Abstract
Unusually large, infrequent reinforcers, described as jackpots, are the subject of considerable discussion among applied animal behaviorists. Such reinforcers offer considerable promise in applied behavior analysis as a means of both potentiating training of new responses and response classes and enhancing previously learned ones. The concept of jackpot reinforcement, however, is rife with not only a lack of definitional and procedural clarity but also a paucity of research, either basic or applied, on such reinforcement. Considerations in undertaking such research include defining the parameters of jackpot reinforcers, identifying suitable dependent variables, and creating experimental designs appropriate for their assessment. The few experimental analyses of jackpot reinforcer effects on either response acquisition or maintenance have produced little evidence of systematic effects, despite the use of several different methods and behavioral measures. Negative results could reflect either the absence of systematic effects of these jackpot reinforcers or unsuitable methods of analysis. Only further research will take the topic of jackpot reinforcers beyond opinion and testimonial and into the realm of the science of behavior.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Change history
02 December 2020
A Correction to this paper has been published: <ExternalRef><RefSource>https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-020-00532-w</RefSource><RefTarget Address="10.1007/s40617-020-00532-w" TargetType="DOI"/></ExternalRef>
References
Bonem, M., & Crossman, E. K. (1988). Elucidating the effects of reinforcement magnitude. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 348–362. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.104.3.348.
Boren, J. J., & Devine, D. D. (1968). The repeated acquisition of behavioral chains. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 11(6), 651–660. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1968.11-651.
Burch, M. R., & Bailey, J. S. (1999). How dogs learn. New York, NY: Howell Book House.
Campbell, P. E., Fixsen, D. L., & Phillips, E. (1969). The reinstatement effect: Amount of noncontingent reward in the runway. Psychonomic Science, 14, 228–229. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03332808.
Carr, J. E., Coriaty, S., Wilder, D. A., Gaunt, B. T., Dozier, C. L., Britton, L. N., et al. (2000). A review of “noncontingent” reinforcement as treatment for the aberrant behavior of individuals with developmental disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 21, 377–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0891-4222(00)00050-0.
Catania, A. C. (1963). Concurrent performances: A baseline for the study of reinforcement magnitude. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 6, 299–300. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1963.6-299.
Catania, A. C. (1991). Glossary. In I. H. Iversen & K. A. Lattal (Eds.), Techniques in the behavioral and neural sciences: Experimental analysis of behavior Vol. 2 (pp. G1–G44). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Davison, M., & Hogsden, I. (1984). Concurrent variable-interval schedule performance: Fixed versus mixed reinforcer durations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 41, 169–182. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1984.41-169.
DeLeon, I. G., Chase, J. A., Frank-Crawford, M. A., Carreau-Webster, A. B., Triggs, M. M., Bullock, C. E., & Jennett, H. K. (2014). Distributed and accumulated reinforcement arrangements: Evaluations of efficacy and preference. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 47, 293–313. https://doi.org/10.10002/jaba.116.
Dennison, P. (2011). The complete idiot’s guide to positive dog training. New York, NY: Alpha Books.
Doughty, A. H., Galuska, C. M., Dawson, A. E., & Brierly, K. P. (2012). Effects of reinforcer magnitude on response acquisition with unsignaled delayed reinforcement. Behavioural Processes, 20, 287–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2012.02.016.
Eckerman, D. A., Heinz, R. D., Stern, S., & Kowlowitz, V. (1980). Shaping the location of a pigeon’s peck: Effect of rate and size of shaping steps. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 22, 299–310. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1980.33-299.
Farricelli, A. J. (2014). Using jackpots of treats in dog training. Retrieved from https://hubpages.com/animals/Using-Jackpots-of-Treats-in-Dog-Training
Fisher, G. (2009). The thinking dog: Crossover to clicker training. Wenatchee, WA: Dogwise.
Fisher, W., Thompson, R. H., Piazza, C. C., Crosland, K., & Gotjen, D. (1997). On the relative reinforcing effects of choice and differential consequences. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 423–438. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1997.30-423.
Flaherty, C. F. (1982). Incentive contrast: A review of behavioral changes following shifts in reward. Animal Learning & Behavior, 10, 409–440. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212282.
Gomes, J. (2017). Jackpots in animal training. Retrieved from http://www.trainmeplease.com.au/blog/archives/06-2017
Harlow, H. F. (1949). The formation of learning sets. Psychological Review, 56, 51–65. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0062474.
Kershaw, E. (2002). An evaluation of the use of magnitude of reinforcement, i.e. “jackpot” rewards, during shaping in the training of pet dogs (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Southampton New College, Southampton, UK.
Killon, J. (2007). When pigs fly: Training success with impossible dogs. Wenatchee, WA: Dogwise.
Kincaid, S. L., & Lattal, K. A. (2018). Beyond the breakpoint: Reinstatement, resurgence, and renewal of ratio-strained behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 109, 475–491. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.433.
Kuroda, T., & Lattal, K. A. (2018). Behavioral control by the response-reinforcer correlation. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 109, 164–175. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.285.
Kuroda, T., Roca, A., Hall, E. G., Jarmolowicz, J. P., & Lattal, K. A. (2020). An experimental analysis of jackpot reinforcers. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.593.
Lattal, K. A. (1974). Combinations of response-reinforcer dependence and independence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 22, 357–362. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1974.22-357.
Lattal, K. A. (2010). Delayed reinforcement of operant behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 93, 129–139. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2010.93-129.
Lerman, D. C., Kelley, M. E., Vorndran, C. M., Kuhn, S. A. C., & LaRue Jr., R. H. (2005). Reinforcement magnitude and responding during treatment with differential reinforcement. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 35, 29–48. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2002.35-29.
Lieberman, D. A., McIntosh, D. C., & Thomas, G. V. (1979). Learning when reward is delayed: A marking hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 5, 224–242. https://doi.org/10.1037//0097-7403.5.3.224.
Mazur, J. E. (2017). Learning and behavior. New York, NY: Routledge.
Michael, J. (1982). Distinguishing between discriminative and motivational functions of stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 149–155. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1982.37-149.
Muir, K. L. (2010). The effects of jackpots on responding and choice in two domestic dogs (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of North Texas, Denton, TX.
Nevin, J. A. (1974). Response strength in multiple schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 21, 389–408. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1974.21-389.
O’Heare, J. (2016). Problem animal behavior: Functional assessment & constructional contingency management planning. Wenatchee, WA: Dogwise.
Oliver, A. C., Nighbor, T. E., & Lattal, K. A. (2018). Reinforcement magnitude and resurgence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 110, 440–450. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.481.
Oliver, A. C., Sheridan, M. C., & Lattal, K. A. (unpublished). THe one and the many: Equalduration unitary and segmented reinforcer effects.
Perone, M., & Courtney, K. (1992). Fixed-ratio pausing: Joint effects of past reinforcer magnitude and stimuli correlated with upcoming magnitude. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 57(1), 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1992.57-33.
Pryor, K. (1984). Don’t shoot the dog: The new art of teaching and training. New York, NY: Bantam.
Pryor, K. (2006). Jackpots: Hitting it big. Retrieved from https://clickertraining.com/node/825
Ramerez, K. (2017). The jackpot mystique: Tool or trainer superstition? Retrieved from https://www.clickertraining.com/the-jackpot-mystique
Reid, R. L. (1958). The role of the reinforcer as a stimulus. British Journal of Psychology, 49, 202–209. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1958.tb00658.x.
Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II (pp. 64–99). New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Sidman, M. (1960). Tactics of scientific research. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Williams, B. A. (1994). Conditioned reinforcement: Experimental and theoretical issues. The Behavior Analyst, 17, 261–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392675.
Zeiler, M. D. (1968). Schedules of response-independent reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 11, 405–414. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1968.11-405.
Funding
This manuscript was written during the author’s tenure as a Japanese Society for the Promotion of Science Fellow at Osaka Kyoiku University, Osaka, Japan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
There were no conflicts of interest.
Ethical Approval
Procedures performed in experiments involving animals and conducted in the author’s laboratory were in accordance with the ethical standards of West Virginia University.
Informed Consent
Informed consent is not relevant to the research described in this article.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This manuscript was written during the author's tenure as a Japanese Society for the Promotion of Science Fellow at Osaka Kyoiku University, Osaka, Japan. The author is deeply indebted to Professor Hiroto Okouchi for sponsoring the fellowship, stimulating discussions, and for his warm hospitality, and Professor Doug Elliffe for encouraging an article on this topic.
This article was updated to correct errors in the Article Note that were introduced by the Publisher.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lattal, K.A. Big Surprises: Jackpot Reinforcers in Research and Practice. Behav Analysis Practice 13, 1000–1008 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-020-00423-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-020-00423-0