Abstract
This article aims to present the challenges, trends, and advancements in winery wastewater treatment systems through a systematic literature review. The methodology was based on the guidelines proposed by PRISMA. Initially, 293 articles published in the last decade were analyzed, and out of these, 122 were selected as relevant for the review. The average removal of chemical oxygen demand (COD) for each group of technology analyzed is as follows: 66% for physicochemical processes, 83% for biological processes, 90% for constructed wetlands (CWs), 96% for membranes, 42% for microbial fuel cells (MFCs), and 71% for advanced oxidation processes (AOPs). AOPs exhibit the highest efficiency in color removal (over 95%). Almost complete removals of total phenols are observed in AOPs and membrane systems. On the other hand, less robust systems such as biological sand filters and CWs also achieve removals of phenols exceeding 85%. Regarding nutrient removal, physicochemical processes show an average removal of 82% for phosphorus, while biological processes and CWs achieve removals exceeding 85% for total nitrogen. Adaptations of traditional technologies and emerging technologies show a trend towards eco-efficiency, with the reuse of residues in treatment systems (e.g., grape pomace as adsorbent), the recovery of compounds (e.g., polyphenols) and energy in the form of chemical (biogas in anaerobic systems) and electrical energy (MFCs). This literature review provides a compilation of quantitative and qualitative data to support decision-making related to winery wastewater treatment and presents possibilities to make this agro-industrial sector more sustainable.
Highlights
• A systematic review using PRISMA analyzed 122 articles on winery wastewater (WWW).
• Key technologies discussed: biological, physicochemical, wetlands, AOPs, and MFCs.
• Pollutants studied: BOD, COD, color, polyphenols, nutrients, turbidity.
• Pollutant removal efficiencies are presented based on statistical analyses.
• A narrative approach highlights aligning WWW treatment with sustainable practices.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Akratos CS, Tatoulis TI, Tekerlekopoulou AG (2020) Biotreatment of winery wastewater using a hybrid system combining biological trickling filters and constructed wetlands. Appl Sci 10(2):619. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10020619
Amaral-Silva N, Martins RC, Paiva C, Castro-Silva S, Quinta-Ferreira RM (2016) A new winery wastewater treatment approach during vintage periods integrating ferric coagulation, Fenton reaction and activated sludge. J Environ Chem Eng 4:2207–2215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2016.03.044
Amor C, Marchão L, Lucas MS, Peres JA (2019) Application of advanced oxidation processes for the treatment of recalcitrant agro-industrial wastewater: a review. Water 11(2):205. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11020205
Avila R, Carrero E, Vicent T, Blánquez P (2021) Integration of enzymatic pretreatment and sludge co-digestion in biogas production from microalgae. Waste Manag 124:254–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2021.01.042
Avila R, Justo Á, Carrero E, Crivillés E, Vicent T, Blánquez P (2022) Water resource recovery coupling microalgae wastewater treatment and sludge co-digestion for bio-wastes valorisation at industrial pilot-scale. Bioresour Technol 343:126080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126080
Baía A, Lopes A, Nunes MJ, Ciríaco L, Pacheco MJ, Fernandes A (2022) Removal of recalcitrant compounds from Winery Wastewater by Electrochemical Oxidation. Water 14(5):750. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14050750
Basset N, Santos E, Dosta J, Mata-Álvarez J (2016) Start-up and operation of an AnMBR for winery wastewater treatment. Ecol Eng 86:279–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.11.003
Bolzonella D, Papa M, Da Ros C, Anga Muthukumar L, Rosso D (2019) Winery wastewater treatment: a critical overview of advanced biological processes. Crit Rev Biotechnol 39:489–507. https://doi.org/10.1080/07388551.2019.1573799
Buitrón G, Martínez-Valdez FJ, Ojeda F (2019) Biogas Production from a highly Organic Loaded Winery Effluent through a two-stage process. Bioenergy Res 12:714–721. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-019-09984-7
Cañadas R, Díaz I, Rodríguez M, González EJ, González-Miquel M (2022) An integrated approach for sustainable valorization of winery wastewater using bio-based solvents for recovery of natural antioxidants. J Clean Prod 334:130181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130181
Candia-Onfray C, Espinoza N, Sabino da Silva EB, Toledo-Neira C, Espinoza LC, Santander R et al (2018) Treatment of winery wastewater by anodic oxidation using BDD electrode. Chemosphere 206:709–717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.04.175
Chai S, Guo J, Chai Y, Cai J, Gao L (2014) Anaerobic treatment of winery wastewater in moving bed biofilm reactors. Desalin Water Treat 52:1841–1849. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2013.792008
De La Varga D, Díaz MA, Ruiz I, Soto M (2013a) Avoiding clogging in constructed wetlands by using anaerobic digesters as pre-treatment. Ecol Eng 52:262–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.11.005
De La Varga D, Ruiz I, Soto M (2013b) Winery wastewater treatment in subsurface constructed wetlands with different bed depths. Water Air Soil Pollut 224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-013-1485-5
Díez AM, Iglesias O, Rosales E, Sanromán MA, Pazos M (2016) Optimization of two-chamber photo electro Fenton reactor for the treatment of winery wastewater. Process Saf Environ Prot 101:72–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2015.09.010
Díez AM, Rosales E, Sanromán MA, Pazos M (2017a) Assessment of LED-assisted electro-Fenton reactor for the treatment of winery wastewater. Chem Eng J 310:399–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.08.006
Díez AM, Sanromán MA, Pazos M (2017b) Sequential two-column electro-Fenton-photolytic reactor for the treatment of winery wastewater. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:1137–1151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-7937-x
Domínguez CM, Quintanilla A, Casas JA, Rodriguez JJ (2014) Treatment of real winery wastewater by wet oxidation at mild temperature. Sep Purif Technol 129:121–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2014.04.003
Esteban-Gutiérrez M, Garcia-Aguirre J, Irizar I, Aymerich E (2018) From sewage sludge and agri-food waste to VFA: individual acid production potential and up-scaling. Waste Manag 77:203–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2018.05.027
Fernandes JMC, Sousa RMOF, Fraga I, Sampaio A, Amaral C, Bezerra RMF et al (2020) Fungal biodegradation and multi-level toxicity assessment of vinasse from distillation of winemaking by-products. Chemosphere 238:124572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124572
Ferreira R, Gomes J, Martins RC, Costa R, Quinta-Ferreira RM (2018) Winery wastewater treatment by integrating Fenton’s process with biofiltration by Corbicula fluminea. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 93:333–339. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.5355
Ganeshkumar V, Subashchandrabose SR, Dharmarajan R, Venkateswarlu K, Naidu R, Megharaj M (2018) Use of mixed wastewaters from piggery and winery for nutrient removal and lipid production by Chlorella sp. MM3. Bioresour Technol 256:254–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.02.025
Guimarães V, Lucas MS, Peres JA (2019) Combination of adsorption and heterogeneous photo-Fenton processes for the treatment of winery wastewater. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:31000–31013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06207-6
Higgins BT, Gennity I, Fitzgerald PS, Ceballos SJ, Fiehn O, VanderGheynst JS (2018) Algal–bacterial synergy in treatment of winery wastewater. Clean Water 1. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41545-018-0005-y
Holtman GA, Haldenwang R, Welz PJ (2018) Biological sand filter system treating winery effluent for effective reduction in organic load and pH neutralisation. J Water Process Eng 25:118–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2018.07.008
Holtman GA, Haldenwang R, Welz PJ (2022) Calcite dissolution and bioneutralization of Acidic Wastewater in Biosand reactors. Water 14(21):3482. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14213482
Iglesias O, Meijide J, Bocos E, Sanromán M, Pazos M (2015) New approaches on heterogeneous electro-Fenton treatment of winery wastewater. Electrochim Acta 169:134–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2015.04.062
Ioannou LA, Fatta-Kassinos D (2013) Solar photo-Fenton oxidation against the bioresistant fractions of winery wastewater. J Environ Chem Eng 1:703–712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2013.07.008
Ioannou L, Michael C, Kyriakou S, Fatta-Kassinos D (2014) Solar Fenton: from pilot to industrial scale application for polishing winery wastewater pretreated by MBR. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 89:1067–1076. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.4203
Ioannou LA, Michael C, Vakondios N, Drosou K, Xekoukoulotakis NP, Diamadopoulos E et al (2013) Winery wastewater purification by reverse osmosis and oxidation of the concentrate by solar photo-Fenton. Sep Purif Technol 118:659–669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2013.07.049
Ioannou LA, Puma GL, Fatta-Kassinos D (2015) Treatment of winery wastewater by physicochemical, biological and advanced processes: a review. J Hazard Mater 286:343–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.12.043
Jesson J, Matheson L, Lacey FM (2011) Doing your systematic review - traditional and systematic techniques. SAGE Publications Ltd, London
Johnson MB, Mehrvar M (2022) Treatment of actual winery wastewater by fenton-like process: optimization to improve organic removal, reduce inorganic sludge production and enhance co-treatment at municipal wastewater treatment facilities. Water 14(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/w14010039
Jorge N, Teixeira AR, Guimarães V, Lucas MS, Peres JA (2022) Treatment of winery wastewater with a combination of adsorption and thermocatalytic processes. Processes 10(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10010075
Jorge N, Teixeira AR, Matos CC, Lucas MS, Peres JA (2021) Combination of coagulation–flocculation–decantation and ozonation processes for winery wastewater treatment. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18(16):8882. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168882
Kalogerakis N, Kalogerakis GC, Botha QP (2021) Environmental applications of nanobubble technology: field testing at industrial scale. Can J Chem Eng 99:2345–2354. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.24211
Kara S, Gürbulak E, Eyvaz M, Yüksel E (2013) Treatment of winery wastewater by electrocoagulation process. Desalin Water Treat 51:5421–5429. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2013.770223
Kim B, Gautier M, Prost-Boucle S, Molle P, Michel P, Gourdon R (2014) Performance evaluation of partially saturated vertical-flow constructed wetland with trickling filter and chemical precipitation for domestic and winery wastewaters treatment. Ecol Eng 71:41–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.07.045
Kongthale G, Sotha S, Michu P, Madloh A, Wetchapan P, Chaijak P (2022) Electricity production and phenol removal of Winery Wastewater by Constructed Wetland – Microbial Fuel Cell Integrated with ethanol tolerant yeast. Biointerface Res Appl Chem 13(2). https://doi.org/10.33263/BRIAC132.157
Lauzurique Y, Espinoza LC, Huiliñir C, García V, Salazar R (2022) Anodic oxidation of Industrial Winery Wastewater using different anodes. Water 14(1):95. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14010095
Litaor MI, Meir-Dinar N, Castro B, Azaizeh H, Rytwo G, Levi N et al (2015) Treatment of winery wastewater with aerated cells mobile system. Environ Nanatechnol Monit Manag 4:17–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enmm.2015.03.001
Liu T, Nadaraja AV, Friesen J, Gill K, Lam MI, Roberts DJ (2021a) Narrow pH tolerance found for a microbial fuel cell treating winery wastewater. J Appl Microbiol 131:2280–2293. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.15102
Liu T, Nadaraja AV, Shi J, Roberts DJ (2021b) Stable performance of microbial fuel cell technology treating Winery Wastewater irrespective of Seasonal Variations. J Environ Eng 147(10). https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)ee.1943-7870.0001921
Luz S, Rivas J, Afonso A, Carvalho F (2021) Immediate one-step lime precipitation process for the valorization of winery wastewater to agricultural purposes. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:18382–18391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11933-3
Makaroglou G, Marakas H, Fodelianakis S, Axaopoulou VA, Koumi I, Kalogerakis N, et al (2021) Optimization of biomass production from Stichococcous sp. biofilms coupled to wastewater treatment. Biochem Eng J 169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2021.107964
Marchão L, Fernandes JR, Sampaio A, Peres JA, Tavares PB, Lucas MS (2021) Microalgae and immobilized TiO2/UV-A LEDs as a sustainable alternative for winery wastewater treatment. Water Res 203:117464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2021.117464
Martínez-Cruz A, Fernandes A, Ciríaco L, Pacheco MJ, Carvalho F, Afonso A et al (2020) Electrochemical oxidation of effluents from food processing industries: a short review and a case-study. Water 12(12):3546. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12123546
Milani M, Consoli S, Marzo A, Pino A, Randazzo C, Barbagallo S et al (2020) Treatment of winery wastewater with a multistage constructedwetland system for irrigation reuse. Water 12(5):1260. https://doi.org/10.3390/W12051260
Moreira FC, Boaventura RAR, Brillas E, Vilar VJP (2015) Remediation of a winery wastewater combining aerobic biological oxidation and electrochemical advanced oxidation processes. Water Res 75:95–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2015.02.029
Mosse KP, Verheyen TV, Cruickshank AJ, Patti AF, Cavagnaro TR (2013) Soluble organic components of winery wastewater and implications for reuse. Agric Water Manag 120:5–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2012.05.011
Nayak A, Bhushan B, Rodriguez-Turienzo L (2018) Recovery of polyphenols onto porous carbons developed from exhausted grape pomace: a sustainable approach for the treatment of wine wastewaters. Water Res 145:741–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.09.017
OIV (2022) State of the world vine and wine Sector 2021. Int Organ Vine Wine Intergov Organ. https://oiv.int/sites/default/files/documents/eng-state-of-the-world-vine-and-wine-sector-april-2022-v6_0.pdf. Accessed 17 Apr 2023
Orescanin V, Kollar R, Nad K, Mikelic IL, Gustek SF (2013) Treatment of winery wastewater by electrochemical methods and advanced oxidation processes. J Environ Sci Heal - Part A Toxic/Hazard Subst Environ Eng 48:1543–1547. https://doi.org/10.1080/10934529.2013.797267
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD et al (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372(71):n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Pascual A, Pena R, Gómez-Cuervo S, de la Varga D, Alvarez JA, Soto M et al (2021) Nature based solutions for winery wastewater valorisation. Ecol Eng 169:106311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2021.106311
Penteado ED, Fernandez-Marchante CM, Zaiat M, Cañizares P, Gonzalez ER, Rodrigo MA (2016a) Influence of sludge age on the performance of MFC treating winery wastewater. Chemosphere 151:163–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.01.030
Penteado ED, Fernandez-Marchante CM, Zaiat M, Cañizares P, Gonzalez ER, Rodrigo MAR (2016b) Energy recovery from winery wastewater using a dual chamber microbial fuel cell. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 91:1802–1808. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.4771
Penteado ED, Fernandez-Marchante CM, Zaiat M, Gonzalez ER, Rodrigo MA (2016c) Influence of carbon electrode material on energy recovery from winery wastewater using a dual-chamber microbial fuel cell. Environ Technol (United Kingdom) 38:1333–1341. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2016.1226961
Penteado ED, Fernandez-Marchante CM, Zaiat M, Gonzalez ER, Rodrigo MA (2017) On the Effects of Ferricyanide as Cathodic Mediator on the performance of Microbial Fuel cells. Electrocatalysis 8:59–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12678-016-0334-x
Petropoulos E, Cuff G, Huete E, Garcia G, Wade M, Spera D et al (2016) Investigating the feasibility and the limits of high rate anaerobic winery wastewater treatment using a hybrid-EGSB bio-reactor. Process Saf Environ Prot 102:107–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2016.02.015
Petta L, De Gisi S, Casella P, Farina R, Notarnicola M (2017) Evaluation of the treatability of a winery distillery (vinasse) wastewater by UASB, anoxic-aerobic UF-MBR and chemical precipitation/adsorption. J Environ Manage 201:177–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.06.042
Pipolo M, Martins RC, Quinta-Ferreira RM, Costa R (2017) Integrating the Fenton’s process with Biofiltration by Corbicula fluminea to Reduce Chemical Oxygen demand of Winery Effluents. J Environ Qual 46:436–442. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2016.09.0338
Policastro G, Luongo V, Fabbricino M (2020) Biohydrogen and poly-β-hydroxybutyrate production by winery wastewater photofermentation: Effect of substrate concentration and nitrogen source. J Environ Manage 271:111006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111006
Ramond JB, Welz PJ, Tuffin MI, Burton SG, Cowan DA (2013) Assessment of temporal and spatial evolution of bacterial communities in a biological sand filter mesocosm treating winery wastewater. J Appl Microbiol 115:91–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.12203
Rizzo A, Bresciani R, Martinuzzi N, Masi F (2020) Online monitoring of a long-term full-scale constructed wetland for the treatment of winery wastewater in Italy. Appl Sci 10:555. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10020555
Robles A, Capson-Tojo G, Ruano MV, Latrille E, Steyer JP (2018) Development and pilot-scale validation of a fuzzy-logic control system for optimization of methane production in fixed-bed reactors. J Process Control 68:96–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprocont.2018.05.007
Robles A, Latrille E, Ruano MV, Steyer JP (2017) A fuzzy-logic-based controller for methane production in anaerobic fixed-film reactors. Environ Technol 38:42–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2016.1184321
Rodríguez-Chueca J, Amor C, Silva T, Dionysiou DD, Li Puma G, Lucas MS et al (2017a) Treatment of winery wastewater by sulphate radicals: HSO5–/transition metal/UV-A LEDs. Chem Eng J 310:473–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.04.135
Rodríguez-Chueca J, Moreira SI, Lucas MS, Fernandes JR, Tavares PB, Sampaio A et al (2017b) Disinfection of simulated and real winery wastewater using sulphate radicals: Peroxymonosulphate/transition metal/UV-A LED oxidation. J Clean Prod 149:805–817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.135
Russo D, Muscetta M, Clarizia L, Di Somma I, Garlisi C, Marotta R et al (2020) Photoactivated Fe(III)/Fe(II)/WO3–Pd fuel cell for electricity generation using synthetic and real effluents under visible light. Renew Energy 147:1070–1081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.09.080
Sánchez M, Gonzalo OG, Yáñez S, Ruiz I, Soto M (2021) Influence of nutrients and pH on the efficiency of vertical flow constructed wetlands treating winery wastewater. J Water Process Eng 42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.102103
Santos C, Lucas MS, Dias AA, Bezerra RMF, Peres JA, Sampaio A (2014) Winery wastewater treatment by combination of Cryptococcus laurentii and Fenton’s reagent. Chemosphere 117:53–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.05.083
Sheridan CM, Glasser D, Hildebrandt D (2014) Estimating rate constants of contaminant removal in constructed wetlands treating winery effluent: a comparison of three different methods. Process Saf Environ Prot 92:903–916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2013.09.004
Skornia K, Safferman SI, Rodriguez-Gonzalez L, Ergas SJ (2020) Treatment of winery wastewater using bench-scale columns simulating vertical flow constructed wetlands with adsorption media. Appl Sci 10(3):1063. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10031063
Souza BS, Moreira FC, Dezotti MWC, Vilar VJP, Boaventura RAR (2013) Application of biological oxidation and solar driven advanced oxidation processes to remediation of winery wastewater. Catal Today 209:201–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2012.08.037
Spennati E, Casazza AA, Converti A (2020) Winery wastewater treatment by microalgae to produce low-cost biomass for energy production purposes. Energies 13(10):2490. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13102490
Spennati E, Casazza AA, Perego P, Solisio C, Busca G, Converti A (2019) Microalgae growth in winery wastewater under dark conditions. Chem Eng Trans 74:1471–1476. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1974246
Thirugnanasambandham K, Sivakumar V, Loganathan K, Jayakumar R, Shine K (2016) Pilot scale evaluation of feasibility of reuse of wine industry wastewater using reverse osmosis system: modeling and optimization. Desalin Water Treat 57:25358–25368. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2016.1154894
Tsolcha ON, Tekerlekopoulou AG, Akratos CS, Aggelis G, Genitsaris S, Moustaka-Gouni M, et al (2018) Agroindustrial wastewater treatment with simultaneous biodiesel production in attached growth systems using a mixed microbial culture. Water 10(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/w10111693
Tsolcha ON, Tekerlekopoulou AG, Akratos CS, Aggelis G, Genitsaris S, Moustaka-Gouni M et al (2017) Biotreatment of raisin and winery wastewaters and simultaneous biodiesel production using a Leptolyngbya-based microbial consortium. J Clean Prod 148:185–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.026
Vecino X, Devesa-Rey R, Moldes AB, Cruz JM (2014) Formulation of an alginate-vineyard pruning waste composite as a new eco-friendly adsorbent to remove micronutrients from agroindustrial effluents. Chemosphere 111:24–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.03.004
Velegraki T, Mantzavinos D (2015) Solar photo-Fenton treatment of winery effluents in a pilot photocatalytic reactor. Catal Today 240:153–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2014.06.008
Vergine P, Salerno C, Berardi G, Pappagallo G, Pollice A (2020) The self-forming dynamic membrane BioReactor (SFD MBR) as a suitable technology for agro-industrial wastewater treatment. N Biotechnol 56:87–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2019.12.005
Vital-Jacome MA, Buitrón G (2021) Thermophilic anaerobic digestion of winery effluents in a two-stage process and the effect of the feeding frequency on methane production. Chemosphere 272:129865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.129865
Vital-Jacome M, Cazares-Granillo M, Carrillo-Reyes J, Buitron G (2020a) Characterization and anaerobic digestion of highly concentrated mexican wine by-products and effluents. Water Sci Technol 81:190–198. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2020.102
Vital-Jacome M, Díaz-Zamorano AL, Cuautle-Marín M, Moreno G, Buitrón G, Muñoz R et al (2020b) Microalgal–bacterial aggregates with flue gas supply as a platform for the treatment of anaerobic digestion centrate. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 95:289–296. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.6235
Vukmanović S, Vitas J, Malbaša R (2020) Valorization of winery effluent using kombucha culture. J Food Process Preserv 44. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.14627
Welz PJ, Palmer Z, Isaacs S, Kirby B, le Roes-Hill M (2014) Analysis of substrate degradation, metabolite formation and microbial community responses in sand bioreactors treating winery wastewater: a comparative study. J Environ Manage 145:147–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.06.025
Welz PJ, Ramond JB, Braun L, Vikram S, Le Roes-Hill M (2018) Bacterial nitrogen fixation in sand bioreactors treating winery wastewater with a high carbon to nitrogen ratio. J Environ Manage 207:192–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.11.015
Welz PJ, le Roes-Hill M (2014) Biodegradation of organics and accumulation of metabolites in experimental biological sand filters used for the treatment of synthetic winery wastewater: a mesocosm study. J Water Process Eng 3:155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2014.06.007
Yanez E, Santander P, Contreras D, Yanez J, Cornejo L, Mansilla HD (2016) Homogeneous and heterogeneous degradation of caffeic acid using photocatalysis driven by UVA and solar light. J Environ Sci Heal - Part A Toxic/Hazard Subst Environ Eng 51:78–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/10934529.2015.1086211
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge the Graduate Program in Civil Engineering from the Federal University of Technology–Paraná and the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) for their technical and financial support.
Funding
This study was financed in part by the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES)–Finance Code 001.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study’s conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by E.M. The first draft of the manuscript was written by E.M. and F.B.F. All authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Melchiors, E., Freire, F.B. Winery Wastewater Treatment: a Systematic Review of Traditional and Emerging Technologies and Their Efficiencies. Environ. Process. 10, 43 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40710-023-00657-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40710-023-00657-4