Skip to main content
Log in

Response Biases on the IRAP for Adults and Adolescents with Respect to Smokers and Nonsmokers: The Impact of Parental Smoking Status

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The current research aimed to examine the implicit biases of smokers and nonsmokers to others who did or did not smoke. Study 1 presented adult smokers and nonsmokers with an Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP) that assessed bias toward or against smokers and nonsmokers. Study 2 replicated this with adolescent smokers and nonsmokers. Both studies also presented self-report measures. Both adult and adolescent smokers produced IRAP effects that indicated prosmoker biases; nonsmokers’ biases were relatively neutral. Trends in the data from Studies 1 and 2 led to a post hoc analysis of the nonsmoker data to investigate the potential impact of parental smoking status on nonsmokers’ biases. Both the IRAP and self-report measures data suggested that parental smoking status increased positivity in attitudes toward smokers among nonsmokers. Hierarchical logistic regression analyses indicated that the IRAP data in Study 1, but not Study 2, predicted smoking status above and beyond the self-report measures. The post hoc analyses showed a similar trend. The consistency of the findings with the only existing IRAP study of attitudes toward smokers, as well as with the broader literature, supports the view that response biases toward smokers may not change fundamentally from adolescence to adulthood, and that parental smoking status may having a moderating influence on these biases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alves, J., Perelman, J., Sota-Rojas, V., Richter, M., Rimpela, A., Loureiro, I. … & Lorant, V. (2016). The role of parental smoking on adolescent smoking and its social patterning: A cross sectional survey in six European cities. Journal of Public Health. Advance online publication. doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdw040

  • Andrews, J. A., Hampson, S. E., Greenwald, A. G., Gordon, J., & Widdop, C. (2010). Using the Implicit Association Test to assess children’s implicit attitudes towards smoking. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40(9), 2387–2406. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00663.x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, J. A., Hops, H., & Duncan, S. C. (1997). Adolescent modelling of parent substance use: The moderating effect of the relationship with the parent. Journal of Family Psychology, 11, 259–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Power, P., Hayden, E., Milne, & Stewart, I. (2006). Do you really know what you believe? Developing the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP) as a direct measure of implicit beliefs. The Irish Psychologist, 32(7), 169–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Stewart, I., & Boles, S. (2010). A sketch of the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP) and the Relational Elaboration and Coherence (REC) model. The Psychological Record, 60, 527–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes-Holmes, D., Hayden, E., Barnes-Holmes, Y., & Stewart, I. (2008).The Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP) as a response-time and event-relatedpotentialsmethodology for testing natural verbal relations. The Psychological Record, 58, 497-516.

  • Chapman, S., & Freeman, B. (2008). Markers of the denormalisation of smoking and the tobacco industry. Tobacco Control, 17, 25–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dal Cin, S., Gibson, B., Zanna, M. P., Shumate, R., & Fong, G. T. (2007). Smoking in the movies, implicit associations of smoking with the self, and intentions to smoke. Psychological Science, 18, 559–563.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Houwer, J., Clusters, R., & De Clercq, A. (2006). Do smokers have a negative implicit attitude toward smoking? Cognition and Emotion, 20, 1274–1284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Jong, P. (2002). Implicit self-esteem and social anxiety: Differential self-positivity effects in high and low anxious individuals. Behavior Research and Therapy, 40, 501–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Distefan, J. M., Gillpin, E. A., Choi, W. S., & Pierce, J. P. (1998). Parental influences predict adolescent smoking in the United States 1989–1993. Journal of Adolescent Health, 22, 466–474.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Farrimond, H. R., & Joffe, H. (2006). Pollution, peril and poverty: A British study of the stigmatization of smokers. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 16, 481–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, J. (1991). The stigmatization of smokers: An empirical investigation. Journal of Drug Education, 21, 167–182.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. K. L. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1464–1480.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, A.G., Nosek, B.A., & Banaji, M.R. (2003). Using and understanding the implicit association test: I. an improved scoring algorithm. Journal of personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 197-216.

  • Hayes, S.C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (2001). Relational Frame Theory: A post Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York, NY: Plenum.

  • Murray, M., Kiryluk, S., & Swan, V. (1985). Relation between parents’ children’s smoking behavior and attitudes. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 39, 169–174.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Shafey, O., Dolwick, S., & Guindon, G. E. (Eds.). (2003). Tobacco Control Country Profiles 2003. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, J. E., Rudman, L. A., & Greenwald, A. G. (2001). Using the Implicit Association Test to investigate attitude-behaviour consistency for stigmatized behaviour. Cognition and Emotion, 15, 207–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tickle, J. J., Hull, J. G., Sargent, J. D., Dalton, M. A., & Heatherton, T. F. (2006). A structural equation model of social influences and exposure to media smoking on adolescent smoking. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 28, 117–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vahey, N., Boles, S., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2010). Measuring adolescents’ smoking-related social identity preferences with the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP) for the first time: A starting point that explains later IRAP evolutions. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 10, 453–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vahey, N. A., Nicholson, E., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2015). A meta-analysis of criterion effects for the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP) in the clinical domain. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 48, 59–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C., Hipp, J. R., Butts, C. T., Jose, R., & Lakon, C. M. (2016). Coevolution of adolescent friendship networks and smoking and drinking behaviors with consideration of parental influence. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 30(3), 312–324.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This article was prepared with the support of an Odysseus Group 1 grant awarded to the third author by the Flanders Science Foundation (FWO).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Colin Harte.

Ethics declarations

Declaration of Interest

This article was prepared with the support of an Odysseus Group 1 grant awarded to the third author by the Flanders Science Foundation (FWO). The data collected for this research were attained with the support of funding awarded to the first author by the Irish Research Council (IRC). The authors declare no other conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in the studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Appendix A

Appendix A

Nonsmoker Smoking History Assessment

To be filled out by the researcher—Take notes to supplement answers where responses supplement the responses available on the sheet (e.g., any information with a bearing on smoking status).

  1. 1.

    What is your cultural ethnicity, date of birth (& today’s), sex, current occupation, and highest level of education (second level, third level, etc.)?

  2. 2.

    Have you ever lived in a home where people smoked indoors? Give brief details about whom, when, and for how long.

    Have you ever lived in a home where people smoked outdoors? Give brief details about whom, when, and for how long.

  3. 3.

    How often do you usually think about the topic of smoking? Often versus seldom?

    When you do think of the topic of smoking, what do you typically think of?

  4. 4.

    If you don’t currently smoke, please describe absolutely any previous experience (when and for how long) you have with smoking, no matter how long ago.

    Then ask on how many occasions (not cigarettes) would they estimate they have smoked on in their lives.

    How long since they last tried a cigarette?

  5. 5.

    Do you have any direct experience of the negative consequences of smoking (whether your health or someone in your personal life)? Please provide brief details:

Smoker Smoking History Assessment

To be filled out by the researcher— Take notes to supplement answers where it would provide more information regarding smoking status.

  1. 1.

    What is your cultural ethnicity, date of birth, sex, current occupation, and current level of education (second level, third level, etc.)?

  2. 2.

    At what time was your last cigarette? (Take note of time at intake and also current time and how long slept during that period.)

  3. 3.

    How old were you when you first started smoking cigarettes FAIRLY REGULARLY? (Enter “X” if never smoked regularly.)

  4. 4.

    How old were you when you first started to buy cigarettes FAIRLY REGULARLY? (Enter “X” if never smoked regularly.)

  5. 5.

    Do you buy cigarettes on a regular basis (on more days than not)?

  6. 6.

    On how many of the past 30 days did you smoke cigarettes?

    0–10 days 10–20 days 20–30 days 30 days

  7. 7.

    During the past 30 days, on the days you smoked, how many cigarettes do you think you smoked on average each day?

    Between ___ and ___ per day.

    Are you currently smoking as usual or more or less cigarettes per day than is usual for you?

    figure a

    Please give details of daily cigarette consumption CURRENTLY versus USUALLY (get ranges as before) and reasons for any differences (e.g., just money or because of quitting concerns; extrinsic versus intrinsic):

  8. 8.

    How long ago did your most recent attempt to QUIT smoking START?

    (Get participant to provide their best recall of date when they relapsed and calculate how long ago this was.)

    During this quit attempt, for how long were you able to quit?

  9. 9.

    When did you last try to REDUCE how much you smoked?

    (Get participant to provide their best recall how long ago it was when they started this attempt.)

    During this attempt to reduce the number of cigarettes you smoke, how long were you able to maintain the reduction in your cigarette consumption?

  10. 10.

    How many times in the past 12 months have you made what you would consider a “serious” attempt to quit smoking?

    Between _______ and _______ times

  11. 11.

    How many times in your life have you made what you would consider a “serious” attempt to quit smoking?

    Between _______ and _______ times

  12. 12.

    In the past 12 months, how many times have you quit smoking for at least 24 hours?

    Between _______ and _______ times

  13. 13.

    How many times in your life have you quit smoking for at least 24 hours?

    Between _______ and _______ times

  14. 14.

    What information resource or professional support have you previously used to help you stop smoking? Please give details of type and length of support, how well it worked, and how long ago:

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cagney, S., Harte, C., Barnes-Holmes, D. et al. Response Biases on the IRAP for Adults and Adolescents with Respect to Smokers and Nonsmokers: The Impact of Parental Smoking Status. Psychol Rec 67, 473–483 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-017-0249-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-017-0249-9

Keywords

Navigation