Skip to main content
Log in

‘Ancient episteme’ and the nature of fossils: a correction of a modern scholarly error

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Beginning the nineteenth-century and continuing down to the present, many authors writing on the history of geology and paleontology have attributed the theory that fossils were inorganic formations produced within the earth, rather than by the deposition of living organisms, to the ancient Greeks and Romans. Some have even gone so far as to claim this was the consensus view in the classical period up through the Middle Ages. In fact, such a notion was entirely foreign to ancient and medieval thought and only appeared within the manifold of ‘Renaissance episteme,’ the characteristics of which have often been projected backwards by some historians onto earlier periods. This paper endeavors to correct this error, explain the development of the Renaissance view, describe certain ancient precedents thereof, and trace the history of the misinterpretation in the literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. ‘DK’ refers to the Diels-Kranz numbering of the fragments of the Presocratics.

  2. Like many prevalent beliefs of antiquity that strike modern ears as ludicrous, the notion of spontaneous generation had strong (but incomplete) evidence in its favor. Aristotle, for example, was aware of fishermen’s testimony that they had never seen a juvenile eel, nor one carrying eggs; and he noticed in his own dissections that eels lack sex organs. From this he reasonably inferred that eels can thus be “neither male nor female, and can engender nothing,” and concluded that they “are derived from the so-called ‘earth’s guts’ that grow spontaneously in mud and in humid ground.” (Hist. An. 538a3, 570a16–17; cf. Plutarch, Moralia 637e). It was not until 1859 that Louis Pasteur finally buried the notion of spontaneous generation, and it wasn’t until the twentieth century that it was discovered that European eels migrate thousands of miles to breed in the Sargasso Sea, developing their sex organs along the way. The adult eels spawn and die there and the young undergo several metamorphoses before returning to European waters.

  3. Lister says: “we will easily believe, that in some Countries, and particularly along the shores of the Mediterranean Sea, there may be found all manner of Sea shells promiscuously included in Rocks or Earth, and at good distances from the Sea.” (Lister 1671, VI. 2282) John Ray concurred on this point with Lister, noting the fossils found in England and Flanders vary so much from place to place, both in type and in quantity, that is seems more liked that they are formed in situ by conditions specific to the place, rather than mixed up and laid down generally, as one would otherwise expect in an oceanic environment.

  4. In a similar manner, Renaissance mineralogy was grounded in a sexual rather than mechanical conceptual framework, much of which derived from the Stoic notion of logoi spermatikoi as transmitted by Plotinus. See Enneads, IV.3.10. Cf. Oldroyd 1974, 130–3.

  5. Rudwick claims that “Steno felt no sense of strain in accommodating his six-phase geological history of Tuscany within the bounds of conventional chronology…So far was he from feeling he had to compress his history into an embarrassingly short time-scale, that his arguments show precisely the opposite concern, namely that he might be ridiculed for placing his events at such a great antiquity.” (Rudwick 1976, p. 72. Cf. Rudwick 2014, pp. 45f–6) I am unsure of how to interpret this passage in the manner Rudwick suggests, as Steno here is clearly concerned with the potential excess of time fossil bearing beds imply. Oldroyd concurs with this assessment. (Oldroyd 1996, p. 67).

  6. Pliny mentions glossopetrae. (Nat. hist. xxxvii.10) Steno was not the first to recognize the true origin of glossopetrae; the claim had been made earlier by Fabio Colonna and by Conrad Gessner; see Adams 1938, p. 117; Rudwick 1976, pp. 30–1, 42–3. He was, however, the first to prove it by detailed analysis. Among many arguments, Steno showed that the fossilized teeth often showed signs of decay (Rudwick 1976, p. 50; Oldroyd 1996, p. 63). Steno’s work on fossils quickly attracted noticed and appeared in English translation in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. (Rudwick 1976, 53) Cf. V. A. Eyles, “The Influence of Nicholaus Steno on the Development of Geological Science in Britain,” in Nicholaus Steno and His Indice, ed. G. Sherz (Copenhagen: Munksgaard, 1958): 167–188. Hooke also examined fossilized wood under the newly invented microscope and noted that it showed a mineralized lattice of cells similar to that seen in living plants. (Rudwick 2014, p. 40).

  7. This full title of the treatise is De juventute et senectute, De vita et morte, De respiratione. The division into sections is not given in the manuscript, but the latter part, De respiratione, is commonly regarded as pseudo-Aristotelian, while the former is regarded as authentic.

  8. Adams’ spurious reference to De respiration has proliferated on the literature; see Tom McCann, The Geology of Central Europe. (Bath: The Geological Society Publishing House, 2008), 1.

  9. In spite of his claim that most ancient writers supported the endogenic theory, Adams correctly interprets this passage. (Adams 1938, pp. 17, 81).

  10. I’d like to thank Staffan Müller-Wille for noting this point.

  11. Other examples include: Rudwick, Worlds Before Adam (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2008); Davis Young & Ralph Stearley, The Bible, Rocks and Time (Downers Grove: IVP Academic, 2008), 28–30.

References

  • Adams, F. D. (1938). The birth and development of the geological sciences. Baltimore: William & Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agricola, G. (1955). De natura fossilarum (M. Chance & J. Bandy, Trans.). New York: Geological Society of America.

  • Albury, W. R., & Oldroyd, D. R. (1977). From Renaissance mineral studies to historical geology, in the light of Michel Foucault’s ‘the order of things’. British Journal for the History of Science, 10, 187–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, D. (1986). Dante and the form of the land. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 76, 38–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alighieri, D. (1987). A question of the water and of the land (C. H. Bromby, Trans.). London: David Nutt.

  • Allaby, M. (2009). Earth science: A scientific history of the solid Earth. New York: Facts on File.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arezzo, R. D. (1859). In E. Narducci (Ed.), La composizione del mondo di Ristoro d’Arezzo. Rome: Tipografia delle Scienze Mathematiche e Fisiche.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ariew, R. (1991). A new science of geology in the seventeenth century? In P. Barker & R. Ariew (Eds.), Revolution and continuity. Washington: Catholic University of America Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle, (1951). Metrologica (H. D. P. Lee, Trans.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  • Aristotle, (1984). Complete works. Princeton: Princeton Univeristy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnim, HV. (1903–1905). Stoicorum veterum fragmenta. Stuttgart: Teubner.

  • Augustine, (1984). City of God (H. Bettenson, Trans.). New York: Penguin Books.

  • Avicenna, (1927). De congelatione et conglutinatione lapidum (E. J. Holmyard, Trans.). Paris: Paul Geuthner.

  • Balme, D. (1939). Greek science and mechanism I. Classical Quarterly, 33, 129–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balme, D. (1962). Development of biology in Aristotle and Theophrastus: Theory of spontaneous generation. Phronesis, 7, 91–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, J. (1979). The presocratic Philosophers (Vol. 2). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrow, M. V. (2009). Nature’s ghosts: Confronting extinction from the age of Jefferson to the age of ecology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bentley, R. (1693). The folly and unreasonableness of atheism. London: J.H.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berryman, S. (2007). Teleology without tears: Aristotle and the role of mechanistic conceptions of organisms. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 37, 351–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulanger, N.-A. (1754). Déluge. Encyclopédie ou Dictionnaire Raisonné des Sciences, des Arts et des Métiers (M. Eden, Trans.). The Encyclopedia of Diderot and d’Alembert Collaborative Translation Project. Ann Arbor: Michigan Publishing, University of Michigan Library, 2009. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.did2222.0000.850. Accessed December 24, 2014.

  • Bowler, P. (1992). The Earth encompassed: A history of the environmental sciences. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer, R. (2015). Stoic sympathy. In E. Schliesser (Ed.), Sympathy: A history (pp. 15–35). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Burnet, T. (1719). The sacred theory of the Earth. London: John Hooke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caley, E., & Richards, J. (Eds.). (1956). Theophrastus on stones. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassirer, E. (1963). The individual and the cosmos in Renaissance philosophy (M. Domandi, Trans.). New York: Harper & Row.

  • Clericuzio, A. (2000). Elements, principles and corpuscles: A study of atomism and chemistry in the seventeenth century. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, C. (1998). Un manuscrit inédit de Leibniz (1646–1716) sur la nature des ‘objets fossiles. Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France, 169, 137–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, K. B. (1934). Cosmogonies of our Fathers. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, A. H. (2009). Nicolaus steno and the problem of deep time. Memoir Geological Society of America, 203, 143–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalrymple, B. G. (1991). The age of the Earth. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Digby, K. (1664). A late discourse. London: JG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dod, B. G. (1982). Aristoteles latinus. In N. Kretzmann, et al. (Eds.), The Cambridge history of later medieval philosophy (pp. 45–79). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duhem, P. (1906). Études sur Léonard de Vinci. Paris: A. Hermann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eicher, D. (1968). Geologic time. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emiliani, C. (1992). Planet Earth: Cosmology, geology, and the evolution of life and environment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emilsson, E. (2015). Plotinus on sympatheia. In E. Schliesser (Ed.), Sympathy: A history (pp. 36–60). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Engels, D. (1985). The length of Eratosthenes’ stade. American Journal of Philology, 106, 298–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, J. (2000). An introduction to fossils and minerals. New York: Facts on File.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1970). The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furley, D. J. (1989). Cosmic problems: Essays on Greek and Roman philosophy of nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, C. C. (1951). Genesis and geology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gotthelf, A. (2012). Teleology, first principles, and scientific method in Aristotle’s biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J. (1987). Time’s arrow, time’s cycle. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, D. W. (Ed.). (2010). The texts of early Greek philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R. M. (1952). Miracle and natural law in graeco-roman and early christian thought. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, A. (2007). Ancient Greek cosmogony. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutas, D. (1985). The life, works and sayings of theophrastus in the arabic tradition. In W. W. Fortenbaugh, P. M. Huby, & A. A. Long (Eds.), Theophrastus of Eresus. New Brunswick: Transaction Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, W. C. K. (1957). In the beginning: Some Greek views of the origin of life and the early state of Man. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, W. C. K. (1962). A history of Greek philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haber, F. C. (1959). The age of the World: Moses to Darwin. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harkness, D. E. (2007). The jewel house: Elizabethan London and the scientific revolution. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J. (1697). Remarks on some late papers. London: R. Wilkin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, D. (2003). Themistius and spontaneous generation in Aristotle’s metaphysics. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 24, 183–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herodotus, (2007). The histories (A. L. Purvis, Trans.). Pantheon: New York.

  • Hirai, H. (2008). Logoi Spermatikoi and the concept of seeds in the mineralogy and cosmology of Paracelsus. Revue de Historie des Sciences, 61, 245–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, A. (1913). The age of the Earth. London: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooke, R. (1705). Lectures and discourses of earthquakes. In R. Waller (Ed.), The posthumous works of Robert Hooke M.D. London: Royal Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D. (1967–1968). The conflict between spontaneous generation and Aristotle’s. In Metaphysics. Proceedings of the Inter-American Congress of Philosophy, 7 (pp. 244–250).

  • Hutton, J. (1788). Theory of the Earth. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 1, 209–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ierodiakonou, A. (2006). The Greek concept of sympatheia and its Byzantine appropriation by Michael Psellos. In P. Magdalino & M. Mavroudi (Eds.), The Occult Sciences in Byzantium (pp. 97–117). Geneva: La Pomme d’or.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, C. (1994). Anaximander and the origins of Greek cosmology. Indianapolis: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kircher, A. (1664–1665). Mundus subterraneus., (Vol. 2). Amsterdam: Joannem Janssonium & Elizeum Weyerstraten.

  • Klibansky, R. (1982). The continuity of the platonic tradition during the middle ages. London: Kraus International Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koutsoukos, E. (2007). Applied stratigraphy. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krynine, P. D. (1960). On the antiquity of sedimentation and hydrology. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 71, 1721–1726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laertius, D. (1925). Lives of the eminent philosophers (R. D. Hicks, Trans.) (Vol. 2). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  • Lapidge, M. (1978). Stoic cosmology. In J. M. Rist (Ed.), The stoics. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudan, R. (1987). From mineralogy to geology: The foundations of a science, 1650–1830. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Leibniz, G. W. (2008). Protogaea (C. Cohen & A. Wakefield, Trans.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

  • Lennox, J. G. (2001). Aristotle’s philosophy of biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindberg, D. C., & Shank, M. H. (2015). Introduction. In D. C. Lindberg & M. H. Shank (Eds.), The Cambridge history of science (pp. 1–26). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lister, M. (1671). Philosophical transactions. London: John Martyn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucretius, C. T. (1975). De rerum natura , (W. H. D. Rouse, Trans.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  • Lyell, C. (1872). Principes of geology (11th ed.). New York: D. Appleton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maclean, I. (1998). Foucault’s Renaissance episteme reassessed: An Aristotelian counterblast. Journal of the History of Ideas, 59, 149–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnus, A. (1967). Book of minerals (D. Wyckoff, Trans.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • Manfredi, E. (1745). De aucta maris altitudine. In Commentarii. Bologna.

  • Mayor, A. (2000). The first fossil hunters: Paleontology in Greek and Roman times. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. (1982). The growth of biological thought: Diversity, evolution, and inheritance. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morello, N. (2006). Steno, the fossils, the rocks, and the calendar of the Earth. In G. Battista Vai & W. G. F. Caldwell (Eds.), The origins of geology in Italy. Boulder: The Geological Society of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mourelatos, A. (2006). The concept of the universal in some later pre-platonic cosmologists. In M. L. Gill & P. Pellegrin (Eds.), A companion to ancient philosophy (pp. 57–76). Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyer, A. (2015). Sympathy in the Renaissance. In E. Schliesser (Ed.), Sympathy: A history (pp. 70–101). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, J. (2009). The providence of mineral generation in the sermons of Johann Mathesius (1504–1565). In M. Kölbl-Ebery (Ed.), Geology and religion: A history of harmony and hostility (pp. 37–40). Bath: The Geological Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldroyd, D. (1974). Some neo-platonic and stoic influences on mineralogy in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. Ambix, 21, 128–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oldroyd, D. (1996). Thinking about the earth: A history of ideas in geology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orosius, P. (1936). History against the Pagans (I. W. Raymond, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.

  • Paracelsus, (1999). Essential readings (N. Goodrick-Clarke, Trans.). Berkeley: North Atlantic Books.

  • Peters, E. (1978). The magician, the witch, and the law. Philadelphia: The University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philostratus, (2014). Herocius, gymnasticus, discourses 1 and 2 (J. Rusten & J. König, Trans.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  • Plato, (1997). Introduction. In J. M. Cooper (Ed.), Complete works. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Playfair, J. (1805). Biographical account of the Late James Hutton F.R.S. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 5, 39–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pliny, (1940). Natural history (H. Rackham, et al., Trans.) (Vol. 10). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  • Plotinus, (1984). Enneads (A. H. Armstrong, Trans.) (Vol. 7). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Plutarch, (1927). Moralia (F. C. Babbitt, et al., Trans.) (Vol. 16). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  • Popper, K. (1998). The world of Parmenides. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powers, N. (2012). The stoic argument for the rationality of the cosmos. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 43, 245–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, R. (1997). When geologists were historians, 1665–1750. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, J. (1713). Three physico-theological discourses. London: William Innys.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, J. (1759). Wisdom of God manifested in the works of the creation (Vol. 2). London: William Innys.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, J. (1783). Travels through the low Countries (Vol. 2). London: J. Walthoe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riddle, J., & Mulholland, J. (1980). Albert on stones and minerals. In J. A. Weisheipl (Ed.), Albertus Magnus and the sciences. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, P. (1984). The dark abyss of time (L. G. Cochrane, Trans.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

  • Rudwick, M. J. S. (1964). Problems in the recognition of fossils as organic remains (pp. 985–987). Paris: Actes, Xme Congrès International de l’Histoire des Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudwick, M. J. S. (1976). The meaning of fossils: Episodes in the history of paleontology. New York: Science History Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudwick, M. J. S. (2008). Worlds Before Adam. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

  • Rudwick, M. J. S. (2014). Earth’s deep history: How it was discovered and why it matters. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sambursky, S. (1959). Physics of the stoics. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • See, T. J. J. (1907). On the temperature, secular cooling and contraction of the Earth. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 46, 191–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellars, J. (2014). Stoicism. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sextus, E. (1933). Outlines of pyrrhonism (R. G. Bury, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Sextus, E. (1935). Against logicians (R. G. Bury, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Sextus, E. (1936). Against physicists (R. G. Bury, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Sextus, E. (1949). Against professors (R. G. Bury, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Sharples, R. W. (1988). Some aspects of the secondary tradition of Theophrastus’ Opuscula. In W. Fortenbaugh & R. Sharples (Eds.), Theophrastean studies. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharples, R. W. (1992). Theophrastus: On fish. In W. Fortenbaugh & D. Gutas (Eds.), Theophrastus: His psychological, doxographical, and scientific writings. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharples, R. W. (2010). Peripatetic philosophy 200BC to AD 200: An introduction and collection of sources in translation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sorabji, R. (2005). The philosophy of the commentators: 200–600 AD (Vol. 3). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steno, N. (2013). In T. Kardel & P. Maquet (Eds.), Biography and original papers of a 17th century Scientist. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strabo, (1929). Geography (H. L. Jones, Trans.) (Vol. 8). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  • Taylor, C. C. W. (1999). The atomists. In A. A. Long (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to early Greek philosophy (pp. 181–204). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Throndike, L. (1923–1958). A history of magic and experimental science. New York: Columbia University Press.

  • Toulmin, S., & Goodfield, J. (1965). The discovery of time. London: Hutchinson & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevor-Roper, H. (1967). Witches and Witchcraft. Encounter, 28, 3–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickers, B. (1992). Critical reactions to the occult sciences during the Renaissance. The Scientific Enterprise, 146, 43–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vinci, L. D. (1939). In E. MacCurdy (Ed.), The notebooks of Leonardo Da Vinci. New York: Reynal & Hitchcock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, L. F. (1885). Sketch of palaeobotany. Annual Report of the United States Geological Survey, 5, 363–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whewell, W. (1837). History of the inductive sciences. London: John W. Parker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiston, W. (1737). A new theory of the earth. London: Benjamin Tooke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witty, J. (1705). An essay towards the vindication of the vulgar exposition of the mosaic history (Vol. 2). London: John Wyat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, L. (2009). Evolutions’ fatal flaw. Bloomington: iUniverse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, L. (2010). Evolution and the future of mankind. Bloomington: iUniverse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, J. (1695). An essay toward a natural history of the earth. London: Wilkin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, D. A., & Stearley, R. F. (2008). The Bible, rocks and time (pp. 28–30). Downers Grove: IVP Academic.

  • Zittel, K. V. (1901). History of geology and palaeontology (M. Ogilvie-Gordon, Trans.). Walter-Scott: London.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. M. Jordan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jordan, J.M. ‘Ancient episteme’ and the nature of fossils: a correction of a modern scholarly error. HPLS 38, 90–116 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-015-0094-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-015-0094-6

Keywords

Navigation