Skip to main content
Log in

Materials selection of thermoplastic matrices for ‘green’ natural fibre composites for automotive anti-roll bar with particular emphasis on the environment

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, selection of thermoplastic polymers to be used in natural fibre-reinforced polymer composite is performed using Quality Function Deployment for Environment technique. The candidate materials for the matrix in composites are thermoplastic polyurethane, highdensity polyethylene, low-density polyethylene, polystyrene and polypropylene and the selection process is carried out based on the design requirements of an automotive anti-roll bar. Requirements are collected through a study on the voice of customers and the voice of the environment. The approach is followed by sensitivity analysis using Expert Choice software based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process method. From the analysis, high-density polyethylene scored the highest (28.76%), and followed by thermoplastic polyurethane, which had 22.30% of the overall score. Finally, Young’s modulus of hemp fibre reinforced high-density polyethylene and thermoplastic polyurethane composites were compared, predicted using the Halpin-Tsai method. The results show that hemp-reinforced thermoplastic polyurethane composite shows higher Young’s modulus of 10.6 GPa, compared with hemp-reinforced high-density polyethylene composite (8.27 GPa). Based on these two analyses, thermoplastic polyurethane is selected as the most suitable polymer matrix for natural fibre composites for automotive anti-roll bar.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

QFDE:

Quality Function Deployment for Environment

AHP:

Analytic Hierarchy Process

VOC:

Voice of Customer

VOE:

Voice of Environment

HOQ:

House of Quality

RS:

Raw Score

RW:

Relative Weight

NRS:

Normalised Raw Score

TUSL:

Technical Upper Specification Limit

TRT:

Technical Requirement Targets

W:

Weight

E m :

Modulus of Matrix

ξ :

Shape Fitting Parameter

V f :

Fibre Volume Fraction

E f :

Modulus of Fibre

References

  1. Koronis, G., Silva, A., and Fontul, M., “Green Composites: A Review of Adequate Materials for Automotive Applications,” Composites Part B: Engineering, Vol. 44, No. 1, pp. 120–127, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Salit, M. S., “Tropical Natural Fibre Composites: Properties, Manufacture and Applications,” Springer, 2014.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Sunija, A., Ilango, S. S., and Vinod Kumar, K., “Thespesia Populnea Reinforced Cashew Nut Husk Tannin-Based Polyurethane Composites,” Journal of Natural Fibers, Vol. 12, No. 5, pp. 481–493, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Saheb, D. N. and Jog, J. P., “Natural Fiber Polymer Composites: A Review,” Advances in Polymer Technology, Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 351–363, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim, J.-W. and Lee, D.-G., “Study on the Fiber Orientation During Compression Molding of Reinforced Thermoplastic Composites,” Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf.-Green Tech., Vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 335–339, 2014.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Sanadi, A. R., Caulfield, D. F., and Jacobson, R. E., “Agro-Fiber Thermoplastic Composites,” CRC Lewis Publishers, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gascons, M., Blanco, N., Mayugo, J. A., and Matthys, K., “A Strategy to Support Design Processes for Fibre Reinforced Thermoset Composite Materials,” Applied Composite Materials, Vol. 19, Nos. 3-4, pp. 297–314, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mayyas, A. T., Qattawi, A., Mayyas, A. R., and Omar, M., “Quantifiable Measures of Sustainability: A Case Study of Materials Selection for Eco-Lightweight Auto-Bodies,” Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 40, pp. 177–189, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mayyas, A., Shen, Q., Mayyas, A., Shan, D., Qattawi, A., et al., “Using Quality Function Deployment and Analytical Hierarchy Process for Material Selection of Body-in-White,” Materials & Design, Vol. 32, No. 5, pp. 2771–2782, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ullah, S. M. S., Muhammad, I., and Ko, T. J., “Optimal Strategy to Deal with Decision Making Problems in Machine Tools Remanufacturing,” Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf.-Green Tech., Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 19–26, 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Al-Oqla, F. M., Sapuan, S., Ishak, M., and Nuraini, A., “Decision Making Model for Optimal Reinforcement Condition of Natural Fiber Composites,” Fibers and Polymers, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 153, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Giudice, F., La Rosa, G., and Risitano, A., “Materials Selection in the Life-Cycle Design Process: A Method to Integrate Mechanical and Environmental Performances in Optimal Choice,” Materials & Design, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 9–20, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sapuan, S., Kho, J., Zainudin, E., Leman, Z., Ali, B., et al., “Materials Selection for Natural Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composites Using Analytical Hierarchy Process,” Indian Journal of Engineering and Materials Sciences, Vol. 18, pp. 255–267, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Beng, L. G. and Omar, B., “Integrating Axiomatic Design Principles into Sustainable Product Development,” Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf.-Green Tech., Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 107–117, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Meng, Q., Li, F.-Y., Zhou, L.-R., Li, J., Ji, Q.-Q., et al., “A Rapid Life Cycle Assessment Method Based on Green Features in Supporting Conceptual Design,” Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf.-Green Tech., Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 189–196, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pugh, S., “Total Design: Integrated Methods for Successful Product Engineering,” 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Masui, K., “Environmental Quality Function Deployment for Sustainable Products,” Handbook of Sustainable Engineering, pp. 285–300, 2013.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Facca, A. G., Kortschot, M. T., and Yan, N., “Predicting the Elastic Modulus of Natural Fibre Reinforced Thermoplastics,” Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, Vol. 37, No. 10, pp. 1660–1671, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Renner, O., Krahl, M., Lepper, M., and Hufenbach, W., “Stabilizer Bar of Fiber Reinforced Plastic Composite and Method for Its Manufacture,” US Patent, 8668212 B2, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Topaç, M. M., Enginar, H. E., and Kuralay, N., “Reduction of Stress Concentration at the Corner Bends of the Anti-Roll Bar by Using Parametric Optimisation,” Mathematical and Computational Applications, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 148–158, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Çaliskan, K., “Automated Design Analysis of Anti-Roll Bars,” Middle East Technical University, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mao, Z., Chen, D., Jiang, S., Zhao, Z., and Yang, G., “Study on Fatigue Rupture of Automotive Rear Stabilizer-Bar,” SAE Technical Paper, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Prawoto, Y., Djuansjah, J., Tawi, K., and Fanone, M., “Tailoring Microstructures: A Technical Note on an Eco-Friendly Approach to Weight Reduction through heat Treatment,” Materials & Design, Vol. 50, pp. 635–645, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bayrakceken, H., Tasgetiren, S., and Aslantas, K., “Fracture of an Automobile Anti-Roll Bar,” Engineering Failure Analysis, Vol. 13, No. 5, pp. 732–738, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Doody, M., “Design and Development of a Composite Automotive Anti-Roll Bar,” University of Windsor, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Dhingra, R. and Das, S., “Life Cycle Energy and Environmental Evaluation of Downsized vs. Lightweight Material Automotive Engines,” Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 85, pp. 347–358, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Marzbanrad, J. and Yadollahi, A., “Fatigue Life of an Anti-Roll Bar of a Passenger Vehicle,” International Journal of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 204–210, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Shinde, P. and Patnaik, M., “Parametric Optimization to Reduce Stress Concentration at Corner Bends of Solid and Hollow Stabilizer Bar,” International Journal of Research in Aeronautical and Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 1–15, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Al-Oqla, F. M., Sapuan, S., Ishak, M., and Nuraini, A., “Predicting the Potential of Agro Waste Fibers for Sustainable Automotive Industry Using a Decision Making Model,” Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, Vol. 113, pp. 116–127, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Granta Design, CES Edupack, 2014.

  31. Kakou, C., Arrakhiz, F., Trokourey, A., Bouhfid, R., Qaiss, A., et al., “Influence of Coupling Agent Content on the Properties of High Density Polyethylene Composites Reinforced with Oil Palm Fibers,” Materials & Design, Vol. 63, pp. 641–649, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Sood, M., Dharmpal, D., and Gupta, V., “Effect of Fiber Chemical Treatment on Mechanical Properties of Sisal Fiber/Recycled HDPE Composite,” Materials Today: Proceedings, Vol. 2, Nos. 4-5, pp. 3149–3155, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Yao, F., Wu, Q., Lei, Y., and Xu, Y., “Rice Straw Fiber-Reinforced High-Density Polyethylene Composite: Effect of Fiber Type and Loading,” Industrial Crops and Products, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 63–72, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Arrakhiz, F., El Achaby, M., Kakou, A., Vaudreuil, S., Benmoussa, K., et al., “Mechanical Properties of High Density Polyethylene Reinforced with Chemically Modified Coir Fibers: Impact of Chemical Treatments,” Materials & Design, Vol. 37, pp. 379–383, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Li, Y., Du, L., Kai, C., Huang, R., and Wu, Q., “Bamboo and High Density Polyethylene Composite with Heat-Treated Bamboo Fiber: Thermal Decomposition Properties,” Bio Resources, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 900–912, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ku, H., Wang, H., Pattarachaiyakoop, N., and Trada, M., “A Review on the Tensile Properties of Natural Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composites,” Composites Part B: Engineering, Vol. 42, No. 4, pp. 856–873, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Facca, A. G., Kortschot, M. T., and Yan, N., “Predicting the Tensile Strength of Natural Fibre Reinforced Thermoplastics,” Composites Science and Technology, Vol. 67, No. 11, pp. 2454–2466, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Mansor, M., Sapuan, S., Salim, M., Akop, M., and Tahir, M., “Modeling of Kenaf Reinforced Sugar Palm Starch Biocomposites Mechanical Behaviour Using Halpin-Tsai Model,” Recent Advances in Environment, Ecosystems and Development, pp. 94–99, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  39. El-Shekeil, Y., Sapuan, S., Khalina, A., Zainudin, E., and Al-Shuja'a, O., “Effect of Alkali Treatment on Mechanical and Thermal Properties of Kenaf Fiber-Reinforced Thermoplastic Polyurethane Composite,” Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, Vol. 109, No. 3, pp. 1435–1443, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Sharma, N. K. and Kumar, V., “Studies on Properties of Banana Fiber Reinforced Green Composite,” Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, Vol. 32, No. 8, pp. 525–532, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Zia, K. M., Bhatti, H. N., and Bhatti, I. A., “Methods for Polyurethane and Polyurethane Composites, Recycling and Recovery: A Review,” Reactive and Functional Polymers, Vol. 67, No. 8, pp. 675–692, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Dwan'isa, J.-P. L., Mohanty, A., Misra, M., Drzal, L., and Kazemizadeh, M., “Biobased Polyurethane and Its Composite with Glass Fiber,” Journal of Materials Science, Vol. 39, No. 6, pp. 2081–2087, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Suresha, B., “Friction and Dry Slide Wear of Short Glass Fiber Reinforced Thermoplastic Polyurethane Composites,” Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, Vol. 29, No. 7, pp. 1055–1061, 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Zo, H. J., Joo, S. H., Kim, T., Seo, P. S., Kim, J. H., et al., “Enhanced Mechanical and Thermal Properties of Carbon Fiber Composites with Polyamide and Thermoplastic Polyurethane Blends,” Fibers and Polymers, Vol. 15, No. 5, pp. 1071–1077, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. T. Mastura.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mastura, M.T., Sapuan, S.M., Mansor, M.R. et al. Materials selection of thermoplastic matrices for ‘green’ natural fibre composites for automotive anti-roll bar with particular emphasis on the environment. Int. J. of Precis. Eng. and Manuf.-Green Tech. 5, 111–119 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-018-0012-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-018-0012-y

Keywords

Navigation