Abstract
Limited information is available about energy efficiency evaluation of industrial sewage sludge gasification nowadays. The goal of this study is to determine the best proper feeding waste combination/combinations of miscellaneous industrial sewage sludges in a down draft fluidized bed pilot-scale gasification reactor to maximize energy recovery. Different industrial sewage sludge samples were taken from dewatering units of wastewater treatment plants of textile, dairy, vegetable and non-vegetable oil, glass and metal industries, located in Thrace Region of Turkey (Thrace Catchment of Area) and characterized in terms of three important indicator parameters (moisture, ash and heating value) for identifying the best feeding waste combination of the reactor which has high gasification efficiency. In addition, the same parameters were also analysed for the char and cyclone dust samples that occurred as a result of gasification process, and then, energy yields of all industrial sewage sludge combinations have been calculated. Results revealed that the majority of sludge samples, apart from metal and glass industries, were found suitable for gasification process in terms of both organic and inorganic contents either alone or in mixture form. The heating value and ash content of vegetable and non-vegetable oil industrial sewage sludge were measured approximately two times higher (average 11,622 kcal.kg−1 = 48 MJ.kg−1 for oil and average 5163 kcal.kg−1 = 21.6 MJ.kg−1 for dairy) and nearly in the same values (average 9.3% for oil and 9.5% for dairy) compared to dairy industrial sewage sludge, respectively. According to these results, four feeding sludge combinations were determined based on their ash content and heating values. It was found that Combination 1, which has high calorific value and low ash ratio, has the highest energy efficiency (97%), while the other combinations were found below this value. If the proper sludge combination can be identified for a draft fluidized bed gasification reactor, energy efficiency may be increased. Moreover, identifying the best feeding combination for sludge gasification reactor may be the best way to obtain both high energy recovery and low char/tar products and to also minimize industrial sewage sludge before being sent to landfill.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ASTM D5468-95 (2010) Standard Test method for gross calorific and ash value of waste materials. The American Society for Testing and Materials, USA. https://www.astm.org/DATABASE.CART/HISTORICAL/D5468-95.htm
ASTM D3173 (2010) Standard Test method for moisture in the analysis sample of coal and coke. The American Society for Testing and Materials, USA. https://www.astm.org/DATABASE.CART/HISTORICAL/D3173-11.htm
ASTM D3174 – 04 (2010) Standard Test method for ash in the analysis sample of coal and coke from coal. The American Society for Testing and Materials, USA. https://www.astm.org/DATABASE.CART/HISTORICAL/D3174-04R10.htm
Cao Y, Wang Y (2006) A novel biomass air gasification process for producing tar-free higher heating value fuel gas. Fuel Process Technol 87:343–353
Chun YN, Ji DW, Yoshikawa K (2013) Pyrolysis and gasification characterization of sewage sludge for high quality gas and char production. J Mech Sci Technol 27:263–272
Dogru M, Midilli A, Howarth CR (2002) Gasification of sewage sludge using a throated downdraft gasifier and uncertainity analysis. Fuel Process Technol 75:55–82
Dotti FR, Nicholas PGL, Ana LP, Jason MP, Tzahi YC (2015) Evaluating air-blown gasification for energy recovery from wastewater solids: impact of biological treatment and point of generation on energy recovery/sustainable energy technologies and assessments. Sustainable Energy Technol Assess 9:22–29
Fytili D, Zabaniotou A (2008) Utilization of sewage sludge in EU application of old and new methods—a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 12(1):116–140
Güzel E (2011) Industrial waste gasification and the characterization of solid effluents (char, cyclone dust and Clınker) of gasification process. MSc. Thesis, it was written in Turkish, Istanbul Technical University, İstanbul
Kang SW, Dong JI, Kim JM, Lee WC, Hwang WG (2011) Gasification and its emission characteristics for dried sewage sludge utilizing a fluidized bed gasifier. J Mater Cycles Waste Manage 13:180–185
Li AM, Gao NB, Li RD, Wei LH (2004) NOx and SO2 emission characteristics of sewage sludge in gasified incineration treatment. J Combustion Sci Technol 10(4):289–294
Mahmoud A, Olivier J, Vaxelaire J, Hoadley AF (2010) Electrical field: a historical review of its application and contributions in wastewater sludge dewatering. Water Res 44:2381–2407
Manya JJ, Sanchez JL, Gonzalo A, Arauzo J (2005) Air gasification of dried sewage sludge in a fluidized bed-effect of the operation conditions and in-bed use of alumina. Energy Fuel 19(2):629–636
Ongen A, Kurtulus Ozcan H, Arayıcı S (2013) An evaluation of tannery industry wastewater treatment sludge gasification by artificial neural network modeling. J Hazard Mater 263:361–366
Phuphuakrat T, Nipattummakul N, Namioka T, Kerdsuwan S, Yoshikawa K (2010) Characterization of tar content in the syngas produced in a downdraft type fixed bed gasification system from dried sewage sludge. Fuel 89:2278–2284
Rajvanshi AK (1986) Chapter 4: biomass gasification. In: Yogi Goswami D (ed) Alternative energy in agriculture (book), vol. II. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 83–102
Ren JZ, Liang HW, Dong L, Gao ZQ, He C, Pan M, Sun L (2017) Sustainable development of sewage sludge-to-energy in China: barriers identification and technologies prioritization. Renew Sust Energ Rev 67:384–396
Skoulou V, Zabaniotou A, Stavropoulos G, Sakelaropoulos G (2008) Syngas production from olive tree cuttings and olive kernels in a downdraft fixed-bed gasifier. Int J Hydrog Energy 33:1185–1194
Thomas WM, Brendan PM, William RS, Morris JS, Manahan SE (2004) Fate of heavy metals and radioactive metals in gasification of sewage sludge. Waste Manag 24:193–198
Werle S (2013) Sewage sludge gasification: theoretical and experimental investigation. Environ Prot Eng 39:25–32
Werle S, Wilk RK (2010) A review of methods for the thermal utilization of sewage sludge: the polish perspective. Renew Energy 35:1914–1919
Yucheng CAO, Pawłowski A (2012) Sewage sludge-to-energy approaches based on anaerobic digestion and pyrolysis: brief overview and energy efficiency assessment. Renew Sust Energ Rev 16(3):1657–1665
Acknowledgments
This paper is associated with MSc. Thesis titled “Energy Efficienciy Assesment of a Gasification Plant Using Industrial Sludge” funded by the Scientific Research Council of Namık Kemal University via Grant No. NKUBAP.00.17.YL.12.06. An initial version of this paper has been presented at the 13th International Conference on Protection and Restoration of the Environment, Mykonos island, Greece, July 3-8, 2016.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Töre, G.Y., Kar, Y.B. Evaluation of Gasification Efficiency of Miscellaneous Industrial Sewage Sludges in a Down Draft Fluidized Bed Reactor. Environ. Process. 4 (Suppl 1), 223–237 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40710-017-0227-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40710-017-0227-x