Abstract
The soil water characteristic curve (SWCC) is a fundamental tool for studying the intrinsic mechanical properties of unsaturated soils. The data for SWCCs must be obtained via laboratory tests, which require considerable time and labour. Therefore, in practice, empirical models are often developed with a limited number of laboratory data samples to produce SWCC curves. However, empirical models fitted with limited data often lead to inaccurate modelling of SWCCs. This research aims to propose a data-driven optimization framework to accurately and effectively fit empirical SWCC models with limited amounts of laboratory data. First, the van Genuchten model is adopted as the empirical model to construct the SWCCs. Second, the performance-guided Jaya algorithm (PGJAYA) is introduced to optimize the parameters of the van Genuchten model and increase the fitting accuracy. In the experiments, two cases are investigated, one with limited data and another with abundant data, for four types of soils, i.e., sand, silt, clay and loess. To demonstrate the accuracy and effectiveness of the proposed approach, a comparison with other benchmark optimization algorithms is performed. With limited data, the PGJAYA algorithm outperforms the other optimization algorithms tested. Furthermore, the PGJAYA algorithm produces the smallest fitting error for the SWCCs in the case with full data. Overall, the PGJAYA algorithm is an effective and accurate optimizer with respect to the parameter fitting tasks based on empirical SWCC models.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated during the current study.
References
Akin ID, Likos WJ (2020) Suction stress of clay over a wide range of saturation. Geotech Geol Eng 38(1):283–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-019-01016-7
Anagnostopoulos I, Rizeq A (2019) Confining value from neural networks: a sectoral study prediction of takeover targets in the US technology sector. Manag Finance 45(10/11):1433–1457. https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-12-2017-0523
Azmi M, Ramli MH, Hezmi MA, Yusoff SM, Alel MA (2019) Estimation of soil water characteristic curves (SWCC) of mining sand using soil suction modelling. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 527(1): 012016. IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/527/1/012016
Bharat TV, Sharma J (2012) Metaheuristics for improved estimation of hydraulic properties of unsaturated soils. In GEOMANITOBA 2012-65th Canadian Geotechnical Conference. Manitoba, Canadian, pp: 1-8
Brooks RH, Corey AT (1966) Properties of porous media affecting fluid flow. J Irrig Drain Div 92(2):61–90. https://doi.org/10.1061/JRCEA4.0000425
Brutsaert W (1966) Probability laws for pore-size distributions. Soil Sci 101(2):85–92. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-196602000-00002
Burdine N (1953) Relative permeability calculations from pore size distribution data. J Petrol Technol 5(3):71–78. https://doi.org/10.2118/225-G
Chakri A, Khelif R, Benouaret M, Yang XS (2017) New directional bat algorithm for continuous optimization problems. Expert Syst Appl 69:159–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2016.10.050
Civicioglu P, Besdok E (2019) Bernstain-search differential evolution algorithm for numerical function optimization. Expert Syst Appl 138:112831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2019.112831
Dobre RG, Gaitanaru DS (2018) Estimating soil hydraulic properties for unsaturated zone using gradient and metaheuristic methods. Int Multidiscip Sci Geo Conf: SGEM 18(3.2):165–172. https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2018/3.2/S13.022
Fredlund DG, Xing A (1994) Equations for the soil-water characteristic curve. Can Geotech J 31(4):521–532. https://doi.org/10.1139/t94-061
He Y, Kusiak A (2018) Performance assessment of wind turbines: data-derived quantitative metrics. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy 9(1):65–73. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSTE.2017.2715061
He Y, Deng J, Li H (2017) Short-term power load forecasting with deep belief network and copula models. In 2017 9th International Conference on Intelligent Human-Machine Systems and Cybernetics (IHMSC), IEEE. Hangzhou, China, pp:191–194. https://doi.org/10.1109/IHMSC.2017.50
Kennedy J, Eberhart R (1995) Particle swarm optimization. In Proceedings of ICNN'95-International Conference on Neural Networks, IEEE: 1942–1948. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNN.1995.488968
Kosugi KI, Hopmans JW, Dane JH (2002) Section 3.3.4: Parametric Models. Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 4 Physical Methods 5: 739–757. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.4.c27
Li H, Feng W, Xu Q, He Y, Luo B, Chen S (2017) A revised formula to compute shear strength of unsaturated soils. Int J Georesourc Environ 3(1–2): 47–55. https://doi.org/10.15273/ijge.2017.01.006
Li H, Xu Q, He Y, Deng J (2018a) Prediction of landslide displacement with an ensemble-based extreme learning machine and copula models. Landslides 15(10):2047–2059. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-018-1020-2
Li YB, Liu Y, Nie WB, Ma XY (2018b) Inverse modelling of soil hydraulic parameters based on a hybrid of vector-evaluated genetic algorithm and particle swarm optimization. Water 10(1):84. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10010084
Mualem Y (1976) A new model for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous media. Water Resour Res 12(3):513–522. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR012i003p00513
Nam S, Gutierrez M, Diplas P, Petrie J, Wayllace A, Lu N, Muñoz JJ (2010) Comparison of testing techniques and models for establishing the SWCC of riverbank soils. Eng Geol 110(1–2):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2009.09.003
Ouyang T, He Y, Huang H (2018) Monitoring wind turbines’ unhealthy status: a data-driven approach. IEEE Trans Emerg Topics Comput Intell 3(2):163–172. https://doi.org/10.1109/TETCI.2018.2872036
Ouyang T, He Y, Li H, Sun Z, Baek S (2019) Modeling and forecasting short-term power load with copula model and deep belief network. IEEE Trans Emerg Topics Comput Intell 3(2):127–136. https://doi.org/10.1109/TETCI.2018.2880511
Ouyang T, Kusiak A, He Y (2017) Predictive model of yaw error in a wind turbine. Energy 123:119–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.01.150
Phoon KK, Santoso A, Quek ST (2010) Probabilistic analysis of soil-water characteristic curves. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 136(3):445–455. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000222
Prakash A, Hazra B, Sekharan S (2020) Probabilistic analysis of soil-water characteristic curve of bentonite: multivariate copula approach. Int J Geomech 20(2):04019150. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001554
Premkumar M, Babu TS, Umashankar S, Sowmya R (2020) A new metaphor-less algorithms for the photovoltaic cell parameter estimation. Optik 208:164559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2020.164559
Rao R (2016) Jaya: A simple and new optimization algorithm for solving constrained and unconstrained optimization problems. Int J Ind Eng Comput 7(1):19–34. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijiec.2015.8.004
Rao R (2020) Rao algorithms: Three metaphor-less simple algorithms for solving optimization problems. Int J Ind Eng Comput 11(1):107–130. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijiec.2019.6.002
Satyanaga A, Kim J, Moon SW, Wijaya M (2020) Exponential functions for modelling hysteresis of soil-water characteristic curves. In E3S Web of Conferences. EDP Sciences, 195: 02002. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202019502002
Soltani A, Azimi M, Deng A, Taheri A (2019) A simplified method for determination of the soil–water characteristic curve variables. Int J Geotech Eng 13(4):316–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/19386362.2017.1344450
Sun Z, He Y, Gritsenko A, Lendasse A, Baek S (2020) Embedded spectral descriptors: learning the point-wise correspondence metric via Siamese neural networks. J Comput Des Eng 7(1):18–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcde/qwaa003
van Genuchten MT (1980) A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 44(5):892–898. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400050002x
Wang L, Huang C, Huang L (2018) Parameter estimation of the soil water retention curve model with Jaya algorithm. Comput Electron Agric 151:349–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2018.06.024
Xu Q, Li H, He Y, Liu F, Peng D (2019a) Comparison of data-driven models of loess landslide runout distance estimation. Bull Eng Geol Env 78(2):1281–1294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-017-1176-3
Xu G, Cui Q, Shi X, Ge H, Zhan ZH, Lee HP, ... Wu C (2019b) Particle swarm optimization based on dimensional learning strategy. Swarm Evol Comput 45: 33-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.swevo.2018.12.009
Yu K, Qu B, Yue C, Ge S, Chen X, Liang J (2019) A performance-guided JAYA algorithm for parameters identification of photovoltaic cell and module. Appl Energy 237:241–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.01.008
Zhai Q, Rahardjo H, Satyanaga A (2017) Effect of bimodal soil-water characteristic curve on the estimation of permeability function. Eng Geol 230:142–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2017.09.025
Acknowledgments
The study was supported by the Key Program of Science and Technology Planning Project of Deyang, China (2018SZY108).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Data collection and analysis were performed by W. Zhao and W. Yang. The manuscript was written by W. Zhao. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhao, W., Yang, W. Predicting and Optimizing the Soil–Water Characteristic Curve Parameters with Limited Data using the Performance Guided Jaya Algorithm. Environ. Process. 8, 1231–1248 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40710-021-00517-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40710-021-00517-z