Abstract
Compassionate care is integral to forming positive, collaborative relationships with caregivers. The field of behavior analysis has identified a need to integrate compassionate care into professional development and service provision practices. Taylor and colleagues (2019) proposed core skills with operationally defined subskills to teach compassionate care across the domains of empathy, compassion, collaboration, and positive social interactions. The present study utilized a convergent mixed methods design to investigate the use compassionate care skills from the perspectives of early interventionists (EI) and the caregivers they coach. Data from online questionnaires, compassionate care logs, and semi-structured interviews allowed for a deeper understanding of the role and potential of compassionate care. Findings indicate that EI providers and caregivers value compassionate care and noted specific benefits related to improved outcomes, relationship building, and satisfaction. Overall, findings suggest areas of growth for compassion and collaboration skills that are relevant for the field of applied behavior analysis. Implications for research and practice are also discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Andzik, N. R., & Kranak, M. P. (2021). The softer side of supervision: Recommendations when teaching and evaluating behavior-analytic professionalism. Behavior Analysis: Research & and Practice, 21(1), 65. https://doi.org/10.1037/bar0000194
Behavior Analyst Certification Board. (2020). Ethics code for behavior analysts. https://www.bacb.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Ethics-Code-for-Behavior-Analysts-220316-2.pdf
Behavior Analyst Certification Board. (2018). Supervision training curriculum outline 2.0. https://www.bacb.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Supervision_Training_Curriculum_190813.pdf
Brown, C. L., West, T. V., Sanchez, A. H., & Mendes, W. B. (2021). Emotional empathy in the social regulation of distress: A dyadic approach. Personality & and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47(6), 1004–1019. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167220953987
Collins, D. (2003). Pretesting survey instruments: An overview of cognitive methods. Quality of Life Research, 12(3), 229–238.
Craig, C., Hiskey, S., & Spector, A. (2020). Compassion focused therapy: a systematic review of its effectiveness and acceptability in clinical populations. Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics, 20(4), 385–400.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE.
D’Agostino, S. R., Douglas, S. N., & Meadan, H. (2023). Compassionate care within early intervention caregiver coaching: They won’t care what you know until they know that you care. Infants & Young Children, 36(2), 147–163. https://doi.org/10.1097/IYC.0000000000000238
Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality & and Social Psychology, 44(1), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113
Decety, J., & Jackson, P. (2004). The functional architecture of human empathy. Behavioral & and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 3(2), 71–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534582304267187
Division for Early Childhood (DEC). (2014). DEC recommended practices in early intervention/early childhood special education 2014. http://www.dec-sped.org/recommendedpractices
Durkin, M., Gurbutt, R., & Carson, J. (2018). Qualities, teaching, and measurement of compassion in nursing: A systematic review. Nurse Education Today, 63, 50-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.01.025
Early Childhood Personnel Center. (2019). DEC, CEC, and NAEYC initial standards alignment. https://d4ab05f7-6074-4ec9-998a-232c5d918236.filesusr.com/ugd/95f212_ef42f1ea2d9340a782f85ae44a1ddfb0.pdf
Fetters, M. D. (2019). The mixed methods research workbook: Activities for designing, implementing, and publishing projects (7th ed.). Sage Publications.
Fetters, M. D., Curry, L. A., & Creswell, J. W. (2013). Achieving integration in mixed methods designs—principles and practices. Health Services Research, 48(6,pt. 2), 2134–2156. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12117
Fukushima, S., & Haugh, M. (2014). The role of emic understandings in theorizing im/politeness: The metapragmatics of attentiveness, empathy and anticipatory inference in Japanese and Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics, 74, 165–179.
Greene, J. C. (2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry. Wiley.
Hojat, M., Louis, D., Markham, F., Wender, R., Rabinowitz, C., & Gonnella, J. (2011). Physician’s empathy and clinical outcomes for diabetic patients. Academic Medicine, 86, 359–364. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182086fe1
Hook, J. N., Davis, D., Owen, J., & DeBlaere, C. (2017). Cultural humility (1st ed.). American Psychological Association (APA).
Kaufman, J. H., Stein, M. K., & Junker, B. (2016). Factors associated with alignment between teacher survey reports and classroom observation ratings of mathematics instruction. The Elementary School Journal, 116(3), 339–364.
LeBlanc, L. A., Taylor, B. A., & Marchese, N. V. (2020). The training experiences of behavior analysts: Compassionate care and therapeutic relationships with caregivers. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 13(2), 387–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-019-00368-z
Lluch, C., Galiana, L., Doménech, P., & Sansó, N. (2022). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on burnout, compassion fatigue, and compassion satisfaction in healthcare personnel: A systematic review of the literature published during the first year of the pandemic. Healthcare, 10(2), 364–405. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10020364
Lown, B., Rosen, J., & Marttila, J. (2011). An agenda for improving compassionate care: a survey shows about half of patients say such care is missing. Health Affairs, 30(9), 1772–1778. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0539
Meadan, H., Douglas, S. N., Kammes, R., & Schraml-Block, K. (2018). “I’m a different coach with every family”: Early interventionists’ beliefs and practices. Infants & Young Children, 31(3), 200–214. https://doi.org/10.1097/IYC.0000000000000118
McCormick, K. M., Stricklin, S., Nowak, T. M., & Rous, B. (2008). Using eco-mapping to understand family strengths and resources. Young Exceptional Children, 11(2), 17–28.
McWilliam, R. A. (2010). Routines-based early intervention supporting young children and their families. Paul H Brookes.
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Teddlie, C. (2003). A framework for analyzing data in mixed methods research. Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research, 2(1), 397–430.
Owen, J., Leach, M. M., Wampold, B., & Rodolfa, E. (2011). Client and therapist variability in clients’ perceptions of their therapists’ multicultural competencies. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 58(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021496
Rohrer, J. L., & Weiss, M. J. (2022). Teaching compassion skills to students of behavior analysis: A preliminary investigation. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 1–20.
Rush, D., & Shelden, M. (2020). The early childhood coaching handbook (2nd ed.). Paul H. Brookes Publishing Company.
Sellers, T., Valentino, A., Landon, T., & Aiello, S. (2019). Board certified behavior analysts’ supervisory practices of trainees: Survey results and recommendations. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 12, 536–546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-019-00367-0
Taylor, B., LeBlanc, L., & Nosik, M. (2019). Compassionate care in behavior analytic treatment: Can outcomes be enhanced by attending to relationships with caregivers? Behavior Analysis in Practice, 12(3), 654–666. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-018-00289-3
Van Etten, N. I. (2022). An analysis of the effects of a web-based training package on the development of compassionate care Skills in novice board certified behavior analysts [Doctoral dissertation, The Chicago School of Professional Psychology]. ProQuest Dissertations &and Theses Global.
Funding
Sophia R. D’Agostino received funding for the research reported in this manuscript from the Early On Center for Higher Education.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
D’Agostino, S.R., Dueñas, A.D., Douglas, S.N. et al. Exploring Perceptions and Use of Compassionate Care with Early Interventionists and Caregivers: A Mixed Methods Investigation. Behav Analysis Practice (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-023-00831-y
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-023-00831-y