Skip to main content
Log in

The Scope of Practice of Applied Behavior Analysis in State Licensure Laws

  • Discussion and Review Paper
  • Published:
Behavior Analysis in Practice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The scope of applied behavior analysis has historically been defined by behavior analytic publications like Baer et al., Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 91, (1968). However, starting in 2009, state legislators began creating licensure laws for behavior analysts that formalized the scope of practice for applied behavior analysis (ABA) within the applicable states. The purpose of this study was twofold: (1) to evaluate the degree scope of practice statements found in state licensure laws aligned with the individual components of Baer et al.’s seven dimensions of ABA and the APBA Model Act and (2) to evaluate the consistency of the scope of practice statements across states. Each licensed state law was identified, and the section that outlined the scope of practice was isolated and coded. The results of this study identified varying degrees of alignment with the individual components of Baer et al.’s seven dimensions and the APBA Model Act, as well as inconsistencies in the scope of practice among states with licensure for ABA. The component scores of each content area will be discussed, along with the implications for practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. All references to the term license used throughout this article refers specifically to professional license.

  2. Some states do allow for interstate compacts at allow licensed professionals to practice in any state that joins the compact. This will be discussed below.

  3. Section 3, Part F of the APBA Model Act (2018) will be referred to as the APBA Model Act (2018) throughout this article.

  4. It should be noted that there is some overlap between the seven dimensions and APBA Model Act. Specifically, section one of the APBA model act seems to refer to the applied and effective dimensions, section two seems to refer to the behavioral and analytic dimensions, section three seems to refer to the conceptual systems and behavioral dimensions, and section four seems to refer to the conceptual systems dimension.

  5. Approximations of this phrasing were common throughout all of the scope of practice statements reviewed in this study.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cody Morris.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of Interest/Competing Interests

Not applicable.

Research involving Human Participants and/or Animals

Not applicable.

Informed Consent

Not applicable.

Data Sharing

 The source materials for this study are all publicly available.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Morris, C., Donovan, M.T. & Switzer, E.J. The Scope of Practice of Applied Behavior Analysis in State Licensure Laws. Behav Analysis Practice (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-024-00915-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-024-00915-3

Keywords

Navigation