Skip to main content
Log in

Older patients’ engagement in hospital medication safety behaviours

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Increasing age is associated with more medication errors in hospitalised patients. Patient engagement is a strategy to reduce medication harm.

Aims

To measure older patients’ preferences for and reported medication safety behaviours, identify the relationship between preferred and reported medication safety behaviours and identify whether perceptions of medication safety behaviours differ between groups of young–old, middle–old and old–old patients (65–74 years, 75–84 years, and ≥ 85 years).

Methods

A survey, which included the Inpatient Medication Safety Involvement Scale (IMSIS) was administered to 200 older patients from medical settings, at one hospital. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, Spearman’s rho and the Kruskal–Wallis test.

Results

Patients reported a desire to ask questions (59.5% n = 119) and check with healthcare professionals if they perceived that a medication was wrong (86.5% n = 173) or forgotten (87.0% n = 174). Patients did not have particular preferences, which differed from their experiences in terms of viewing the medication administration chart and self-administering medications. Preferred and reported behaviours correlated positively (r = 0.46–0.58, n = 200, p ≤ 0.001). Young-old patients preferred notifying healthcare professionals of perceived medication errors more than middle–old and old–old patients (p ≤ 0.05).

Conclusions

Older patients may prefer verbal medication safety behaviours like asking questions and notifying healthcare professionals of medication errors, over viewing medication charts and self-administering medications. The young-old group wanted to identify perceived medication errors more than other age groups. Older patients are willing to engage in medication safety behaviours, and healthcare professionals and organisations need to embrace this engagement in an effort to reduce medication harm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nguyen T-L, Leguelinel-Blache G, Kinowski J-M et al (2017) Improving medication safety: development and impact of a multivariate model-based strategy to target high-risk patients. PLoS ONE 12:e1–e13. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171995

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Picone DM, Titler MG, Dochterman J et al (2008) Predictors of medication errors among elderly hospitalized patients. Am J Med Qual 23:115–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/1062860607313143

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. World Health Organisation (2019) Medication safety in high-risk situations. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/325131/WHO-UHC-SDS-2019.10-eng.pdf?ua=1.

  4. World Health Organisation (2017) Medication without harm. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/255263/1/WHO-HIS-SDS-2017.6-eng.pdf?ua=1&ua=1. Accessed 11 Nov 2018

  5. Canadian Patient Safety Institute (2017) Medication safety. http://www.patientsafetyinstitute.ca/en/Topic/Pages/Medication-Safety.aspx Accessed 1 Nov 2018

  6. Wang S-Y, Zhao Y, Zang X-Y (2014) Continuing care for older patients during the transitional period. Chin Nurs Res 1:5–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnre.2014.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim JM, Suarez-Cuervo C, Berger Z et al (2017) Evaluation of patient and family engagement strategies to improve medication safety. Patient 11:193–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-017-0270-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Higgins T, Larson E, Schnall R (2016) Unraveling the meaning of patient engagement: a concept analysis. Patient Educ Couns 100:30–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2016.09.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Menichetti J, Libreri C, Lozza E et al (2016) Giving patients a starring role in their own care: a bibliometric analysis of the on-going literature debate. Health Expect 19:516–526. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12299

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mohsin-Shaikh S, GarfieldFranklin SBD (2014) Patient involvement in medication safety in hospital: an exploratory study. Int J Clin Pharm 36:657–666. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-014-9951-8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Tobiano G, Chaboyer W, Teasdale T et al (2020) Older patient and family discharge medication communication: a mixed-methods study. J Eval Clin Pract. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.13494

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R et al (2009) Research electronic data capture (REDCap)–a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 42:377–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. IBM Corp (2019) IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26.0. 2019, NY: IBM Corp

  14. Pallant J (2016) SPSS survival manual: a step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS, 6th edn. Allen & Unwin, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gilford DM (1988) The aging population in the twenty-first century: statistics for health policy. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK217732/ Accessed 12 Jun 2020

  16. Katz MG, Jacobson TA, Veledar E et al (2007) Patient literacy and question-asking behavior during the medical encounter: a mixed-methods analysis. J Gen Intern Med 22:782–786. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0184-6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Nyborg I, Kvigne K, Danbolt LJ et al (2016) Ambiguous participation in older hospitalized patients: gaining influence through active and passive approaches-a qualitative study. BMC Nurs 15:e1–e11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-016-0171-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Vaismoradi M, Jordan S, Kangasniemi M (2015) Patient participation in patient safety and nursing input—a systematic review. J Clin Nurs 24:627–639. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12664

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Garfield S, Jheeta S, Husson F et al (2016) The role of hospital inpatients in supporting medication safety: a qualitative study. PLoS ONE 11:e1–e17. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153721

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Manias E, Beanland C, Riley R et al (2004) Self-administration of medication in hospital: patients’ perspectives. J Adv Nurs 46:194–203. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2003.02979.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Vanwesemael T, Boussery K, Manias E et al (2018) Self-management of medication during hospitalisation: healthcare providers’ and patients’ perspectives. J Clin Nurs 27:753–768. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14084

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Anderson J, Manias E, Kusljic S et al (2014) Testing the validity, reliability and utility of the self-administration of medication (SAM) tool in patients undergoing rehabilitation. Res Social Adm Pharm 10:204–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2013.04.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Manias E, Bucknall T, Wickramasinghe N et al (2020) Patient and family engagement in communicating with electronic medical records in hospitals: a systematic review. Int J Med Inform 134:e1–e15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.104036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Irizarry T, DeVito Dabbs A, Curran CR (2015) Patient portals and patient engagement: a state of the science review. J Med Internet Res 17:e148–e169. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4255

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Hambleton SJ, Aloizos AJ (2019) Australia’s digital health journey. Med J Aust 210:e5–e6. https://doi.org/10.5694/mja2.50039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Otte-Trojel ET, Bont A, Rundall T et al (2016) What do we know about developing patient portals? A systematic literature review. J Am Med Inf Assoc JAMIA 23:e162–e168. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocv114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. de Jong CC, Ros WJG, van Leeuwen M et al (2016) Exploring the effects of patients taking a vigilant role in collaborating on their e-medication administration record. Int J Med Inf 88:18–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Osborn CY, Mayberry LS, Wallston KA et al (2013) Understanding patient portal use: implications for medication management. J Med Internet Res 15:204–215. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hoogland AI, Mansfield J, Lafranchise EA et al (2020) eHealth literacy in older adults with cancer. J Geriatr Oncol 11:1020–1022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgo.2019.12.015

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Sakaguchi-Tang DK, Bosold AL, Choi YK et al (2017) Patient portal use and experience among older adults: systematic review. JMIR Med Inform 5:e38–e38. https://doi.org/10.2196/medinform.8092

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Jerofke-Owen TD, Ahlman J (2019) Patients’ perspectives on engaging in their healthcare while hospitalised. J Clin Nurs 28:340–350. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14639

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Chen K-M, Lin M-H, Wang Y-C et al (2013) Psychological and socioeconomic health of community-dwelling older adults. Int J Psychol 48:1038–1049. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2013.771814

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Davis R, Briggs M, Arora S et al (2014) Predictors of health care professionals’ attitudes towards involvement in safety-relevant behaviours. J Eval Clin Pract 20:12–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.12073

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Foss C (2011) Elders and patient participation revisited—a discourse analytic approach to older persons’ reflections on patient participation. J Clin Nurs 20:2014–2022. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03505.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Tobiano G, Chaboyer W, Teasdale T et al (2019) Patient engagement in admission and discharge medication communication: a systematic mixed studies review. Int J Nurs Stud 95:87–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.04.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Lingaratnam S, Aranda S, Pearce T et al (2012) A controlled before and after study to evaluate a patient and health professional partnership model towards effective medication reconciliation. J Oncol Pharm Pract 19:48–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078155212451936

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Ozavci G, Bucknall T, Woodward-Kron R et al (2020) A systematic review of older patients’ experiences and perceptions of communication about managing medication across transitions of care. Res Social Adm Pharm 17:273–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.03.023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Hirpa M, Woreta T, Addis H et al (2020) What matters to patients? A timely question for value-based care. PLoS ONE 15:e0227845. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227845

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Pimentel CB, Snow AL, Carnes SL et al (2021) Huddles and their effectiveness at the frontlines of clinical care: a scoping review. J Gen Intern Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-021-06632-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Backman C, Cho-Young D (2019) Engaging patients and informal caregivers to improve safety and facilitate person- and family-centered care during transitions from hospital to home—a qualitative descriptive study. Patient Prefer Adherence 13:617–626. https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S201054

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Manias E, Watson B (2014) Moving from rhetoric to reality: patient and family involvement in bedside handover. Int J Nurs Stud 51:1539–1541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.08.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Van Grootven B, Flamaing J, De Casterlé BD et al (2017) Effectiveness of in-hospital geriatric co-management: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Age Ageing 46:903–910. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afx051

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Leguelinel-Blache G, Castelli C, Rolain J et al (2020) Impact of pharmacist-led multidisciplinary medication review on the safety and medication cost of the elderly people living in a nursing home: a before-after study. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 20:481–490. https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2020.1707082

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Bowling A (2005) Mode of questionnaire administration can have serious effects on data quality. J Public Health (Oxf) 27:281–291. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdi031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Jerofke-Owen TA, Garnier-Villarreal M (2020) Development and psychometric analysis of the patient preferences for engagement tool. Nurs Res 69:289–298. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0000000000000423

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by the Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service and Gold Coast Hospital Foundation Research Grant Scheme 2018. Grant ID: RGS201800001.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by GT, WC, GD and EM. The first draft of the manuscript was written by GT and all authors commented on subsequent versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. We would like to thank Professor Lukman Thalib and Dr. Jeremy Wellwood for their input during study conception, design and data collection.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Georgia Tobiano.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Availability of data and material

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the appropriate institutional and/or national research ethics committee including Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service Human Research Ethics Committee, Deakin University Human Research Ethics Committee and Griffith University Human Research Ethics Committee. This study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tobiano, G., Chaboyer, W., Dornan, G. et al. Older patients’ engagement in hospital medication safety behaviours. Aging Clin Exp Res 33, 3353–3361 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-021-01866-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-021-01866-3

Keywords

Navigation