Skip to main content
Log in

Growth patterns and outcomes of growth hormone therapy in patients with acrodysostosis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Endocrinological Investigation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Severe short stature is a feature of acrodysostosis, but data on growth are sparse. Treatment with recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) is used in some centers to increase final height, but no studies have been published so far. Our objective was to conduct a multicenter, retrospective, cohort study to investigate growth in individuals with both types of acrodysostosis, treated with rhGH or not; we used the new nomenclature to describe acrodysostosis, as this disease belongs to the large group of inactivating PTH/PTHrP signaling disorders (iPPSD); acrodysostosis refers to iPPSD4 (acrodysostosis type 1 due to PRKAR1A mutations) and iPPSD5 (acrodysostosis type 2, due to PDE4D mutations).

Methods

We present auxological data from individuals with genetically characterized iPPSD4, and participants with clinical features of iPPSD5.

Results

We included 20 and 17 individuals with iPPSD4 and iPPSD5, respectively. The rhGH-treated iPPSD4 patients (n = 9) were smaller at birth than those who did not receive rhGH (median – 2.2 SDS vs. – 1.7 SDS); they showed a trend to catch-up growth during rhGH therapy (median 0.5 SDS in the first year). The rhGH-treated patients (n = 5) reached a better final height compared to those who did not receive rhGH (n = 4) (median – 2.8 SDS vs. – 3.9 SDS), suggesting that rhGH is efficient to increase height in those patients. The difference in target height to final height ranged between 1.6 and 3.0 SDS for iPPSD4 not treated with rhGH (n = 4), 2.1–2.8 SDS for rhGH-treated iPPSD4 (n = 5), 0.6–5.5 SDS for iPPSD5 not treated with rhGH (n = 5) and 2.5–3.1 for rhGH-treated iPPSD5 (n = 2).

Conclusion

Final height may be positively influenced by rhGH in patients with acrodysostosis/iPPSD. Our rhGH-treated cohort started therapy relatively late, which might explain, at least in part, the limited effect of rhGH on height.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Maroteaux P, Malamut G (1968) L’acrodysostose [Acrodysostosis]. Presse Med 76(46):2189–2192

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Robinow M, Pfeiffer RA, Gorlin RJ et al (1971) Acrodysostosis. A syndrome of peripheral dysostosis, nasal hypoplasia, and mental retardation. Am J Dis Child 121(3):195–203

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Silve C, Clauser E, Linglart A (2012) Acrodysostosis. Horm Metab Res 44(10):749–758

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Linglart A, Menguy C, Couvineau A et al (2011) Recurrent PRKAR1A mutation in acrodysostosis with hormone resistance. N Engl J Med 364(23):2218–2226

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Michot C, Le Goff C, Goldenberg A et al (2012) Exome sequencing identifies PDE4D mutations as another cause of acrodysostosis. Am J Hum Genet 90(4):740–745

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee H, Graham JM Jr, Rimoin DL et al (2012) Exome sequencing identifies PDE4D mutations in acrodysostosis. Am J Hum Genet 90(4):746–751

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Linglart A, Fryssira H, Hiort O et al (2012) PRKAR1A and PDE4D mutations cause acrodysostosis but two distinct syndromes with or without GPCR-signaling hormone resistance. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 97(12):2328–2338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Muhn F, Klopocki E, Graul-Neumann L et al (2013) Novel mutations of the PRKAR1A gene in patients with acrodysostosis. Clin Genet 84(6):531–538

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Elli FM, Bordogna P, de Sanctis L et al (2016) Screening of PRKAR1A and PDE4D in a large Italian series of patients clinically diagnosed with Albright hereditary osteodystrophy and/or pseudohypoparathyroidism. J Bone Miner Res 31(6):1215–1224

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lynch DC, Dyment DA, Huang L et al (2013) Identification of novel mutations confirms PDE4D as a major gene causing acrodysostosis. Hum Mutat. 34(1):97–102 (Published correction appears in Hum Mutat. 2013 Apr;34(4):667)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lindstrand A, Grigelioniene G, Nilsson D et al (2014) Different mutations in PDE4D associated with developmental disorders with mirror phenotypes. J Med Genet 51(1):45–54

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Michot C, Le Goff C, Blair E et al (2018) Expanding the phenotypic spectrum of variants in PDE4D/PRKAR1A: from acrodysostosis to acroscyphodysplasia. Eur J Hum Genet 26(11):1611–1622

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Taskén K, Skålhegg BS, Taskén KA et al (1997) Structure, function, and regulation of human cAMP-dependent protein kinases. Adv Second Messenger Phosphoprot Res 31:191–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Taylor SS, Kim C, Cheng CY, Brown SH, Wu J, Kannan N (2008) Signaling through cAMP and cAMP-dependent protein kinase: diverse strategies for drug design. Biochim Biophys Acta 1784(1):16–26

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Conti M, Beavo J (2007) Biochemistry and physiology of cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterases: essential components in cyclic nucleotide signaling. Annu Rev Biochem 76:481–411

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Thiele S, Mantovani G, Barlier A et al (2016) From pseudohypoparathyroidism to inactivating PTH/PTHrP signalling disorder (iPPSD), a novel classification proposed by the EuroPHP network. Eur J Endocrinol 175(6):1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nagasaki K, Iida T, Sato H et al (2012) PRKAR1A mutation affecting cAMP-mediated G protein-coupled receptor signaling in a patient with acrodysostosis and hormone resistance. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 97(9):1808–1813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rhayem Y, Le Stunff C, Abdel Khalek W et al (2015) Functional characterization of PRKAR1A mutations reveals a unique molecular mechanism causing acrodysostosis but multiple mechanisms causing carney complex. J Biol Chem 290(46):27816–32828

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Briet C, Pereda A, Le Stunff C et al (2017) Mutations causing acrodysostosis-2 facilitate activation of phosphodiesterase 4D3. Hum Mol Genet 26(20):3883–3894

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Silve C, Le-Stunff C, Motte E, Gunes Y, Linglart A, Clauser E (2012) Acrodysostosis syndromes. Bonekey Rep 1:225

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Kaname T, Ki CS, Niikawa N et al (2014) Heterozygous mutations in cyclic AMP phosphodiesterase-4D (PDE4D) and protein kinase A (PKA) provide new insights into the molecular pathology of acrodysostosis. Cell Signal 26(11):2446–2459

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Pereda A, Elli FM, Thiele S et al (2021) Inactivating PTH/PTHrP signaling disorders (iPPSDs): evaluation of the new classification in a multicenter large series of 544 molecularly characterized patients. Eur J Endocrinol 184(2):311–320

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Karaplis AC, Goltzman D (2000) PTH and PTHrP effects on the skeleton. Rev Endocr Metab Disord 1(4):331–341

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kronenberg HM (2003) Developmental regulation of the growth plate. Nature 423(6937):332–336

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rentzsch P, Witten D, Cooper GM, Shendure J, Kircher M (2019) CADD: predicting the deleteriousness of variants throughout the human genome. Nucleic Acids Res 47(D1):886–894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kircher M, Witten DM, Jain P, O’Roak BJ, Cooper GM, Shendure J (2014) A general framework for estimating the relative pathogenicity of human genetic variants. Nat Genet 46(3):310–315

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Desmet FO, Hamroun D, Lalande M, Collod-Béroud G, Claustres M, Béroud C (2009) Human Splicing Finder: an online bioinformatics tool to predict splicing signals. Nucleic Acids Res 37(9):e67

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Kopanos C, Tsiolkas V, Kouris A et al (2019) VarSome: the human genomic variant search engine. Bioinformatics 35(11):1978–1980

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S et al (2015) Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med 17(5):405–424

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Carel J-C, Eugster EA, Rogol A, Ghizzoni L, Palmert MR (2009) Consensus statement on the use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs in children. Pediatrics 123(4):e752-762

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. The WHO child growth standards: https://www.who.int/childgrowth/standards

  32. Mantovani G, Bastepe M, Monk D et al (2018) Diagnosis and management of pseudohypoparathyroidism and related disorders: first international consensus Statement. Nat Rev Endocrinol 14(8):476–500

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Ueyama K, Namba N, Kitaoka T et al (2017) Endocrinological and phenotype evaluation in a patient with acrodysostosis. Clin Pediatr Endocrinol 26(3):177–182

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhan Y, Chen W, Feng Z et al (2019) A novel de novo PDE4D gene mutation identified in a Chinese patient with acrodysostosis. Genesis 57(11–12):e23336

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Le Stunff C, Tilotta F, Sadoine J et al (2017) Knock-in of the recurrent R368X mutation of PRKAR1A that represses cAMP-dependent protein kinase A activation: a model of type 1 acrodysostosis. J Bone Miner Res 32(2):333–346

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Giustina A, Mazziotti G, Canalis E (2008) Growth hormone, insulin-like growth factors, and the skeleton. Endocr Rev 29(5):535–559

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Tell GP, Cuatrecasas P, Van Wyk JJ, Hintz RL (1973) Somatomedin: inhibiton of adenylate cyclase activity in subcellular membranes of various tissues. Science 180(4083):312–315

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Smith DM, Roth LM, Johnston CC Jr (1976) Hormonal responsiveness of adenylate cyclase activity in cartilage. Endocrinology 98(1):242–246

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Canalis E, Centrella M, Burch W, McCarthy TL (1989) Insulin-like growth factor I mediates selective anabolic effects of parathyroid hormone in bone cultures. J Clin Invest 83(1):60–65

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Sanchez CP, Salusky IB, Kuizon BD et al (1998) Growth of long bones in renal failure: roles of hyperparathyroidism, growth hormone and calcitriol. Kidney Int 54(6):1879–1887

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. McCarthy TL, Centrella M, Canalis E (1990) Cyclic AMP induces insulin-like growth factor I synthesis in osteoblast-enriched cultures. J Biol Chem 265:15353–15356

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are very grateful to the Acrodysostosis Support & Research Group, the patients, and their families for their important contribution to the study.

Funding

This work was partially supported by the following grants: Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIIII) of the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (Spain) (to GPdN and AP: PI20/00950), European Regional Development Fund, a grant from the Department of Health of the Basque Government (GV2021/111056 to GPdN), the 2019 Research Unit Grant from European Society for Paediatric Endocrinology (ESPE) (to GdPN, GM, and AL), the Ricerca Corrente Funds from the Italian Ministry of Health to Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico (GM)), the AP-HP recurrent funds from the rare disease plan (to A.L. and DA.E.), the RaDiCo PIA « ANR» IO-COHO-03 grant (to A.L.), and the Progetti di Ricerca di Interesse Nazionale (PRIN) grant to GM (2020FYCCE3).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D.-A. Ertl.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

DAE reports receiving travel grants and honoraria from Novo Nordisk, Pfizer and Merck Serono. AL reports receiving research grant support and honoraria from Novo Nordisk, Sandoz, Pfizer, and Merck Serono. All disclosures mentioned are unrelated to this research project. The other authors have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

Participants were selected initially from France, Italy and Spain. For the French participants, the need for written consent was waived, according to national laws. The other centers received approval from their local ethics committees for the collection and sharing of patient data in a pseudonymized manner. The original cohort was extended with the help of the Acrodysostosis Support and Research Patients’ Group, UK, which provided pseudonymized data from families consenting to participate in the study. 

Informed consent

In accordance with the Jardé law in France, as the study was approved by the French Data Protection Authority (CNIL), the need for written consent was waived. Patients and/or their parents/legal guardians were informed verbally of the objectives and procedures of the study and their consent was obtained. They have the right to refuse to participate or to withdraw at any time by writing to http://recherche.aphp.fr/eds/droit-opposition. All other centers were approved by local ethics committees for the collection of data on the patients, which were transferred and analyzed in a pseudonymized manner.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOC 528 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ertl, DA., Mantovani, G., de Nanclares, G.P. et al. Growth patterns and outcomes of growth hormone therapy in patients with acrodysostosis. J Endocrinol Invest 46, 1673–1684 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40618-023-02026-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40618-023-02026-2

Keywords

Navigation