Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Systematic Review of Verbal Operants in Speech Generating Device Research from Skinner’s Analysis of Verbal Behavior

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Perspectives on Behavior Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Skinner’s (1957) book Verbal Behavior is a critical tool in designing effective communication programs for individuals with limited speech. The purpose of this systematic review was to analyze the speech generating device (SGD) research literature from Skinner’s taxonomy of primary verbal operants. An extraction procedure yielded 56 studies published between 1995 and 2018, with a total of 221 participants, most of whom had autism spectrum disorder (ASD) or an intellectual and developmental disability (IDD). The large majority of SGD studies (42) targeted multiply controlled mands, whereas only a handful of studies targeted verbal operants that were not mands. Few studies employed procedures for fading contrived sources of stimulus control to promote spontaneous responding, and few studies targeted more sophisticated, topography-based responses (e.g., typing, speech). Results of the review highlight the need for better dissemination of Skinner’s Verbal Behavior, the need for research to evaluate effects of SGD in teaching a greater variety of spontaneous verbal operants, and the need to focus on application of SGD with populations beyond individuals with ASD and IDD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

*This study was included in the systematic review.

  • * Achmadi, D., Kagohara, D. M., van der Meer, L., O’Reilly, M. F., Lancioni, G. E., Sutherland, D., ... & Sigafoos, J. (2012). Teaching advanced operation of an iPod-based speech-generating device to two students with autism spectrum disorders. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 6, 1258-1264.

  • * Achmadi, D., Sigafoos, J., van der Meer, L., Sutherland, D., Lancioni, G. E., O’Reilly, M. F., ... & Marschik, P. B. (2014). Acquisition, preference, and follow-up data on the use of three AAC options by four boys with developmental disability/delay. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 26, 565-583.

  • * Agius, M. M., & Vance, M. (2016). A comparison of PECS and iPad to teach requesting to pre-schoolers with autistic spectrum disorders. Augmentative & Alternative Communication, 32, 58–68.

  • * Alzrayer, N. M., Banda, D. R., & Koul, R. (2017). Teaching children with autism spectrum disorder and other developmental disabilities to perform multistep requesting using an iPad. Augmentative & Alternative Communication, 33, 65–76.

  • * Banda, D. R., Copple, K. S., Koul, R. K., Sancibrian, S. L., & Bogschutz, R. J. (2010). Video modelling intervention to teach spontaneous requesting using AAC devices to individuals with autism: A preliminary investigation. Disability & Rehabilitation: An International, Multidisciplinary Journal, 32, 1364–1372.

  • * Beck, S. J., Stoner, J. B., Bock, S. J., & Parton, T. (2008). Comparison of PECS and VOCA: A replication. Education & Training in Developmental Disabilities, 40, 264–278.

  • * Bock, S. J., Stoner, J. B., Beck, A. R., Hanley, L., & Prochnow, J. (2005). Increasing functional communication in non-speaking preschool children: Comparison of PECS and VOCA. Education & Training in Developmental Disabilities, 40, 264–278.

  • * Boesch, M. C., Wendt, O., Subramanian, A., & Hsu, N. (2013). Comparative efficacy of the Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS) versus a speech-generating device: Effects on requesting skills. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 7, 480–493.

  • Bondy, A., Tincani, M., & Frost, L. (2004). Multiply controlled verbal operants: An analysis and extension to the picture exchange communication system. The Behavior Analyst, 27, 247–261.

  • Brunner, M., Hemsley, B., Togher, L., & Palmer, S. (2017). Technology and its role in rehabilitation for people with cognitive-communication disability following a traumatic brain injury (TBI). Brain Injury, 31, 1028-1043.

  • * Bruno, J., & Trembath, D. (2006). Use of aided language stimulation to improve syntactic performance during a weeklong intervention program. Augmentative & Alternative Communication, 22, 300–313

  • * Carnett, A., & Ingvarsson, E. T. (2016). Teaching a child with autism to mand for answers to questions using a speech-generating device. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 32, 233-241.

  • * Chen, C-H., Wang, C-P., Lee, I-J., & Su, C C-C. (2016). Speech generating devices: effectiveness of interface design—a comparative study of autism spectrum disorders. SpringerPlus, 5, 1.

  • * Choi, H., O’Reilly, M., Sigafoos, J., & Lancioni, G. (2010). Teaching requesting and rejecting sequences to four children with developmental disabilities using augmentative and alternative communication. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 31, 560–567.

  • * Chung, Y., & Douglas, K.H. (2015). A peer interaction package for students with autism spectrum disorders who use speech-generating devices. Journal of Developmental & Physical Disabilities, 27, 831–849.

  • * Couper, L., van der Meer, L., Schäfer, M. C., McKenzie, E., McLay, L., O’Reilly, M. F., ... & Sutherland, D. (2014). Comparing acquisition of and preference for manual signs, picture exchange, and speech-generating devices in nine children with autism spectrum disorder. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 17, 99-109.

  • DeSouza, A. A., Fisher, W. W., & Rodriguez, N. M. (2019). Facilitating the emergence of convergent intraverbals in children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 52, 28-49.

  • * DiCarlo, C. F. & Banajee, M. (2000). Using voice output devices to increase initiations of young children with disabilities. Journal of Early Intervention, 23, 191–199.

  • * Drager, K. D., Light, J. C., Carlson, R., D'Silva, K., Larsson, B., Pitkin, L., & Stopper, G. (2004). Learning of dynamic display AAC technologies by typically developing 3-year-olds: Effect of different layouts and menu approaches. Journal of Speech, Language, & Hearing Research, 47, 1133–1148.

  • * Dundon, M., McLaughlin, T. F., Neyman, J., & Clark, A. (2013). The effects of a model, lead, and test procedure to teach correct requesting using two apps on an iPad with a 5-year-old student with autism spectrum disorder. Educational Research International, 1, 1–10.

  • Flippin, M., Reszka, S., & Watson, L. R. (2010). Effectiveness of the picture exchange communication system (PECS) on communication and speech for children with autism spectrum disorders: A meta-analysis. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 19, 178–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frost, L., & Bondy, A. (2002). The picture exchange communication system training manual. Newark, DE: Pyramid Educational Products.

  • Ganz, J. B., Davis, J. L., Lund, E. M., Goodwyn, F. D., & Simpson, R. L. (2012). Meta-analysis of PECS with individuals with ASD: Investigation of targeted versus non-targeted outcomes, participant characteristics, and implementation phase. Research in Developmental Disorders, 33, 406–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganz, J. B., Morin, K. L., Foster, M. J., Vannest, K. J., Genc-Tosun, D., Gregori, E. V., & Gerow, S. L. (2017). High-technology augmentative and alternative communication for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities and complex communication needs: A meta-analysis. Augmentative & Alternative Communication, 33, 224–238.

  • * Genc-Tosun, D., & Kurt, O. (2017). Teaching multi-step requesting to children with autism spectrum disorder using systematic instruction and a speech-generating device. Augmentative & Alternative Communication, 33, 213–223.

  • * Gevarter, C., O'Reilly, M. F., Kuhn, M., Mills, K., Ferguson, R., Watkins, L., ... & Lancioni, G. E. (2016). Increasing the vocalizations of individuals with autism during intervention with a speech‐generating device. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 49, 17-33.

  • * Gevarter, C., O’Reilly, M. F., Rojeski, L., Sammarco, N., Sigafoos, J., Lancioni, G. E., & Lang, R. (2014). Comparing acquisition of AAC-based mands in three young children with autism spectrum disorder using iPad® applications with different display and design elements. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44, 2464-2474.

  • Gilroy, S. P., McCleery, J. P., & Leader, G. (2017). Systematic review of methods for teaching social and communicative behavior with high-tech augmentative and alternative communication modalities. Review Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders, 4, 307–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunning, C., Breathnach, Ó., Holloway, J., McTiernan, A., & Malone, B. (2019). A systematic review of peer-mediated interventions for preschool children with autism spectrum disorder in inclusive settings. Review Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders, 6(1), 40–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heath, A. K., Ganz, J. B., Parker, R., Burke, M., & Ninci, J. (2015). A meta-analytic review of functional communication training across mode of communication, age, and disability. Review Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders, 2, 155–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • * Hill, D. A., & Flores, M. M. (2014). Comparing the picture exchange communication system and the iPad for communication of students with autism spectrum disorder and developmental delay. TechTrends, 58, 45–53.

  • Ishikawa, N., Omori, M., & Yamamoto, J. I. (2019). Modeling training of child’s echoic conversational response for students with autism spectrum disorder: To be a good listener. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 12, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • * Johnson, R. K., Hough, M. S., King, K. A., Vos, P., & Jeffs, T. (2009). Functional communication in individuals with chronic severe aphasia using augmentative communication. Augmentative & Alternative Communication, 24, 269–280,

  • * Kagohara, D. M., van der Meer, L., Achmadi, D., Green, V. A., O’Reilly, M. F., Mulloy, A., et al. (2010). Behavioral intervention promotes successful use of an iPod-based communication device by an adolescent with autism. Clinical Case Studies, 9, 328–338.

  • * Kagohara, D. M., van der Meer, L., Achmadi, D., Green, V. A., O’Reilly, M. F., Lancioni, G. E., ... & Sigafoos, J. (2012). Teaching picture naming to two adolescents with autism spectrum disorders using systematic instruction and speech-generating devices. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 6, 1224-1233.

  • * Kasari, C., Kaiser, A., Goods, K., Nietfeld, J., Mathy, P., Landa, R., ... & Almirall, D. (2014). Communication interventions for minimally verbal children with autism: A sequential multiple assignment randomized trial. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 53, 635-646.

  • Kelley, M. E., Shillingsburg, M. A., Castro, M. J., Addison, L. R., & LaRue Jr., R. H. (2007). Further evaluation of emerging speech in children with developmental disabilities: Training verbal behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40, 431–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • * King, M. L., Takeguchi, K., Barry, S. E., Rehfeldt, R. A., Boyer, V. E., & Mathews, T. L. (2014). Evaluation of the iPad in the acquisition of requesting skills for children with autism spectrum disorder. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 8, 1107–1120.

  • Lamarre, J., & Holland, J. G. (1985). The functional independence of mands and tacts. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 43, 5–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laraway, S., Snycerski, S., Michael, J., & Poling, A. (2003). Motivating operations and terms to describe them: Some further refinements. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36, 407–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • * Lorah, E. R. (2016). Comparing teacher and student use and preference of two methods of augmentative and alternative communication: Picture exchange and a speech-generating device. Journal of Developmental & Physical Disabilities, 28, 751–767.

  • * Lorah, E. R. (2018). Evaluating the iPad Mini as a speech-generating device in the acquisition of a discriminative mand repertoire for young children with autism. Focus on Autism & Other Developmental Disabilities, 33, 47–54.

  • * Lorah, E. R., Crouser, J., Gilroy, S. P., Tincani, M., & Hantula, D. (2014). Within stimulus prompting to teach symbol discrimination using an iPad speech generating device. Journal of Developmental & Physical Disabilities, 26, 335–346.

  • * Lorah, E. R., Karnes, A. & Speight, D. R. (2015). The acquisition of intraverbal responding using a speech generating device in school aged children with autism. Journal of Developmental & Physical Disabilities, 27, 557–568.

  • * Lorah, E. R. & Parnell, A. (2017). Acquisition of tacting using a speech-generating device in group learning environments for preschoolers with autism. Journal of Developmental & Physical Disabilities, 29, 597–609.

  • * Lorah, E. R., Parnell, A., & Speight, D. R. (2014). Acquisition of sentence frame discrimination using the iPad as a speech generating device in young children with developmental disabilities. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 8, 1734–1740.

  • * Lorah, E. R., Parnell, A., Whitby, P. S., & Hantula, D. (2015). A systematic review of tablet computers and portable media players as speech generating devices for individuals with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders, 45, 3792–3804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, C. C., & Karsten, A. M. (2020). Efficacy and social validity of procedures for improving conversational skills of college students with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 53, 402-421.

  • * McLay, L., Schäfer, M. C., van der Meer, L., Couper, L., McKenzie, E., O’Reilly, M. F., ... & Sutherland, D. (2017). Acquisition, preference and follow-up comparison across three AAC modalities taught to two children with autism spectrum disorder. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 64, 117-130.

  • * McLay, L., van der Meer, L., Schäfer, M. C., Couper, L., McKenzie, E., O’Reilly, M. F., ... & Sutherland, D. (2015). Comparing acquisition, generalization, maintenance, and preference across three AAC options in four children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 27, 323-339.

  • McNaughton, D., & Light, J. (2013). The iPad and mobile technology revolution: Benefits and challenges for individuals who require augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative & Alternative Communication, 29, 107–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michael, J. (1985). Two kinds of verbal behavior plus a possible third. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 3, 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michael, J., Palmer, D. C., & Sundberg, M. L. (2011). The multiple control of verbal behavior. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 27, 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & the PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Med, 6, e1000097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muharib, R., & Alzrayer, N. M. (2018). The use of high-tech speech-generating devices as an evidence-based practice for children with autism spectrum disorders: A meta-analysis. Review Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders, 5, 43–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • * Nepo, K., Tincani, M., Axelrod, S., & Meszaros, L. (2017). iPod touch® to increase functional communication of adults with autism spectrum disorder and significant intellectual disability. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 32, 209-217.

  • * Olive, M. L., de la Cruz, B., Davis, T. N., Chan, J. M., Lang, R. B., O’Reilly, M. F., & Dickson, S. M. (2007). The effects of enhanced milieu teaching and a voice output communication aid on the requesting of three children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37, 1505-1513.

  • * Olive, M. L., Russell, B., & Tonya, N. (2008). An analysis of the effects of functional communication and a Voice Output Communication Aid for a child with autism spectrum disorder. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 2, 223–236.

  • Ploog, B. O. (2010). Stimulus overselectivity four decades later: A review of the literature and its implications for current research in autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders, 40, 1332–1349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • * Roche, L., Sigafoos, J., Lancioni, G. E., O’Reilly, M. F., Schlosser, R. W., Stevens, M., ... & Carnett, A. (2014). An evaluation of speech production in two boys with neurodevelopmental disorders who received communication intervention with a speech-generating device. International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience, 38, 10-16.

  • Sautter, R. A., & LeBlanc, L. A. (2006). Empirical applications of Skinner’s analysis of verbal behavior with humans. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 22, 35–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlosser, R. W., & Wendt, O. (2008). Effects of augmentative and alternative communication intervention on speech production in children with autism: A systematic review. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 17, 212–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • * Shih, C-H., Chiang, M-S., Wang, S-H., & Chen, C-N. (2014). Teaching two teenagers with autism spectrum disorders to request the continuation of video playback using a touchscreen computer with the function of automatic response to requests. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 8, 1055–1061.

  • * Sigafoos, J., Lancioni, G. E., O’Reilly, M. F., Achmadi, D., Stevens, M., Roche, L., ... & Marschik, P. B. (2013). Teaching two boys with autism spectrum disorders to request the continuation of toy play using an iPad®-based speech-generating device. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 7, 923-930.

  • * Sigafoos, J., Wermink, H., Didden, R., Green, V. A., Schlosser, R. W., O'Reilly, M. F., & Lancioni, G. E. (2011). Effects of varying lengths of synthetic speech output on augmented requesting and natural speech production in an adolescent with Klinefelter Syndrome. Augmentative & Alternative Communication, 27, 163–171.

  • * Simacek, J., Reichle, J., & McComas, J. J. (2016). Communication intervention to teach requesting through aided AAC for two learners with Rett syndrome. Journal of Developmental & Physical Disabilities, 28, 59–81.

  • Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • * Stasolla, F., De Pace, C., Damiani, R., Di Leone, A., Albano, V., & Perilli, V. (2014). Comparing PECS and VOCA to promote communication opportunities and to reduce stereotyped behaviors by three girls with Rett syndrome. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 8, 1269–1278.

  • * Stephenson, J. (2016). Using the Choiceboard Creator™ app on an iPad© to teach choice making to a student with severe disabilities. Augmentative & Alternative Communication, 32, 49–57.

  • * Strasberger, Sean. (2013). The effects of peer assisted communication application training on the communicative and social behaviors of children with autism. Journal of Developmental & Physical Disabilities, 26, 513–526.

  • Sulzer-Azaroff, B., Hoffman, A. O., Horton, C. B., Bondy, A., & Frost, L. (2009). The Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS): What do the data say? Focus on Autism & Other Developmental Disabilities, 24, 89–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundberg, M. L., & Michael, J. (2001). The benefits of Skinner’s analysis of verbal behavior for children with autism. Behavior Modification, 25, 698–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundberg, M. L., & Partington, J. W. (1998). Teaching language to children with autism or other developmental disabilities. Pleasant Hill, CA: Behavior Analysts.

    Google Scholar 

  • * Tan, P. & Alant, E. (2016) Using peer-mediated instruction to support communication involving a student with autism during mathematics activities: A case study, Assistive Technology, 30, 9-15.

  • * Trottier, N., Kamp, L., & Mirenda, P. (2011). Effects of peer-mediated instructions to teach use of speech-generating devices to students with autism in social game routines. Augmentative & Alternative Communication, 27, 26–39.

  • Twyman, J. S. (1996). The functional independence of impure mands and tacts of abstract stimulus properties. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 13, 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • * van Acker, R., & Grant, S. H. (1995). An effective computer-based requesting system for persons with Rett syndrome. Journal of Childhood Communication Disorders, 16, 31–38.

  • * van der Meer, L., Kagohara, D., Roche, L., Sutherland, D., Balandin, S., Green, V. A., ... & Sigafoos, J. (2013). Teaching multi-step requesting and social communication to two children with autism spectrum disorders with three AAC options. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29, 222-234.

  • van der Meer, L. A., & Rispoli, M. (2010). Communication interventions involving speech-generating devices for children with autism: A review of the literature. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 13, 294–306.

  • * van der Meer, L., Sigafoos, J., Sutherland, D., McLay, L., Lang, R., Lancioni, G. E., ... & Marschik, P. B. (2014). Preference-enhanced communication intervention and development of social communicative functions in a child with autism spectrum disorder. Clinical Case Studies, 13, 282-295.

  • * van der Meer, L., Sutherland, D., O’Reilly, M. F., Lancioni, G. E., & Sigafoos, J. (2012). A further comparison of manual signing, picture exchange, and speech-generating devices as communication modes for children with autism spectrum disorders. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 6, 1247–1257.

  • * Waddington, H., Sigafoos, J., Lancioni, G. E., O’Reilly, M. F., van der Meer, L., Carnett, A., ... & Sutherland, D. (2014). Three children with autism spectrum disorder learn to perform a three-step communication sequence using an iPad®-based speech-generating device. International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience, 39, 59-67.

  • * Waddington, H., van der Meer, L., Carnett, A., & Sigafoos, J. (2017). Teaching a child with ASD to approach communication partners and use a speech-generating device across settings: Clinic, school, and home. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 32, 228–243.

  • * Ward, M., McLaughlin, T. F., Neyman, J., & Clark, A. (2013). Use of an iPad application as functional communication for a five-year-old preschool student with autism spectrum disorder. International Journal of English & Education, 4, 231–238

  • Wodka, E. L., Mathy, P., & Kalb, L. (2013). Predictors of phrase and fluent speech in children with autism and severe language delay. Pediatrics, 131, 1128–1134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • * Xin, J. F., & Leonard, D. A. (2015). Using iPads to teach communication skills of students with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45, 4154–4164.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Temple University, 1301 Cecil B. Moore Ave., Ritter Hall 351, Philadelphia, PA, 19122, USA

    Matt Tincani

  2. University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA

    Jessica Miller & Elizabeth R. Lorah

  3. Chimes of Delaware, Inc., Newark, DE, USA

    Kaori Nepo

Authors
  1. Matt Tincani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jessica Miller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Elizabeth R. Lorah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kaori Nepo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matt Tincani.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tincani, M., Miller, J., Lorah, E.R. et al. Systematic Review of Verbal Operants in Speech Generating Device Research from Skinner’s Analysis of Verbal Behavior. Perspect Behav Sci 43, 387–413 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-020-00243-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-020-00243-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation