Abstract
This article addresses the relationship between applied behavior analysis (ABA) and the emergence of positive behavior support (PBS) in context of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in the UK and Ireland. Two overarching issues that are salient in this discussion are professional training and certification. To date, there has been a lack of standardized training or statutory requirements to practice PBS despite proponents insisting that its practice should be grounded in behavior analytic principles. Furthermore, there is an undercurrent of anti-ABA bias fueled by misinterpretation and unsubstantiated anecdotal claims used to promote an alternative “value based” approach to managing behavior.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Previous literature has discussed the differences and similarities between applied behavior analysis (ABA) and positive behavior support (PBS) and the associated implications (e.g., Brown et al., 2008; Johnston et al., 2006). The concerns discussed within the current article are by no means unique or new to our field, however, the concerns remain. It is alarming that within the United Kingdom (UK) and Ireland, it can be argued that the distinction between ABA and PBS is broadening, creating a “hard border” between the two camps. The purpose of the current article is not to regurgitate previous debates and discussions but rather to outline the current relationship between ABA and PBS within the UK and Ireland. In doing so, we will examine the outcome of these concerns insofar as they affect behavior services.
There are 700,000 autistic people in the UK which equates to 1 in 100 (Buescher et al., 2014). Specific to Northern Ireland (NI, 2021), governmental statistics consistently reveal that the number of individuals diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) has substantially increased yearly over the last 2 decades. Northern Ireland Health and Social Care Service is divided into five public sector corporations or Trusts. Each Trust represents a particular geographical location within the region and are regarded as part of the UK’s National Health Service (NHS).
An examination of figures on all five Health Trusts revealed that 2,345 children under 18 years of age were diagnosed with ASD in 2018, compared with 1,047 in 2013 (NI, 2021). The latest update in NI from January to March 2022 reveals an overall figure of 2,563 children diagnosed with ASD. Thus, the upward trend is continuing. Furthermore, in terms of referrals, data from September 2002 to 2023, show that the number of children referred for autism services, across all five Trusts, has increased by 36% (Heidi & Kinghan 2023). This upward trend is reflected in prevalence rates in other countries (Anorson et al., 2021; Hai et al., 2023; Talantseva et al., 2023; Zeidan et al., 2022). Increasing prevalence of ASD inevitably leads to the need for increased provision of health and educational services (Bürki et al., 2021) with an associated financial burden on these service providers (Buescher et al., 2014; Grosse et al., 2021; Howlin & Moss, 2012). The estimated financial cost to the UK economy in 2011 was £32 billion (Buescher et al., 2014). These figures underscore the importance of government and charitable agencies making informed decisions on where to concentrate resources, such as staff training and professional development (Fennell & Dillenburger, 2018; Saigh & Bagadood, 2022).
Although ABA is not exclusively an intervention for ASD (Heward et al., 2022), its underlining methodology has provided numerous empirically validated interventions to assess and assist individuals with ASD (e.g., Boyle et al., 2019; Chiesa, 2005; Dillenburger & Keenan, 2009; Ghaemmaghami et al., 2021; Lovaas, 1987; Matson et al., 1996) and it has been recommended as providing the basis for addressing difficulties associated with ASD and intellectual disability (ID; see Larsson, 2013; Leaf & McEachin, 2016; Leaf et al., 2022). However, a public information site from a leading UK-based charity, the National Autistic Society (NAS, 2022), recently painted a different picture of ABA. The charity posted information about PBS and ABA on its web page. When referring to ABA, they implied that cruel punishment methods were currently being used in the UK by ABA practitioners; there was no evidence to substantiate the claim. Moreover, emotive terms such as “barbaric, cruel, traumatizing” (NAS, 2022, p. 1) were paired with a description of ABA, implying that such practices significantly contribute to people's opposition to ABA. The NAS stated they "do not support any intervention that follows one-size-fits-all approaches” and that they “believe that some ABA interventions used today are not sufficiently person-centered and are too intensive" (NAS, 2022, p. 1). Although the post concedes that "ABA is now one of the most researched of all autism approaches" (NAS, 2022, p. 1), there is a caveat that stated that there are significant limitations and gaps in the research, particularly about its long-term effects. With no clarification of where these gaps are, the statement implied that one possible long-term effect is the traumatization of those exposed to ABA interventions. It is paradoxical that although the NAS stated that support "should always be based on best available evidence" (NAS, 2022, p. 1), there is no mention of the lack of empirically validated research regarding the long-term effects of PBS. It is significant that the British Institute of Learning Disabilities (BILD), an organization that purports to provide information, publications, guidance, and training services to improve the quality of life for people with a learning disability, appeared to agree with the misinformation published by the NAS when they posted the following statement on its web page:
We know that some people are concerned that PBS is similar to Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA). At BILD, we are clear that PBS and ABA are not the same thing. The NAS has published a helpful statement highlighting differences between ABA and PBS. (BILD, 2022, p. 2)
Being clear that PBS is not the same thing as ABA is different from clarifying any similarities or differences. It is the contention of the current authors that this BILD statement gives the impression that they sanction this view of ABA and, by default, recommend PBS as the preferred approach for individuals diagnosed with ASD or ID. To the best of our knowledge, no organization has challenged the above statements made by NAS and BILD.
It is the current authors’ assessment that a primary problem is how the NAS and BILD characterize ABA as “an approach.” This sleight of hand stems from a category mistake that results in an applied science being placed on a par with specific interventions or branded packages of intervention (Chiesa, 2005; Cooper et al., 2020; Keenan & Dillenburger, 2018). The result is that ABA is wrongly categorized as a therapeutic intervention for ASD instead of being viewed as a practical application of a scientific discipline (Dillenburger, 2011). In addition to this issue, the NAS, although defining ABA as a broad approach that has changed over time, briefly described the origins of ABA by focusing on a narrow range of interventions without historical or theoretical context. Unfortunately, this uninformed narrative is not uncommon among opponents of ABA (e.g., Anderson, 2023; Milton, 2018). The possible implication of such misinformation/misrepresentation of ABA alongside the unabashed promotion of PBS to policymakers, or the general public, is of great concern to behavior analysts working and advocating for effective evidence-based intervention services to assist individuals with ASD (Keenan & Dillenburger, 2018). The rest of this article examines PBS and ABA both in a historical and present context with reference to peer-reviewed publications, research, and observations from the first two authors who work within the PBS framework/model. As stated, the concerns highlighted within the current article are not new to our field. However, rather than being resolved, the attempt to label ABA as the "bad boy of ASD interventions" appears to be gathering pace in UK and Ireland. For this reason, we feel it is important to rejuvenate this discussion.
PBS Values and Emphasis
The increased prevalence of ASD seems to be paralleled by the ever-increasing number of behavior management strategies, and interventions, many of which claim to be evidence-based (Jacobson et al., 2005). Such a prevalence of often diverse procedures makes any analysis of the parameters and components contributing to efficacy a challenging process (Makrygianni et al., 2018). In the past few decades, PBS (more commonly referred to as positive behavior intervention support [PBIS] in the United States) has pervaded the areas of education, institutional, and community care provisions for individuals with a diagnosis of ASD and those with ID (Guercio & Murray, 2014; Kern & Lane, 2015; Storey & Post, 2019).
PBS can be defined as a method to increase an individual's repertoire utilizing methods of system changes to improve an individual's living environment; it is focused on quality of life in addition to providing solutions to challenging behavior (Horner et al., 1990; Koegel et al., 1996). The general perception of an overreliance on aversive behavioral change procedures to deal with challenging behavior attributed to early behavior modification or ABA interventions (LaVigna & Donnellan, 1986; Meyer & Evans, 1989; Will, 1999) is often linked to the inception of PBS. Thus, PBS emergence can be seen in the context of the move towards using less aversive forms of behavioral management of individuals with an ID (Horner et al., 1990). Whether PBS is seen as consistent with ABA (Anderson & Freeman, 2000) or developing as a distinct discipline (Carr & Sidener, 2002; Kincaid, 2018), it has undoubtedly been, and arguably still is, substantially influenced by ABA (Johnston et al., 2006).
Carr and Horner (2007) drew our attention to the general movement from pathology-based models in favor of more contemporary positive models that emphasize environmental integrity and personal competence (Carr et al., 2002). Furthermore, Carr and Horner conceded that PBS benefits from many decades of scientific research in ABA, which has provided the conceptual framework for numerous assessment procedures, strategies, and interventions (Carr et al., 2002). Moreover, Filter et al. (2009) found that professionals who affiliated exclusively with either PBS or behavior analysis expressed common ground on some of the core elements of both. However, the same professionals expressed greater disagreement regarding the importance of service delivery methods, values, and research methods utilized. That said, Carr and Sidener (2002) seemed to conceptualize PBS as a value-driven behavior analytic service-delivery framework. Likewise, Wacker and Berg (2002) saw PBS as a service delivery model and outlined the value of PBS in promoting the palatability of ABA to the general population. It is interesting that a similar point is made by opponents of ABA (including some of those promoting the neurodiversity movement perspective) who imply a more cynical motive by depicting PBS as a Trojan horse, enabling ABA to be incorporated into schools under the more acceptable brand of PBS (Murray, 2020). However, in defense to such claims, PBS has also been proclaimed as being higher up the evolutionary scale than ABA within the context of ideological movements to promote inclusion/normalization, person-center values, and deinstitutionalization, originally in the field of ID (Knoster, 2018). In the UK, the PBS Competence Framework provides a guide to delivering best practice PBS:
PBS combines the technology of behavioral intervention with the values of normalization, human rights, and self-determination to deliver effective person-centered support for people whose behavior challenges. Crucially, these values inform both the way in which this technology is used and the outcomes that it is designed to achieve. (Positive Behavioral Support Coalition UK, 2015, p. 6)
If we accept the premise that ideological movements can be subject to arbitrary change and cross-cultural variances (Cascio et al., 2021; Grinker, 2020; Kirkham, 2017), then ideological values take precedence over science. As a result, interventions and research data can become filtered through this lens, potentially promoting unhelpful compromises in both intervention and research findings (Filter et al., 2009; Jackson & Panyan, 2002; Johnston et al., 2006).
In practice, PBS interventions follow the idea of what has become known as "wrap-around support," the proactive integration of services across multiple domains, including education, home, family, clinical and therapeutic interventions (Clark & Hieneman, 1999; Hieneman & Fefer, 2017; Raulston et al., 2019). However, Dillenburger et al. (2014) noted that although one intervention does not fit all, the authors also cautioned against an ill-defined multidisciplinary approach evolving into an eclectic "hodgepodge" of interventions consisting of many conceptual and procedural inconsistencies that potentially sideline the empirical evidence-based efficacy of ABA in favor of a “throw everything at it to see what sticks” approach. The question, therefore, is whether PBS, as defined by proponents (Carr et al., 2002; Horner et al., 2021), is methodologically and conceptually compatible with behavior analysis? Reid (2020) conceded that PBS and ABA are linked. However, he caveated this conclusion with the observation that there is no consistent agreement on the precise nature of that link, which he referred to as leaving lingering questions. For PBS practitioners, the potential for an eclectic mismatch of procedures that fall under the umbrella of PBS is significant, motivated at best by misguided propaganda or, at worse, commercially driven pseudo-science (Keenan, 2017; Leaf et al., 2022). As a result, PBS in the UK and Ireland often appears to have little empirical evidence of its engagement in the teaching of functional skills or utilizing skill sets inspired by ABA (Fennel & Dillenburger, 2018).
Working for PBS services within NI, two of the current authors have often received reports about professionals who experienced barriers to implementing skills-based interventions. To teach functional-based skills, the controlling environmental contingencies need to be managed. However, in our experience, purposively controlling or modifying these contingencies has been considered "manipulative" by those who subscribe to a different perspective under the guise of PBS. The result is that professionals have been forced to withdraw effective interventions with the result that levels of challenging behavior return to preintervention levels. In such examples, implementation of PBS has been diluted to only using antecedent interventions, whereas challenging behavior continues to be reinforced with no alternative behaviors taught. Matters are further compounded by the fact that PBS subscribes to the value of “self-determination,” which is inconsistent with the philosophical position of radical behaviorism (Berkholz et al., 2021; Rajaraman et al., 2023; Singer & Wang, 2009). Thus, the inconsistencies within and surrounding the PBS approach often mean that the “throw everything at it to see what sticks” approach that Dillenburger et al. (2014) warns against is often the reality of “PBS” within NI.
Person-Centered Values
ABA, it could be argued, has always been in the truest sense a person-centered approach with its focus on measuring individual behavior across time and the use of single-case experimental designs to demonstrate control, as opposed to the aggregation of data across individuals (Cowan et al., 2017; Keenan & Dillenburger, 2011). In this way, behavior analysis takes into account individual variability (Johnston et al., 2019) and the ethos has always been to empower people, not normalize them, all the while retaining a perspective that is not ableist. As noted by Baer (2005):
The effectiveness of applied behavior analysis depends on analysis. When teaching techniques fail, which often happens with autistic children, that failure should be detected within a few days. . . . In ABA, a graph showing no progress in the last two weeks is always a powerful indicator of a need for analysis and changes in teaching technique reflecting that analysis. (p. 8)
Such analysis prevents unsubstantiated value judgements by the teacher, interventionist, or researchers alike. Moreover, rather than labelling the person or client as “aggressive,” for example, behavior analysts work to uncover the environmental contingencies which establish, shape, and maintain behavior (Fisher et al., 2021). Friman (2021) referred to this as the “circumstances view” of behavior, and neatly summarized the perspective by quoting a Catholic Priest, Father Flanaghan, who stated: "there is no such thing as a bad boy, only bad environment, bad modelling, and bad teaching" (Friman, 2021). The application of the circumstances view has significantly affected the lifestyle changes for people diagnosed with ASD, facilitating their inclusion within the community (Burtner, 2020). Is this not the epitome of the person-centered practice espoused by many other value-based approaches and organizations?
Friman (2021) noted that the normalization and deinstitutionalization movements have long availed of behavior technologies for those with mental health or developmental disabilities (see Ayllon & Michael, 1959; Wolf et al., 1963; Wolfensberger et al., 1972). However, PBS's overt promotion of these social/ethical concepts is a probable factor in its rapid dissemination and uptake by organizations within the ASD and ID care sector (Friman, 2021). Johnston et al. (2006) conceded that PBS has had a superior marketing strategy and that lessons could be learnt to promote the acceptance of ABA. However, Johnston et al. argued that the dissemination of PBS has not furthered the acceptance of ABA (Dillenburger et al., 2016; Johnston et al., 2006). On the contrary, the NAS contrast between PBS and ABA shows the damage being done to the uptake of ABA in the community when proponents of PBS denigrate ABA. Keenan (2017) likens the propagation of such misinformation to “fake news” with its focus on promoting PBS at the expense of the scientific methods used in ABA.
Intervention Emphasis
Johnston et al. (2006) pointed to PBS’s overemphasis on antecedent elements and procedures with comparably less emphasis on the role of consequences. This is most evident with the increasing focus on broad ecological antecedent interventions such as inclusion and awareness of ASD with the aim of increasing societal acceptance and understanding, what Dunlap et al. (2008) refer to as “context” and “macro variables” (Dunlap et al., 2008, p. 693). Thus, the actual origins of challenging behavior could potentially be obscured by what Skinner (1953) refers to as the logical fallacy of post hoc ergo propter hoc (after this, therefore, because of this). For example, challenging behavior can often result in exclusion or restricted access to many community activities or facilities (Emerson & Bromley, 1995; McClean & Grey, 2007). It is conceivable that the PBS focus on these types of ecological or social value-based strategies could ultimately increase societal acceptance of a particular challenging behavior, thus facilitating greater levels of inclusion. However, in reality, the challenging behavior may continue to be emitted at the same level and severity if the maintaining variables have not been identified and manipulated to decrease its occurrence (Fisher et al., 2014). In other words, because a specific antecedent event takes priority, this does not mean that consequences should be relegated in importance in the PBS approach (Miltenberger, 2015). It is the correct balance within the contingent relations of the three-term contingency that determines the analysis of any procedure (Keenan & Dillenburger, 2018).
Many of the skill deficits observed in individuals with developmental disabilities and ID (e.g., language, social, and academic deficits) can also be found in many individuals diagnosed with ASD (see Matson et al., 1996). The acquisition or improvement of such skills would have a positive impact, not only for daily living skills but at the macro level allowing greater inclusion for autistic individuals (Friman, 2021). The beneficiary of the extensively researched and validated ABA technology is not just the person with ASD but also the parents or primary caregivers (Dogan, 2023; Sun, 2022). Healthy functional relationships are essential for all and, indeed, for wider society (Dogan et al., 2017). However, the elephant in the room is the question of whether or not a PBS practitioner can utilize such technology without full engagement with the principles and practices associated with behavior analysis? On the other hand, are such practitioners still practicing PBS if not applying skill development interventions? Without adequate training, the former would be unachievable and the latter indefensible.
Training and Certification
Fischer et al. (2021) advocated evidence-based behavioral problem-solving for challenging behavior. They argued it would be remiss not to accompany this approach with the appropriate behavioral training. Although the Behavior Analyst Certification Board (BACB) and the United Kingdom Society for Behaviour (UK-SBA, n.d.) require standards of knowledge and skill-based technical requirements (BACB, n.d.; UK-SBA, 2023a, b), similar homogeneity seems relatively lacking in PBS. To date, PBS has no certification protocol, and there are no statutory training requirements to practice PBS (Cihon et al., 2020; McDaniel et al., 2017). Thus, anyone can claim to be a specialist and have knowledge of PBS, a reality confirmed by Horner and Kittelman (2021). This starkly contrasts with the academic and practical training criteria for ABA practitioners (Kazemi & Shapiro, 2013). Once behavior analytic certification is achieved, certificants are compelled to adhere to a code of ethics (Bailey & Burch, 2022), practice competency standards and obtain continuing education credits on a 2-year cycle (BACB, 2021), with a similar standard adopted by the UK-SBA (2023a, b).
It is paradoxical that proponents of PBS such as Horner et al. (1990) and Carr et al. (2002) acknowledged the need for all of its practices to be grounded in ABA, and they take the view that one cannot claim to be doing PBS without full engagement with the principles and practices associated with behavior analysis (Horner & Kittelman, 2021). This begs the question as to how a PBS practitioner in the UK or Ireland can effectively utilize behavior intervention procedures without appropriate scientific and technical training in behavior analysis (Tincani, 2007). The early innovators of PBS, such as Carr et al. and Horner et al., had the advantage of extensive training in the scientific foundations, philosophy, and systematic methodology of ABA with the associated certification by the BACB. Given Horner and Kittelman's (2021) stated importance of training in ABA, it behooves all PBS practitioners in the UK and Ireland to rectify the misrepresentation of ABA that appear on the NAS and BILD websites. In addition, there is a duty of care responsibility to correctly inform other organizations about the need for training in ABA in their guidelines of best practice on how to support ASD and ID individuals who engage in challenging behavior (Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2007). The current authors have come to the conclusion that this is all the more important now that in the UK and the Republic of Ireland, PBS is a mandatory framework to provide solutions for the challenging behavior of individuals with an ID or ASD diagnosis (Grey et al., 2016).
It is interesting that Skinner (1974) conceded that the precise terminology utilized by behavior analysis could be a potential variable in the lack of appeal of ABA to the general lay population. That is, the potential difficulty experienced in interpreting this scientific language may alienate the community to the benefits of ABA interventions or even produce animosity towards it (Bailey, 1991; Deitz & Arrington, 1983; Foxx, 1996; Lindsley, 1991; Marshall et al, 2023; O'Leary, 1984; Skiba & Deno, 1991). However, as with all sciences, a taxonomy is important. Without such a behavioral taxonomy, we risk unravelling the precision of its scientific language and replacing it with loose and subjective, often nondescript labels, thus compromising the validity and reliability of its applications and ultimately its efficacy (Keenan et al., 2010). This lack of understanding has been shown to extend beyond the lay population. Arntzen et al. (2010) found misconceptions in university students' and teachers' understanding of behavior analytic terminology, including significant confusion and conceptual misunderstandings (Lamal, 1995). Perhaps more concerning is that similar misconceptions have been found among professionals, most notably in direct care staff (Atun-Einy & Ben-Sasson, 2018; Donat & McKeegan, 1990). However, at the same time, as indicated by the ethics codes of both the BACB and the UK-SBA, behavior analysts are to use understandable language when communicating with clients, customers, and stakeholders. The misconceptions and misunderstandings of behavior analytic terminology among professionals highlights the difficulties one may face when attempting to implement scientific, analytic, and/or technical procedures that characterize the field of behavior analysis. This led Fennell and Dillenburger (2018) to argue for more emphasis on training professionals, such as teachers working with individuals diagnosed with ASD, in the fundamentals of behavior analysis.
In a review of training needed for the competent application of PBS, Mahon et al. (2022) acknowledged and highlighted the need for appropriate and effective staff training in challenging behavior and behavioral interventions. Mahon et al. called for more evidence-based studies of the efficacy of staff-based PBS instruction. They reiterated a call by Bradly and Nathan (2019) for more experimentally rigorous designs to identify the efficacy of PBS training (Bradly & Nathan, 2019; Mahon et al., 2022). However, if PBS practitioners seek behavior analytic advice from a credentialed professional behavior analyst or even work to implement the advice, at what stage could they be said to be practicing ABA? At what stage does an intervention design stop being referred to as PBS or an eclectic approach?
Aversive Procedures
PBS practitioners reject aversive and restrictive practices (Horner et al., 1990; Knoster, 2018; Positive Behavioral Support Coalition UK, 2015). As stated, part of the development of PBS was the reaction to the historically perceived overuse of aversive procedures and ABA’s focus on consequent-based interventions directed at individuals diagnosed with ID, with little regard for the individual's dignity (Horner et al., 1990). Although this perception was compounded by a number of prominent abuse scandals in the late 1980s and early 1990s, most notably the Sunland Miami residential unit in the State of Florida, these incidents were more about the poorly informed application of behavior modification (Bailey & Burch, 2022). Bailey and Burch (2022) linked such abuses to an expectation of quick, easy fixes by poorly trained staff fueled by previous legitimate successes (e.g., Ayllon & Michael, 1959; Burchard & Tyler, 1965; Lovaas et al., 1965; Wolf et al., 1967). The contention that behavior analysts overused or misused aversive procedures and punishment is a post hoc value judgement that is contested (Johnston et al., 2006; Leaf et al., 2022). It could be contended that PBS makes the same erroneous assumptions made by some social movements for autism rights by disproportionately focusing on historical practices and reviewing them under contemporary social standards and knowledge (Furman & Lepper, 2018; Dillenburger & Keenan, 2023; Leaf et al., 2022). Furthermore, the focus on removing coercion or punitive practices has historical precedent in the uptake of behavior analysis well before PBS emerged (Bailey & Burch, 2022). In effect, the call from PBS advocates is a reminder not to forget their roots in ABA as outlined by its founders.
A frequently cited example of the use of aversives is the clinical and research practices of Ivor Lovaas in the Young Autism Project (YAP), which spanned over 20 years (Lovaas et al., 1973). Aversive procedures demonstrated quantifiable reductions of intensity and frequency in individuals emitting life-endangering, self-injurious, or severe obsessive, repetitive behaviors. It is controversial that electric shock was utilized initially (Smith & Eikeseth, 2011), with Lovaas later substituting shock for a spank (Lovaas, 1987). However, YAP's own guidelines aimed for a ratio of reinforcement to punishment at the very most to be 100:1 (Leaf & McEachin, 2016). Lovaas was undoubtedly a pioneer in the field who brought meaningful change to the lives of many children diagnosed with autism (Leaf et al., 2022). Before his seminal work, there was a general perception that autistic individuals were "beyond help" (i.e., incapable of change; Eikeseth, 2001). The fact that aversive procedures were used relatively more frequently in the past says more about the moral climate at that time. The Equal Protection from Assault (Scotland) Act 2019 (see Rogers & Thomas, 2022), covering the principle of reasoned chastisement, outlawed all physical punishment, including smacking, for children under 16 as of November 7, 2020. This removes the caveat of "reasonable punishment." Although Scotland was the first part of the UK to legislate for this, the Welsh Assembly followed suit on March 21, 2022 (Rogers & Thomas, 2022) Likewise, in England and NI, legislation is currently under review with a view to making similar legislative changes (Rogers & Thomas, 2022). However, physical punishment by professionals such as teachers, nursery workers, care workers, or babysitters has been illegal since 1986 in the UK and from 2003 in NI (Speyer et al., 2021). Members of the Association for Behavior Analysis International (ABAI) recently voted in their opposition to the use of the punishment procedure of using contingent electric skin shock under any condition, no matter how extreme the behavior (Perone et al., 2022).
Mainstream ABA has long since embraced socially valid aspects of its interventions (Metz et al., 2005). Indeed, one of the founding fathers of ABA, Don Baer, said the following: "Everything I have described as typical ABA programming does not evoke negative emotions” (Baer, 2005, p. 14). This viewpoint has been enshrined in the BACB's Ethics Code for Behavior Analysts, which emphasizes "providing effective treatment" (code 2.01, p. 10) and "minimizing risk of behavior change" (code 2.15, p. 12); the BACB would only recommend "restrictive or punishment based procedures only after demonstrating that desired results have not been obtained using less intrusive means, or when it is determined by an existing intervention team that the risk of harm to the client outweighs the risk associated with the behavior change" (code 2.15, p. 12). Likewise, the UK-SBA states that "All UK-SBA registrants have signed up to our ethical code, and any registrant found to be using harmful, degrading, painful, or dehumanizing punishment procedures will be removed from our register" (UK-SB 2023a, b, p. 1). That said, punishment is a well-defined principle within ABA. The behavior analytic definition of punishment relates to behavior change i.e., a consequence of behavior that reduces the future probability of that behavior (Azrin, 1970). This can often differ considerably from the layperson’s perception of what constitutes punishment, which is often conflated with coercive and punitive techniques within context of social or personal retribution.
However, using the behavioral definition, even a kiss could be categorized as a punisher for an individual if it decreases the target behavior (Foxx, 1985). If an ABA practitioner discusses punishment contingencies with a fellow behavioral scientist, the common language facilitates objective comparisons and eliminates misunderstandings. It should also be noted that punishment contingencies operate independently of the science of behavior analysis and thus have been operational long before the conception of ABA (Skinner, 1990). Consider a person who may have first tried to touch an open flame and experienced the aversive consequences (i.e., pain) which reduced the likelihood of them engaging this behavior in the future. The only thing that is new is a better understanding how to categorize the effects of this interaction using the science of behavior analysis (Skinner, 1990).
It is the science of behavior analysis which first discovered and demonstrated the functional and possible adverse side effects of punishment; inducing escape and avoidance (Mayer et al., 1968), aggression (Ulrich et al., 1969), stress and anxiety (Sidman, 1989), and negatively reinforcing the behavior of the punishing agent (Lerman & Vorndran, 2002). However, according to recent empirical research, the seemly ubiquitous adverse side effects of punishment may not be as widespread as previously believed (Fontes & Shahan, 2021).
Dillenburger and Keenan (1995) argued that the legal prohibition of such aversive punishment procedures is not enough, and that ABA has at its disposal a range of scientifically validated alternative techniques to tackle CB that do not include aversive procedures (LaVigna et al., 2022). However, if, as we noted, PBS practitioners are prevented from implementing consequence-based interventions, aimed at teaching functional alternative behaviors, there are serious implications for clients and various stakeholders.
Science and PBS
It is the current authors concern that with the importance allocated by PBS to broad issues such as inclusion and normalization, it becomes difficult to separate it from social or political movements, risking the uncritical adaption of subjective philosophical assumptions at the expense of objective science. As Cooper et al. (2020) reminded us, science is not the tool for validating treasured beliefs or our preferred versions of how things should be. The inherent ethical danger of such prioritization is that practitioners may ultimately be imposing their own cherished values or beliefs on the individuals they are there to assist (Baer, 1998). There has been a push by some exponents within PBS to adopt more flexibility in its application of scientific procedures (Scott et al., 2009). The rationale offered details of practical problems such as the resources (e.g., time) required to conduct assessments (e.g., functional analysis) and the difficulties in controlling variables within the community setting (Desrochers et al., 1997; Kern et al., 2006). However, Hanley (2012), for example, rejected such difficulties as myths and demonstrated the practical utility of scientific procedures such as experimental functional analysis in applied settings (Jessel et al., 2022). Although, it should be noted that the validity of such experimental functional analyses is not universally accepted within the behavior analytic community (Fisher et al., 2016; Tiger & Effertz, 2021).
Regardless, the implication is that PBS is “ABA light,” in other words, containing less content, being relatively less complex, or less technical (Ferguson et al., 2019). It is unclear whether PBS can be defined as an application, an applied science, a technology, a collection of procedures, or simply a framework for delivery. Which of these definitions’ proponents deem most relevant can vary and some even incorporate all these components (Kincaid, 2018). Although perhaps no single definition of PBS would be universally acceptable to all PBS or ABA practitioners, it is often referred to as being a multicomponent framework (Gore et al., 2013). However, in the current reviewed literature on PBS the parallels with components of ABA seem unavoidable. Any analysis of the identity of PBS ultimately reverts to conceptual, procedural, and ethical comparisons with ABA past and present.
Conclusion
The current analysis is based on writings from prominent proponents of PBS (e.g., Allen et al., 2005; Carr et al., 2002; Horner et al., 1990; Horner et al., 2021) and our own “lived experience in working in a PBS environment in NI.” Many other publications on ABA and PBS revealed that what variance there is on the surface, at times, appears small and no more than the debates within the disciplines that make up ABA (Weiss et al., 2010). In fact, when you look at Skinner’s criticism on the use of aversives (Griffin et al., 1988), it can easily be argued that PBS has simply voiced its opposition to those who have strayed too far from his vision. Harvey (1973) expressed Skinner’s vision like this:
We cannot imagine how a nonpunishing world would work, even though it is clear that the punishing world we have does not work. That is, most of us cannot imagine what a nonpunishing world would be like. A minority among us can, however. Its members are adherents of a new behaviorism with a new non-Benthamite psychology, one that claims to rest upon solid scientific foundations rather than merely superficial common-sense postulates. This is the psychology of operant conditioning, invented (discovered) by B. F. Skinner. (p. 4)
Is there enough to constitute the separation of PBS from ABA as a distinct science? The Carr et al. (2002) brand of PBS has close conceptual and procedural links that appear to display only moderate differences from ABA. However, Carr et al. viewed PBS differently enough to consider it a new science. There is less consensus on how close this relationship should be in the future. The appeal of a relatively newly marketed and rapidly growing approach which distances itself from a more established approach may add to the allure of PBS (Johnston et al., 2006). The PBS proponents are not immune to the environmental consequences of conditioned reinforcers such as academic acclaim and financial and social reinforcement (Keenan et al., 2010). It is interesting that Skinner (1988) likened the appropriation of the principles of behavior analysis to the actions of cuckoos—birds that lay their eggs in other birds' nests, so the host bird does all the work in rearing its offspring. Is PBS the cuckoo in the nest? Such depiction implies that the ideological purity of behavior analysis is threatened by such diversification of the field although these same proponents are still able to reap the benefits of the knowledge gained in the field. Friman (2021) suggested the possible existence of an evolutionary instinct that leads an organism to interpret differences as potentially threatening hence the universal tendency to attack it. In doing, Friman related this as a possible factor in the forceful criticisms by some "conventional behavior analysis" of PBS. This rubric assumes that there is considerable similarity between PBS and ABA, with only modest differences between the fields and that the attack is not directed at ABA. Others are more concerned about the potential increasing divisive effect that the debate is having (Weiss et al., 2010). In reviewing the literature on the difference between PBS and ABA, we believe there is a temptation to overstate the case in either direction. At the same time, we might argue that there is an element of political naivety on the part of PBS proponents. This is evident outside of the United States in countries where training opportunities in ABA have yet to be established (Keenan et al., 2023; Kingsdorf & Pancocha, 2023; Sivaraman & Fahmie, 2020).
How can policymakers decide between investing in ABA or PBS training in such a country? This becomes a serious issue when proponents of PBS denigrate ABA, as happens in the UK (BILD, 2022). In effect, this defamation of ABA misleads policymakers into concluding that the breakthrough at the state level in the independent support for ABA is to be considered irrelevant for policy decisions in relation to autism service provision. Without an existing infrastructure in a country to provide training in ABA, the consequence is that this makes it more difficult for professionals to develop the science in their own countries. Those affected most are the parents, caregivers, and indeed the ASD individuals (Dillenburger et al., 2010). Are these individuals who are in need of assistance just to be collateral damage? Are both service providers and service users being deprived of effective interventions and knowledge born out of the science of ABA? It is the opinion of the current authors that when PBS emphasizes a value-driven position, this implies an air of ethical and moral superiority. However, general ethical principles such as the pursuit of excellence, accountability, and do no harm (Keith-Spiegel & Koocher, 1998) which are included in and inspire many ethical codes, including behavior analytic and medical codes, seem inconceivable without the prerequisite knowledge and training before any intervention. Bailey and Burch (2022) identified insufficient knowledge and training as a significant factor in the drift from treatment to abuse in scandals such as the Sunland residential home (McAllister, 1972). The consequence of such a scandal has changed ABA practice, leading to statutory requirements for certification, supervision, and training before practice (Bailey & Burch, 2022). Such consistency in a flooded marketplace of interventions and treatments for autism can only inject more clarity in a melee of proposed experts and specialists in the field.
Keenan (2017) suggested a possible solution regarding productive comparisons and the current confusion of clients who need to invest in effective strategies and treatment packages. Historical reviews can easily connect PBS to ABA (Carr & Sidener, 2002; Gore et al., 2013), as they can with Early Intensive Behavioral Intervention (Dunlap & Fox, 2009; Eldevik et al., 2009), Picture Exchange Communication System (Bondy & Frost, 1994), and Pivotal Response Training (Koegel et al., 1996). That being so, it makes perfect sense to reflect these historical connections by anchoring their acronyms with ABA itself as in ABA: PBS, ABA: EIBI, ABA: PECS, ABA: PRT, respectively. Without such a nomenclature, it would not be inconceivable for the short-sightedness of PBS advocates and others who denigrate ABA, along with the misunderstandings promulgated by neurodiversity arguments, to coalesce into a movement that prevents the development of ABA in other countries. Although some of the arguments made in this paper have been made before, they seem to have been unsuccessful in arresting the continued fragmentation of a science. Our goal in this article has been to rekindle discussion because spreading misinformation about ABA seems to be fair game for those who experience no consequences for doing so.
References
Allen, D., James, W., Evans, J., Hawkins, S., & Jenkins, R. (2005). Positive behavioural support: Definition, current status and future directions. Tizard Learning Disability Review, 10(2), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.1108/13595474200500014
Anderson, C. M., & Freeman, K. A. (2000). Positive behavior support: Expanding the application of applied behavior analysis. The Behavior Analyst, 23(1), 85–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392001
Anderson, L. K. (2023). Autistic experiences of applied behavior analysis. Autism, 27(3), 737–750. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613221118216
Arntzen, E., Lokke, J., Lokke, G., & Eilertsen, D. E. (2010). On misconceptions about Behavior Analysis among university students and teachers. The Psychological Record, 60(2), 325–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395710
Anorson, N., Male, I., Farr, W., & Memon, A. (2021). Prevalence of autism in Europe, North America and Oceania, 20002020: A systematic review. European Journal of Public Health, 31(Suppl 3), ckab164.786. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckab164.786
Atun-Einy, O., & Ben-Sasson, A. (2018). Pediatric allied healthcare professionals’ knowledge and self-efficacy regarding ASD. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 47, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2017.12.001
Ayllon, T., & Michael, J. (1959). The psychiatric nurse as a behavioural engineer. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 2(4), 323–334. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1959.2-323
Azrin, N. H. (1970). Punishment of elicited aggression. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 14(1), 7–10. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1970.14-7
Baer, D. M. (1998). Self-determination and individuals with significant disabilities: Examining meanings and misinterpretations. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 23(1), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.2511/rpsd.23.1.5
Baer, D. M. (2005). Letters to a lawyer. In W. L. Heward, T. E. Heron, N. A. Neef, S. M. Peterson, D. M. Sainato, G. Cart-Ledge, R. Gargner, D. Peterson, S. B. Hersh, & J. C. Dardig (Eds.), Focus on behavior analysis in education: Achievements, challenges, & opportunities (pp. 3–29). Pearson/Merrill/Prentice Hall.
Bailey, J. S. (1991). Marketing behavior analysis requires different talk. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24(3), 445–448. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1991.24-445
Bailey, J. S., & Burch, M. R. (2022). Ethics for behavior analysts (4th ed.). Routledge Taylor & Francis.
Behavior Analyst Certification Board. (2021). Ethics code for behavior analysts. Retrieved November 21, 2021, from https://bacb.com/wp-content/ethics-code-for-behavior-analysts/
Behavior Analyst Certification Board. (n.d.). Handbook. Retrieved December 21, 2021, from https://www.bacb.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/BCBAHandbook_230321-a.pdf
Berkholz, J., Hemberger, K., Jonason, B., & Nelson, S. (2021). Promoting the well-being of people with neurodevelopmental disabilities through trauma-informed supports. MSW Program Policy Advocacy Briefs. Minnesota State University https://cornerstone.lib.mnsu.edu/msw-student-policy-advocacy-briefs/36
Bondy, A. S., & Frost, L. A. (1994). The picture exchange communication system. Focus on Autism & Other Developmental Disabilities, 9(3), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357694009003
Boyle, M. A., Keenan, G., Forck, K. L., & Curtis, K. S. (2019). Treatment of elopement without blocking with a child with autism. Behavior Modification, 43(1), 132–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445517740871
Bradly, A., & Nathan, G. (2019). Institutional CSR: Provision of public goods in developing economies. Social Responsibility Journal, 15(7), 874–887. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-01-2018-0019
British Institute of Learning Disabilities (BILD). (2022). What does good PBS look like? Retrieved October 10, 2022, from https://www.bild.org.uk/what-does-good-pbs-look-like/
Brown, F., Michaels, C. A., Oliva, C. M., & Woolf, S. B. (2008). Personal paradigm shifts among ABA and PBS experts: Comparisons in treatment acceptability. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 10(4), 212–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300708318797
Buescher, A. V. S., Cidav, Z., Knapp, M., & Mandell, D. S. (2014). Costs of autism spectrum disorders in the United Kingdom and the United States. JAMA Pediatrics, 168(8), 721. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.210
Burchard, J. D., & Tyler, V. O. (1965). The modification of delinquent behavior through operant conditioning. Behaviour Research & Therapy, 2(2–4), 245–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(64)90028-2
Bürki, L., Höfer, J., Kamp-Becker, I., Poustka, L., Roessner, V., Stroth, S., Wolff, N., Hoffmann, F., & Bachmann, C. (2021). Special educational support in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder in Germany: Results from a parent survey. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 112, 103931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2021.103931
Burtner, J. (2020). The heart of ABA: Science to the rescue. Retrieved December 8, 2021, from https://abatechnologies.com/blog/the-heart-of-aba-science-to-the-rescue
Carr, E. G., Dunlap, G., Horner, R. H., Koegel, R. L., Turnbull, A. P., Sailor, W., Anderson, J. L., Albin, R. W., Koegel, L. K., & Fox, L. (2002). Positive behavior support: Evolution of an applied science. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 4(1), 4–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/109830070200400102
Carr, E. G., & Horner, R. H. (2007). The expanding vision of positive behavior support: research perspectives on happiness, helpfulness, hopefulness. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 9(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/10983007070090010201
Carr, J. E., & Sidener, T. M. (2002). On the relation between applied behavior analysis and positive behavioral support. The Behavior Analyst, 25(2), 245–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392062
Cascio, M. A., Weiss, J. A., & Racine, E. (2021). Making Autism research inclusive by attending to intersectionality: A review of the research ethics literature. Review Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders, 8(1), 22–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40489-020-00204-z
Chiesa, M. (2005). ABA is not “a therapy for autism.” In M. Keenan, M. Henderson, K. P. Kerr, & K. Dillenburger (Eds.), Applied behaviour analysis and autism: Building a future together. Jessica Kingsley.
Cihon, J. H., Ferguson, J. L., Leaf, J. B., Milne, C. M., Leaf, R., & McEachin, J. (2020). A randomized clinical trial of three prompting systems to teach tact relations. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 53(2), 727–743. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.617
Clark, H. B., & Hieneman, M. (1999). Comparing the wraparound process to positive behavioral support: What we can learn. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 1(3), 183–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/109830079900100307
Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2020). Applied behavior analysis (3rd ed.). Pearson.
Cowan, R. J., Abel, L., & Candel, L. (2017). A meta-analysis of single-subject research on behavioral momentum to enhance success in students with autism. Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders, 47(5), 1464–1477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-017-3076-6
Deitz, S. M., & Arrington, R. L. (1983). Factors confusing language use in the analysis of behavior. Behaviorism, 11(2), 117–132. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27759023
Desrochers, M. N., Hile, M. G., & Williams-Moseley, T. L. (1997). Survey of functional assessment procedures used with individuals who display mental retardation and severe problem behaviors. American Journal of Mental Retardation: AJMR, 101(5), 535–546.
Dillenburger, K. (2011). The emperor’s new clothes: Eclecticism in autism treatment. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 5(3), 1119–1128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2010.12.008
Dillenburger, K., & Keenan, M. (1995). Dealing with child problem behaviours effectively. Child Care in Practice, 1(3), 33–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/13575279508412864
Dillenburger, K., & Keenan, M. (2009). None of the As in ABA stand for autism: Dispelling the myths. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 34(2), 193–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668250902845244
Dillenburger, K., & Keenan, M. (2023). Autism and behavior analysis: From dissonance to dialogue. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 15(3), 199–208. https://www.iejee.com/index.php/IEJEE/article/view/2054%3cAQ%3eNotcitedinthearticle.%3c%3e
Dillenburger, K., Keenan, M., Doherty, A., Byrne, T., & Gallagher, S. (2010). Living with children diagnosed with autistic spectrum disorder: Parental and professional views. British Journal of Special Education, 37(1), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8578.2010.00455.x
Dillenburger, K., McKerr, L., Jordan, J. A., & Keenan, M. (2016). Staff training in Autism: The one-eyed wo/man. International Journal of Environmental Research & Public Health, 13(7), 716. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13070716
Dillenburger, K., Röttgers, H.-R., Dounavi, K., Sparkman, C., Keenan, M., Thyer, B., & Nikopoulos, C. (2014). Multidisciplinary teamwork in Autism: Can one size fit all? Australian Educational & Developmental Psychologist, 31(2), 97–112. https://doi.org/10.1017/edp.2014.13
Dogan, R. K. (2023). Parent training interventions to applied behavior analysis (ABA). Handbook of applied behavior analysis for children with autism: Clinical guide to assessment and treatment (pp. 435–466). Springer International.
Dogan, R. K., King, M. L., Fischetti, A. T., Lake, C. M., Mathews, T. L., & Warzak, W. J. (2017). Parent-implemented behavioral skills training of social skills. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 50(4), 805–818. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.411
Donat, D. C., & McKeegan, G. F. (1990). Behavioral knowledge among direct care staff in an inpatient psychiatric setting. Behavioral Interventions, 5(2), 95–103. https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.2360050204
Dunlap, G., Carr, E. G., Horner, R. H., Zarcone, J. R., & Schwartz, I. (2008). Positive behavior support and applied behavior analysis: A familial alliance. Behavior Modification, 32(5), 682–698. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445508317132
Dunlap, G., & Fox, L. (2009). Positive behavior support and early intervention. Handbook of positive behavior support (pp. 49–71). Springer.
Eikeseth, S. (2001). Recent critiques of the UCLA Young Autism Project. Behavioral Interventions, 16(4), 249–264. https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.95
Eldevik, S., Hastings, R. P., Hughes, J. C., Jahr, E., Eikeseth, S., & Cross, S. (2009). Meta-analysis of early intensive behavioral intervention for children with autism. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 38(3), 439–450. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374410902851739
Emerson, E., & Bromley, J. (1995). The form and function of challenging behaviours. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 39(5), 388–398. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.1995.tb00543.x
Fennell, B., & Dillenburger, K. (2018). Applied behaviour analysis: What do teachers of students with autism spectrum disorder know. International Journal of Educational Research, 87, 110–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2016.06.012
Ferguson, J. L., Cihon, J. H., Leaf, J. B., Van Meter, S. M., McEachin, J., & Leaf, R. (2019). Assessment of social validity trends in the journal of applied behavior analysis. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 20(1), 146–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/15021149.2018.1534771
Filter, K. J., Tincani, M., & Fung, D. (2009). Surveying professionals’ views of positive behavior support and behavior analysis. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 11(4), 222–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300708325264
Fontes, R. M., & Shahan, T. A. (2021). Punishment and its putative fallout: A reappraisal. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 115(1), 185–203. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.653
Fischer, A. J., Lehman, E., Miller, J., Houlihan, D., Yamashita, M., O’Neill, R. E., & Jenson, W. R. (2021). Integrating school psychology and applied behavior analysis: A proposed training model. Contemporary School Psychology, 25(1), 51–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-018-00223-y
Fisher, W. W., Greer, B. D., Romani, P. W., Zangrillo, A. N., & Owen, T. M. (2016). Comparisons of synthesized and individual reinforcement contingencies during functional analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 49(3), 596–616. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.314
Fisher, W. W., Greer, B. D., Querim, A. C., & DeRosa, N. (2014). Decreasing excessive functional communication responses while treating destructive behavior using response restriction. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 35(11), 2614–2623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2014.06.024
Fisher, W. W., Piazza, C. C., & Roane, H. S. (Eds.). (2021). Handbook of applied behavior analysis (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
Foxx, R. M. (1985). The jack tizzard memorial lecture decreasing behaviours: Clinical, ethical, and environmental issues. Australia 7 New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 11(4), 189–199. https://doi.org/10.3109/13668258508998639
Foxx, R. M. (1996). Translating the covenant: The behavior analyst as ambassador and translator. The Behavior Analyst, 19(2), 147–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393162
Friman, P. C. (2021). There is no such thing as a bad boy: The circumstances view of problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 54(2), 636–653. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.816
Furman, T. M., & Lepper, T. L. (2018). Applied behavior analysis: Definitional difficulties. The Psychological Record, 68(1), 103–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-018-0282-3
Ghaemmaghami, M., Hanley, G. P., & Jessel, J. (2021). Functional communication training: From efficacy to effectiveness. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 54(1), 122–143. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.762
Gore, N. J., McGill, P., Toogood, S., Allen, D., Hughes, J. C., Baker, P., Hastings, R. P., Noone, S. J., & Denne, L. D. (2013). Definition and scope for positive behavioural support. International Journal of Positive Behavioural Support, 3(2), 14–23. Retrieved December 20, 2021, from https https://www.bild.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Definition-and-scope-for-positive-behavioural-support.pdf
Grey, I., Lydon, H., & Healy, O. (2016). Positive behaviour support: What model of disability does it represent? Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 41(3), 255–266. https://doi.org/10.3109/13668250.2016.1164304
Griffin, J. C., Paisey, T. J., Stark, M. T., & Emerson, J. H. (1988). B. F. Skinner’s position on aversive treatment. American Journal of Mental Retardation, 93(1), 104–105.
Grinker, R. R. (2020). Autism, “stigma”, disability: A shifting historical terrain. Current Anthropology, 61(S21), S55–S67. https://doi.org/10.1086/705748
Grosse, S. D., Ji, X., Nichols, P., Zuvekas, S. H., Rice, C. E., & Yeargin-Allsopp, M. (2021). Spending on young children with Autism Spectrum Disorder in employer-sponsored plans, 2011–2017. Psychiatric Services, 72(1), 16–22. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.20200009
Guercio, J. M., & Murray, W. J. (2014). Licensure for behavior analysts: The path to responsible and cooperative action. Behavioral Interventions, 29(3), 225–240. https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.1388
Hai, Y., Muhammad, S., Ain, Q., Zou, M., Liu, D., & LiJie, W. (2023). A comparison of the epidemiological factors and burden of autism spectrum disorders worldwide `and in China. Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3012853/v1
Hanley, G. P. (2012). Functional assessment of problem behavior: Dispelling myths, overcoming implementation obstacles, and developing new lore. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 5(1), 54–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03391818
Harvey, W. J. (1973). Beyond the punitive society. Freeman.
Heidi, R., & Kinghan, D. (2023). Childrens quarterly autism statistics. Northern Statistics & Research Agency https://datavis.nisra.gov.uk/health/ni-childrens-autism-stats-jul-sep-23.html#Validation
Heward, W. L., Critchfield, T. S., Reed, D. D., Detrich, R., & Kimball, J. W. (2022). ABA from A to Z: Behavior science applied to 350 domains of socially significant behavior. Perspectives on Behavior Science, 45(2), 327–359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-022-00336-z
Hieneman, M., & Fefer, S. A. (2017). Employing the principles of positive behavior support to enhance family education and intervention. Journal of Child & Family Studies, 26(10), 2655–2668. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-017-0813-6
Horner, R. H., Dunlap, G., Koegel, R. L., Carr, E. G., Sailor, W., Anderson, J., Albin, R. W., & O’Neill, R. E. (1990). Toward a technology of “nonaversive” behavioral support. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 15(3), 125–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/154079699001500301
Horner, R. H., & Kittelman, A. (2021). Advancing the large-scale implementation of applied behavior analysis. Behavior & Social Issues, 30(1), 94–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42822-021-00049-z
Howlin, P., & Moss, P. (2012). Adults with autism spectrum disorders. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 57(5), 275–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/070674371205700502
Jackson, L., & Panyan, M. V. (2002). Positive behavioral support in the classroom: Principles and practices. Paul H Brookes.
Jacobson, J. W., Foxx, R. M., & Mulick, J. A. (Eds.). (2005). Controversial therapies for developmental disabilities: Fad, fashion, and science in professional practice. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Jessel, J., Rosenthal, D., Hanley, G. P., Rymill, L., Boucher, M. B., Howard, M., Perrin, J., & Lemos, F. M. (2022). On the occurrence of dangerous problem behavior during functional analysis: An evaluation of 30 applications. Behavior Modification, 46(4), 834–862. https://doi.org/10.1177/01454455211010698
Johnston, J. M., Foxx, R. M., Jacobson, J. W., Green, G., & Mulick, J. A. (2006). Positive behavior support and applied behavior analysis. The Behavior Analyst, 29(1), 51–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392117
Johnston, J. M., Pennypacker, H. S., & Green, G. (2019). Strategies and tactics of behavioral research and practice (4th ed.). Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
Kazemi, E., & Shapiro, M. (2013). A review of board standards across behavioral health professions: Where does the BCBA credential stand? Behavior Analysis in Practice, 6(2), 18–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03391799
Keenan, M. (2017). The fuzzy outline of an operant. The Behavior Analyst, 40(1), 187–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-017-0097-6
Keenan, M., & Dillenburger, K. (2011). When all you have is a hammer.... RCTs and hegemony in science. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 5(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2010.02.003
Keenan, M., Dillenburger, K., Konrad, M. H., Debetencourt, N., Vuksan, R., Kourea, L., . . . & Gallagher, S. (2023). Professional development of behavior analysts in Europe: A snapshot for 21 countries. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 16(3), 709–729. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-022-00754-0
Keenan, M., & Dillenburger, K. (2018). How “fake news” affects autism policy. Societies, 8(2), 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc8020029
Keenan, M., Dillenburger, K., Moderato, P., & Röttgers, H. R. (2010). Science for sale in a free market economy: But at what price? ABA and the treatment of autism in Europe. Behavior & Social Issues, 19(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v19i0.2879
Keith-Spiegel, P., & Koocher, G. P. (1998). How to confront and unethical colleague. In G. P. Koocher, J. C. Norcross, & S. S. Hill (Eds.), Psychologist’s desk reference (pp. 469–473). Oxford University Press.
Kern, J. K., Trivedi, M. H., Garver, C. R., Grannemann, B. D., Andrews, A. A., Savla, J. S., Johnson, D. G., Mehta, J. A., & Schroeder, J. L. (2006). The pattern of sensory processing abnormalities in autism. Autism, 10(5), 480–494. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361306066564
Kern, L., & Lane, K. (2015). What’s inside—Highlights from this issue. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 17(2), 67–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300715570617
Kincaid, D. (2018). Staying true to our PBS roots in a changing world. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 20(1), 15–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300717735057
Kingsdorf, S., & Pancocha, K. (2023). Learning from the Czech Republic’s experiences with growing applied behavior analysis services for children with autism. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 24(1–2), 154–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/15021149.2022.2164827
Kirkham, P. (2017). “The line between intervention and abuse” Autism and applied behaviour analysis. History of the Human Sciences, 30(2), 107–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695117702571
Knoster, T. (2018). Commentary: Evolution of positive behavior support and future directions. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 20(1), 23–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300717735056
Koegel, L. K. E., Koegel, R. L., & Dunlap, G. E. (1996). Positive behavioral support: Including people with difficult behavior in the community. Paul H Brookes.
Lamal, P. A. (1995). College students’ misconceptions about Behavior Analysis. Teaching of Psychology, 22(3), 177–180. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top2203_3
Larsson, E. V. (2013). Is applied behavior analysis (ABA) and early intensive behavioral intervention (EIBI) an effective treatment for autism? A cumulative review of impartial reports. Autism, 27(1), 168–179. Retrieved December 20, 2022, from https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Is-Applied-Behavior-Analysis-(ABA)-and-Early-(EIBI)-Larsson/80f58225e081e55b83e0a5472f833196f71d4bfc
LaVigna, G. W., & Donnellan, A. M. (1986). Alternatives to punishment: Solving behavior problems with non-aversive strategies. Irvington Publishers.
LaVigna, G. W., Hughes, E. C., Potter, G., Spicer, M., Hume, L., Willis, T. J., & Huerta, E. (2022). Needed independent and dependent variables in multi-element behavior support plans addressing severe behavior problems. Perspectives on Behavior Science, 45(2), 421–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-022-00331-4
Leaf, J. B., Cihon, J. H., Leaf, R., McEachin, J., Liu, N., Russell, N., Unumb, L., Shapiro, S., & Khosrowshahi, D. (2022). Concerns about ABA-based intervention: An evaluation and recommendations. Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders, 52(6), 2838–2853. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-021-05137-y
Leaf, R., & McEachin, J. (2016). The Lovaas Model: Love it or hate it, but first understand it. In R. G. Romanczyk & J. McEachin (Eds.), Comprehensive models of Autism Spectrum Disorder treatment: Points of divergence and convergence (pp. 7–43). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40904-7_2
Lerman, D. C., & Vorndran, C. M. (2002). On the status of knowledge for using punishment: Implications for treating behavior disorders. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 35(4), 431–464. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2002.35-431
Lindsley, O. R. (1991). From technical jargon to plain English for application. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24(3), 449–458. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1991.24-449
Lovaas, O. I. (1987). Behavioral treatment and normal educational and intellectual functioning in young autistic children. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 55(1), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.55.1.3
Lovaas, O. I., Koegel, R., Simmons, J. Q., & Long, J. S. (1973). Some generalization and follow-up measures on autistic children in behavior therapy. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 6(1), 131–165. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1973.6-131
Lovaas, O., Schaeffer, B., & Simmons, J. (1965). Building social behavior in autistic children by use of electric shock. Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 1, 99–109. Retrieved July 18, 2021, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232564728_Building_social_behavior_in_autistic_children_by_use_of_electric_shock/citation/download
Mahon, D., Walsh, E., Holloway, J., & Lydon, H. (2022). A systematic review of training methods to increase staff’s knowledge and implementation of positive behaviour support in residential and day settings for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 26(3), 732–757. https://doi.org/10.1177/17446295211022124
Makrygianni, M. K., Gena, A., Katoudi, S., & Galanis, P. (2018). The effectiveness of applied behavior analytic interventions for children with autism spectrum disorder: A meta-analytic study. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 51, 18–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2018.03.006
Matson, J. L., Baglio, C. S., Smiroldo, B. B., Hamilton, M., Packlowskyj, T., Williams, D., & Kirkpatrick-Sanchez, S. (1996). Characteristics of autism as assessed by the Diagnostic Assessment for the Severely Handicapped—II (DASH-II). Research in Developmental Disabilities, 17(2), 135–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/0891-4222(95)00044-5
Marshall, K. B., Weiss, M. J., & Critchfield, T. S. (2023). Parents’ emotional responses to behavior analysis terms: A comparative analysis. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 39(2), 247–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40416-023-00191-2
Mayer, G. R., Sulzer, B., & Cody, J. J. (1968). The use of punishment in modifying student behavior. Journal of Special Education, 2(3), 323–328. https://doi.org/10.1177/002246696800200311
McAllister, J. W. (1972). Report of resident abuse investigating committee. Division of Retardation. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services.
McClean, B., & Grey, I. (2007). Modifying challenging behaviour and planning positive supports. In A. Carr, G. O’Reilly, P. N. Walsh, & J. McEvoy (Eds.), The handbook of intellectual disability and clinical psychology practice (pp. 643–684). Routledge.
McDaniel, S., Kim, S., & Guyotte, K. (2017). Perceptions of implementing positive behavior interventions and supports in high-need school contexts through the voice of local stakeholders. Journal of At-Risk Issues, 20(2), 35–44. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1175692
Metz, B., Mulick, J. A., & Butter, E. M. (2005). Autism: A late 20th century fad magnet. In J. W. Jacobson, R. M. Foxx, & J. A. Mulick (Eds.), Controversial therapies for developmental disabilities: Fad, fashion, and science in professional practice (pp. 237–264). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Meyer, L. H., & Evans, I. M. (1989). Nonaversive intervention for behavior problems: A manual for home and community. Brookes.
Miltenberger, R. G. (2015). Behavior modification: Principles and procedures (6th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Milton, D. (2018). A critique of the use of applied behavioural analysis (ABA): On behalf of the Neurodiversity manifesto steering group. https://kar.kent.ac.uk/69268/
Murray, D. (2020). From protest to taskforce. In S. K. Kapp (Ed.), Autistic community and the neurodiversity movement (pp. 277–285). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8437-0_20
National Autistic Society. (2022). Positive behaviour support (PBS). Retrieved October 10, 2022, from https://www.autism.org.uk/advice-and-guidance/topics/positive-behaviour-support-pbs
Northern Ireland Government. (2021). Autism statistics. Retrieved May 20, 2022, from https://www.health-ni.gov.uk/articles/autism-statistics
O’Leary, K. D. (1984). The image of behavior therapy: It is time to take a stand. Behavior Therapy, 15(3), 219–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7894(84)80025-8
Perone, M., Lerman, D., Peterson, S., & Williams, D. C. (2022). Report of the ABAI task force on contingent electric skin shock. Retreived November 1, 2022, from https://vkc.vumc.org/assets/files/triad/CESS_Task_Force_Report_09-28-22.pdf
Positive Behavioral Support Coalition UK. (2015). A competence framework. http://pbsacademy.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Positive-Behavioural-Support-Competence-Framework-May-2015.pdf
Rajaraman, A., Austin, J. L., & Gover, H. C. (2023). A practitioner’s guide to emphasizing choice-making opportunities in behavioral services provided to individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 69(1), 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/20473869.2022.2117911
Raulston, T. J., Hieneman, M., Caraway, N., Pennefather, J., & Bhana, N. (2019). Enablers of behavioral parent training for families of children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Child & Family Studies, 28(3), 693–703. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-018-1295-x
Reid, D. H. (2020). Contributions of positive behavior support amid lingering questions over its relationship with behavior analysis: A review of Positive behavior supports for adults with disabilities in employment, community, and residential settings by Storey and Post. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 53(2), 1192–1199. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.671
Rogers, C., & Thomas, G. (2022). Spare the rod! Implications for community safety partnerships in removing the reasonable chastisement defence in Wales. Crime Prevention & Community Safety, 24(1), 42–56. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41300-021-00137-7
Royal College of Psychiatrists. (2007). Challenging behaviour: A unified approach. British Psychological Society, & Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists. Retrieved May 4, 2021, from https://www.rcpsych.ac.uk/docs/default-source/improving-care/better-mh-policy/college-reports/college-report-cr144.pdf?sfvrsn=73e437e8_2
Saigh, B. H., & Bagadood, N. H. (2022). Knowledge assessment of teachers of students with autism spectrum disorder from applied behaviour analysis perspective. International Journal of Computer Science & Network Security, 22(1), 288–294. https://doi.org/10.22937/IJCSNS.2022.22.1.40
Scott, T. M., Anderson, C., Mancil, R., & Alter, P. (2009). Function-based supports for individual students in school settings. In W. Sailor, G. Dunlap, G. Sugai, & R. Horner (Eds.), Handbook of positive behavior support (pp. 421–441). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09632-2_18
Sidman, M. (1989). Coercion and its fallout (Rev). Authors Cooperative.
Singer, G. H., & Wang, M. (2009). The intellectual roots of positive behavior support and their implications for its development. Handbook of positive behavior support (pp. 17–46). Springer.
Sivaraman, M., & Fahmie, T. A. (2020). A systematic review of cultural adaptations in the global application of ABA-based telehealth services. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 53(4), 1838–1855. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.763
Skiba, R. J., & Deno, S. L. (1991). Terminology and behavior reduction: The case against “punishment.” Exceptional children, 57(4), 298–313. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2009902/
Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior (First Free Press Paperback edition). The Free Press.
Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. Vintage Books. ISBN 100394716183.
Skinner, B. F. (1988). The cuckoos. The ABA Newsletter, 11(9).
Skinner, B. F. (1990). The non-punitive society. Japanese Journal of Behavior Analysis, 5(2), 87–106. https://coehuman.uodiyala.edu.iq/uploads/Coehuman%20library%20pdf/English%20library%D9%83%D8%AA%D8%A8%20%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%83%D9%84%D9%8A%D8%B2%D9%8A/linguistics/Skinner,%20B.%20F.%20(1979).%20The%20non-punitive%20society.pdf
Smith, T., & Eikeseth, S. (2011). O. Ivar Lovaas: Pioneer of applied behavior analysis and intervention for children with autism. Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders, 41(3), 375–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-010-1162-0
Speyer, L. G., Hang, Y., Hall, H. A., & Murray, A. L. (2021). The role of harsh parenting practices in early- to middle-childhood socioemotional development: An examination in the Millennium Cohort Study. Child Development, 93(5), 1304–1317. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13761
Storey, K., & Post, M. (2019). Positive behavior supports for adults with disabilities in employment, community, and residential settings: Practical strategies that work (2nd ed.). Thomas.
Sun, X. (2022). Behavior skills training for family caregivers of people with intellectual or developmental disabilities: A systematic review of literature. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 68(3), 247–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/20473869.2020.1793650
Talantseva, O. I., Romanova, R. S., Shurdova, E. M., Dolgorukova, T. A., Sologub, P. S., Titova, O. S., Kleeva, D. F., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2023). The global prevalence of autism spectrum disorder: A three-level meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 14, 1071181. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1071181
Tiger, J. H., & Effertz, H. M. (2021). On the validity of data produced by isolated and synthesized contingencies during the functional analysis of problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 54(3), 853–876. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.792
Tincani, M. (2007). Moving forward: Positive behavior support and applied behavior analysis. Behavior Analyst Today, 8(4), 492–499. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0100635
UK Society for Behaviour Analysis. (2023a). UK-SBA code of ethical and professional conduct. Retrieved June 20, 2023, from https://uk-sba.org/about-uk-sba/ethics/
UK Society for Behaviour Analysis. (2023b). UK-SBA Statement on the use of punishment. Retrieved May 3, 2023, from https://uksba.org/about-behaviour-analysis/uk-sbapositionstatement-on-the-use-of-punishment/
Ulrich, R., Wolfe, M., & Dulaney, S. (1969). Punishment of shock-induced aggression. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12(6), 1009–1015. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1969.12-1009
United Kingdom Society for Behaviour Analysis. (n.d.). The standards of education, training and experience for behaviour analysis. Retrieved May 3, 2023, from https://uk-sba.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/STD-9-Training.pdf
Wacker, D. P., & Berg, W. K. (2002). PBS as a service delivery system. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 4(1), 25–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392117
Weiss, M. J., DelPizzo-Cheng, E., LaRue, R. H., & Sloman, K. (2010). ABA and PBS: The dangers in creating artificial dichotomies in behavioral intervention. The Behavior Analyst Today, 10(3–4), 428–439. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0100681
Will, M. (1999). Foreword. In E. G. Carr, R. H., Horner, A. P. Turnbull, J. G. Marquis, D. M. McLaughlin, M. L. McAtee, C. E. Smith, K. A. Ryan, M. B. Ruef, & A. Doolabh, Positive behavior support for people with developmental disabilities: A research synthesis (pp. ). American Association on Mental Retardation.
Wolf, M., Risley, T., Johnston, M., Harris, F., & Allen, E. (1967). Application of operant conditioning procedures to the behavior problems of an autistic child: A follow-up and extension. Behaviour Research & Therapy, 5(2), 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(67)90004-6
Wolf, M., Risley, T. R., & Mees, H. L. (1963). Application of operant conditioning procedures to the behaviour problems of an autistic child. Behaviour Research & Therapy, 1, 305–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(67)90004-6
Wolfensberger, W. P., Nirje, B., Olshansky, S., Perske, R., & Roos, P. (1972). The principle of normalization in human services. National Institute on Mental Retardation Retrieved 2 May 7, 2022, from https://digitalcommons.unmc.edu/wolf_books/1/
Zeidan, J., Fombonne, E., Scorah, J., Ibrahim, A., Durkin, M. S., Saxena, S., Yusuf, A., Shih, A., & Elsabbagh, M. (2022). Global prevalence of autism: A systematic review update. Autism Research, 15(5), 778–790. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.2696
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
First Author's Note
As a PBS employee and a parent with a non-vocal child on the autism spectrum I find myself on the frontline of this debate. I have experienced significant opposition in applying evidence-based behavior interventions, often being pushed to accommodate an ill-considered, mismatched eclectic approach. The scientific analysis of behavior is being placed on extinction while alternative or incompatible pseudo-science accounts are being reinforced. The reinforcers include career advancement or socially mediated backslaps for those with matching ethical approaches while the people who need our help are neglected. Anecdotal evidence of questionable interventions has supplanted the importance of empirical evidence in the UK and Ireland. People who genuinely care need to call out such behavior publicly, again and again until the scientific community brings this behavior to an end. Our cousins in the United States should be alerted to the risk of such unbated attacks and the potential of importing back a science that is a shadow of its former self.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Stalford, D., Graham, S. & Keenan, M. A Discussion of Positive Behavior Support and Applied Behavior Analysis in the Context of Autism Spectrum Disorder in the UK and Ireland. Behav Analysis Practice 17, 442–455 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-023-00905-x
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-023-00905-x