B., Forsyth, J. P., Whelan, R., & Rhoden, J. (2008). Derived avoidance learning: Transformation of avoidance response functions in accordance with same and opposite relational frames. The Psychological Record, 58, 269–286.
Dymond, S., Schlund, M. W., Roche, B., Whelan, R., Richards, J., & Davies, C. (2011). Inferred threat and safety: Symbolic generalization of human avoidance learning. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 49, 614–621.
Dymond, S., Schlund, M. W., Roche, B., De Houwer, J., & Freegard, G. P. (2012). Safe from harm: Learned, instructed, and symbolic generalization pathways of human threat-avoidance. PloS One, 7, e47539.
Dymond, S., Roche, B., & Bennett, M. (2013). Relational frame theory and experimental psychopathology. In S. Dymond & B. Roche (Eds.), Advances in relational frame theory: Research and application (pp. 199–218). Oakland, CA: Context Press.
Dymond, S., Dunsmoor, J. E., Vervliet, B., Roche, B., & Hermans, D. (2014). Fear generalization in humans: Systematic review and implications for anxiety disorder research. Behavior Therapy, 46, 561–582.
Eilers, H. J., & Hayes, S. C. (2015). Exposure and response prevention therapy with cognitive defusion exercises to reduce repetitive and restrictive behaviors displayed by children with autism spectrum disorder. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 19, 18–31.
Falls, W. A. (1998). Extinction: A review of theory and the evidence suggesting that memories are not erased with nonreinforcement. In W. O’Donohue (Ed.), Learning and behavior therapy (pp. 205–229). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Foody, M., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Barnes-Holmes, D., Rai, L., & Luciano, C. (2015). An empirical investigation of the role of self, hierarchy, and distinction in a common ACT exercise. The Psychological Record, 65, 231–243.
Galizio, M. (1979). Contingency-shaped and rule-governed behavior: Instructional control of human loss avoidance. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 31, 53–70.
Gil, E., Luciano, C., Ruiz, F. J., & Valdivia-Salas, F. (2012). A preliminary demonstration of transformation of functions through hierarchical responding. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 12, 1–19.
Gil, E., Luciano, C., Ruiz, F. J., & Valdivia-Salas, F. (2014). A further experimental step in the analysis of hierarchical responding. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 14, 137–153.
Golijani-Moghaddam, N. (2011). The impact of brief exposure and acceptance interventions on implicit verbal relations in spider-fear (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://eprints.lincoln.ac.uk/18949/1/__network.uni_staff_S2_jpartridge_Nima%20GMoghaddam%202011.pdf
Greenway, D. E., Dougher, M. J., & Wulfert, E. (1996). Transfer of consequential functions via stimulus equivalence: Generalization to different testing contexts. The Psychological Record, 46, 131–143.
Gutiérrez, O., Luciano, C., Rodríguez, M., & Fink, B. C. (2004). Comparison between an acceptance-based and a cognitive-control-based protocol for coping with pain. Behavior Therapy, 35, 767–783.
Hannon, B. (1994). Sense of place: Geographic discounting by people, animals and plants. Ecological Economics, 10, 157–174.
Hayes, S. C. (2004). Acceptance and commitment therapy, relational frame theory, and the third wave of behavioral and cognitive therapies. Behavior Therapy, 35, 639–665.
Hayes, S. C., & Strosahl, K. D. (Eds.). (2004). A practical guide to acceptance and commitment therapy. New York, NY: Springer.
Hayes, S. C., Brownstein, A. J., Zettle, R. D., Rosenfarb, I., & Korn, Z. (1986). Rule-governed behavior and sensitivity to changing consequences of responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 45, 237–256.
Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (Eds.). (2001). Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic.
Hayes, S. C., Luoma, J. B., Bond, F. W., Masuda, A., & Lillis, J. (2006). Acceptance and commitment therapy: Model, processes and outcomes. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44, 1–25.
Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Wilson, K. G. (2012a). Contextual behavioral science: Creating a science more adequate to the challenge of the human condition. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 1, 1–16.
Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., & Wilson, K. G. (2012b). Acceptance and commitment therapy: The process and practice of mindful change (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Haynes, S. N., & O’Brien, W. H. (1990). Functional analysis in behavior therapy. Clinical Psychology Review, 10, 649–668.
Healy, H. A., Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Keogh, C., Luciano, C., & Wilson, K. (2008). An experimental test of a cognitive defusion exercise. The Psychological Record, 58, 623–640.
Herrnstein, R. J. (1970). On the law of effect. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 13, 243–266.
Hinton, M. J., & Gaynor, S. T. (2010). Cognitive defusion for psychological distress, dysphoria, and low self-esteem: A randomized technique evaluation trial of vocalizing strategies. International Journal of Behavioral Consultation and Therapy, 6, 164–185.
Hooper, N., & McHugh, L. (2013). Cognitive defusion versus thought distraction in the mitigation of learned helplessness. The Psychological Record, 63, 209–218.
Hooper, N., Sandoz, E. K., Ashton, J., Clarke, A., & McHugh, L. (2012). Comparing thought suppression and acceptance as coping techniques for food cravings. Eating Behaviors, 13, 62–64.
Iwata, B. A., Dorsey, M. F., Slifer, K. J., Bauman, K. E., & Richman, G. S. (1982). Toward a functional analysis of self-injury. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 2, 3–20.
James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. New York, NY: Holt and Company.
Jenkins, K. T., & Tapper, K. (2014). Resisting chocolate temptation using a brief mindfulness strategy. British Journal of Health Psychology, 19, 509–522.
Kanter, J. W. (2013). The vision of a progressive clinical science to guide clinical practice. Behavior Therapy, 44, 228–233.
Kehoe, A., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Barnes-Holmes, D., Luciano, C., Bond, F., & Foody, M. (2014). Systematic analyses of the effects of acceptance on tolerance of radiant heat pain. The Psychological Record, 64, 41–51.
Keogh, C. A. (2008). Cognitive and emotional defusion: Investigations of the underlying psychological processes using explicit and implicit measures (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://eprints.maynoothuniversity.ie/1830/1/CKthesis.pdf
Kishita, N., Muto, T., Ohtsuki, T., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2014). Measuring the effect of cognitive defusion using the implicit relational assessment procedure: An experimental analysis with a highly socially anxious sample. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 3, 8–15.
Kralik, J. D., & Sampson, W. W. (2012). A fruit in hand is worth many more in the bush: Steep spatial discounting by free-ranging rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). Behavioural Processes, 89, 197–202.
Kross, E., Ayduk, O., & Mischel, W. (2005). When asking “why” does not hurt distinguishing rumination from reflective processing of negative emotions. Psychological Science, 16, 709–715.
Kross, E., Gard, D., Deldin, P., Clifton, J., & Ayduk, O. (2012). “Asking why” from a distance: Its cognitive and emotional consequences for people with major depressive disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 121, 559–569.
Larsson, A., Hooper, N., Osborne, L. A., Bennett, P., & McHugh, L. (2016). Using brief cognitive restructuring and cognitive defusion techniques to cope with negative thoughts. Behavior Modification, 40, 452–482.
Leahy, R. L. (2003). Cognitive therapy techniques: A practitioner’s guide. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Levin, M. E., & Villatte, M. (2016). The role of experimental psychopathology and laboratory-based intervention studies in contextual behavioral science. In R. D. Zettle, S. C. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes, & A. Biglan (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of contextual behavioral science (pp. 347–364). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons.
Levin, M. E., Hildebrandt, M. J., Lillis, J., & Hayes, S. C. (2012). The impact of treatment components suggested by the psychological flexibility model: A meta-analysis of laboratory-based component studies. Behavior Therapy, 43, 741–756.
Levin, M. E., Twohig, M. P., & Smith, B. M. (2016). Contextual behavioral science: An overview. In R. D. Zettle, S. C. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes, & A. Biglan (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of contextual behavioral science (pp. 17–36). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons.
Long, A., & Platt, M. (2005). Decision making: The virtue of patience in primates. Current Biology, 15, 874–876.
Lopes, C. E. (2008). Uma proposta de definição de comportamento no behaviorismo radical. Revista Brasileira de Terapia Comportamental e Cognitiva, 10, 1–13.
Luciano, C., Rodríguez, M., Mañas, I., Ruiz, F., Berens, N. M., & Valdivia-Salas, S. (2009). Acquiring the earliest relational operants: Coordination, difference, opposition, comparison and hierarchy. In R. A. Rehfeldt & Y. Barnes-Holmes (Eds.), Derived relational responding: Applications for learners with autism and other developmental disabilities (pp. 149–170). Oakland, CA: New Harbinger Publications.
Luciano, C., Ruiz, F. J., Torres, R. M. V., Martín, V. S., Martínez, O. G., & López, J. C. L. (2011). A relational frame analysis of defusion interactions in acceptance and commitment therapy: A preliminary and quasi-experimental study with at-risk adolescents. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 11, 165–182.
Luciano, C., Valdivia-Salas, S., Ruiz, F. J., Rodríguez-Valverde, M., Barnes-Holmes, D., Dougher, M. J., et al. (2013). Extinction of aversive eliciting functions as an analog of exposure to conditioned fear: Does it alter avoidance responding? Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 2, 120–134.
Luciano, C., Valdivia-Salas, S., Ruiz, F. J., Rodríguez-Valverde, M., Barnes-Holmes, D., Dougher, M. J., et al. (2014). Effects of an acceptance/defusion intervention on experimentally induced generalized avoidance: A laboratory demonstration. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 101, 94–111.
Luoma, J., & Hayes, S. C. (2009). Cognitive defusion. In W. T. O’Donohue & J. E. Fisher (Eds.), Empirically supported techniques of cognitive behavioral therapy: A step-by-step guide for clinicians (2nd ed., pp. 181–188). New York, NY: Wiley & Sons.
Mandavia, A., Masuda, A., Moore, M., Mendoza, H., Donati, M. R., & Cohen, L. L. (2015). The application of a cognitive defusion technique to negative body image thoughts: A preliminary analogue investigation. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 4, 86–95.
Marcks, B. A., & Woods, D. W. (2005). A comparison of thought suppression to an acceptance-based technique in the management of personal intrusive thoughts: A controlled evaluation. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 43, 433–445.
Masuda, A., Hayes, S. C., Sackett, C. F., & Twohig, M. P. (2004). Cognitive defusion and self-relevant negative thoughts: Examining the impact of a ninety year old technique. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 42, 477–485.
Masuda, A., Hayes, S. C., Twohig, M. P., Drossel, C., Lillis, J., & Washio, Y. (2009). A parametric study of cognitive defusion and the believability and discomfort of negative self-referential thoughts. Behavior Modification, 33, 250–262.
Masuda, A., Twohig, M. P., Stormo, A. R., Feinstein, A. B., Chou, Y. Y., & Wendell, J. W. (2010a). The effects of cognitive defusion and thought distraction on emotional discomfort and believability of negative self-referential thoughts. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 41, 11–17.
Masuda, A., Feinstein, A. B., Wendell, J. W., & Sheehan, S. T. (2010b). Cognitive defusion versus thought distraction: A clinical rationale, training, and experiential exercise in altering psychological impacts of negative self-referential thoughts. Behavior Modification, 34, 520–538.
Matthews, B. A., Shimoff, E., Catania, A. C., & Sagvolden, T. (1977). Uninstructed human responding: Sensitivity to ratio and interval contingencies. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 27, 453–467.
McEnteggart, C., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Hussey, I., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2015). The ties between a basic science of language and cognition and its clinical applications. Current Opinion in Psychology, 2, 56–59.
McHugh, L., Barnes-Holmes, Y., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2004). A relational frame account of the development of complex cognitive phenomena: Perspective-taking, false belief understanding, and deception. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 4, 303–324.
McMullen, J., Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Stewart, I., Luciano, C., & Cochrane, A. (2008). Acceptance versus distraction: Brief instructions, metaphors and exercises in increasing tolerance for self-delivered electric shocks. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 46, 122–129.
Mischkowski, D., Kross, E., & Bushman, B. J. (2012). Flies on the wall are less aggressive: Self-distancing “in the heat of the moment” reduces aggressive thoughts, angry feelings and aggressive behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 1187–1191.
Moffitt, R., Brinkworth, G., Noakes, M., & Mohr, P. (2012). A comparison of cognitive restructuring and cognitive defusion as strategies for resisting a craved food. Psychology & Health, 27, 74–90.
Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2, 175–220.
O’Sullivan, B. (2013). Comparing the effectiveness of thought suppression and cognitive defusion in managing obsessional intrusive thoughts (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://theses.gla.ac.uk/4637/1/2013osullivanDClinPsy.pdf
Pate, J., & Loomis, J. (1997). The effect of distance on willingness to pay values: A case study of wetlands and salmon in California. Ecological Economics, 20, 199–207.
Perez, W. F., Fidalgo, A. P., Kovac, R., & Nico, Y. C. (2015). The transfer of Cfunc contextual control through equivalence relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 103, 511–523.
Pilecki, B. C., & McKay, D. (2012). An experimental investigation of cognitive defusion. The Psychological Record, 62, 19–40.
Pilgrim, C., & Galizio, M. (1990). Relations between baseline contingencies and equivalence probe performances. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 54, 213–224.
Pilgrim, C., & Galizio, M. (1995). Reversal of baseline relations and stimulus equivalence: I. Adults. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 63, 225–238.
Powers, M. B., Vörding, M. B. Z. V. S., & Emmelkamp, P. M. (2009). Acceptance and commitment therapy: A meta-analytic review. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 78, 73–80.
Quiñones, J. L., & Hayes, S. C. (2014). Relational coherence in ambiguous and unambiguous relational networks. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 101, 76–93.
Rachlin, H. (2006). Notes on discounting. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 85, 425–435.
Ritzert, T. R., Forsyth, J. P., Berghoff, C. R., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Nicholson, E. (2015). The impact of a cognitive defusion intervention on behavioral and psychological flexibility: An experimental evaluation in a spider fearful non-clinical sample. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 4, 112–120.
Roche, B., Barnes, D., & Smeets, P. M. (1997). Incongruous stimulus pairing and conditional discrimination training: Effects on relational responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 68, 143–160.
Roche, B., Barnes-Holmes, D., Smeets, P. M., Barnes-Holmes, Y., & McGeady, S. (2000). Contextual control over the derived transformation of discriminative and sexual arousal functions. The Psychological Record, 50, 267–291.
Roche, B. T., Kanter, J. W., Brown, K. R., Dymond, S., & Fogarty, C. C. (2010). A comparison of “direct” versus “derived” extinction of avoidance responding. The Psychological Record, 58, 443–464.
Rosen, G. M., & Davison, G. C. (2003). Psychology should list empirically supported principles of change (ESPs) and not credential trademarked therapies or other treatment packages. Behavior Modification, 27, 300–312.
Shimoff, E., Catania, A. C., & Matthews, B. A. (1981). Uninstructed human responding: Sensitivity of low- rate performance to schedule contingencies. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 36, 207–220.
Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Stevens, J. R., Rosati, A. G., Ross, K. R., & Hauser, M. D. (2005). Will travel for food: Spatial discounting in two new world monkeys. Current Biology, 15, 1855–1860.
Sturmey, P. (1996). Functional analysis in clinical psychology. New York, NY: Wiley & Sons.
Tryon, W. W. (2005). Possible mechanisms for why desensitization and exposure therapy work. Clinical Psychology Review, 25, 67–95.
Tyndall, I. T., Papworth, R., Roche, B. T., & Bennett, M. (2017). Differential effects of word-repetition rate on cognitive defusion of believability and discomfort of negative self-referential thoughts postintervention and at one-month follow-up. The Psychological Record, 67, 377–386.
Vervoort, E., Vervliet, B., Bennett, M., & Baeyens, F. (2014). Generalization of human fear acquisition and extinction within a novel arbitrary stimulus category. PloS One, 9, 1–10.
Vilardaga, R., Hayes, S. C., Levin, M. E., & Muto, T. (2009). Creating a strategy for progress: A contextual behavioral science approach. Behavior Analyst, 32, 105–133.
Vollmer, T. R., & Iwata, B. A. (1992). Differential reinforcement as treatment for behavior disorders: Procedural and functional variations. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 13, 393–417.
Vygostky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wagener, A. L., & Zettle, R. D. (2011). Targeting fear of spiders with control-, acceptance-, and information-based approaches. The Psychological Record, 61, 77–92.
Watson, C. (2007). Verbal repetition in the reappraisal of contamination-related thoughts (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://uwspace.uwaterloo.ca/bitstream/handle/10012/3560/Verbal%20Repetition.pdf?sequence=1
Westrup, D. (2014). Advanced acceptance and commitment therapy: The experienced practitioner’s guide to optimizing delivery. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger Publications.
Whelan, R., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2004). The transformation of consequential functions in accordance with the relational frames of same and opposite. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 82, 177–195.
Whelan, R., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Dymond, S. (2006). The transformation of consequential functions in accordance with the relational frames of more-than and less-than. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 86, 317–335.
Wilson, K. G., & Murrell, A. R. (2004). Values work in acceptance and commitment therapy: Setting a course for behavioral treatment. In S. C. Hayes, V. M. Follette, & M. M. Linehan (Eds.), Mindfulness and acceptance: Expanding the cognitive-behavioral tradition (pp. 120–151). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Wray, A. M., Dougher, M. J., Hamilton, D. A., & Guinther, P. M. (2012). Examining the reinforcing properties of making sense: A preliminary investigation. The Psychological Record, 62, 599–622.
Wulfert, E., & Hayes, S. C. (1988). Transfer of a conditional ordering response through conditional equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 50, 125–144.
Zettle, R. D. (2005). The evolution of a contextual approach to therapy: From comprehensive distancing to ACT. International Journal of Behavioral Consultation and Therapy, 1, 77–89.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Human and animal rights
This article does not discuss any experiments with human or animal participants performed by any of the authors.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Assaz, D.A., Roche, B., Kanter, J.W. et al. Cognitive Defusion in Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: What Are the Basic Processes of Change?. Psychol Rec 68, 405–418 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-017-0254-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-017-0254-z