Abstract
In the presence of the complex-hydrodynamic phenomenon, the previous studies on wave transmission characteristics behind low-crested submerged breakwaters are still insufficient yet to appropriately understand of their behaviour. Therefore, a reliable prediction through a computational fluid dynamic (CFD) approach of waves across the structure is necessarily required. This paper presents three-dimensional (3D) computational modelling on hydrodynamic performance of narrow crest behind submerged breakwater aimed at gaining a comprehensive insight into the wave transmission coefficient \((K_{t})\) characteristics. Meanwhile, a two-dimensional (2D) analysis has been initially carried out to provide a satisfactory description of the fundamental hydrodynamic phenomena through capturing the patterns of wave surface profile, flow velocity, and wave energy dissipation. In addition, a numerical wave tank model is well developed on the basis of the extended Reynolds Average Navier–Stokes (RANS) solver incorporated with level set algorithm to treat highly nonlinear effects at interface boundary between water, air and porous obstacle. Here, a submerged breakwater called as wave breaker coral restorer (WABCORE) designed by the National Water Research Institute of Malaysia is then employed. Based on the capability of laboratory experiment, the tested wave parameters were properly selected in 1:4 scaled model of the breakwater for wave height ranging from 0.10 to 0.25 m and wave period ranging from 1.5 to 2.5 s, in which correspond to the recorded wave prototype characteristics at Island of Tinggi, Malaysia. Thus, the wave constraints on a regime of small wave height and wavelength were then considered for various relative significant incident wave height, wave steepness, relative structural crest width and water-depth and have been taken into account in the computational simulation of the transmission coefficient \((K_{t})\). The result shows that a good agreement was obtained between numerical and experimental measurements. \(K_{t}\) decreases to less than 0.5 with increasing relative water depth (\(0.40 \le h/d \le 1.00\)) for significant incident wave height (\(0.1338 \le H_s/d \le 0.5547\)), wave steepness (\(0.0164 \le H_s/L \le 0.1303\)), and crest width of breakwater (0.0256 \(\le C_w/L \le 0.0512\)). Detailed investigation suggests that the result is attributed to significant wave transformation in the vicinity of breakwater, especially for higher h/d. Furthermore, the wave absorbing effect of the submerged WABCORE breakwater is markedly better for increased steepness of \({H_{s}}/{L}\) from 0.0292 to 0.0204 at \(h/d=1.00\), which is consistent with the augmented turbulent energy and dissipation shown on CFD visualizations across the breakwater entanglement.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abdullah SF, Fitriadhy A (2020) Application of genetic algorithm for optimum hydrodynamic performance of twin pontoon floating breakwater. J Waterw Port Coast Ocean Eng 146(2): 4019040 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WW.1943-5460.0000548
Black K, Mead S (2001) Design of the gold coast reef for surfing, beach amenity and coastal protection: surfing aspects. J Coastal Res 452(29):115–130
Buccino M, Del Vita I, Calabrese M (2014) Engineering modeling of wave transmission of reef balls. J Waterw Port Coast Ocean Eng 140(4):04014010
Corvaro S, Seta E, Mancinelli A, Brocchini M (2014) Flow dynamics on a porous medium. Coast Eng 91:280–298
Dean RG, Dalrymple RA (2001) Coastal processes with engineering application. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Díaz-Carrasco P, Moragues MV, Clavero M, Losada MÁ (2020) 2D water-wave interaction with permeable and impermeable slopes: dimensional analysis and experimental overview. Coast Eng 158:103682
Fitriadhy A, Abdullah SF, Hairil M, Ahmad MF, Jusoh A (2019) Optimized modelling on lateral separation of twin pontoon-net floating breakwater. J Mech Eng Sci 13(4):5764–5779. https://doi.org/10.15282/jmes.13.4.2019.04.0460
Hashim AM, Nur Diyana MN, Siti Nur Hanis A (2014) Wave attenuate of interlocking concrete unit (ICU-V). Appl Mech Mater 567:313–318
Higuera P, Lara JL, Losada IJ (2014) Three-dimensional interaction of waves and porous coastal structures using OpenFOAM.Part I: formulation and validation. Coast Eng 83:243–258
Hirt CW, Billy DN (1981) Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries. J Comput Phys 39(1):201–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(81)90145-5
Huang CJ, Chang HH, Hwung HH (2003) Structural permeability effects on the interaction of a solitary wave and a submerged breakwater. Coast Eng 49(1–2):1–24
International Towing Tank Conference (ITTC) Quality System Manual (2017) Uncertainty analysis in CFD, verification and validation methodology andprocedures. ITTC-Recommended Procedures and Guidelines, 7.5-03-01-01. In: Proceedings of 28th International Towing Tank Conference, Wuxi, China
Jackson LA, Tomlinson R, McGrath J, Turner I (2002) Monitoring of a multi-functional submerged geotextile reef breakwater. In: Proceedings of 28th International Conference on Coastal Engineering. ASCE, Reston, pp 1923–1935
Khenner M, Averbuch A, Israeli M, Nathan M (2001) Numerical simulation of grain-boundary grooving by level set method. J Comput Phys 170(2):764–784. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.2001.6760
Lorenzoni C, Luciano S, Maurizio B, Alessandro M, Matteo P, Elisa S, Sara C (2010) Working of defense coastal structures dissipating by macroroughness. J Waterw Port Coast Ocean Eng 136:79–90
Losada IJ, Silva R, Losada MA (1996) 3-D non breaking regular wave interaction with submerged breakwaters. Coast Eng 28:229–248
Mayilvahanan AC, Hans B, Dag M (2015) Characteristics and profile asymmetry properties of waves breaking over an impermeable submerged reef. Coast Eng 100:26–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2015.03.008
Mizutani N, Mostafa AM, Iwata K (1998) Nonlinear regular wave, submerged breakwater and seabed dynamic interaction. Coast Eng 33(2–3):177–202
Petit HAH, Tonjes P, Van Gent MRA, Van Den Bosch P (1995) Numerical simulation and validation of plunging breakers using a 2D Navier–Stokes model. Coast Eng 1994:511–524
Sakakiyama T, Kajima R (1992) Numerical simulation of nonlinear waves interacting with permeable breakwaters. In: Proceedings of 23rd International Conference on Coastal Engineering. ASCE, pp 1517–1530
Scannapieco E, Harlow FH (1995) Introduction of finite difference methods for numerical fluid dynamics (No. LA-12984). Los Alamos National Lab., NM(United States)
Srisuwan C, Payom R (2015) Modelling of seadome as artificial reefs for coastal wave attenuation. Ocean Eng 103:198–201
Sussman M, Smereka P, Osher S (1994) A level set approach for computing solutions to incompressible two-phase flow. J Comput Phys 114(1):146–159. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.1994.1155
Torey MD, Cloutman LD, Mjolness RC, Hirt CW (1985) NASA-VOF2D: a computer program for incompressible flows with free surfaces, Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory Rep. No. LA-10612-MS. Flow Science, Los Alamos
Van der Meer JW, Briganti R, Zanuttigh B, Wang B (2005) Wave transmission and reflection at low-crested structures: design formulae, oblique wave attack and spectral change. Coast Eng 52(10–11):915–929
Yong L, Hua-Jun L (2012) Analysis of wave interaction with submerged perforated semi-circular breakwaters through multipole method. Appl Ocean Res 34:164–172
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank and express their great appreciations to Universiti Malaysia Terengganu (UMT) and National Hydraulic Research Institute of Malaysia (NAHRIM) for its support in the completion of this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Abdullah, S.F., Fitriadhy, A. & Desa, S.M. Numerical and experimental investigations of wave transmission behind a submerged WABCORE breakwater in low wave regime. J. Ocean Eng. Mar. Energy 7, 405–420 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40722-021-00209-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40722-021-00209-8