Abstract
The Italian Society of Nephrology has tasked its Working Group on Physical Exercise with developing a consensus statement document on physical activity and exercise in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). This paper consists of 16 points that were discussed, and approved using the mini-Delphi method by 15 members of the working group. Each statement is based on a comprehensive review of the literature, clinical experience, and expert opinions. Overall, the statements affirm that regular physical activity and exercise training offer numerous benefits to CKD patients, including improved physical function, enhanced cardiometabolic and neuromuscular function, cognitive benefits, and an overall improvement in quality of life. Furthermore, exercise may provide nephroprotection and reduce mortality. These advantages are observed across all CKD stages, whether on conservative therapy or kidney replacement therapy (hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis), and in kidney transplant recipients. Moreover, when physical activity and exercise training are implemented with appropriate precautions, they are safe in CKD patients. Gradual physical activity and customized exercise programs should be tailored to the patient's exercise tolerance, potentially enhancing compliance. Clinicians are encouraged to use a series of questionnaires and tests to assess the patient's level of physical activity and performance. However, exercise and physical activity are poorly implemented in clinical practice due to many barriers related to patients and healthcare staff. Overcoming these barriers requires the proactive role of the nephrologists, who should actively incorporate exercise training and promote physical activity within routine care plans. Adopting a multidisciplinary team approach, which includes nephrologists, nurses, exercise professionals, and dietitians, is crucial for providing comprehensive rehabilitation for CKD patients. Integrating new technologies and remote check ups could further enhance the effectiveness of these interventions.
Graphical abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The first recommendations in the field of physical activity and exercise in patients with chronic kidney diseases (CKD) were published in 2005 and were included in the Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) guidelines only for hemodialysis patients [1]. These guidelines state that nephrologists and hemodialysis staff should encourage all hemodialysis patients to maintain or increase their physical activity level, with a recommended goal of 30 min of moderate physical activity most days of the week.
In 2012, the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines [2] expanded the recommendation of physical activity to patients with CKD stages 3–5, suggesting at least 30 min 5 times a week based on the patient’s cardiovascular status and tolerance. However, these guidelines are adapted from the general population or other chronic conditions with more robust evidence than in the CKD setting. It is worth noting that patients with CKD differ from the general population or those with other chronic conditions in terms of physical capacity and comorbidities [3, 4], exhibiting wide heterogeneity in both underlying kidney diseases and different CKD stages. The presence of CKD itself, along with other comorbidities (e.g., physical inactivity, arterial hypertension, dyslipidemia, obesity, and diabetes), contributes to a high cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in CKD patients [5]. Nonetheless, in the Consensus Statement from EXercise Prescription in Everyday practice and Rehabilitative Training (EXPERT) Working Group, obesity, dyslipidemia, diabetes, and hypertension, but not CKD, were considered for exercise prescription in patients with different CVD risk factor combinations [6]. Similarly, the latest World Health Organization (WHO) Guidelines released in 2020 [7] are targeted at adults or older individuals with chronic conditions, including hypertension, diabetes, cancer, and HIV, but kidney disease is not specifically mentioned.
The first guidelines on exercise specifically for CKD populations, categorizing patients into conservative treatment, dialysis, or kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), were developed by the UK Kidney Research Consortium Clinical Study Group for exercise and lifestyle [8] in 2020. Similarly, the recommendations on physical activity in the updated KDIGO 2024 guidelines, with grade 1D evidence, were extended to all patients with CKD, and suggest advising patients to engage in moderate-intensity physical activity for at least 150 min per week, based on their cardiovascular and physical tolerance [9].
Nonetheless, it is crucial to emphasize that these recommendations are concise statements within guidelines lacking clinical practice suggestions. Firstly, as revealed by a scoping review of current recommendations on physical activity and exercise in dialysis patients, there are discrepancies in the terms used for exercise, physical activity, frequency, duration, intensity, and type [10]. Additionally, physical activity and exercise prescriptions should be tailored to each patient, considering factors such as physical function, comorbidities, space availability, and time to ensure that physical exercise is adequate, safe, and feasible [11]. Although further multicenter studies are needed to improve our knowledge in this field, the Italian Society of Nephrology has tasked the Working Group on Physical Exercise to develop a consensus statement document regarding physical activity and exercise in patients affected by CKD.
Methods
A comprehensive literature review was conducted, primarily focusing on original research due to the scarcity of systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials specifically addressing physical activity and exercise in CKD. Available guidelines and clinical practice recommendations were also reviewed.
Using the Estimate-Talk-Estimate (ETE) method, or “mini-Delphi” [12, 13], 20 points of interest were initially proposed by 15 experts and then harmonized with a facilitator, resulting in 16 final items. One statement was generated for each item based on an in-depth review of the evidence, clinical practice experience, and expert opinion. During a plenary session, the 16 final statements were thoroughly discussed and unanimously approved with a strong level of agreement among members of the Working Group. The workflow of the project is illustrated in Fig. 1.
Summary of statements
-
1.
"Physical activity" and "exercise" have distinct meanings and should be used accordingly.
-
2.
Physical inactivity is prevalent in CKD patients and represents a modifiable risk factor for increased mortality and morbidity, as well as for reduced quality of life
-
3.
Physical activity and exercise significantly benefit CKD patients, particularly in improving physical function, cardiorespiratory capacity, muscle strength, and overall quality of life.
-
4.
Physical exercise is safe in CKD patients when appropriately performed.
-
5.
Physical function assessment can be performed routinely through physical performance tests and patient-focused questionnaires.
-
6.
Monitoring physical activity levels using self-report instruments or objective measures is advisable to counteract sedentary behavior.
-
7.
Protein restriction does not blunt or prevent the favorable effects of exercise on muscle strength and mass in CKD patients.
-
8.
Dietary supplements combined with exercise are an effective strategy for preventing sarcopenia or protein-energy wasting in CKD patients, including those on dialysis.
-
9.
Barriers to physical activity in the CKD population are well known: each nephrology and dialysis unit needs to identify its center-specific barriers and establish a detailed plan for overcoming them.
-
10.
It is crucial to personalize physical activity prescriptions, which can be provided by a nephrologist, while in the presence of functional limitations, a physiotherapist or sports medicine physician consultation is generally needed.
-
11.
Exercise training for CKD patients can be undertaken alone or in groups, at home, in a dialysis unit, or in a sports facility.
-
12.
Exercise training for CKD patients should include aerobic and resistance exercises.
-
13.
Exercise programs should be carried out regularly for at least 12 weeks to be effective.
-
14.
Physical activity and exercise programs should begin at low intensity and progress gradually according to the patient's tolerance.
-
15.
In everyday clinical practice, renal rehabilitation should be provided by a healthcare team (nephrologists, nurses, dietitians, and exercise professionals) and, ideally, reimbursed by the national healthcare system.
-
16.
New technologies, such as interactive social media creation and virtual reality gaming, could improve CKD patients' adherence to exercise implementation.
"Physical activity" and "exercise" have distinct meanings and should be used accordingly
Rationale
The term “physical activity” refers to any movement of the body produced by the contraction of skeletal muscles that increases energy expenditure compared to the baseline value (e.g., walking, climbing stairs). In contrast, “exercise” is a planned, structured, repetitive form of physical activity intended to improve or maintain physical fitness [5].
Before prescribing any form of exercise, it is essential to assess physical function, which is defined by the patient’s ability to perform routine daily activities [14]. Physical function differs from physical fitness, which refers to a set of attributes that people have or achieve related to their ability to perform physical activity, including cardiorespiratory fitness, muscle strength, and flexibility [11]. In detail, cardiorespiratory fitness is the capacity of the circulatory and respiratory systems to deliver oxygen during sustained physical activity. It is typically expressed as maximal oxygen uptake during exercise testing [5].
Physical inactivity is prevalent in CKD patients and represents a modifiable risk factor for increased mortality and morbidity, as well as for reduced quality of life.
Rationale
There is no specific definition of "physical inactivity" (also referred to as sedentarism). Some authors define this term as an insufficient level of physical activity compared to current recommendations, although there are often limited details available for CKD patients [11, 15].
Physical inactivity is regarded as the underlying network responsible for the presence of disease clusters, such as diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, dementia, and depression, all of which share common pathogenetic mechanisms. This concept, known as the diseasome of physical inactivity, is also frequently observed in CKD patients [5]. Indeed, the risk of developing CKD is higher in inactive or minimally active individuals than in those engaging in moderate or high levels of physical activity [16].
On the other hand, when compared to the general population, CKD patients typically exhibit lower levels of physical activity, with some becoming completely inactive. Indeed, physical inactivity is present in all CKD stages and worsens as the disease progresses, reaching its peak in dialysis patients [17]. The leading causes contributing to the high prevalence of physical inactivity and sedentary lifestyle in CKD patients may be divided as follows [18]:
-
(a)
Patient-related factors: physical (e.g., older age, female gender, higher number of comorbidities), psychological, cultural, and socio-economic;
-
(b)
Disease-related factors: fatigue, depression, lack of energy, comorbidities, polypharmacy, uremia, chronic inflammation, insulin resistance, metabolic acidosis, anemia, Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disorder (CKD-MBD), sarcopenia, protein-energy wasting and endothelial dysfunction [19];
-
(c)
Treatment-related factors: CKD therapies or dialysis schedule, health staff attitude, lack of physical activity assessment and a low rate of exercise counseling, exercise-associated untoward outcomes, availability of tutoring, suitable environments, and equipment.
In turn, physical inactivity leads to reduced physical function, exercise tolerance, muscle mass and strength, and cardiorespiratory fitness while increasing fatigue, frailty, and risk of depression [20, 21]. These factors create a vicious circle of reduced physical activity, which can be broken only by exercise implementation.
Physical activity and exercise significantly benefit CKD patients, particularly in improving physical function, cardiorespiratory capacity, muscle strength and overall quality of life
Rationale
Regular physical activity is associated with reduced mortality and morbidity in the general population. Physical activity plays a crucial role in primary prevention in the general population and secondary and tertiary prevention for specific categories of patients. These considerations can also be applied to CKD patients. Indeed, a growing body of literature suggests that physical activity and exercise offer numerous benefits to CKD patients [5].
Firstly, randomized controlled trials have demonstrated improvements in physical function, cardiorespiratory fitness, muscle strength, and quality of life [22,23,24,25]. Secondly, observational studies have described reduced mortality risk and a nephroprotective effect. The mechanisms underlying a possible nephroprotective effect are diverse and could be related to controlling blood pressure, body weight, and glucose tolerance [21, 26, 27]. Thirdly, some experimental studies suggest the existence of a muscle-kidney cross talk, where muscle contraction stimulates the release of factors that promote cell growth within the damaged kidney [28]. Finally, physical activity enables the management of the several comorbidities that characterize CKD patients by improving cardiometabolic, neuromuscular, and cognitive function [27]. However, it is worth noting that further long-term, randomized controlled studies are needed to precisely define the effects of exercise on relevant outcomes such as mortality and CKD progression.
Physical exercise is safe in CKD patients when appropriately performed
Rationale
Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in patients with CKD. Notably, for CKD patients on dialysis or conservative therapy and KTRs, the predominant concern is a cardiovascular event such as arrhythmia, heart attack, and hypertension. Remarkably, no cardiac events have been reported in any published exercise training studies involving hemodialysis patients [11]. However, a limited number of hypotensive episodes may occur in patients engaging in intradialytic exercise, likely attributed to the attenuation of the cardiovascular response to sympathetic nervous system activation [29]. These episodes are more frequent during high-intensity than moderate-intensity exercises [11]. Lin et al. demonstrated in their randomized controlled trial (RCT) that moderate-intensity intradialytic exercise for 12 weeks did not cause adverse events, not even hypotension. The reason likely lies in the acute physiological response to exercise, which helps increase circulating volume and improve hemodynamics by promoting greater reuptake of blood from tissues [30]. Similarly, in the EXCITE study, during low-intensity home-based exercise, moderate-intensity symptoms such as moderate fatigue, leg pain, dyspnea, and joint pain were recorded in 54% of sessions performed by 38 patients, while angina or significant symptoms were not reported [31].
When it comes to patients on peritoneal dialysis engaging in exercise training with both a full or empty abdomen, a few cases of leaks, hernias, or catheter dysfunction, but no severe adverse events, have been reported. Increasing abdominal musculature through exercise likely contributes to increased resistance against hernias and leaks [32].
Although less studied, exercise training can be deemed safe for patients with stage 3–4 CKD [33]. Indirectly, sedentary patients face a higher risk of cardiovascular events than those who exercise during physical inactivity or activity periods [11].
Currently, there is limited literature on the safety of exercise for KTRs. Studies with longer follow-ups and larger sample sizes are needed to comprehensively understand the effects of exercise on cardiovascular events, death, and risk of transplant rejection [34]. However, based on the clinical experience, no significant adverse events correlating with regular physical exercise have been identified in KTRs so far [8, 35].
Nevertheless, the current literature does not allow for definitive conclusions on whether CKD patients are at higher risk of exercise-induced death than the general population [14]. Therefore, as a precaution, before starting exercise training, CKD patients should undergo medical evaluation by a sports medicine physician [11] to assess multiple parameters, including exercise suitability, medical history, current therapy, physical evaluation, electrocardiogram, and laboratory tests.
Physical function assessment can be performed routinely through physical performance tests and patient-focused questionnaires
Rationale
Physical function is typically assessed through objective physical performance tests or self-reported physical function questionnaires, both of which are significantly associated with survival in CKD patients [36]. It should be evaluated at least annually, regardless of physical activity levels, to obtain a more comprehensive health status assessment of CKD patients, especially in end-stage kidney disease and dialysis patients in whom physical function declines more rapidly [37]. Furthermore, physical function should be assessed before prescribing any physical activity or exercise program (see statement 10) to tailor the prescription, and during the interventions, every three or six months, to monitor improvement.
Physical performance tests, such as the Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), the Sit-To-Stand (STS) test, and the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), should be included in the routine management of CKD patients on conservative or dialysis treatment and KTRs (Table 1). The 6MWT and STS tests have often been used to assess aerobic capacity and lower limb function [38] in multiple recent clinical trials conducted primarily in patients on dialysis [39,40,41] Interestingly, in CKD patients, a strict correlation was found between each reduction of 1 ml/min/1.73 m2 in eGFR and a 1.5 times increase in the odds that patients would be unable to rise from a chair [42]. Meanwhile, the more comprehensive SPPB can provide measurements not only of the strength and gait domains but also of the balance domain [43, 44]. This test has been reported to be a valuable tool for predicting falls, hospitalization, and mortality in CKD and dialysis patients and KTRs [45,46,47,48,49,50]. In a CKD cohort, poor physical performance, as assessed by low SPPB scores, was found to be statistically associated with higher severity of renal dysfunction [51].
Taken together, these findings suggest that SPPB can be considered a reliable measurement instrument of functional capacity, lower extremity strength, and balance in the CKD population, consistent with results from other settings.
Self-reported physical function questionnaires primarily encompass the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) [52], RAND-36 [53] or Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Health and PROMIS-29 [54]. It is advisable to use the adapted versions of SF-36, such as the 36-item Kidney Disease Quality of Life Survey (KDQOL-36) for CKD patients or its Short Form (KDQOL-36-SF) for dialysis and CKD patients [55]. These two modified subjective tests include specific items tailored to patients with CKD [56]. However, numerous self-report tools are available to capture patient-focused information on activities of daily living, health-related quality of life, kidney disease quality of life, and the sickness impact profile [57,58,59].
Monitoring physical activity levels using self-report instruments or objective measures is advisable to counteract sedentary behavior
Rationale
While some physical activity is undoubtedly better than none, it is crucial to accurately identify the patient’s physical activity levels or sedentary behavior using validated activity questionnaires (Table 2). Logs or diaries collect hour-by-hour or activity-by-activity information [60].
Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ) [61], a NICE-recommended survey is instrumental in identifying those who are inactive and in need of support. In a validation study for CKD patients, compared to accelerometry, GPAQ demonstrated a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 54.6%, 96.6%, and 85.0%, respectively [62].
Other valuable questionnaires, such as Physical Activity Vital Signs (PAVS) [63] and 94-item Human Activity Profile (HAP) [64] can be used to gauge the level of physical activity. Specifically, HAP is a comprehensive questionnaire that evaluates activities across various energy requirements and has been validated in CKD patients. Johansen et al. demonstrated, for the first time, a strong correlation between HAP and seven-day accelerometry, the gold standard measure of physical activity (r = 0.78, P < 0.0001) in dialysis patients [65].
From the HAP assessment, both Maximum Activity Score (MAS) and Adjusted Activity Score (AAS) may be derived [66], with the latter as a measure of the individual's habitual physical activity level. These scores should be compared with established normative data based on age and gender. In dialysis patients, lower maximum activity score and adjusted activity score were found to be correlated with a higher risk of death [67]. Surprisingly, habitual physical activity, assessed by adjusted activity score, appears to be a stronger predictor of quality of life in dialysis compared to healthy subjects [68].
However, HAP is time-consuming, with over 94 items to address, thus limiting its widespread use in clinical practice. Therefore, a shorter, adapted version of the HAP questionnaire has been proposed [69] and successfully tested in CKD, dialysis, and peritoneal patients, as well as in KTRs, showing different physical activity levels across the CKD population.
Physical activity should be monitored daily, but patient compliance in collecting questionnaire data tends to decrease over time, even with the briefest and most easily administered questionnaire. To overcome this limitation, technological advancements and miniaturization have led to increased ambulatory movement registration techniques in recent years. Daily physical activity can be continually measured using accelerometers, pedometers, or heart rate monitors cached in wearable devices, smartwatches, or mobile phones [70, 71]. These technologies allow long-term monitoring and provide a positive stimulus to increase physical activity levels.
Protein restriction does not blunt or prevent the favorable effects of exercise on muscle strength and mass in CKD patients
Rationale
A low-protein diet (LPD) plays a pivotal role in CKD patients' conservative management, and if energy intake is adequate, it does not affect muscle mass. Castaneda et al. conducted an RCT in which patients with moderate CKD on an LPD (0.6 g/kg of body weight per day) were randomized to resistance training (n = 14) or no exercise for 12 weeks. Total body potassium and type I and II muscle-fiber cross-sectional areas increased in patients on an LPD who performed resistance training compared with those who were not. Accordingly, leucine oxidation, serum pre-albumin levels, and muscle strength increased. These data show that the improvement of muscle mass and strength and nutritional status induced by resistance training occurs even during protein restriction regimens [72]. A secondary analysis of the above mentioned study investigated mitochondrial biogenesis by quantitative real-time PCR of mitochondrial DNA copy number in the vastus lateralis muscle. A marked increase in muscle mitochondrial DNA was observed in the exercise group, and they were positively correlated with the changes in fiber cross-sectional area of types I and II muscle fibers [73].
These findings suggest resistance training enhanced mitochondrial content in patients with moderate-to-severe CKD on a low-protein diet. In summary, a low-protein diet does not represent a condition that limits the favorable effects of exercise training on muscle ultrastructural, metabolic, and morpho-functional features. Moreover, although a low protein diet “per se’” may reduce protein synthesis, it induces favorable effects on metabolic acidosis and insulin resistance associated with CKD, preventing their pro-catabolic effects on protein metabolism [74].
Dietary supplements combined with exercise are an effective strategy for preventing sarcopenia or protein-energy wasting in CKD patients, including those on dialysis
Rationale
Evidence shows that the loss of skeletal muscle mass in dialysis patients may be due to changes in intracellular signaling that involves the insulin receptor substrate/phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt pathway, which leads to reduced mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) stimulation and consequently decreased protein synthesis. Exercise can reverse these changes and increase protein intake. The muscle protein synthetic rate in response to protein feeding is impaired in hemodialysis patients when studied on non-dialysis days [75]. This kind of anabolic resistance to dietary protein is well known also in the elderly. Conversely, physical exercise represents the physiological anabolic stimulus for skeletal muscle, while inactivity induces muscle mass and strength loss.
Therefore, it is conceivable that coupling adequate nutrition with physical exercise can prevent muscle loss in dialysis patients more effectively than nutritional intervention or physical exercise applied separately. While no effect on lean body mass was found when exercise training alone or nutritional supplementation alone was implemented, a significant improvement in body weight and muscle strength was observed when resistance exercise was coupled with intradialytic oral supplementation of protein and energy [76].
Protein kinetics in dialysis patients following oral nutritional supplementation and resistance exercise were investigated using stable isotope. The results showed that exercise significantly increased the protein anabolic effects of oral intradialytic nutritional supplementation [77]. Moreover, an increased rate of protein synthesis was reported in untrained subjects when resistance exercise was coupled with whey protein intake. This intervention induced a higher level of phosphorylation of mRNA translational signaling proteins, namely the mTOR pathway, than that related to exercise alone [78]. Activation of mTOR signaling by whey protein intake after resistance exercise occurs in a dose-dependent manner [79]. Protein intake and exercise training during the hemodialysis session do not have a negative impact on dialysis efficacy nor do they compromise the removal of uremic toxins [80].
In summary, protein supplementation and resistance exercise training can likely stimulate protein synthesis by activating pAkt and mTOR pathways. In contrast, aerobic exercise training and energy supplementation have favorable effects on mitochondrial and energy metabolism, reducing protein degradation. Coupling protein-energy supplementation with exercise training may contribute to maintaining muscle mass and counteract sarcopenia [6]. This is one more example of the usefulness of a team that includes a dietitian/nutritionist and exercise professional/physiotherapist to implement as much as possible proper nutrition and tailored physical activity, both within dialysis centers or hospital facilities and in a home-based setting.
Barriers to physical activity in the CKD population are well known: each nephrology and dialysis unit needs to identify its center-specific barriers and establish a detailed plan for overcoming them
Rationale
In the last decade, a sufficiently broad body of literature has characterized and defined the barriers that limit the implementation of physical activity in CKD patients and has outlined appropriate strategies to overcome them (Table 3). Generally, barriers to physical activity are quite common, with the vast majority of patients reporting at least one barrier and frequently two or more. Substantial numbers of patients endorse many barriers. Both a more significant number of reported barriers and the endorsement of several specific barriers were associated with lower levels of physical activity [81].
A simplified and holistic approach to overcoming these barriers has recently been proposed [82].
Each nephrology center must evaluate its population through a four-step program:
-
1.
Evaluate the level of physical activity (see statement 6)
-
2.
Identify the barriers related to patients;
-
3.
Identify the barriers related to the health care staff;
-
4.
Plan an appropriate strategy for overcoming the barriers.
For assessing the presence of patient-related barriers, the questionnaire by Delgado & Johansen [83] can be helpful. It includes questions related to various categories of disease- and patient-specific barriers to physical activity, such as psychological barriers, physical barriers, economic barriers, lack of time, and comorbidities. Short and validated screening tools for assessing depressed mood, recent falls, and functional impairment are readily available, and they can be easily incorporated into clinical care management.
The staff’s attitude toward physical activity counseling may be analyzed using the Fiaccadori questionnaire [84], a modified version of Johansen's. It comprises 17 questions, 13 of which are applicable to nurses, focusing on the opinions and practices of dialysis personnel regarding physical activity counseling.
It is noteworthy to consider that the different barriers may influence each other. Patients who perceive the staff as supportive are likelier to have a positive attitude towards physical activity. Conversely, it has been demonstrated that patients in poor health, endorsing multiple barriers to physical activity, may benefit less from a proactive staff attitude compared to patients in better general conditions with fewer barriers [85]. Moreover, a positive interaction between a proactive attitude of healthcare providers and the clinical setting (e.g., availability of trained exercise program supervisors) has been reported to stimulate patients' willingness to increase physical activity [85].
In order to plan an appropriate strategy, the stakeholders, including patients, dialysis staff, and nephrologists, must be involved [8].
The first step is to address a critical gap in the patient's knowledge of the health benefits of physical activity, which becomes a primary target for intervention. Patients are often unaware of the recommended frequency and duration of physical activity [87]. On the other hand, although health professionals are frequently aware of the benefits of physical activity, they may need a more proactive attitude [7]. There is a passive attitude among healthcare providers towards inquiring about patients' physical activity levels. Indeed, although nephrologists generally recognize the importance of increasing physical activity, they usually do not actively encourage it [88]. This reluctance is often attributed not only to a lack of time but also an inability to counsel [34, 89]. Therefore, to enhance physician confidence in counseling, guidelines should explicitly recommend which methods to adopt [66, 90]. Additionally, better use of available materials could assist nephrologists in prescribing physical activities such as those designed for patients on dialysis therapy.
A second step involves carefully evaluating this specific population and applying for an individualized program with prior testing of an individual's capabilities (see statement 10).
It is crucial to personalize physical activity prescriptions, which can be provided by a nephrologist, while in the presence of functional limitations, a physiotherapist or sports medicine physician consultation is generally needed
Rationale
Physical activity may be prescribed in CKD patients, considering primarily their general clinical conditions and current physical performance. Firstly, information concerning demographics, the presence of comorbidities, and drug intake should be collected before providing a personalized prescription for physical activity. This approach helps to avoid generic advice that may lack efficacy and ensures that physical activity is tailored to the individual's needs and circumstances. For instance, patients with high comorbidity need to be encouraged to increase overall physical activity by boosting daily step counts, moving between rooms, and standing longer. Additionally, dialysis schedules and medications should be re-evaluated to achieve better control of factors such as fatigue, pain, and sadness.
However, it is crucial to exclude patients with high or acute cardiovascular risk from participating in exercise training, specifically those with recent myocardial infarction, unstable angina, uncontrolled arrhythmia, symptomatic severe aortic stenosis, suspected aortic dissection, and poorly controlled severe hypertension [91]. As per the American College of Sports Medicine, exercise is discouraged if systolic blood pressure is greater than or equal to 200 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure is greater than or equal to 110 mmHg [11].
Regarding physical performance, as previously reported, various tests can identify this level, among which SPPB provides objective measurements comparable with other populations. If the SPPB score is moderate or high, to enhance patients' compliance, the needs and requests of patients regarding the type of physical activity should also be considered. Indeed, no differences in mortality, hospitalization, or disease progression are observed among different types of physical activities for CKD patients without absolute contraindications [8].
However, to achieve the desired goal, similar to the dosage of a drug, a tailored prescription is essential for CKD patients with physical limitations [92]. In-depth rehabilitation treatments, supervised by physiatrists and/or physiotherapists and/or sports medicine physicians and/or kinesiologists, are crucial to improving the physical function of frail, comorbid elderly individuals, including those with CKD [93].
Exercise training for CKD patients can be undertaken alone or in groups, at home, in a dialysis unit, or in a sports facility
Rationale
Over the years, several studies have explored various methods to improve health status and quality of life with exercise training in CKD patients on conservative or dialysis treatment and in KTRs. These studies evaluate the optimal location for activity (i.e., home, dialysis, or sports facility) (Table 4).
Exercise can be performed either in the facility or at home for patients with CKD on conservative therapy and patients on peritoneal dialysis [11, 21]. The same applications are valid for hemodialysis patients, who can exercise on dialysis days (intradialytic or immediately pre/post-dialysis session) or interdialytic days, whether in the dialysis facility or home-based [94, 95].
Intradialytic exercise offers several advantages. It does not disrupt usual care or require additional dialysis time, as no patient wants to spend more time in the dialysis unit. Many patients have reported finding it convenient to save travel and precious non-dialysis time. It ensures medical supervision for prompt complication management and can enhance dialysis efficacy by increasing muscle blood flow and reducing cardio-pulmonary recycling [96]. Furthermore, it distracts from the mundane dialysis routine, making time go faster and giving value to the overall dialysis experience [76]. Despite these potential benefits, intradialytic exercise is underutilized, likely due to a lack of randomized controlled trials demonstrating its efficacy on clinical outcomes and insufficient education among nephrologists and nurses [76]. Moreover, as underlined by Zoccali et al. [96], intradialytic exercise is often challenging to organize due to space and staff shortages. However, when performing cost-effectiveness analyses, the resources needed for a walking exercise program are just a tiny fraction of those needed for an intradialytic exercise program.
Consequently, a good strategy may involve patients and staff in these exercise programs. Adopting training programs that require minimal staff assistance can be easily accommodated and would not increase nurses’ workload. In addition, long-term adherence can be guaranteed by a multi-modal intra-dialytic exercise training program that incorporates exercise, educational, and motivational components [97, 98].
Home-based exercise training could achieve excellent results by promoting greater patient autonomy and improved cost-effectiveness [31]. However, to date, there are no studies demonstrating the superiority of the home-based modality over others [99, 100]. A recent meta-analysis [83] of 12 RCTs sought to respond by comparing the efficacy of home-based exercise versus intradialytic or usual care. It revealed that, in dialysis patients, home-based exercise training for 3–6 months favored physical function and quality of life as assessed by 6MWT and Short Form (36) Health (SF-36) scores, respectively. The Authors proved that home-based exercise training was superior to usual care and equal to training conducted in dialysis units [80]. Indeed, taking into account the most relevant trials, Excite (EXerCise Introduction To Enhance Performance in Dialysis) for home-based [22] and the recent DiaTT (Dialysis Training Therapy) for intradialytic exercise [101], both achieved the same benefits. Home–based exercise has also been shown to maintain the gain in walking distance achieved in the sixth month for up to 36 months. These results indicate that the legacy effect of physical exercise programs described in the general population also occurs in the dialysis population [102].
In summary, each center may choose between intradialytic and home-based exercise training, considering local resources and conditions. In any case, physical exercise programs benefit dialysis patients wherever they are delivered. Additionally, for KTRs and CKD patients on conservative therapy, exercise training could be planned and performed in groups with patients affected by other chronic diseases (such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and heart failure) to reduce costs and enhance sustainability.
Regarding the superiority of group versus individual exercise for CKD patients, more data is needed. However, this remains a promising area for future studies. Notably, exercise during dialysis sessions is frequently conducted in groups. This communal approach may positively influence patients, encouraging them to start their exercise training.
Exercise training for CKD patients should include aerobic and resistance exercises
Rationale
The most effective type of exercise training (i.e., aerobic, strength, combined aerobic and strength, or flexibility routines) has been assessed by several studies in the CKD population (Table 4). Aerobic and resistance exercises may be practicable based on the patient’s needs and requests [103, 104]. However, aerobic exercise stands out as the most often proposed training program [10, 105]. An indirect measurement of aerobic capacity is the maximal oxygen consumption (VO2 peak), which is one of the most studied parameters to assess cardio-respiratory function and tends to improve post-exercise [85, 106]. A more practical parameter for testing aerobic capacity is the 6MWT, which also improves during aerobic exercise. Sheng et al., in their meta-analysis, assessed the effects of different exercise modalities on V02 peak and found that, although still underutilized, the combination of aerobic and resistance exercise is more effective in increasing VO2 peak than solely engaging in aerobic exercise [94]. This finding is likely attributed to the fact that, in some patients, severe muscle atrophy can limit the increase in V02 peak [107].
Some studies propose strength exercise exclusively, sometimes focusing on the lower limbs or incorporating both the lower and upper limbs. In contrast, few studies suggest flexibility exercises [21, 87].
To date, there is still no consensus on the most effective type of exercise to improve physical performance [80], but a combination of both aerobic and resistance exercises can simultaneously provide the advantages of each type [108]. In line with this, a Cochrane systematic review by Heiwe and Jacobson suggested engaging in regular high-intensity mixed cardiovascular and resistance training for at least 30 min per session, three times per week, to achieve the optimal effect on physical fitness, walking capacity, cardiovascular parameters, nutritional status, and health-related quality of life. These beneficial effects have been observed in patients with stage 1–5 CKD, dialysis patients, and KTRs [24].
Exercise programs should be carried out regularly for at least 12 weeks to be effective
Rationale
As early as 2005, Stack et al. analyzed the survival advantages of dialysis patients who exercised 2–3 times/week or 4–5 times/week [89]. The duration of treatment proposed in multiple studies ranges from 8 weeks to 12 months, with a prevalence of activity duration of 3 months. In a Cochrane systematic review of forty‐five studies with 1863 participants, the interventions were predominantly short-term (three months) in 17 (37.7%) studies, followed by medium-term (four to six months) in 14 (31.1%) studies and long-term (seven to 12 months) in 14 (31.1%) studies [91]. Exercise training or physical activity lasting 12 months or more is less commonly practiced due to higher dropout rates, although longer treatments may significantly affect structural restoration [88]. In particular, an increase in VO2 peak was observed for exercise training programs longer than six months, even if the effects were minimal [76, 88]. Studies on aerobic exercise showed that variation in duration did not significantly alter the effectiveness of VO2 peak [84, 90]. It is noteworthy that, regardless of the treatment duration, the key is the regularity of exercise training to break sedentary habits in CKD patients. Indeed, regular exercise, irrespective of type, intensity, or intervention length, has consistently demonstrated improvements in aerobic capacity [91]. Further studies with a longer duration of exercise intervention (more than 12 months) should be planned to assess the long‐term benefits of exercise training in CKD patients, such as morbidity and mortality.
Physical activity and exercise programs should begin with low intensity and progress gradually according to the patient's tolerance
Rationale
The patient’s tolerance to exercise depends on various elements, encompassing the type, frequency, volume, intensity, duration, and progressive exercise overload. Exercise intensity is critical for ensuring patient compliance. It is a crucial parameter that must be adjusted in a training program based on the patient's prior physical activity to facilitate gradual progression.
The intensity of physical activity is objectively defined by the unit of the metabolic equivalent of task (MET) scores based on the NHANES guidelines. One MET corresponds to the energy consumed at rest. A MET score less than 4 corresponds to light activities, while a score between 4 and 6 represents moderate activity, and a score higher than 6 denotes vigorous activity [109].
According to the United States Physical Activity Guidelines, patients are characterized based on their MET/min/week scores: extremely active if the score is > 1500, very active if > 600 but < 1500, low active if > 0 and < 600, or inactive if 0 [110]. A study exploring the relationship between physical activity and mortality in the general population noted gender differences: for men, there was a reduction in mortality for any level of physical activity, while for women, only extremely intense activity reduced mortality. Therefore, even when considering gender, physical activity should be individualized [111].
However, the exercise prescription guided by the MET score is limited in clinical practice [112], while subjective measurement of exercise intensity is routinely employed. The most common self-reporting method to gauge the intensity of exercise based on the patient’s physical exertion is the rating of perceived exertion (RPE) [113]. It depends on various factors, including heart rate and breathing rate. Subjects' heart rate reserve typically determines the maximum heart rate (HRmax) and maximum oxygen uptake (VOmax).
Currently, the Borg 15-point RPE Scale [76] is the most widely used tool to assess rating of perceived exertion as it is valid, inexpensive, and handy for monitoring individual perceptions of exercise intensity. It ranges from a score of 6, corresponding to no exercise, to 20, corresponding to maximum exercise. A Borg RPE score from 11 to 13 indicates moderate-intensity exercise for CKD patients, while a score of 14 or more indicates vigorous intensity [114].
In everyday clinical practice, renal rehabilitation should be provided by a healthcare team (nephrologists, nurses, dietitians, and exercise professionals) and, ideally , reimbursed by the national healthcare system
Rationale
KDIGO and KDOQI guidelines recommend that physicians stimulate CKD patients to engage in daily exercise [1, 115]. Therefore, exercise training should be included in the routine patient care plan, regarded as renal rehabilitation. Specifically, according to the WHO, renal rehabilitation is defined as “a long-term comprehensive program consisting of exercise therapy, diet therapy, water management, drug therapy, physiological and mental support, to alleviate the physical/mental effects based on renal disease and dialysis therapy, prolong life expectancy, and improve psychosocial and occupational circumstances” [116]. Indeed, incorporating renal rehabilitation as a routine treatment in CKD patients’ care plans could reduce all-cause mortality and improve clinical outcomes, quality of life, and life expectancy [4]. In order to assess the sustainability of renal rehabilitation, cost-effectiveness studies with long follow-ups should be conducted. However, currently, rehabilitation therapy involving physical activity or exercise training remains rarely prescribed in patients with CKD. Therefore, one effective strategy is to adopt a multidisciplinary approach involving the entire nephrology healthcare team, which includes nephrologists, nurses, dietitians, and exercise professionals [117].
Among these, nephrologists play a central role in improving exercise prescription and addressing sedentary behavior for many reasons [118, 119]. Nephrologists may assess the patient's activity level. They can educate patients about the benefits of exercise and physical activity, providing written information to reinforce them [120]. They can recommend a supportive exercise professional and discuss with the patient, for instance, the feasibility of incorporating physical activity and exercise training during dialysis sessions, utilizing treatment time [68].
Nurses, due to their unique relationship with patients and exercise professionals on account of their specific academic training, are often designated as responsible for exercise programs, yielding optimal results [121]. A randomized controlled trial demonstrated the effectiveness of the nurse-led intradialytic exercise program and a home-based exercise program supervised by a physical therapist [79]. Similar results were found in patients with CKD on conservative therapy [22]. In a recent survey conducted by Bennet et al. in peritoneal dialysis patients, clinicians expressed enthusiasm for promoting exercise training with a multidisciplinary team involving different experts in exercise, such as exercise physiologists, kinesiologists, physical therapists [122].
Dietitians also play an essential role in prescribing an adequate diet for better physical performance. Indeed, patients with renal dysfunction frequently and precociously suffer from skeletal muscle atrophy. This muscle mass loss is attributed to insufficient nutrient intake or an imbalance between protein synthesis and degradation, especially in dialysis patients [96]. In line with this approach, the Clinical Practice Guidelines for Renal Rehabilitation provide guidance not only for exercise training but also for diet, to be undertaken in conservative, kidney transplanted and dialysis patients [123].
In order to develop and promote this multidisciplinary approach, it is fundamental to consider the possibility of recognizing prescribed physical activity as a therapy reimbursable by the national health care system, a path already embraced by other countries. Currently, Japan is the country furthest along in this regard. In April 2022, Japan's Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare became the world's first to extend rehabilitation coverage for intradialytic exercise under the National Health Insurance Reimbursement [124]. Similarly, the Italian Ministry of Health has been recently (as of August 2024) working on a draft law to offer reimbursement for exercise to the entire population.
To summarize, the the presence of an exercise team, the promotion of a culture of exercise, and the increase in physical activity levels lead to a more comprehensive and modern clinical care management of CKD patients [68, 100].
New technologies, such as interactive social media creation and virtual reality gaming, could improve CKD patients’ adherence to exercise implementation
Rationale
In recent years, technology has opened new perspectives, from the creation of social networks for information dissemination and social interaction to the production of virtual reality gaming, intradialytic yoga, or electrical stimulation of muscles, proposed to enhance exercise programs [125, 126]. However, the literature on this topic needs more evidence.
Social media, often associated with health management platforms, has beneficial effects in promoting healthy lifestyle behaviors and inducing changes in exercise habits among CKD patients. The existence of a virtual community could empower patients and improve their physical performance [127].
Virtual Reality gaming involves an electronic game with a computer-based system. Players have an immersive 360-degree view in a simulation of a virtual setting using a helmet-mounted display or a flat-screen television. They experience real interaction with the environment while carrying out tasks. This modality allows for engaging in physical activity while playing a game [128]. Virtual reality gaming is typically integrated into intradialytic exercise and appears to be effective in improving physical performance and quality of life, potentially playing a crucial role in adherence [129, 130]. In a scoping review outlining the most common exercise prescriptions, the virtual reality exergame (game combined with exercise) protocol was prescribed during dialysis, in the first half of treatment, for three days per week for four weeks [99].
Few studies have analyzed multicomponent yoga in patients with CKD, primarily those on dialysis [131]. Briefly, multicomponent yoga involves movements, breathwork, and meditation. It is a low-intensity exercise program suitable for patients with more compromised cardiovascular frameworks [108]
Conclusions
The physical exercise working group of the Italian Society of Nephrology has identified sixteen statements aimed at addressing clinically relevant issues in physical activity and exercise for the CKD population. Each point offers practical suggestions to promote a safe approach to facilitate the implementation of physical activity and exercise in clinical practice. The nephrology community should support nephrology and dialysis units to offer effective renal rehabilitation therapy, providing adequate counseling, prescribing appropriate diets, assessing physical performance, and tailoring physical activity prescription, monitoring physical improvements, involving exercise experts, and employing new virtual technologies and social media.
Data availability
Not applicable.
References
K/DOQI Workgroup (2005) K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for cardiovascular disease in dialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis 45(4 Supple 3):S1-153
Stevens PE, Levin A, Improving Global Outcomes Chronic Kidney Disease Guideline Development Work Group Members (2013) Evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease: synopsis of the kidney disease: improving global outcomes 2012 clinical practice guideline. Ann Intern Med 158(11):825–830
Mallamaci F, Pisano A, Tripepi G (2020) Physical activity in chronic kidney disease and the EXerCise introduction to enhance trial. Nephrol Dial Transplant 35(Suppl 2):ii18–ii22
Zelle DM, Klaassen G, van Adrichem E, Bakker SJ, Corpeleijn E, Navis G (2017) Physical inactivity: a risk factor and target for intervention in renal care. Nat Rev Nephrol 13(3):152–168. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneph.2016.187. (Epub 2017 Jan 31. Erratum in: Nat Rev Nephrol. 2017 Apr 13;13(5):318)
Deligiannis A, D’Alessandro C, Cupisti A (2021) Exercise training in dialysis patients: impact on cardiovascular and skeletal muscle health. Clin Kidney J 14(2):25–33
Hansen D, Niebauer J, Cornelissen V, Barna O, Neunhäuserer D, Stettler C, Tonoli C, Greco E, Fagard R, Coninx K, Vanhees L, Piepoli MF, Pedretti R, Ruiz GR, Corrà U, Schmid JP, Davos CH, Edelmann F, Abreu A, Rauch B, Ambrosetti M, Braga SS, Beckers P, Bussotti M, Faggiano P, Garcia-Porrero E, Kouidi E, Lamotte M, Reibis R, Spruit MA, Takken T, Vigorito C, Völler H, Doherty P, Dendale P (2018) Exercise prescription in patients with different combinations of cardiovascular disease risk factors: a consensus statement from the EXPERT working group. Sports Med 48(8):1781–1797
Bull FC, Al-Ansari SS, Biddle S, Borodulin K, Buman MP, Cardon G, Carty C, Chaput JP, Chastin S, Chou R, Dempsey PC, DiPietro L, Ekelund U, Firth J, Friedenreich CM, Garcia L, Gichu M, Jago R, Katzmarzyk PT, Lambert E, Leitzmann M, Milton K, Ortega FB, Ranasinghe C, Stamatakis E, Tiedemann A, Troiano RP, van der Ploeg HP, Wari V, Willumsen JF (2020) World health organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Br J Sports Med 54(24):1451–1462
Baker LA, March DS, Wilkinson TJ, Billany RE, Bishop NC, Castle EM, Chilcot J, Davies MD, Graham-Brown MPM, Greenwood SA, Junglee NA, Kanavaki AM, Lightfoot CJ, Macdonald JH, Rossetti GMK, Smith AC, Burton JO (2022) Clinical practice guideline exercise and lifestyle in chronic kidney disease. BMC Nephrol 23(1):75
Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) CKD Work Group (2024) KDIGO 2024 clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int 105(4):S117–S314
Lambert K, Lightfoot CJ, Jegatheesan DK, Gabrys I, Bennett PN (2022) Physical activity and exercise recommendations for people receiving dialysis: a scoping review. PLoS ONE 17(4):e0267290
Aucella F, Battaglia Y, Bellizzi V, Bolignano D, Capitanini A, Cupisti A (2015) Erratum to: physical exercise programs in CKD: lights, shades and perspectives. J Nephrol 28(4):521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-015-0209-x.Erratumfor:JNephrol.2015Apr;28(2):143-50. (PMID: 26012378)
Gustafson DH, Shukla RK, Delbecq A, Walster GW (1973) A comparative study of differences in subjective likelihood estimates made by individuals, interacting groups, Delphi groups, and nominal groups. Organ Behav Hum Perform 9:280–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(73)90052-4
Gallego D, Bueno S (2014) Exploring the application of the Delphi method as a forecasting tool in information systems and technologies research. Technol Anal Strateg Manag 26:987–999. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2014.941348
Johansen KL, Painter P (2012) Exercise in individuals with CKD. Am J Kidney Dis 59(1):126–134
Ekramzadeh M, Santoro D, Kopple JD (2022) The effect of nutrition and exercise on body composition, exercise capacity, and physical functioning in advanced CKD patients. Nutrients 14(10):2129. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14102129.PMID:35631270;PMCID:PMC9143955
Seidu S, Abdool M, Almaqhawi A, Wilkinson TJ, Kunutsor SK, Khunti K, Yates T (2023) Physical activity and risk of chronic kidney disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of 12 cohort studies involving 1,281,727 participants. Eur J Epidemiol 38(3):267–280
Wilkinson TJ, Clarke AL, Nixon DGD, Hull KL, Song Y, Burton JO, Yates T, Smith AC (2021) Prevalence and correlates of physical activity across kidney disease stages: an observational multicentre study. Nephrol Dial Transplant 36(4):641–649
Hirai K, Ookawara S, Morishita Y (2016) Sarcopenia and physical inactivity in patients with chronic kidney disease. Nephrourol Mon 8(3):e37443
Bellos I et al (2023) Association of physical activity with endothelial dysfunction among adults with and without chronic kidney disease: the maastricht study. Atherosclerosis 383:117330
Elia R, Piva G, Bulighin F, Lamberti N, Manfredini F, Gambaro G, Di Maria A, Salvagno G, Carbonare LGD, Storari A, Valenti MT, Battaglia Y, Working Group of Physical Exercise of Italian Society of Nephrology (2024) The impact of physical exercise on microRNAs in hemodialysis patients: a review and a protocol for an ancillary study. Biomedicines. 12(2):468
Battaglia Y, Lamberti N, Piva G, Manfredini F, Storari A (2021) Physical exercise in chronic kidney disease: an empty narrative or an effective intervention? G Ital Nefrol 38(6):2021-vol6
Torino C, Manfredini F, Bolignano D, Aucella F, Baggetta R, Barillà A, Battaglia Y, Bertoli S, Bonanno G, Castellino P, Ciurlino D, Cupisti A, D’Arrigo G, De Paola L, Fabrizi F, Fatuzzo P, Fuiano G, Lombardi L, Lucisano G, Messa P, Rapanà R, Rapisarda F, Rastelli S, Rocca-Rey L, Summaria C, Zuccalà A, Tripepi G, Catizone L, Zoccali C, Mallamaci F, EXCITE Working Group (2014) Physical performance and clinical outcomes in dialysis patients: a secondary analysis of the EXCITE trial. Kidney Blood Press Res 39(2–3):205–11
Baggetta R, Bolignano D, Torino C, Manfredini F, Aucella F, Barillà A, Battaglia Y, Bertoli S, Bonanno G, Castellino P, Ciurlino D, Cupisti A, D’Arrigo G, De Paola L, Fabrizi F, Fatuzzo P, Fuiano G, Lombardi L, Lucisano G, Messa P, Rapanà R, Rapisarda F, Rastelli S, Rocca-Rey L, Summaria C, Zuccalà A, Abd ElHafeez S, Tripepi G, Catizone L, Mallamaci F, Zoccali C, EXCITE Working Group (2014) Fitness for entering a simple exercise program and mortality: a study corollary to the exercise introduction to enhance performance in dialysis (EXCITE) trial. Kidney Blood Press Res 39(2–3):197–204
Heiwe S, Jacobson SH. Exercise training for adults with chronic kidney disease. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011, Issue 10. Art. No.: CD003236. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003236.pub2. Accessed 6 Apr 2024
Natale P, Ju A, Strippoli GFM, Craig JC, Saglimbene VM, Unruh ML, Stallone G, Jaure A. Interventions for fatigue in people with kidney failure requiring dialysis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2023, Issue 8. Art. No.: CD013074. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD013074.pub2. Accessed 6 Apr 2024.
Sprick JD, Mammino K, Jeong J, DaCosta DR, Hu Y, Morison DG, Nocera JR, Park J (2022) Aerobic exercise training improves endothelial function and attenuates blood pressure reactivity during maximal exercise in chronic kidney disease. J Appl Physiol 132(3):785–793. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00808.2021. (Epub 2022 Feb 10. PMID: 35142559; PMCID: PMC8917938)
Pedersen BK, Saltin B (2015) Exercise as medicine - evidence for prescribing exercise as therapy in 26 different chronic diseases. Scand J Med Sci Sports 25(Suppl 3):1–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.12581. (PMID: 26606383)
Jenkin KA, Perry BD (2022) Skeletal muscle and kidney crosstalk in chronic kidney disease. Cell Physiol Biochem 56(5):587–601. https://doi.org/10.33594/000000578. (PMID: 36285606)
Pu J, Jiang Z, Wu W, Li L, Zhang L, Li Y, Liu Q, Ou S (2019) Efficacy and safety of intradialytic exercise in haemodialysis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 9(1):e020633
Lin CH, Hsu YJ, Hsu PH, Lee YL, Lin CH, Lee MS, Chiang SL (2021) Effects of intradialytic exercise on dialytic parameters, health-related quality of life, and depression status in hemodialysis patients: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18(17):9205
Baggetta R, D’Arrigo G, Torino C, ElHafeez SA, Manfredini F, Mallamaci F, Zoccali C, Tripepi G, EXCITE Working group (2018) Effect of a home-based, low-intensity, physical exercise program in older adults dialysis patients: a secondary analysis of the EXCITE trial. BMC Geriatr 18(1):248
Isnard-Rouchon M, West M, Bennett PN (2019) Exercise and physical activity for people receiving peritoneal dialysis: why not? Semin Dial 32(4):303–307
Howden EJ, Coombes JS, Strand H, Douglas B, Campbell KL, Isbel NM (2015) Exercise training in CKD: efficacy, adherence, and safety. Am J Kidney Dis 65(4):583–591
Calella P, Hernández-Sánchez S, Garofalo C, Ruiz JR, Carrero JJ, Bellizzi V (2019) Exercise training in kidney transplant recipients: a systematic review. J Nephrol 32(4):567–579
Roi GS, Mosconi G, Totti V, Angelini ML, Brugin E, Sarto P, Merlo L, Sgarzi S, Stancari M, Todeschini P, La Manna G, Ermolao A, Tripi F, Andreoli L, Sella G, Anedda A, Stefani L, Galanti G, Di Michele R, Merni F, Trerotola M, Storani D, Nanni CA (2018) Renal function and physical fitness after 12-mo supervised training in kidney transplant recipients. World J Transplant 8(1):13–22
Clarke AL, Zaccardi F, Gould DW et al (2019) Association of self-reported physical function with survival in patients with chronic kidney disease. Clin Kidney J 12:122–128
Kurella Tamura M, Covinsky KE, Chertow GM et al (2009) Functional status of elderly adults before and after initiation of dialysis. N Engl J Med 361:1539–1547
Fuentes-Abolafio IJ, Escriche-Escuder A, Bernal-López MR, Gómez-Huelgas R, Ricci M, Trinidad-Fernández M, Roldán-Jiménez C, Arjona-Caballero JM, Cuesta-Vargas AI, Pérez-Belmonte LM (2022) Estimation of functional aerobic capacity using the sit-to-stand test in older adults with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. J Clin Med 11(10):2692
Manfredini F, Mallamaci F, Arrigo GR, Bolignano D, Torino C, Lamberti N, Bertoli S, Ciurlino D, Rocca-Rey L, Barillà A, Battaglia Y, Rapanà RM, Zuccalà A, Bonanno G, Fatuzzo P, Rapisarda F, Rastelli S, Fabrizi F, Messa P, De Paola L, Lombardi L, Cupisti A, Fuiano G, Lucisano G, Summaria C, Felisatti M, Pozzato E, Malagoni AM, Castellino P, Aucella F, Abd ElHafeez S, Provenzano PF, Tripepi G, Catizone L, Zoccali C (2017) Exercise in patients on dialysis: a multicenter, randomized clinical trial. J Am Soc Nephrol 28(4):1259–1268
Walker SR, Brar R, Eng F et al (2015) Frailty and physical function in chronic kidney disease: the CanFIT study. Can J Kidney Heal Dis 2:1–10
Iman Y, Harasemiw O, Tangri N (2020) Assessing physical function in chronic kidney disease. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 29(3):346–350
Brodin E, Ljungman S, Sunnerhagen KS (2008) Rising from a chair: a simple screening test for physical function in predialysis patients. Scand J Urol Nephrol 42:293–300
MacRae JM, Harasemiw O, Lightfoot CJ, Thompson S, Wytsma-Fisher K, Koufaki P, Bohm C, Wilkinson TJ (2023) Measurement properties of performance-based measures to assess physical function in chronic kidney disease: recommendations from a COSMIN systematic review. Clin Kidney J 16(11):2108–2128
Nogueira Á, Álvarez G, Russo F, San-José B, Sánchez-Tomero JA, Barril G (2019) Is SPPB useful as a screening method of functional capacity in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease? Nefrologia (Engl Ed) 39(5):489–496 (English, Spanish)
Zanotto T, Gobbo S, Bullo V et al (2020) Postural balance, muscle strength, and history of falls in end-stage renal disease patients living with a kidney transplant: a cross-sectional study. Gait Posture 76:358–363
Ortega-Perez de Villar L, Martınez-Olmos FJ, Junque-Jimenez A et al (2018) Test- & retest reliability and minimal detectable change scores for the short physical performance battery, one-legged standing test and timed up and go test in patients undergoing hemodialysis. PLoS ONE 2018(13):1–16 (Validation study of the SPPB and other physical function tests in chronic kidney disease, demonstrating excellent test–retest reliability)
Wilkinson TJ, Nixon DG, Smith AC (2019) Postural stability during standing and its association with physical and cognitive functions in nondialysis chronic kidney disease patients. Int Urol Nephrol 51:1407–1414
Guralnik JM, Ferrucci L, Pieper CF, Leveille SG, Markides KS, Ostir GV, Studenski S, Berkman LF, Wallace RB (2000) Lower extremity function and subsequent disability: consistency across studies, predictive models, and value of gait speed alone compared with the short physical performance battery. J Gerontol Ser A Boil Sci Med Sci 55:221–231
Fulinara CP, Huynh A, Goldwater D, Abdalla B, Schaenman J (2023) Frailty and age-associated assessments associated with chronic kidney disease and transplantation outcomes. J Transplant 1(2023):1510259
Mosconi G, Angelini ML, Balzi W, Totti V, Roi GS, Cappuccilli M, Tonioli M, Storani D, Trerotola M, Costa AN (2016) Can solid-organ-transplanted patients perform a cycling marathon? Trends in kidney function parameters in comparison with healthy subjects. Transplant Proc 48(2):415–419
Reese PP, Cappola AR, Shults J et al (2013) Physical performance and frailty in chronic kidney disease. Am J Nephrol 38(4):307–315
OPTUM. SF-36v2 health survey. https://www.optum.com/solutions/life-sciences/answer-research/patient-insights/sf-health-surveys/sf-36v2-health-survey.html
RAND Health Care. 36-item short form survey. https://www.rand.org/health-care/surveys_tools/mos/36-item-short-form.html
Verberne WR, Das-Gupta Z, Allegretti AS et al (2019) Developed of an international standard set of value-based outcome measures for patients with chronic kidney disease: a report of the international consortium for health outcomes measurement (ICHOM) CKD working group. Am J Kidney Dis 73:372–384
Aiyegbusi OL, Kyte D, Cockwell P et al (2017) Measurement properties of patient- reported outcome measures (PROMs) used in adult patients with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review. PLoS ONE 12:e0179733
Peipert JD, Nair D, Klicko K et al (2019) Kidney Disease Quality of Life 36-Item & Short Form survey (KDQOL-36) normative values for the United States dialysis population and new single summary score. J Am Soc Nephrol 30:654–663
Katz S, Ford AB, Moskowitz RW et al (1963) Studies of Illness in the aged. The index of ADL: a standardised measure of biological and psychosocial function. JAMA 185:914–919
Lawton MP, Brody EM (1969) Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist 9:179–186
Bergner M, Bobbitt RA, Carter WB et al (1981) The sickness impact profile: development and final revision of a health status measure. Med Care 19:787–805
Bakker EA, Zoccali C, Dekker FW, Eijsvogels TMH, Jager KJ (2020) Assessing physical activity and function in patients with chronic kidney disease: a narrative review. Clin Kidney J 14(3):768–779. https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfaa156.PMID:33777360;PMCID:PMC7986327
Keating XD, Zhou K, Liu X, Hodges M, Liu J, Guan J, Phelps A, Castro-Piñero J (2019) Reliability and concurrent validity of global physical activity questionnaire (GPAQ): a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 16(21):4128
Wilkinson TJ, Palmer J, Gore EF, Smith AC (2022) The validity of the “General practice physical activity questionnaire” against accelerometery in patients with chronic kidney disease. Physiother Theory Pract 38(10):1528–1537
Ball TJ, Joy EA, Gren LH, Shaw JM (2016) Concurrent validity of a self-reported physical activity “vital sign” questionnaire with adult primary care patients. Prev Chronic Dis 4(13):E16
Davidson M, de Morton N (2007) A systematic review of the human activity profile. Clin Rehab 21:151–162
Johansen KL, Painter P, Kent-Braun JA, Ng AV, Carey S, Da Silva M, Chertow GM (2001) Validation of questionnaires to estimate physical activity and functioning in end-stage renal disease. Kidney Int 59(3):1121–1127
Robinson-Cohen C, Littman AJ, Duncan GE, Roshanravan B, Ikizler TA, Himmelfarb J, Kestenbaum BR (2013) Assessment of physical activity in chronic kidney disease. J Ren Nutr 23(2):123–131
Zhang L, Luo H, Kang G, Wang W, Hu Y (2017) The association between physical activity and mortality among patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis. Int J Nurs Pract 23:e12505
Filipčič T, Bogataj Š, Pajek J, Pajek M (1978) Physical activity and quality of life in hemodialysis patients and healthy controls: a cross-sectional study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021:18
Hayhurst WS, Ahmed A (2015) Assessment of physical activity in patients with chronic kidney disease and renal replacement therapy. Springerplus 4(1):536 (Erratum in: Springerplus. 2016;5(1):961)
van Hees VT, Slootmaker SM, De Groot G, Van Mechelen W, van Lummel RC (2009) Reproducibility of a triaxial seismic accelerometer (DynaPort). Med Sci Sports Exerc 41:810–817
Bakker EA, Zoccali C, Dekker FW, Eijsvogels TMH, Jager KJ (2020) Assessing physical activity and function in patients with chronic kidney disease: a narrative review. Clin Kidney J 14(3):768–779
Castaneda C, Gordon PL, Uhlin KL, Levey AS, Kehayias JJ, Dwyer JT, Fielding RA, Roubenoff R, Singh MF (2001) Resistance training to counteract the catabolism of a low-protein diet in patients with chronic renal insufficiency. A randomised, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 135(11):965–76
Balakrishnan VS, Rao M, Menon V, Gordon PL, Pilichowska M, Castaneda F, Castaneda-Sceppa C (2010) Resistance training increases muscle mitochondrial biogenesis in patients with chronic kidney disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 5(6):996–1002
Garibotto G, Picciotto D, Saio M, Esposito P (2020) Verzola D muscle protein turnover and low-protein diets in patients with chronic kidney disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant 35(5):741–751
van Vliet S, Skinner SK, Beals JW et al (2018) Dysregulated handling of dietary and muscle protein synthesis after mixed meal ingestion in maintenance hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int Rep 3:1403–1415
Dong J, Sundell MB, Pupim LB et al (2011) The effect of resistance exercise to augment long-term benefits of intradialytic oral nutritional supplementation in chronic hemodialysis patients. J Ren Nutr 21:149–159
Majchrzak KM, Pupim LB, Flakoll PJ et al (2007) Resistance exercise augments the acute anabolic effects of intradialytic oral nutritional supplementation. Nephrol Dial Transplant 23:1362–1369
Farnfield MM, Breen L, Carey KA et al (2012) Activation of mTOR signalling in young and old human skeletal muscle in response to combined resistance exercise and whey protein ingestion. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 37:21–30
Kakigi R, Yoshihara T, Ozaki H et al (2014) Whey protein intake after resistance exercise activates mTOR signaling in a dose dependent manner in human skeletal muscle. Eur J Appl Physiol 114:735–742
Hendriks FK, Kuijpers JHW, van Kranenburg JMX, Senden JMG, van der Sande FM, Kooman JP, Meex SJR, van Loon LJC (2023) Intradialytic protein ingestion and exercise do not compromise uremic toxin removal throughout hemodialysis. J Ren Nutr 33(2):376–385
Kutner NG (2010) Rehabilitation in the renal population: barriers to access. Seminar Nephrol 30:59–65
Stevens K et al (2023) 2023 Let’s get physical: considering and overcoming the barriers to physical activity in CKD. Nephrol Dial Transplant 38(6):1405–1407. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfad002
Delgado C, Johansen KL (2012) Barriers to exercise participation among dialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transpl 27:1152–7
Fiaccadori E, Sabatino A, Schito F, Angella F, Malagoli M, Tucci M et al (2014) Barriers to physical activity in chronic hemodialysis patients: a single-center pilot study in an Italian dialysis facility. Kidney Blood Press Res 39:169–75
Regolisti G, Maggiore U, Sabatino A, Gandolfini I, Pioli S, Torino C, Aucella F, Cupisti A, Pistolesi V, Capitanini A, Caloro G, Gregorini M, Battaglia Y, Mandreoli M, Dani L, Mosconi G, Bellizzi V, Di Iorio BR, Conti P, Fiaccadori E (2018) Interaction of healthcare staff’s attitude with barriers to physical activity in hemodialysis patients: a quantitative assessment. PLoS ONE 13(4):e0196313. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196313. (Erratum in: PLoS One. 2018 Jun 20;13(6):e0198987)
Jhamb M, McNulty ML, Ingalsbe G, Childers JW, Schell J, Conroy MB et al (2016) Knowledge, barriers and facilitators of exercise in dialysis patients: a qualitative study of patients, staff and nephrologists. BMC Nephrol 17:192
Silva LC, Marinho PEM (2015) Knowledge among nephrologists about the importance of exercise in the intradialytic period. J Phys Ther Sci 27:2991–4
Ferrari F, Andrade FP, Teixeira MS et al (2023) Efficacy of six exercise-based interventions for individuals undergoing hemodialysis: a network meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials. Nephrol Dial Transplant 38:2389–406
Taryana AA, Krishnasamy R, Bohm C, Palmer SC, Wiebe N, Boudville N, MacRae J, Coombes JS, Hawley C, Isbel N, Thompson S (2019) Physical activity for people with chronic kidney disease: an international survey of nephrologist practice patterns and research priorities. BMJ Open 9(12):e032322
Johansen KL, Sakkas GK, Doyle J, Tiffany Shubert R, Dudley A (2003) Exercise counseling practices among nephrologists caring for patients on dialysis. Am J Kidney Dis 41(1):171–178
Roshanravan B, Gamboa J, Wilund K (2017) Exercise and CKD: skeletal muscle dysfunction and practical application of exercise to prevent and treat physical impairments in CKD. Am J Kidney Dis 69(6):837–852
Luan X, Tian X, Zhang H, Huang R, Li N, Chen P, Wang R (2019) Exercise as a prescription for patients with various diseases. J Sport Health Sci 8(5):422–441
Shiozaki K, Asaeda M, Hashimoto T, Umemoto Y, Ito H, Takahashi T, Nishimura Y, Tajima F (2023) Effects of physiatrist and physiotherapist-supervised therapeutic exercise on physical function in frail older patients with multimorbidity. Prog Rehabil Med 4(8):20230012
Sheng K, Zhang P, Chen L, Cheng J, Wu C, Chen J (2014) Intradialytic exercise in hemodialysis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Nephrol 40(5):478–490
Manfredini F, Lamberti N, Battaglia Y, Straudi S, Belvederi Murri M, Donadi M, Piva G, Fabbian F, López-Soto PJ, Grassi L, Manfredini R, Basaglia N, Storari A (2020) A personalized patient-centered intervention to empower through physical activity the patient in the dialysis center: study protocol for a pragmatic nonrandomized clinical trial. Methods Protoc 3(4):83
Zoccali C, Manfredini F, Kanbay M, Mallamaci F (2023) Intradialysis exercise in haemodialysis patients: effective but complex and costly. Nephrol Dial Transplant 39(1):7–9
Torkington M, MacRae M, Isles C (2006) Uptake of and adherence to exercise during hospital haemodialysis. Physiotherapy 92(2):83–87
Perez-Dominguez B, Casaña-Granell J, Garcia-Maset R, Garcia-Testal A, Melendez-Oliva E, Segura-Orti E (2021) Effects of exercise programs on physical function and activity levels in patients undergoing hemodialysis: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 57(6):994–1001
Battaglia Y, Amicone M, Mantovani A, Combe C, Mitra S, Basile C (2023) Home-based exercise in patients on maintenance dialysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials. Nephrol Dial Trans 38:2550–61
Cho JH, Lee JY, Lee S, Park H, Choi SW, Kim JC (2018) Effect of intradialytic exercise on daily physical activity and sleep quality in maintenance hemodialysis patients. Int Urol Nephrol 50(4):745–754
Anding-Rost K, von Gersdorff G, von Korn P, Ihorst G, Josef A, Kaufmann M, Huber M, Bär T, Zeißler S, Höfling S, Breuer C, Gärtner N, Haykowsky MJ, Degenhardt S, Wanner C, Halle M (2023) Exercise during hemodialysis in patients with chronic kidney failure. NEJM Evid. 2(9):2300057
Manfredini F, D’arrigo G, Lamberti N, Torino C, Tripepi G, Mallamaci F, Zoccali C (2022) The legacy effect of a home walking exercise programme in kidney failure patients on dialysis. Nephrol Dial Trans 37(10):1974–1981
Pei G, Tang Y, Tan L, Tan J, Ge L, Qin W (2019) Aerobic exercise in adults with chronic kidney disease (CKD): a meta-analysis. Int Urol Nephrol 51(10):1787–1795
Abdelbasset WK, Ibrahim AA, Althomali OW, Hussein HM, Alrawaili SM, Alsubaie SF (2022) Effect of twelve-week concurrent aerobic and resisted exercise training in non-dialysis day on functional capacity and quality of life in chronic kidney disease patients. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 26(17):6098–6106
Bernier-Jean A, Beruni NA, Bondonno NP, Williams G, Teixeira-Pinto A, Craig JC, Wong G (2022) Exercise training for adults undergoing maintenance dialysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1(1):14653
Huang M, Lv A, Wang J, Xu N, Ma G, Zhai Z, Zhang B, Gao J, Ni C (2019) Exercise training and outcomes in hemodialysis patients: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Nephrol 50(4):240–254
Stack AG, Molony DA, Rives T, Tyson J, Murthy BV (2005) Association of physical activity with mortality in the US dialysis population. Am J Kidney Dis 45(4):690–701
Watson EL, Gould DW, Wilkinson TJ, Xenophontos S, Clarke AL, Vogt BP, Viana JL, Smith AC (2018) Twelve-week combined resistance and aerobic training confers greater benefits than aerobic training alone in non-dialysis CKD. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 314(6):F1188–F1196
Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Whitt MC, Irwin ML, Swartz AM, Strath SJ, O’Brien WL, Bassett DR Jr, Schmitz KH, Emplaincourt PO, Jacobs DR Jr, Leon AS (2000) Compendium of physical activities: an update of activity codes and MET intensities. Med Sci Sports Exerc 32(9 Suppl):S498-504
Accessed on Dec 22, 2023 https://health.gov/sites/default/files/2019-09/paguide.pdf
Peng W, Han M, Xu G (2023) Gender differences in the association between physical activity and mortality in chronic kidney disease: results from the national health and nutrition examination survey (2011–2018). J Clin Med 12(3):779
Franklin BA, Brinks J, Berra K, Lavie CJ, Gordon NF, Sperling LS (2018) Using metabolic equivalents in clinical practice. Am J Cardiol 121(3):382–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.10.033. (Epub 2017 Oct 31 PMID: 29229271)
Morishita S, Tsubaki A, Takabayashi T, Fu JB (2018) Relationship between the rating of perceived exertion scale and the load intensity of resistance training. Strength Cond J 40(2):94–109
Borg GA (1982) Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc 14(5):377–381 (PMID: 7154893)
KD Workgroup (2005) DOQI clinical practice guidelines for cardiovascular disease in dialysis patients. Am J Kidney, Dis 45:16–153
Hoshino J (2021) Renal Rehabilitation: exercise intervention and nutritional support in dialysis patients. Nutrients 13(5):1444
Roi GS, Stefoni S, Mosconi G, Brugin E, Burra P, Ermolao A, Granito M, Macini P, Mastrosimone S, Nacchia F, Pegoraro C, Rigotti P, Sella G, Sgarzi S, Tamè MR, Totti V, Trerotola M, Tripi F, Nanni CA (2014) Physical activity in solid organ transplant recipients: organisational aspects and preliminary results of the Italian project. Transplant Proc 46(7):2345–2349
Ribeiro HS, Andrade FP, Leal DV, Oliveira JS, Wilund KR, Viana JL (2023) How is exercise being prescribed for patients on hemodialysis? A scoping review J Nephrol 36(5):1307–1319
Aucella F, Gesuete A, Battaglia Y (2014) A “nephrological” approach to physical activity. Kidney Blood Press Res 39(2–3):189–196
Bulighin F, Aucella F, Bellizzi V, Cupisti A, Faga T, Gambaro G, Regolisti G, Storari A, Capitanini A, Battaglia Y; Working Group of Physical Exercise of Italian Society of Nephrology. 2024 Physical activity and exercise programs for kidney patients: an Italian survey of nephrology centres. J Nephrol
Martínez-Majolero V, Urosa B, Hernández-Sánchez S (2022) Physical exercise in people with chronic kidney disease-practices and perception of the knowledge of health professionals and physical activity and sport science professionals about their prescription. Int J Environ Res Public Health 19(2):656
Bennett PN, Bohm C, Yee-Moon Wang A, Kanjanabuch T, Figueiredo AE, Harasemiw O, Brown L, Gabrys I, Jegatheesan D, Lambert K, Lightfoot CJ, MacRae J, Scholes-Robertson N, Stewart K, Tarca B, Verdin N, Warren M, West M, Zimmerman D, Finderup J, Ford E, Ribeiro HS, Xu Q, Thompson S (2023) An international survey of peritoneal dialysis exercise practices and perceptions. Kidney Int Rep 8(7):1389–1398
Yamagata K, Hoshino J, Sugiyama H et al (2019) Clinical practice guideline for renal rehabilitation: systematic reviews and recommendations of exercise therapies in patients with kidney diseases. Ren Replace Ther 5:28
Morgan AM, King AC, Viana J, Wilund KR (2022) Exercise in dialysis: ready for prime time? Blood Purif 25:1–5
Wilkinson TJ, McAdams-DeMarco M, Bennett PN, Wilund K (2020) Advances in exercise therapy in predialysis chronic kidney disease, hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, and kidney transplantation. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 29(5):471–479
Greenwood SA, Young HML, Briggs J, Castle EM, Walklin C, Haggis L, Balkin C, Asgari E, Bhandari S, Burton JO, Billany RE, Bishop NC, Bramham K, Campbell J, Chilcot J, Cooper NJ, Deelchand V, Graham-Brown MPM, Hamilton A, Jesky M, Kalra PA, Koufaki P, McCafferty K, Nixon AC, Noble H, Saynor Z, Taal MW, Tollit J, Wheeler DC, Wilkinson TJ, Worboys H, Macdonald JH (2024) Evaluating the effect of a digital health intervention to enhance physical activity in people with chronic kidney disease (Kidney BEAM): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial in the UK. Lancet Digit Health 6(1):e23–e32
Li WY, Chiu FC, Zeng JK, Li YW, Huang SH, Yeh HC, Cheng BW, Yang FJ (2020) Mobile health app with social media to support self-management for patients with chronic kidney disease: prospective randomized controlled study. J Med Internet Res 22(12):e19452
Gurz D, Coimbatore Dada K, Naga Nyshita V, Aderibigbe FD, Singh M, Yadav KP, Shah SK, Pumbhadia B, Abbas K, Khan W, Kumaran V (2023) The impact of virtual reality (VR) gaming and casual/social gaming on the quality of life, depression, and dialysis tolerance in patients with chronic kidney disease: a narrative review. Cureus 15(9):e44904
Segura-Ortí E, Pérez-Domínguez B, Ortega-Pérez de Villar L, Meléndez-Oliva E, Martínez-Gramage J, García-Maset R, Gil-Gómez JA (2019) Virtual reality exercise intradialysis to improve physical function: a feasibility randomised trial. Scand J Med Sci Sports 29(1):89–94
Maynard LG, de Menezes DL, Lião NS, de Jesus EM, Andrade NLS, Santos JCD, da Silva Júnior WM, Bastos KA, Barreto Filho JAS (2019) Effects of exercise training combined with virtual reality in functionality and health-related quality of life of patients on hemodialysis. Games Health J 8(5):339–348
Herron A, Cavanaugh KL, Umeukeje EM, Ikizler TA, Birdee G (2022) A pilot randomized trial of intradialysis yoga for patients with end-stage kidney disease. Kidney Int Rep 8(2):357–359
Acknowledgements
The authors express their gratitude to Dr. Mariateresa Zicarelli for her support in creating the figures.
Funding
Open access funding provided by Università degli Studi di Verona within the CRUI-CARE Agreement. This research received no external funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Contributions
Facilitator, Y.B.; drafting statements 1,2,3, Fe.B., Fr.B., M.P.; drafting statements 5,6, Y.B., A.S.; drafting statements 7,8, A.C., C.D.A., D.M.; drafting statements 4,9,10. M.A., F.A.; drafting statements 11,12,13,14, C.T., F.M. R.B.; drafting statements 15,16, A.C., G.M., Fe.B.; writing—review and editing Y.B., F.A., A.C.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
The study has been conducted according to the 1995 Declaration of Helsinki and its revisions.
Informed consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by authors.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Battaglia, Y., Baciga, F., Bulighin, F. et al. Physical activity and exercise in chronic kidney disease: consensus statements from the Physical Exercise Working Group of the Italian Society of Nephrology. J Nephrol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-024-02049-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-024-02049-9