Skip to main content
Log in

First Trimester Ultrasound Evaluation of the Cleft Palate: Midsagittal, Axial or Coronal View-Which View is Best?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Fetal Medicine

Abstract

Objective

First trimester evaluation of the palate is now gaining importance and the “maxillary gap sign” described in the midsagittal view and the retronasal triangle serves as a potential marker for detection of cleft palate (CP). The objective is to describe an ultrasound technique for evaluation of the palate in the axial view and to assess the utility of this view in assessing palatine clefts.

Materials and  methods

The anatomical landmarks in sagittal, coronal and in axial view were evaluated in 17 cases of palatine clefts with known postnatal outcomes. Along with the midsagittal and coronal view, the alveolar ridge of the maxilla and the echogenic secondary palate was examined in the transverse view of the base of the skull at the level of the pharynx.

Results

Visualisation of the bony landmarks of the palate in all three planes was possible in all cases. Of the 17  cases, there were 7 unilateral Cleft Lips Palate (CLP), 5 bilateral CLP, 2 median CLP, 2 isolated CP and 1 atypical cleft. 2 cases of bilateral CLP showed no demonstrable maxillary gap in the midsagittal view (the vomer can often mimic the maxillary line). 2 cases showed a normal retronasal triangle (RNT) when the cleft was confined to the premaxilla alone. However, the axial view showed abnormal appearance in all 17 cases.

Conclusion

A combination of all three planes can be used as an effective screening tool but the axial view has more potential for detection of CP in first trimester. However, large scale prospective studies are needed to confirm this observation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Salomon LJ, Alfirevic Z, Berghella V, Bilardo C, Hernandez-Andrade E, Johnsen SL, Kalache K, Leung KY, Malinger G, Munoz H, Prefumo F. Practice guidelines for performance of the routine mid-trimester fetal ultrasound scan. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;37(1):116–26.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Salomon LJ, Alfirevic Z, Bilardo CM, Chalouhi GE, Ghi T, Kagan KO, Lau TK, Papageorghiou AT, Raine-Fenning NJ, Stirnemann J, Suresh S. ISUOG practice guidelines: performance of first-trimester fetal ultrasound scan. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;41(1):102.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bianchi DW, Crombleholme TM, D’Alton ME, Malone FD. Fetology: diagnosis and management of the fetal patient. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chaoui R, Orosz G, Heling KS, Sarut-Lopez A, Nicolaides KH. Maxillary gap at 11–13 weeks’ gestation: marker of cleft lip and palate. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;46(6):665–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sepulveda W, Wong AE, Martinez-Ten P, Perez-Pedregosa J. Retronasal triangle: a sonographic landmark for the screening of cleft palate in the first trimester. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010;35(1):7–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lakshmy SR, Deepa S, Rose N, Mookan S, Agnees J. First-trimester sonographic evaluation of palatine clefts: a novel diagnostic approach. J Ultrasound Med. 2017;36(7):1397–414.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lakshmy SR, Rose N, Masilamani P, Umapathy S, Ziyaulla T. Role of TUI in first trimester evaluation of palate. J Fetal Med. 2019;6(3):113–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wilhelm L, Borgers H. The ‘equals sign’: a novel marker in the diagnosis of fetal isolated cleft palate. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010;36(4):439–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Syngelaki A, Chelemen T, Dagklis T, Allan L, Nicolaides KH. Challenges in the diagnosis of fetal non-chromosomal abnormalities at 11–13 weeks. Prenat Diagn. 2011;31(1):90–102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Suresh S, Vijayalakshmi R, Indrani S, Devaki G, Bhavani K. The premaxillary triangle: clue to the diagnosis of cleft lip and palate. J Ultrasound Med. 2006;25(2):237–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. De Robertis V, Rembouskos G, Fanelli T, Votino C, Volpe P. Cleft palate with or without cleft lip: the role of retronasal triangle view and maxillary gap at 11–14 weeks. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2019;46(4):266–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hoopmann M, Sonek J, Esser T, Bilardo CM, Wagner P, Abele H, Kagan KO. Frontal space distance in facial clefts and retrognathia at 11–13 weeks’ gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;48(2):171–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Pan M, Chen M, Sahota DS, Lao TT, Lau TK, Leung TY. Can we use the frontomaxillary facial angle in the first trimester to predict facial cleft? Prenat Diagn. 2012;32(5):491–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sohan K, Freer M, Mercer N, Soothill P, Kyle P. Prenatal detection of facial clefts. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2001;16(4):196–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cash C, Set P, Coleman N. The accuracy of antenatal ultrasound in the detection of facial clefts in a low-risk screening population. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001;18(5):432–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rotten D, Levaillant JM. Two-and three-dimensional sonographic assessment of the fetal face. 2. Analysis of cleft lip, alveolus and palate. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004;24(4):402–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Clementi M, Tenconi R, Bianchi F, Stoll C, EUROSCAN Study Group. Evaluation of prenatal diagnosis of cleft lip with or without cleft palate and cleft palate by ultrasound: experience from 20 European registries. Prenat Diagn. 2000;20(11):870–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Faure JM, Bäumler M, Boulot P, Bigorre M, Captier G. Prenatal assessment of the normal fetal soft palate by three-dimensional ultrasound examination: is there an objective technique? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;31(6):652–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pilu G, Segata M. A novel technique for visualization of the normal and cleft fetal secondary palate: angled insonation and three-dimensional ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;29(2):166–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ramos GA, Romine LE, Gindes L, Wolfson T, McGahan MC, D’Agostini D, Lee S, Jones MC, Pretorius DH. Evaluation of the fetal secondary palate by 3-dimensional ultrasonography. J Ultrasound Med. 2010;29(3):357–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Campbell S, Lees C, Moscoso G, Hall P. Ultrasound antenatal diagnosis of cleft palate by a new technique: the 3D ‘reverse face’view. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005;25(1):12–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lakshmy SR, Rose N, Masilamani P, Umapathy S, Ziyaulla T. Absent ‘superimposed line’ sign: a novel marker in early diagnosis of secondary cleft palate. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.21931(Accepted Author Manuscript).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lachmann R, Schilling U, Brückmann D, Weichert A, Brückmann A. Isolated cleft lip and palate: maxillary gap sign and palatino-maxillary diameter at 11–13 weeks. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2018;44(4):241–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Martinez-Ten P, Adiego B, Illescas T, Bermejo C, Wong AE, Sepulveda W. First-trimester diagnosis of cleft lip and palate using three-dimensional ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012;40(1):40–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Platt LD, DeVore GR, Pretorius DH. Improving cleft palate/cleft lip antenatal diagnosis by 3-dimensional sonography: the “flipped face” view. J Ultrasound Med. 2006;25(11):1423–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Zheng MM, Tang HR, Zhang Y, Ru T, Li J, Xu BY, Gu Y, Xu Y, Hu YL. Improvement in early detection of orofacial clefts using the axial view of the maxilla. Prenat Diagn. 2018;38(7):531–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Fuchs F, Grosjean F, Captier G, Faure JM. The 2D axial transverse views of the fetal face: a new technique to visualize the fetal hard palate; methodology description and feasibility. Prenat Diagn. 2017;37(13):1353–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Fuchs F, Burlat J, Grosjean F, Rayssiguier R, Captier G, Faure JM, Dumont C. A score-based method for quality control of fetal hard palate assessment during routine second-trimester ultrasound examination. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018;97(11):1300–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Faure JM, Captier G, Bäumler M, Boulot P. Sonographic assessment of normal fetal palate using three-dimensional imaging: a new technique. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;29(2):159–65.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Campbell S. Prenatal ultrasound examination of the secondary palate. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;29:124–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.3954.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Ghi T, Arcangeli T, Radico D, Cavallotti D, Contro E, Pelusi G. Three-dimensional sonographic imaging of fetal bilateral cleft lip and palate in the first trimester. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;34(1):119–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. To WW. Prenatal diagnosis and assessment of facial clefts: where are we now. Hong Kong Med J. 2012;18(2):146–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Selvaraj Ravi Lakshmy.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lakshmy, S.R., Rose, N., Masilamani, P. et al. First Trimester Ultrasound Evaluation of the Cleft Palate: Midsagittal, Axial or Coronal View-Which View is Best?. J. Fetal Med. 7, 183–191 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40556-020-00262-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40556-020-00262-7

Keywords

Navigation