Abstract
Gender-based segmentation is frequently used by marketers to cater to different needs and preferences of men and women. However, the literature in consumer behaviour has not explored enough the role of gender in decision-making. Specifically, there are hardly any studies that investigate the decision-making styles of Indian male and female consumers. Based on gender and sociocultural theories, this study develops and tests hypotheses on gender-based differences in decision-making styles, including hedonism, novelty consciousness, price value consciousness and brand loyalty orientation. Analysis of data obtained from 355 male and 203 female students through self-administered questionnaire indicates that women score higher than men on hedonism, novelty orientation and price value consciousness. No significant difference was found on the dimension of brand loyalty. The study contributes to the consumer behaviour research by highlighting the differences in decision-making styles of Indian millennial men and women. The results can help marketers to employ gender-based segmentation and target more effectively. The study provides insights that firms can use in framing product, pricing and communication strategies catering to the requirements of a specific gender.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allison N, Golden L, Mullet G, Coogan D (1980) Sex-typed product images: the effects of sex, sex role self-concept and measurement implications. In Olson J. (ed) Advances in consumer research, vol 7, pp 604–609
Alreck PL (1994) Commentary: a new formula for gendering products and brands. J Prod Brand Manag 3(1):6–18
Alreck P, Settle RB (2002) Gender effects on internet, catalogue and store shopping. J Database Manag 9(January):150–162
Anne FL, Bisakha S, Kilgore ML, Locher JL (2014) The influence of gender, age, education and household size on meal preparation and food shopping responsibilities. Public Health Nutr 17(9):2061–2070
Arora S, Singhai M, Patel R (2011) Gender and education determinants of individualism–collectivism: a study of future managers. Indian J Ind Relat 47(2):321–328
Atkins KG, Kim Y-K (2012) Smart shopping: conceptualization and measurement. Int J Retail Distrib Manag 40(5):360–375
Baker JA, Parasuraman GD, Voss GB (2002) The influence of multiple store environment cues on perceived merchandise value and patronage intentions. J Mark 66(2):120–141
Bakewell C, Mitchell V (2006) Male versus female consumer decision making styles. J Bus Res 59:1297–1300
Belk RW (1988) Possessions and the extended-self. J Consum Res 15(2):139–168
Bellenger DN, Korgaonkar PK (1980) Profile the recreational shopper. J Retail 56(3):77–92
Bem SL (1981) Gender schema theory: a cognitive account of sex typing. Psychol Rev 88(4):354–364
Brewer MB, Gardner W (1996) Who is this “we”? Levels of collective identity and self-representations. J Pers Soc Psychol 71:83–93
Brosdahl DJ, Carpenter JM (2011) Shopping orientations of US males: a generational cohort comparison. J Retail Consum Serv 18:548–554
Buhrmester D (1996) Need fulfillment, interpersonal competence and the developmental contexts of early adolescent friendship. In: Bukowski WM, Newcomb AF, Hartup WW (eds) The company they keep: friendship in childhood and adolescence. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 158–185
Burton S, Netemeyer RG, Lichtenstein DR (1994) Gender differences for appearance-related attitudes and behavior: implications for consumer welfare. J Public Policy Mark 13(2):60–75
Buttle F (1992) Shopping motives constructionist perspective. Serv Ind J 12(3):349–367
Cleveland M, Babin BJ, Laroche M, Ward P, Bergeron J (2003) Information search patterns for gift purchases: a cross-national examination of gender differences. J Consum Behav 3(September):20–47
Cross SE, Madson L (1997) Models of the self: self-construals and gender. Psychol Bull 122:5–37
Dholakia RR (1999) Going shopping: key determinants of shopping behaviors and motivations. Int J Retail Distrib Manag 27(4):154–165
Dittmar H (1989) Gender identity-related meanings of personal possessions. Br J Soc Psychol 28:159–171
Durvasula S, Lysonski S, Andrews JC (1993) Cross-cultural generalizability of a scale for profiling consumers’ decision-making styles. J Consum Aff 27(1):55–65
Eagly AH (1987) Sex differences in social behavior: a social-role interpretation. Erlbaum, Hillsdale
Eisinga R, Grotenhuis M, Pelzer B (2013) The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach, or Spearman-Brown? Int J Public Health 58(4):637–642
Fan JX, Xiao JJ (1998) Consumer decision-making styles of young-adult Chinese. J Consum Aff 32(2):275–294
Fischer E, Arnold SJ (1994) Sex, gender identity, gender role attitudes and consumer behavior. Psychol Mark 11:163–182
Fischer E, Gainer B (1991) I shop therefore I am: the role of shopping in the social construction of women’s identities. In: Gender and consumer behavior: proceedings of the conference on gender and consumer behavior. University of Utah Printing Service, Salt Lake City, pp 350–357
Gorsuch RL (1983) Factor analysis, 2nd edn. Erlbaum, Hillsdale
Gould SJ, Stern BB (1989) Gender schema and fashion consciousness. Psychol Mark 6:129–145
Grewal D, Baker J, Levy M, Voss G (2003) The effects of wait expectations and store atmosphere evaluations on patronage intentions in service-intensive retail stores. J Retail 79:259–268
Hafstrom JL, Chae JS, Chung YS (1992) Consumer decision-making styles: comparison between United States and Korean young consumers. J Consum Aff 26(1):146–158
Hanzaee KH, Aghasibeig S (2008) Generation Y female and male decision-making styles in Iran: are they different? Int Rev Retail Distrib Consum Res 18(5):521–537
Harman SK, Hill CJ (2003) Gender and coupon use. J Prod Brand Manag 12(3):166–179
Hofstede G (1980) Culture’s consequences. Sage, Beverly Hills
Hofstede G (2001) Culture’s consequences: comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks
Hui A, Siu N, Wang C, Chang L (2001) An investigation of decision-making styles of consumers in China. J Consum Aff 35(2):326–345
IBEF (2019) About Indian economy growth rate and statistics. https://www.ibef.org/economy/indian-economy-overview. Retrieved February 01, 2019
IMF (2018) India’s strong economy continues to lead global growth, August 8, 2018. https://www.imf.org/en/News/Articles/2018/08/07/NA080818-India-Strong-Economy-Continues-to-Lead-Global-Growth. Retrieved February 01, 2019
Jenner S, MacNab B, Briley D, Brislin R, Worthley Reg (2008) Cultural change and marketing. J Glob Mark 21(2):161–172
Kaiser S, Lennon S, Damhorst M (1991) Forum: gendered appearances in twentieth-century popular media. Dress 18:49–53
Kaltcheva VD, Weitz BA (2006) When should a retailer create an exciting store environment? J Mark 70(1):107–118
Kashima ES, Hardie EA (2000) The development and validation of the relational, individual and collective self-aspects (RIC) scale. Asian J Soc Psychol 3:19–48
Kempf DAS, Palan KM, Laczniak RN (1997) Gender differences in information processing confidence in an advertising context: a preliminary study. Adv Consum Res 24:443–449
Kim W, Di Benedetto CA, Lancioni RA (2011) The effects of country and gender differences on consumer innovativeness and decision processes in a highly globalized high-tech product market. Asia Pac J Mark Logist 23(5):714–744
Knowledge@Wharton (2007) ‘Men buy, women shop’: the sexes have different priorities when walking down the aisles, November 28, 2007. http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article/men-buy-women-shop-the-sexes-have-different-priorities-when-walking-down-the-aisles/. Retrieved June 24, 2018
Kruger D, Byker D (2009) Sex differences in shopping experiences and behaviors. J Soc Evol Cult Psychol 3(4):315–327
Lysonski S, Durvasula S (2013) Consumer decision making styles in retailing: evolution of mindsets and psychological impacts. J Consum Mark 30(1):75–87
Lysonski S, Durvasula S, Zotos Y (1996) Consumer decision-making styles: a multi-country investigation. Eur J Mark 30(12):10–21
Maccoby EE (1990) Gender and relationships: a developmental account. Am Psychol 45:513–520
Madson L, Trafimow D (2001) Gender comparisons in the private, collective and allocentric selves. J Soc Psychol 141:551–559
Mazumdar T, Papatla P (1995) Gender difference in price promotion response. Pricing Strategy Pract 3(1):21–33
Mehta R, Dixit G (2016) Consumer decision making styles in developed and developing markets: a cross-country comparison. J Retail Consum Serv 33:202–208
Mehta R, Sharma NK, Swami S (2014) A typology of Indian hypermarket shoppers based on shopping motivation. Int J Retail Distrib Manag 42:40–55
Melnyk V, van Osselaer SMJ (2012) Make me special: gender differences in consumers’ responses to loyalty programs. Mark Lett 23(3):545–559
Meyers-Levy J, Sternthal B (1991) Gender differences in the use of message cues and judgments. J Mark Res 28(February):84–96
Miller D (1998) A theory of shopping. Cornell University Press, Ithaca
Mirrlees T (2015) A critique of the millennial: a retreat from and return to class. Altern Routes: J Crit Soc Res 26:277–304
Mitchell, Bates L (1998) UK Consumer Decision-Making Styles. J Mark Manage 14(1–3):199–225. https://doi.org/10.1362/026725798784959345
Mitchell VW, Walsh G (2004) Gender differences in German consumer decision-making styles. J Consum Behav 3(4):331–346
Noble SM, Griffith DA, Adjei MT (2006) Drivers of local merchant loyalty: understanding the influence of gender and shopping motives. J Retail 82(3):177–188
OECD (2018) Economic outlook for Southeast Asia, China and India 2019: towards smart urban transportation. OECD Publishing, Paris
Park YA, Gretzel U (2010) Influence of consumers’ online decision-making style on comparison shopping proneness and perceived usefulness of comparison shopping tools. J Electron Commer Res 11(4):342–354
Park JE, Yu J, Zhou JX (2010) Consumer innovativeness and shopping styles. J Consum Mark 27(5):437–446
Seock YK, Bailey LR (2008) The influence of college students’ shopping orientations and gender differences on online information searches and purchase behaviors. Int J Consum Stud 32:113–121
Siu N, Hui A (2001) Consumer decision-making styles in China: a cross-cultural validation. Asia Pac Adv Consum Res 4:258–262
Solka A, Jackson P, Lee M (2011) The influence of gender and culture on Generation Y consumer decision making styles. Int Rev Retail Distrib Consum Res 21(4):391–409
Solomon M (1983) The Role of Products as Social Stimuli: A Symbolic Interactionism Perspective. J Consum Res 10(3):319–329. Retrieved July 27 2020, from www.jstor.org/stable/2488804
Solomon MR, Schopler J (1982) Self-consciousness and clothing. Pers Soc Psycho Bull 8(3):508–514. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167282083018
Sproles GB, Kendall EL (1986) A methodology for profiling consumers’ decision-making styles. J Consum Aff 20(2):267–279
Tafarodi RW, Marshall TC, Katsura H (2004) Standing Out in Canada and Japan. J Pers 72(4):785–814. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00280.x
Tai SHC (2005) Shopping styles of working Chinese females. J Retail Consum Serv 12:191–203
Tang EPY, Chin IOK (2007) Analyzing variety seeking behavior using panel data. J Int Consum Mark 19(4):7–31
Underhill P (2005) Call of the Mall. Simon Schuster, New York
van Rompay TJL, Tanja-Dijkstra K, Verhoeven JWM, van Es AF (2012) On store design and consumer motivation: spatial control and arousal in the retail context. Environ Behav 44(6):800–820
Walsh G, Mitchell V-W, Henning T (2001) German consumer decision-making styles. J Consum Aff 35(1):73–95
Wang C-L, Siu NYM, Hui ASY (2004) Consumer decision-making styles on domestic and imported brand clothing. Eur J Mark 38(1/2):239–252
Wesley S, LeHew M, Woodside AG (2006) Consumer decision-making styles and mall shopping behavior: building theory using exploratory data analysis and the comparative method. J Bus Res 59(5):535–548
Wilkinson-Weber C (2005) Tailoring expectations: how film costumes become the audience’s clothes. South Asian Pop Cult 3(2):135–159
Workman JE, Cho S (2013) Gender, fashion consumer group, need for touch and Korean apparel consumers’ shopping channel preference. Int J Consum Stud 37(5):522–529
Yamaoka S (1995) Uniqueness seeking behavior as self-verification: an alternative approach to the study of uniqueness. Shinrigaku Kenkyu: Japan J Psychol 66(2):107–115. https://doi.org/10.4992/jjpsy.66.107
Yalch R, Spangenberg E (1993) Using store music for retail zoning: a field experiment. In: L. McAlister, M. Rothschild (eds) Advances in consumer research, vol 20, pp 632–636
Yoo B (2009) Cross-national invariance of the effect of personal collectivistic orientation on brand loyalty and equity: the United States versus South Korean consumers. Asia Pac J Mark Logist 21(1):41–57
Zeithaml VA (1988) Consumer perceptions of price, quality and value: a means–end model and synthesis of evidence. J Mark 52(3):2–22
Acknowledgements
The author is grateful to the editor and the anonymous reviewers for their valuable feedback, which significantly improved the presentation of this paper.
Funding
The author(s) declare(s) that this research received no funding from any agency.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declare(s) that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix 1
Principal components analysis (PCA)
PCA uses dependencies between the variables to extract a small number of factors from a larger number of interrelated variables. These factors termed as principal components are orthogonal linear combinations of the measured variables that maximize the total variance. The first factor is constructed such that it explains the largest portion of the total variance, the second that accounts for most of the residual variance and so on. For better interpretation of the extracted factors, we used varimax rotation wherein the original solution is rotated so as to get new factors that correlate well (near − 1 or 1) with some variables and close to zero with others. These correlations between the extracted factor and the variables termed as factor loadings help with factor interpretability.
Appendix 2
Cronbach’s alpha
The coefficient, Cronbach’s alpha, is used as a measure of reliability of a scale. The coefficient measures internal consistency that is how closely related are the different items of a scale. The value of the coefficient ranges from 0 to 1 with high values normally indicating that the items measure the same construct and the scale is internally consistent. The coefficient alpha is calculated as the average of all possible split-half reliability coefficients. In split-half reliability, the items on the scale are divided into two halves and the resulting half scores are used to get correlation coefficient. Cronbach’s alpha value of 0.6 or lower generally indicates unsatisfactory internal consistency reliability.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mehta, R. Gender-based differences in consumer decision-making styles: implications for marketers. Decision 47, 319–329 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40622-020-00252-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40622-020-00252-8