Abstract
The identification of functional relations is a hallmark of applied behavior analysis. Building upon this foundation, applied behavior analysts have developed and researched a number of practices that fall within the purview of Functional Behavioral Assessment, a framework used to understand factors that influence a target behavior. Indeed, there now exists a wide range of procedures that fall within the purview of Functional Behavioral Assessment, with different procedures being associated with different strengths and limitations. Indirect assessments are commonly featured in most descriptions of the Functional Behavioral Assessment process. This paper focuses on the distinction between open and closed-ended indirect assessments specifically, highlighting their strengths and limitations. After distinguishing between these two types of indirect assessments considerations for practice are provided.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The extent to which verbal reports should even be considered part of Applied Behavior Analysis may be debated (e.g., Baer et al. 1968). The current article focuses on the practical aspects of indirect assessments rather than conceptual/theoretical issues.
References
Anderson, C. M., & St. Peter, C. C. (2013). Functional analysis with typically developing children: best practice or too early to tell?: in response to Hanley (2012). Behavior Analysis in Practice, 6, 62–76.
Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. M., & Risley, T. R. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 91–97. doi:10.1901/jaba.1968.1-91.
Bailey, J., & Burch, M. (2011). Ethical for behavior analysts (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Beavers, G. A., Iwata, B. A., & Lerman, D. C. (2013). Thirty years of research on the functional analysis of problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 46, 1–21. doi:10.1002/jaba.30.
Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
Durand, V. M., & Crimmins, D. B. (1992). The Motivations Assessment Scale (MAS) administration guide. Topeka: Monaco and Associates.
Hanley, G. P. (2012). Functional assessment of problem behavior: dispelling myths, overcoming implementation obstacles, and developing new lore. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 5, 54–72.
Hanley, G. P., Iwata, B. A., & McCord, B. E. (2003). Functional analysis of problem behavior: a review. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36, 147–185. doi:10.1901/jaba.2003.36-147.
Iwata, B. A., & DeLeon, I. G. (1996). Functional Analysis Screening Tool (FAST). Gainesville: Florida Center on Self-Injury, University of Florida.
Iwata, B. A., Wong, S. E., Riordan, M. M., Dorsey, M. F., & Lau, M. M. (1982). Assessment and training of clinical interviewing skills: analogue analysis and field replication. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 15, 191–203. doi:10.1901/jaba.1982.15-191.
Iwata, B. A., Dorsey, M. F., Slifer, K. J., Bauman, K. E., & Richman, G. S. (1994). Toward a functional analysis of self-injury. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 197–209. (Reprinted from Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 2, 3–20, 1982) doi: 10.1901/jaba.1994.27-197.
Iwata, B. A., DeLeon, I. G., & Roscoe, E. M. (2013). Reliability and validity of the functional analysis screening tool. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 46, 271–284. doi:10.1002/jaba.31.
Kelley, M. E., LaRue, R. H., Roane, H. S., & Gadaire, D. M. (2011). Indirect behavioral assessments: interviews and rating scales. In W. W. Fisher, C. C. Piazza, & H. S. Roane (Eds.), Handbook of applied behavior analysis (pp. 182–190). New York: Guilford Press.
Kennedy, C. H., & Meyer, K. A. (1996). Sleep deprivation, allergy symptoms, and negatively reinforced problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 133–135. doi:10.1901/jaba.1996.29-133.
Lewis, T. J., Scott, T. M., & Sugai, G. (1994). The problem behavior questionnaire: a teacher-based instrument to develop functional hypotheses of problem behavior in general education classrooms. Diagnostique, 19, 103–115. doi:10.1177/073724779401900207.
Matson, J. L., & Vollmer, T. R. (1995). User’s guide: questions about behavioral function (QABF). Baton Rouge: Scientific Publishers.
Miltenberger, R. G. (2008). Behavior modification: principles and procedures (4th ed.). Belmont: Thompson.
Miltenberger, R. G., & Fuqua, R. W. (1985). Evaluation of a training manual for the acquisition of behavioral assessment interviewing skills. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 323–328. doi:10.1901/jaba.1985.19-323.
O’Neill, R. E., Horner, R. H., Albin, R. W., Sprague, J. R., Storey, K., & Newton, J. S. (1997). Functional assessment and program development for problem behavior. Pacific Grove: Brooks/Cole Publishing.
Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: The Free Press.
Thompson, R. H., & Borrero, J. C. (2011). Direct observation. In W. W. Fisher, C. C. Piazza, & H. S. Roane (Eds.), Handbook of applied behavior analysis (pp. 191–205). New York: Guilford Press.
Wahler, R. G., Vigilante, V. A., & Strand, P. S. (2004). Generalization in a child’s oppositional behavior across home and school settings. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 37, 43–51. doi:10.1901/jaba.2004.37-43.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fryling, M.J., Baires, N.A. The Practical Importance of the Distinction Between Open and Closed-Ended Indirect Assessments. Behav Analysis Practice 9, 146–151 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-016-0115-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-016-0115-2