Abstract
Applied behavior analysis (ABA) is the application of behavioral principles to affect socially important behavior change with social importance, or social validity, being defined by the consumers of the intervention. (Schwartz & Baer, Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 24, 189–204, 1991) provided several suggestions to improve the implementation of the social validity assessment including engaging in ongoing assessment, increasing the type and psychometric rigor of social validity measures, and extending participation in the social validity assessment to include direct and indirect consumers. The purpose of this article is to explore the current implementation of social validity assessments used in behavioral research. This article also explores key demographics among consumers with disabilities and/or mental health disorders who are included and excluded from social validity assessments. The most common social validity assessment source was author-created and implemented at a single time point. In addition, consumers with disabilities were often excluded from the social validity assessments. The implications of the social validity assessment implementation and consumer exclusion are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The data are available from the first author upon request.
References
Anderson, L. K. (2023). Autistic experiences of applied behavior analysis. Autism, 27(3), 737–750.
Arthur, S. M., Linnehan, A. M., Leaf, J. B., Russell, N., Weiss, M. J., Kelly, A. N., Saunders, M. S., & Ross, R. K. (2023). Concerns about ableism in applied behavior analysis: An evaluation and recommendations. Education & Training in Autism & Developmental Disabilities, 58(2), 127–143.
Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. M., & Risley, T. R. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1(1), 91–97.
Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. M., & Risley, T. R. (1987). Some still current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 20(4), 313–327.
Breaux, C. A., & Smith, K. (2023). Assent in applied behaviour analysis and positive behaviour support: ethical considerations and practical recommendations. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 69(1), 111–121.
Brodhead, M. T., Durán, L., & Bloom, S. E. (2014). Cultural and linguistic diversity in recent verbal behavior research on individuals with disabilities: A review and implications for research and practice. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 30, 75–86.
Carr, J. E., Austin, J. L., Britton, L. N., Kellum, K. K., & Bailey, J. S. (1999). An assessment of social validity trends in applied behavior analysis. Behavioral Interventions: Theory & Practice in Residential & Community-Based Clinical Programs, 14(4), 223–231.
Carter, S. L., & Wheeler, J. J. (2019). The social validity manual: Subjective evaluation of interventions. Elsevier Science.
D’Agostino, S. R., Douglas, S. N., & Duenas, A. D. (2019). Practitioner-implemented naturalistic developmental behavioral interventions: Systematic review of social validity practices. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 39(3), 170–182.
Fawcett, S. B. (1991). Social validity: A note on methodology. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24(2), 235.
Ferguson, J. L., Cihon, J. H., Leaf, J. B., Van Meter, S. M., McEachin, J., & Leaf, R. (2019). Assessment of social validity trends in the journal of applied behavior analysis. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 20(1), 146–157.
Hanley, G. P. (2010). Toward effective and preferred programming: A case for the objective measurement of social validity with recipients of behavior-change programs. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 3, 13–21.
Heal, N., & Hanley, G. P. (2008, May). Social validity assessments of behavior-change procedures used with young children: A review. In C. St. Peter Pipkin (eds), Measuring social validity during behavioral research and consultation. Symposium conducted at the 34th Annual Convention of the Association for Behavior Analysis International.
Huntington, R. N., & Schwartz, I. S. (2022). The use of stimulus preference assessments to determine procedural acceptability for participants. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 24(4), 325–336.
Huntington, R. N., Badgett, N., Rosenberg, N., Greeny, K., Bravo, A., Bristol, R., Byun, Y., & Park, M. (2023). Social validity in behavioral research: A selective review. Perspectives on Behavior Science, 46(1), 201–215.
Jones, S. H., St. Peter, C. C., & Ruckle, M. M. (2020). Reporting of demographic variables in the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 53(3), 1304–1315.
Kennedy, C. H. (1992). Trends in the measurement of social validity. The Behavior Analyst, 15(2), 147–156.
Ledford, J. R., Hall, E., Conder, E., & Lane, J. D. (2016). Research for young children with autism spectrum disorders: Evidence of social and ecological validity. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 35(4), 223–233.
Lord, C., Charman, T., Havdahl, A., Carbone, P., Anagnostou, E., Boyd, B., ..., & McCauley, J. B. (2022). The Lancet Commission on the future of care and clinical research in autism. The Lancet, 399(10321), 271–334.
McGill, O., & Robinson, A. (2020). “Recalling hidden harms”: Autistic experiences of childhood applied behavioural analysis (ABA). Advances in Autism, 7(4), 269–282.
Park, E. Y., & Blair, K. S. C. (2019). Social validity assessment in behavior interventions for young children: A systematic review. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 39(3), 156–169.
Pritchett, M., Ala’i-Rosales, S., Cruz, A. R., & Cihon, T. M. (2022). Social justice is the spirit and aim of an applied science of human behavior: Moving from colonial to participatory research practices. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 15(4), 1074–1092.
Schwartz, I. S., & Baer, D. M. (1991). Social validity assessments: Is current practice state of the art? Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24(2), 189–204.
Schwartz, I. S., & Kelly, E. M. (2021). Quality of life for people with disabilities: Why applied behavior analysts should consider this a primary dependent variable. Research and practice for persons with severe disabilities, 46(3), 159–172.
Shogren, K. A. (2023). The right to science: Centering people with intellectual disability in the process and outcomes of science. Intellectual & Developmental Disabilities, 61(2), 172–177.
Snodgrass, M. R., Chung, M. Y., Meadan, H., & Halle, J. W. (2018). Social validity in single-case research: A systematic literature review of prevalence and application. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 74, 160–173.
Witt, J. C., & Martens, B. (1983). Intervention rating profile. Psychology in the Schools, 20, 510–517.
Wolf, M. M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11(2), 203–214.
Acknowledgements
Special thanks to Leicee Teighlyr Guiou for the development of the paper.
Funding
This project was led by Rachelle Huntington; the article was co-authored by Rachelle Huntington and Natalie Badgett with writing support from authors 3–8. Natalie completed the majority of this work at the University of North Florida but has since moved to the University of Utah. Jakob completed the majority of this work at the University of North Florida but has since moved to Ruby Beach Behavioral Pediatrics. Alice completed the majority of this work at Seattle Pacific University but has since moved to the University of Washington. Madelynn completed the majority of this work at the University of Virginia but has since moved to the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of Interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Huntington, R.N., Badgett, N.M., Bristol, R.M. et al. A Descriptive Assessment of Social Validity Source, Timing, and Direct Consumer Inclusion in Behavior Analytic Research. Perspect Behav Sci (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-024-00401-9
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-024-00401-9